|
|
May 24, 2013
|
|
Zinn Is Dead—Long Live ‘Zinn’Posted on Jan 28, 2010I sit here in shock, having just read the Boston Globe headline, “Howard Zinn, historian who challenged status quo, dies at 87.” I knew the day would come. I dreaded it. I flew to Boston last year to spend a day with him just so I wouldn’t read a headline like this without having seen him at least one last time. And now I sit here. Devastated. Much will and should be written about Howard’s contributions to the world: how his ‘People’s History of the U.S.’ changed how many of us understand America and, like all great histories, shed the great light of Truth upon our present, explaining what cannot be understood by official propaganda; the pivotal role he played in the civil rights movement during the tough years when he, like so many others, took enormous physical risks for simply wanting justice, a period he told me was the highlight of his life; the thousands of people, well known and not, whose lives were politically transformed by their encounters with him. And the personal remembrances of Howard the human being will be no less moving and true. I have met many political people in my lifetime. Howard was by far the most honest, human, open, kind, generous, gracious, sweetest, humorous and charming of them. By far. I am not the first to be reminded of Abraham Lincoln when talking with him, not only because of the physical resemblance but his profound humanity. His personal warmth and gentleness, combined with his political fire and passion, were entirely unique in my experience. He looked you in the eyes. He listened. He reacted appropriately to what you were saying. He was as interested in my ideas and experience when we talked last January as he had been 40 years ago. Looking back on his life he was as open and honest about his regrets as well as satisfactions as anyone I have ever met. But to me there is an even more important aspect of his life, like that of his friend and colleague Noam Chomsky, that transcends the personal. To many of us “Zinn” and “Chomsky” have not only been admirable human beings. They have been something far more, something difficult to put into words, something perhaps even risky to try to capture but something that, nonetheless, one feels driven to express at a moment like this. Advertisement “Zinn” and “Chomsky” represented a tradition and state of being that meant we were not entirely on our own, beacons of: —The deepest possible compassion. At any given moment the world is divided into those who hear the screams of the innocent victims and those who do not. Most of us, certainly myself, go in and out of hearing the screams. We fight this injustice but ignore that one. “Zinn” and “Chomsky” is a state of being that consistently hears the screams, from Vietnam to inner city ghettos, from East Timor to Haiti. It is a state that is unable to close itself off from the pain of the world. —Intellectual clarity, as they have told their truths in their writings and speeches to millions, never compromising for the sake of political expediency like so many of their contemporaries. Many of us were terminally confused by the conflict between America’s image and reality. “Zinn” and “Chomsky” provide explanations and understandings that helped keep us sane. —Moral courage, as they went beyond mere speech-making and writing, and joined with those opposing the war, risking imprisonment or physical injury—as in our “affinity group” during May Day when either could have been arrested, beaten up or maced in the eyes like Dan Ellsberg who was standing next to them, or when Chomsky was a leader of the draft resistance movement. “Zinn” and “Chomsky” mean “committed intellectuals” who do not compromise, intellectuals who align their bodies and actions with their minds and thoughts. New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By JDmysticDJ, February 2, 2010 at 9:24 pm Link to this comment
In passing, let me say that in a just, fair minded educational system, Howard Zinn’s “People’s History of the United States” would be available for study in every High School History Curriculum.
Let’s hope that someone, of equal genius, will step up to replace him.
Report thisBy oleeb, February 2, 2010 at 8:53 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I knew Howard very well too and most of this is really good, but typical of your age group it ends up being all about you. Your flourish at the end of no one being their to take Howard’s place or Chomsky’s when he goes is balderdash. They are there and Howard would say they are their too. We just don’t know them yet. No wonder you made the error of thinking Howard naive.
Report thisBy Gordy, January 31, 2010 at 10:14 am Link to this comment
Fred, the ‘Zinn’ you speak of is timeless and
attainable by all. It’s not a quality you inherit
passively from your parents. So long as there are
any kind of sentient beings in the universe, truth
and integrity - unaltered by history - will await
their discovery and service.
Zinn set sail for a true north in the universe, and
would want you to do the same, rather than feel that
a light has gone out. He received his light from
something that cannot be extinguished; it was not
‘his’ so did not ‘go out’.
Still, though I say all that in earnest - I do know
Report thishow you feel.
By samosamo, January 31, 2010 at 8:54 am Link to this comment
By drbhelthi, January 31 at 10:53 am
Why did you just start the nazi connection with poopy sr. when
great grandpoopy prescott was the original american nazi
connection?
And grandpoopy surely had to be protected to some extent by
ol butterball j.edgar since he never spent time for his crimes of
collaborating with the enemy.
I would not be surprised of a linage based in germany for the
Report thiswhole sorry lot of the bushwackers.
By drbhelthi, January 31, 2010 at 6:53 am Link to this comment
In my experience, the choice for the US “presidency” in 2008 simply decided which “political party” would proceed with the Illuminazi-Neocon plan implemented by GHWBSr, while he directed the CIA in the 1960s. How a man with the background of Mr. Zinn could overlook the machine that has installed alleged “US presidents” since 1980, especially 2000 & 2004, and actually support a foreigner who does not provide a genuine birth certificate, evades my comprehension.
We should apply the wisdom of the derivative Mongolians who crossed the Aleutian chain 30,000 years ago, genuine owners of the alleged “american” continents: “what you do speaks so loud I cannot hear what you say”. We discern that not only Mr. Hussein Obama is a shill for the highest bidder, but also several “US presidents” who preceded him.
