Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
June 19, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     nsa     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Reporter Who Brought Down the 'Runaway General' Dead at 33

The Terror Con

The U.S. Military and the Unraveling of Africa

Greenland's Great Melt Is Pinned on Climate Change

Nate Silver vs. Politico: It's on Again

Most Comments
Most Emailed

 * NEW! * Greenland’s Great Melt Is Pinned on Climate Change



The Unwinding


Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Reports

ESPN Is the Diva, Favre Is Just an Old Pro With a Bum Ankle

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Aug 22, 2010
AP / Disney / Matt Stroshane

A couple of characters: Is Goofy one of the planners of Disney-owned ESPN’s coverage of the Brett Favre saga?

By Mark Heisler

(Page 2)

When a delegation of teammates went to Kiln and talked him into returning, local TV stations were on the tarmac in Minneapolis to shoot Favre’s arrival on a white corporate jet.

Walking through the camera crews, the players climbed into a black BMW SUV (with placekicker Ryan Longwell at the wheel, as local stories noted).

News helicopters then followed the SUV’s progress. Tweeted bemused Viking tight end Visanthe Shiancoe, “Where is the bronco.”

Of course, that was O.J. Simpson’s Bronco, in what was then unprecedented coverage of a sensational story but is now just routine.

Advertisement

At this point, “SportsCenter” tried something new—restraint—confining its reaction to a three-minute feature by Chris Connelly, even if he compared Favre’s indecision to Hamlet’s.

“Only it wasn’t his [Favre’s] tragedy,” narrated Connelly. “It was ours and yours. How much could we take?”

Actually, as painful as it is for the press, that’s why remotes have channel changers and could be one reason God invented fish.

Favre then held his usual happy-go-lucky news conference and went back to being the favorite he was before, almost.

Had his ankle improved enough to have announced his return two weeks before, it all would have been over and Deadspin might not have gone with its story, alleging Favre sent photos of his penis to Jets sideline reporter Jenn Sterger, a former Dallas Cowboy cheerleader.

Deadspin Editor A.J. Daulerio pushed Sterger into going public with the story she told him—in a confidence he honored for six months—saying they were close to running it and naming her, with or without her participation.

“Not trying to dick you over,” wrote Daulerio in an e-mail to Sterger, which he included in his story, “but there was no way I was going to sit on it forever, either.”

This prompted an ethical examination by no less than the Poynter Institute, one of the last bastions of journalism standards.

Not that it was necessary. Daulerio had forthrightly explained why he did it in his story—“I’m a dick”—although he might have added “with no ethics.”

Ethics are now a quaint concept in journalism, which is, in turn, another quaint concept. Now, as Martin Sheen said in “Apocalypse Now,” it’s “like handing out speeding tickets at the Indy 500.”

On the other hand, taste notwithstanding, truth is always a defense.

Still, if you weren’t hooked in by Deadspin’s bare-midriff photo of Sterger, or the more provocative shots that bloomed on the Internet, it was enough to make you wish for the dog days of old. Slow as they were, at least Western civilization didn’t seem like it was going into the toilet.


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By Justin Weleski, August 23, 2010 at 4:39 pm Link to this comment

I agree completely, Gary.  Most political commentators seem genuinely more
interested in how a certain event, statistic, war, quote, etc. will affect a
politician’s political standing than how it will affect America, American citizens,
and the world.  For example,

“Obama escalates in Afghanistan.  How will that affect the mid-term elections? 
How about 2012?  Will Republicans use this as a weapon against Obama’s
political base?  What about Harry Reid’s tight race in Afghanistan?  If he
supports the escalation, it would greatly boost his chances against a brazenly
pro-war conservative.  And what will it do to DNC fundraising?  Will the liberal
grassroots movement punish Democrats for this risky move?  So many
questions!”

In reality, very few ever address the actual policy.

Then again, politics has become just another form of entertainment in America. 
Like reality television, only better (because real people get killed).  Click over to
CNN and check up on the war.  Watch a few explosions and raids.  See
commercials for Viagra, toothpaste, a Chevy pickup truck, and Victoria’s Secret. 
Watch some more explosions.  Boring.  Then watch some sharks on the
Discovery Channel.  Boring.  16 year-old birthday parties on MTV.  Jackpot!  See
a few more Viagra commercials.  Paxil.  Ambien CR.  Head-On, apply directly to
the forehead.  Weather Channel.  Back to CNN to see a surfing chimpanzee. 
Another explosion.  It’s 8 o’clock already?  Time for American Idol!

War, death, destruction, torture, rendition, and assassination are all simply one
frame in the mosaic.  Elections are another.  My Sweet 16 is another.  Twilight is
another.  Monday Night Football is another.  Crest White Strips is another.  Etc.,
ad infinitum.

It’s no wonder our politics have devolved to the most base and mindless level. 
We’re in search of amusement, not truth.  Instant gratification, not deep
intellectual thought.

And practically every frame in the mosaic reinforces this mindset.  “Look hot! 
Eat here!  Buy this TV!  Be a kid!  Buy this car!”

And people wonder why the American education system is so hopelessly and
woefully dysfunctional!  :-p

Report this

By garyrose66, August 23, 2010 at 11:44 am Link to this comment

Funny, I had the same response.  Main stream media treat politics and especially coverage of the President exactly like sports stories, with manufactured polls pretending to be news, keeping score who is up and who is down and circle jerk quotes from the most extreme sound bite specialists.  Breathless reporting:  He said THIS…what do you say about THAT?  Its no wonder most people hate politicians, they actually hate the news coverage and don’t realize theiy are being manipulated into thinking they hate the politicians, or sports performers, et al.

Report this

By Justin Weleski, August 23, 2010 at 9:57 am Link to this comment

I would say this article relates to politics by
noting the parallels between political coverage and
sports coverage.  Both require constant “news” to
draw eyeballs and appease their sponsors.  As a
result, the media manufactures news.  It’s very easy
to do, after all, since a certain topic/issue/event
becomes news by simply appearing on the news.

Thus, a grey-haired quarterback’s decision about
retirement is turned into no less a media spectacle
than the boy in the bubble, the Salahi folks sneaking
into a party, Anna Nicole Smith’s death, a fight
between a black kid and a white kid on a school bus,
or any other mundane occurrence.

It’s also an argument for the effectiveness of
propaganda.  Why does America care about Brett
Favre’s retirement or non-retirement?  If we didn’t
tune into ESPN, most of us wouldn’t give a damn. 
It’s a non-issue.  But if a major media apparatus
harps on this single “event” long enough, the general
public almost inevitably joins the uproar (hence, the
“Ground Zero mosque”).

Report this

By ardee, August 23, 2010 at 4:35 am Link to this comment

Sorry to sound narrow minded but, what has this article to do with politics? I read my local paper for sports news. I come here for something meatier.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.