|
|
May 22, 2013
|
|
Help Stop Destruction of the Free Internet NowPosted on Dec 26, 2010
(Page 2) Presently, the Internet is an incredibly robust democratic forum. However, this level of democracy is inversely proportional to the amount of government-corporate control exercised over these information pipes. Americans have become accustomed to finding out things that they might not have known about had they not been permitted to freely surf the Net. When this freedom ends, a vital artery of democracy will be fatally severed. But the time to react to this mounting exigency is not after the free architecture of the Internet is torn down. By then it would be too late. Instead, while it still exists, the free and open Internet can itself be used virally to create a mounting opposition to a pay-for-priority Internet. So this is a plea to spread the news. The new FCC ruling is not good. The American people need to use the free Internet while it still exists to speak with one united voice. The message is that we the people of the free world will not sit idly by and allow the open and democratic Internet to be torn down. Collectively, we have power to stop this decline because these corporations can profit only if they have customers. The will of the people must prevail and we must make our will known. There are several ways to do this. You can go to OpenInternet.gov, which is operated by the FCC, to express your dismay over the failure of the FCC’s new rules to unequivocally preempt a pay-for-priority Internet arrangement. You can write your elected representatives about it and advocate for passage of new legislation protecting net neutrality. You can organize peaceful demonstrations. And you can contact your Internet provider. In the U.S., you can contact Comcast here, AT&T here and Verizon here. Advertisement On New Year’s Day, between the hours of 2 and 3 p.m. Eastern Standard Time, we the people should go offline to express one unified voice against the creation of a pay-for-priority Internet system, the abolition of a flat fee for Internet access, and any attempt by Internet service providers to block, censor or otherwise interfere with Internet content. In other words, we can and should show that people throughout the free world will not tolerate any attempt by any Internet service provider to tamper with the free, open and accessible nature and design of the Internet. As gatekeepers of the Internet, these companies need a demonstration of the power of the people. Collective action by the few is insufficient. In order to succeed, there needs to be an expression of worldwide, unified support for the continued existence of a free and democratic Internet. Please post and pass this plea for collective action on to others. We the people need to stand united and use this very forum to make it known that we will not be silenced. For democracy’s sake, spread the word. Elliot D. Cohen is a media ethicist and political analyst. His latest book is ”Mass Surveillance and State Control: The Total Information Awareness Project”.
1
2
Previous item: Goldman’s Massive Bonuses ‘Totally Deserved,’ Says Satan Next item: Let’s Not Spin the Civil War New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By NYCartist, December 29, 2010 at 12:07 pm Link to this comment
Since my access to my home computer is by a wireless device (I don’t have a cell phone, tv or cable and don’t plan to) - it’s exempt from regs and I’m at the mercy of my ISP = I don’t know how long I’ll be able to use the internet. My service is slow, slower and so bad I can’t use the internet in “peak” hours now.
Reminder to some: we, the people, own the airwaves but we, the people are getting screwed by the corporations and gov’t/pols that support them (helped by campaign financing).
Report thisBy Napolean DoneHisPart, December 28, 2010 at 10:22 pm Link to this comment
I gotta say this!
For the past two weeks, ATT’s service was down for some folks… me was one of them.
They had to change ‘ports’ they said.
Wonder if NOW I will have to move and go invisible.
This is just the beginning…. is satellite internet good from a private company NOT affiliated with these tyrannical monsters?
Or another communications solution?
Report thisBy Peter Knopfler, December 28, 2010 at 6:30 pm Link to this comment
Same old poop profits before people, don´t like it,
Report thissay something, get locked up.What´s a poor boy to do?
Storm corporations, take it to the street. History
has told us, 1% owns 90% of everything, no other
option, but to take it to the street. Corporations
are screwing us, and what do we do; we screw each
other instead of attacking corporations, 108 years of
Coca cola, what do we have to show for it, diabetes
pandemic, and tax payer paying for it all.The
acceptable addiction is the NET, so free and equal
and addicting. Now enough users, lets make them pay
big time. Drug pusher, free samples, get hooked ,
price goes up, BUNCH OF LOW LIFE GEEKS. Technical
addiction are you a victim? Say No to technical
addiction, or JUST DO IT. no thinking, is your mind
right. you know the rest.
