Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
Top Banner, Site wide
Apr 20, 2014

 Choose a size
Text Size

Top Leaderboard, Site wide

First Solar Bread Oven Takes a Bow
Drought Adds to Syria’s Misery




The Divide


Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Report

Blue Man Coup: How Gadhafi’s Mercenaries Broke Mali

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on May 16, 2012
AP/Aliou Sissoko

Tuaregs ride camels in a racing event in northern Mali. Since a military coup in March, ethnic Tuareg rebels have succeeded in taking the three largest towns in the Mali’s north: Kidal, Gao and Timbuktu.

By Susan Zakin

(Page 2)

Tinariwen’s members traded AK-47s for electric guitars back in the 1990s, but for most graduates of Gadhafi’s guerrilla training camps, life has been quite different. Tuareg fighters were the backbone of the Libyan leader’s militia, and when his regime fell in the summer of 2011, several thousand veteran Tuareg fighters suddenly found themselves unemployed. Their only capital was high-end armaments: mortars, antitank and antiaircraft weapons. In early 2012, they bore down on the north, declaring themselves the standard-bearers of a new liberation movement, the MNLA, or Mouvement National Pour la Liberation de l’Azawad—Azawad being the Tuareg name for northern Mali.

Like most observers, New York Times reporter Adam Nossiter linked the uprising directly to Gadhafi’s fall.

“In life, he delighted in fomenting insurgencies in the African nations to the south. And in death, Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi is doing it all over again,” wrote Nossiter.

Faced with Gadhafi’s professional and well-armed fighters, the Malian army quickly lost control. The army’s most humiliating moment came when the Tuareg overran one of its military bases in January—the soldiers had used up all of their ammunition, according to Jeremy Keenan, a professor at the University of London’s School of Oriental and African Studies who has spent much of his career in the Sahara.

Advertisement

Square, Site wide
On March 21, a cadre of junior officers staged a coup, installing Capt. Amadou Sanogo as the country’s leader. A lieutenant announcing the coup in halting French on national television denounced President Amadou Toumani Touré‘s government’s “incapacity ... to fight against the terrorists.”

It may be worth noting that Sanogo was trained in the U.S.; however, by most accounts, the coup was not backed by outside forces. Whatever its roots, far from strengthening the Malian military, the post-coup disarray gave an advantage to the rebels. They gained control of the region’s two major cities in March; Timbuktu fell April 1.

Spokesmen for the MNLA demanded recognition of an independent Tuareg state, but the African Union and the U.S. Department of State quickly rejected the idea. Privately, even MNLA sympathizers—including Tuareg in the U.S.—noted that the group had no formal structure or defined leadership. And for better or worse, the national boundaries drawn by the colonial powers have legal precedent, at least so far, for remaining intact.

The best-case scenario seemed to be a power-sharing agreement that would guarantee Tuareg leaders full participation in the Malian government. As one Tuareg said: “There’s a saying we have: Ask for more than you can get, and get what you want.”

Hope for a quick resolution receded when the situation in the capital city of Bamako grew increasingly uncertain. Unable to stamp out the coup, Touré, set to leave office after elections April 29, ceded power to the coup leaders April 8. A week later, under economic sanctions and the threat of military action by the Economic Community of West African States, Sanogo, the junta’s leader, handed power to Mali’s former parliamentary speaker and a presidential candidate, Diaconda Traoré, with the understanding that elections would be held in 40 days—if possible.

The bones of Mali’s democracy appeared intact when Traoré named Cheick Modibo Diarra, another leading presidential contender, as prime minister. Diarra, the chairman of Microsoft Africa, is an astrophysicist who once worked for NASA. But Diarra is a newcomer to politics, and his presence was not enough to prevent the military from arresting high-ranking allies of ex-president Touré. The men were freed, but as the weeks passed, it looked increasingly unlikely that the military would relinquish control. A counter-coup attempt by presidential guards, reportedly aided by mercenary soldiers, failed May 1. Four days later, radical Islamists of the Ansar Dine group associated with al-Qaida attacked a Sufi saint’s shrine in Timbuktu, confirming the fears of art historians and archaeologists that this century’s upheaval would jeopardize the ancient city’s cultural treasures.

