Top Leaderboard, Site wide
Left Masthead
October 10, 2015
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
Sign up for Truthdig's Email NewsletterLike Truthdig on FacebookFollow Truthdig on TwitterSubscribe to Truthdig's RSS Feed

Chaos Is the GOP’s New Normal

Primo Levi, Complete

Truthdig Bazaar
Last Act: The Final Years and Emerging Legacy of Ronald Reagan

Last Act: The Final Years and Emerging Legacy of Ronald Reagan

Craig Shirley (Author), Lou Cannon (Foreword)

more items

Print this item

Lobbyists Arranged N.Y. Congressman’s $20,000 Trip To Taiwan

Posted on May 11, 2012

U.S. Rep. Bill Owens of New York.

By Justin Elliott, ProPublica

(Page 2)

Between August and January, there were 35 exchanges about the trip between Park Strategies lobbyists and Owens and his aides 2014 by phone, email and in person 2014 including a December call between D’Amato and Owens.

The planning appears to have started in early August 2011, when Zagame and Sean King met for lunch at KyoChon Chicken at Fifth Avenue and 32nd Street in Manhattan to discuss the trip and other matters. They billed Taiwan for the $50 check.

Later that month, King and Zagame, a former New York state assemblyman and D’Amato’s chief of staff in the Senate, reached out to Owens’ chief of staff and his senior legislative assistant, Jon Boughtin.

King sent Boughtin a draft itinerary in mid-October. “This gives Mr. Owens a rough idea of what he might expect if he goes,” King wrote. “It can be adjusted as per his needs and wishes to incorporate whatever other stops, or meetings, he might want to make.”


Square, Site wide

At the end of the month, Boughtin checked with King about the funding of the trip. Boughtin wanted to make sure the trip would be covered under a 1961 law called the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act (MECEA).

“YES, it would be,” King replied.

The Constitution bars gifts from foreign governments to U.S. officials unless Congress specifically authorizes them. But under the MECEA law, the State Department can approve programs to promote culture exchange that are proposed by other countries. Once a program is approved 2014 Taiwan’s was OK’d in 2006 2014 members of Congress can take a qualifying trip paid by that government.

But Owens’ trip was not paid under MECEA, which strictly applies to programs funded by foreign governments. Instead, a private entity 2014 the Chinese Culture University 2014 was brought in to pay for it. Spouses and other family members are not allowed to go on MECEA trips, and Owens’ wife was to accompany him, emails show.

Park Strategies regularly asks members of Congress and staff to travel to Taiwan. For example, Rep. Tom Reed (R-N.Y.) went there in October on a Park organized trip, although it was paid for under the MECEA program.

2018Whenever’s Good For Rep. Owens’

In November, Boughtin was proposing possible trip dates in email messages to Sean King. “Whenever’s good for Rep. Owens is I’m sure also good for Taiwan,” King wrote in a Nov. 3 email.

Later that month, Boughtin’s requests had shifted: Owens’ wife was now involved. “The boss and his wife are looking to travel to Taiwan beginning on December 27th,” he wrote Nov. 21.

A week later, the Chinese Culture University entered the picture. Its president sent Owens and his wife an official invitation to visit Taiwan during the dates Boughtin had specified to King.

Why was the school paying for the trip? In a filing with the House Ethics Committee, the school explained: “The Chinese Culture University aims to promote international cultural exchanges in order for it to thrive in a world increasingly engineered by an irresistible thrust towards globalization.”

The itinerary accompanying the filing was in the same format as the sample itinerary King had sent to Boughtin, and many of the stops were the same.

On Dec. 5, a few days after the university sent Owens the invitation, King traveled to Washington to meet with Owens and a staffer about the trip. The next day, Owens’ office filed a required pre-trip request form with the House Ethics Committee. On Dec. 7, D’Amato and Owens discussed the trip by phone.

Also on Dec. 7, China Airlines sent confirmation of the flight to Taiwan to a pair of Owens staffers.

There were nine more contacts between Parks Strategies lobbyists and Boughtin about the trip before Owens and his wife departed Dec. 27. During the trip itself, King had two contacts with Boughtin, and another after the trip was over Jan. 3.

Taiwan Embassy Involvement

Park Strategies appears to have proposed this kind of handoff to a private sponsor to at least one other member of Congress who wanted to travel with a family member. In one email last year, LaShaun Lesley, then the firm’s compliance coordinator, wrote to the chief of staff of Rep. Bill Shuster, R-Pa., about a trip to Taiwan for Shuster and his son.

“About a week ago, you and I spoke about Congressman Shuster possibly travelling to Taiwan with his son and having it paid through a private sponsor,” she wrote. “In principle, we’ve been told by Taiwan’s representatives that travel to Taiwan through a private sponsor can in fact be arranged.”

The trip never happened.

As for the Owens trip, there is little evidence that the Chinese Culture University was involved other than hosting a dinner for the congressman. But Taiwanese government officials appear in many of the planning documents.

New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By Aarky, May 14, 2012 at 7:24 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The Taiwanese Government paid for free trips for many members of Congress and their staffers for years. It was to make friends that might assist them. cynical,yes? Do campaign contributions from corporations influence members of Congress? Of course it does.

Report this
PatrickHenry's avatar

By PatrickHenry, May 14, 2012 at 3:04 am Link to this comment

This is an example of why lobbying firms should not be tax exempt.  Too much ‘free’ money out there being used for neferious means.

Report this

By SoTexGuy, May 13, 2012 at 11:21 am Link to this comment

The article shows in (boring) detail the way money is used to garner tax dollars for firms, foreign and domestic, and their lobbying representatives.

While I fully understand the comments about the cost of these escapades vs boondoggles of millions and billions of dollars.. the issue at the core of all these problems is how money, including offshore money, trumps votes and the opinions and wishes of the electorate.

The scandal is how such money, money without a state or allegiance to the United States, drowns out the voices of the American constituents of these world-trotting Congressmen and more.


Report this
Shenonymous's avatar

By Shenonymous, May 13, 2012 at 6:34 am Link to this comment

Right! ptamcclung, what could possibly be of such reporting interest
here?  The article itself is boring and I read the entire thing to see if
there was anything, anything at all, that might be worth the time
spent and there wasn’t, except to learn there were some Democrats
and Republicans working to get some business going with Taiwan. 
That is what the story should have been about.  Apparently these trips
are common.  Good grief is the news media in such dire straights of finding stories to write as to have to stoop so low to provide such a vacuous article to Truthdig ?  I think Congress itself would find it borrrrriiiinnnngggg! 

On the other hand…maybe we need a ton of these kinds of noxious
stories. snore zzzzz,  about the engagements Congressmen/ women
regularly do to drum up business to be conducted on US soil so we really
really really know what they are up to?  Naw!  I want my time back!

Report this

By patmcclung, May 11, 2012 at 9:53 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Is there nothing anybody has to say except to criticise some little congressman’s trip to Taiwan?  Perhaps you haven’t noticed that the worlds biggest techincal operational and functional failure is the US F-35, The US joint congressional conference report on FY2012 defense appropriations funded F-35 procurement at $5.9 billion for 31 totally useless aircraft.  Maybe the congressman got the $20,000 trip to Taiwan for voting for this appropriation.  Anyway, get some perspective, please.  Who cares about some venial $20K boondoggle?

Report this
Right 1, Site wide - BlogAds Premium
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
Right Internal Skyscraper, Site wide
Right 2, Site wide - Blogads
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network