By BR549, December 28, 2010 at 4:58 pm Link to this comment
The shut-down was going to happen anyway, whether Assange had squeaky-clean motives or, as some suggest, he had been bribed to bring about an earlier demise to it. The feds have wanted this ever since that philandering dipshit Clinton was in office. It was a thorn in their side and it was only a matter of time before they went after the one media source that could spread the truth virally.
That’s the difference between politicians and true citizens; the citizens realize the sacrifices one must make to support the republic, whereas the politicians actually took an oath to uphold it and then said, WTF. Those that scream the loudest about internet reform are the worst type of traitors. They slide into office promising to support the tenets they were elected on only to then change the rules while they are in power. That’s why we make nooses.
Report thisBy fearnotruth, December 28, 2010 at 1:51 pm Link to this comment
Excuse to police the Internet?
By F. William Engdahl, 7 December 2010
http://engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net/Geopolitics___Eurasia/US_Con_Job/us_con_job.html
Report this[...]
What is emerging from all the sound and Wikileaks fury in Washington is that
the entire scandal is serving to advance a long-standing Obama and Bush
agenda of policing the until-now free Internet. Already the US Government has
shut the Wikileaks server in the United States though no identifiable US law has
been broken.
[...]
By Marc Schlee, December 28, 2010 at 1:12 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
There’s no “I” in team,
But there’s a “U” in fuck the corporations.
Which side are you on?
FREE AMERICA
REVOLUTIONARY (DIRECT) DEMOCRACY
Report thisBy Morpheus, December 27, 2010 at 10:27 pm Link to this comment
I don’t know why people expect real change. Did we forget overnight that our government is bought and paid for? We have to do more than complain to corrupt politicians and broken government. Now dry your eyes and stand for yourself…
Read “Common Sense 3.1” at ( http://www.revolution2.osixs.org )
We don’t have to live like this anymore. “Spread the News”
We have to stop playing defense all the time. It is time to go on offense.
Report thisWelcome to the revolution…
By mack894, December 27, 2010 at 6:26 pm Link to this comment
This is what happens. People begin to ditch land lines, cell phones packages get
more complicated and expensive. People begin to ditch cable tv, the corporate
providers find other ways.
And you are given a little change to pay for it with a payroll tax holiday which
won’t be enough to pay for all the extra increases and charges designed to take
that big of change of your pocket and into theirs.
Too bad we the people don’t have an agency looking out for us, protecting our
Report thisinterests. Sadly, the govt seems to have abdicated that role.
By bpawk, December 27, 2010 at 4:29 pm Link to this comment
Like all progressives, you are trying to applying intelligent, progressive ideas on a right-wing country. After demolishing Ralph Nader et al progressives, you have nowhere else to go to besides Obama, who only has to be left or ultra-right republicans to be defined as even remotely progressive. I’m afraid America is going down the tubes where there will just be rich or poor, as the middle class is being decimated as we speak with an ineffective president residing in the White House. You have nowhere to go as both dems and republicans eat from the same poisonous tree.
Report thisBy ray, December 27, 2010 at 3:22 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
An open & free internet is not in the corporate interests & corporate america is aware of our human needs to sustain physical life & to purchase their products.
Report thisWith over 70% of this nations wealth owned by 1% of the populace, it becomes clear that they have taken care of us commoners.
Look to Bradley Manning to see what will happen to dissenters that express their views- U will also become a vegetable in human form.
By Big B, December 27, 2010 at 2:22 pm Link to this comment
The one thing that people in the USA forget is that nearly the entire utility infrastucture of the US was built with either the help of the peoples government, or the government entirely. (if you live outside of a major city, odds are the federal government paid for all the utilities that are at you house, your power, phone, water and sewer, if you are lucky to have sewer.)