The implosion of Mali was one of those unintended consequences that so often eclipse the goals of Western intervention. As Bajan Ag Hamatou, a lawmaker from Ménaka, complained to the Times’ Nossiter: “The Westerners didn’t want Qaddafi, and they got rid of him, and they created problems for all of us. When you chased Qaddafi out in that barbaric fashion, you created 10 more Qaddafis. The whole Saharo-Sahelian region has become unlivable.”

As onlookers fight to figure out who’s on first in Bamako, it’s easy to overlook the obvious question: What kind of army runs out of bullets? The answer is simple—an army in a country saddled with $3 billion in debt, corruption and cronyism.

Vijay Prashad, the George and Martha Kellner chair in South Asian history and professor of international studies at Trinity College in Hartford, Conn., recounts a tale that sounds familiar to anyone who follows Africa’s post-colonial history: A post-colonial socialist leader striving to make an African country self-sufficient in the 1970s was replaced by a less imaginative president who borrowed from the World Bank and the IMF when things got tough in the 1980s.

By the end of that decade, according to Prashad, Mali had become the “test case” for structural readjustment, the privatization initiatives and public-sector cutbacks that multilateral lending institutions such as the World Bank and the IMF have imposed on debtor nations for the past 20 years.

By 1989, Mali was spending 100.8 percent of its gross national product on debt service. By 1992, Mali’s debt had escalated to $3 billion. New York Times reporter Howard French quoted an associate of Mali’s president: “We service our country’s debt on time every month, never missing a penny, and all the time the people are getting poorer and poorer.”


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By noelle, May 18, 2012 at 12:57 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

When will we acknowledge that the IMF and the World Bank are destroying the world, nation after nation, including the US and Europe? When will we restructure our economy and get rid of these rascal banksters who fatten themselves by looting the whole planet?

Report this

By frecklefever, May 16, 2012 at 6:19 pm Link to this comment

GREAT PIECE…

Report this
PatrickHenry's avatar

By PatrickHenry, May 16, 2012 at 3:18 pm Link to this comment

Heavily armed malcontents with nothing better to do, a later day wild wild west.

Modern day pirates, factions armed by the U.S. and NATO spreading fear, death and anarchy which the victims will beg intervention by those who created this mess.

Report this
americanme's avatar

By americanme, May 16, 2012 at 1:00 pm Link to this comment

balkas:

Hmmmm.  Americans is the wrong term.  Everyone in thsi hemisphere is American.

But USites since I’ve been on the planet—and that’s nearly 70 years have mostly been dumb and uncaring (empathic ealls thicker than the Great Wall of China).  Recently they became really fat and frightened.  I think both were consequences of US government dictates—along with their stupefication from both legal and illegal drugs.

Report this

By litlpeep, May 16, 2012 at 8:15 am Link to this comment

There are so many markers in this tale of radical imperial failure, it is difficult to find one that stands out.

For one example, “When you chased Qaddafi out in that barbaric fashion, you created 10 more Qaddafis. The whole Saharo-Sahelian region has become unlivable.”

That refrain has been repeated since Andrew Jackson decided to create war and destruction on all the native tribes in the US controlled areas of North America.

It has been repeated in Latin America since James Monroe decided (and no one else questioned) that Latin America was part of the US hegemonic area.  Meaning, we’re an empire, and that’s part of our colonies.

We have repeated the radical imperial failures with dramatically increasing consistency since Truman usurped the power to declare war from Congress, and Congress capitulated without a whimper, sending troops into Korea, a war that has lasted more than sixty years, with no resolution even on anyone’s drawing board.

The empire will continue to destroy the USA from the inside and from the top down.  There is no way anyone can imagine to reverse this rot while continuing to vote for either the democratic or republican national parties or any of their candidates.

We have plenty of options, though time is running out.  We either build viable political alliances from the bottom up, from local neighborhoods and communities outward, or our children and grandchildren become the colonized of some as yet not clearly identifiable imperialists who will replace our rotten to the core banker-muppets and their bipartisan puppets in DC.

Report this

By balkas, May 16, 2012 at 5:49 am Link to this comment

there is an enormous diff between saying “tuaregs
are professional thieves” and saying that some or
most of them BECAME thieves.
or even that americans are fat, dumb, uncaring,
frightened, stupefied and saying that they BECAME
so.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
Right 1, Site wide - BlogAds Premium
 
Right 2, Site wide - Blogads
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion   Publisher, Zuade Kaufman   Editor, Robert Scheer
© 2014 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.