The only reponse the people of the US will have after the corporate takeover of the FCC, will be to have a government (peoples) run broadband system. (the people used to own the “public airwaves”) You hate to go this far, but what choice will we have when the voices of corporate opposition are drowned out, or eliminated altogether by the “free market”?
Report thisBy Mike789, December 27, 2010 at 1:05 pm Link to this comment
Sure thing. They built the pipes and hence should have unlimited dominion. Not so fast. They had to get right of way and/or purchase bandwidth which is by law our, the people’s, dominion. Property easements are public property, I believe. The notion that there is, by definition, a difference in a phone land line and and internet connection is a sidestep from established principle of privacy but also contradicts precepts of agreement under which access was originally granted to corporations. The FCC gave up too much. Give them an inch and they’ll take a mile ~ just like with derivatives cubed.
Report thisSo, I’ll let corporations promulgate their agendas to market wares and services within pipes; wire, cable and radio wave, nonetheless, they’re doing it on grounds fought for with blood.
By Rixar13, December 27, 2010 at 11:49 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
“Internet common carriage is presently dead in the water. The upshot is that telecommunication and telephone companies can now decide, within certain limits of fair competition, what content providers can operate on the Internet.”
Report thisBy BR549, December 27, 2010 at 8:45 am Link to this comment
Bill,
The issue over the “free” part of the “free internet” was about openness, ....... not shekels.
Secondly, the ruling by the FCC is only a mirror of the dystopian mindset of our out of touch legislature; that corrupted and still corruptible body of seething avaricious egoists with no social conscience or integrity. Our government is like a rabid dog, chasing its own tail until one day soon it will collapse in an exhausted heap. Actually, it isn’t OUR government because WE the People had been wishing, hoping , and voting for something different. The government we have is the result of a gang of interlopers who have been sneaking in over the years and taking and oath they had no intention of living up to. That is THEIR government, not ours. We want OUR government back.
My two cents.
Report thisBy DarthMiffy, December 27, 2010 at 1:39 am Link to this comment
Bill,
What options do we have that are not worse than a totally open and unrestricted
internet, worldwide?
Please specify.
(Good on you for ditching the TV.)
Report thisBy gerard, December 27, 2010 at 12:58 am Link to this comment
Raking off profits is one thing, but this being a capitalist nation with no conscience, there seems little we can do about that.
It’s freedom of information I worry about, and open communication. That’s what is most likely to disappear. Remember, owners don’t want workers to be independent thinkers. Owners wand followers, buyers, users who are afraid of their shadow, who don’t even know or care when they aren’t getting true information vital to democracy.
This is precisely what Assange and Manning were interested in—free, vital information for the people—particularly in this case about US foreign policy, but ultimately about everything. If you read Assange’s (mostly squelched) statement of reasons, you know how vital he considers internet freedom. Let him and Manning be sacrificed and you will be sorry later—not just for their lives (which is very important) but for freedom of both internet access and content.
Report thisBy Bill, December 26, 2010 at 10:01 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Ummmm, the internet is not free. You pay a decent charge for access. Then
you pay for a device that allows you to access and use it.
I do get the idea of making it like the phone system, or TV: pay for device, pay
for access, pay for content.
But where do the money hounds thinks all this ends? TV content access (and TV is mostly a vast wasteland of garbage) got to a price point some years ago that I decided it added noting or very little to my life that made it worth paying for. Turned more to reading great literature, my personal digital creative pursuits, and my trusty great quality mahogany OM guitar which is quite nice indeed and was also nicely less in cost when new, than some pay for a year of a flush cable package. I have enjoyed it now for 6 years and it is still in fantastic condition, beautiful in looks and sound and all fine wood construction.
These buggers are killing the goose that lays the golden eggs. At a time when consumers are being squeezed dry, the greed mongers are looking for the last drops of blood.
Think about this for a moment, I have the cheapest Verizon package for my minimalist cell. It costs 42 bucks a month. Let’s say 1/3 of all citizens in the US have the same bottom level package. 105 million users x $42/month = $6.3 billion annually, and I have news the infrastructure was paid for some time ago. Someone is getting incredibly wealthy, and it is not working people.
Hey consumers, we have options!!!
Report this