It was a sad day in the history of the USofA when Allen Dulles hired NAZI SS General Gehlin to transform the OSS into the CIA, placing NAZI SS officers into key positions. The list of CIA atrocities recently published by Congressman Dr. Ron Paul delineates the world-wide destruction accelerated by GHWBushSr, during his furtive reign in the CIA. The trillion dollars in “black hole” monies, in essence stolen from the US Treasury by the CIA without congressional approval, with assistance of Federal Reserve moguls, began the “snow-balling” deficit that now plagues the western world. Examplia gratia, 400 million passed out by CIA operatives in Summer 2009 to iranian locals while organizing the CIA uprising against Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, president of Iran.
I raise the question, was J. Edgar assassinated as a “payback” for revealing the letter written to him by GHWBushSr, which broke the cover of GHWBushSr? Which letter attempted to sidetrack the murder investigation? Or did the NAZI leadership of the CIA simply want to replace J. Edgar with one of their own pimps, since they could not manipulate the strings of J. Edgar?
Report thisBy sidneyfalco, January 30, 2010 at 10:21 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Howard Zinn deserves all the credit in the world. But he should have quit when he
Report thiswas ahead, way, way ahead. That is to say, before the presidential election
campaign of 2008, when he supported Barack Obama in an unmitigated display of
political naivety that did much to demoralize the left. How in the world a man like
himself could fail to back someone much like himself—Ralph Nader—is beyond
the pale and must tarnish his otherwise illustrious career.
By NYCartist, January 29, 2010 at 4:31 pm Link to this comment
In my own fog, I forgot to say my condolences to Fred Branfman.
To antispin: It’s perfect for NPR to have David Horowitz speak about Howard Zinn. It shows NPR as NPR is. I loathe NPR.
To PSmith: I read your comment.Thoughtful. All I want to say now is that there are good articles/essays popping up. One is Paul Street’s on Znet, dated Jan.29, “The People’s Historian”. http://www.Zcommunications.org/znet
Report thisBy antispin, January 29, 2010 at 4:22 pm Link to this comment
NPR brought in David Horowitz to condemn Zinn less than 24 hours after his passing. Go to FAIR and register your outrage. http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=4009
Report thisBy NYCartist, January 29, 2010 at 2:21 pm Link to this comment
I appreciate the author’s views and feelings, but poor Howard Zinn: even in death memorial article he’s paired with Noam Chomsky. Zinn would appreciate the joke. Zinn was wonderful. See the article by his editor on The Progressive, Matthew Rothschild,too, which is linked on Zinn’s webpage
Report thishttp://www.howardzinn.org.
By Che J, January 29, 2010 at 8:15 am Link to this comment
I have a very hard time believing in men like Chomsky, who not only denied
the possibility that Sept 11th was rigged and false, but expressed scorn and
derision toward those who were sober and perceptive enough to consider the
fact, obvious to a child, that the buildings could not have fallen in the manner
they did without being detonated. By quelling this kind of discussion, the basis of questioning the ensuing events of a decade and perhaps a century was suppressed wholesale.
Howard Zinn was a more humble and patient intellectual whose mind moved
along much more willingly than Chomsky, but still was an old-fashioned man
from an era of special privilege for everyone of his gender and race. How many
women and Blacks were denied the opportunity to be the ‘conscience of the
people’ so that Zinn could receive that honor? How many women and Blacks had the kind of insights and courage by the age of 20 that Zinn spent a lifetime piecing together? Were either Zinn or Chomsky ever in any kind of
fair competition for accomplishment? How many White men receive this kind of
accolade every year while the world somehow continues to lose bits of its
humanity and dignity in an ever increasing downward spiral. Both men found
ways to become accepted and loved for whatever truth they brought to the
public. Could a courageous outspoken Black man
live to even half their age without being murdered? Could a woman say half
the things they did without losing her reputation to a series of outrageously
trivial and demeaning attacks?
I say these men were and are ‘safe’ placeholders taking up room for far more
Report thismeaningful heros who will make their way to us out of the whole of the human race and not just a fraction of it, and might someday actually spearhead real change and not
just provide the comfortable idea of it.
By Genny Berthault, January 29, 2010 at 7:55 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
What a very beautiful article.
Report thisBy jack, January 29, 2010 at 7:46 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Search Zinn and “left gatekeeper.” I’m sorry for him and his family but he was part of the don’t-look-behind-the-curtain team. Along with Goodman, Chomsky, et al.
Report thisBy KISS, January 29, 2010 at 6:46 am Link to this comment
When we saw them mercilessly, pitilessly, amorally, criminally, deceitfully and undemocratically murder millions of innocent civilians”
Report thisGee, just like today, but instead of one war and one country we now have 4 or 5 countries that we are the killing machine, all justified by our leaders.
Alas, no Zinn to help lead the marches, no King to point out the immorality of Amerika. Just the Buffoons we elect to be our fearless leaders.
By samosamo, January 28, 2010 at 10:55 pm Link to this comment
It’s is just a shame that someone like zinn has died, but won’t
we all, and that bill moyers will give up his pbs journal here
soon; but for long lasting evidence of a sort, and I am sure
neither of these two people, moyers or zinn, would they disapprove of any of Thomas Paine’s writings which very accurately and precisely defines what our and France’s revolutions created and the role of a republic of the people, for the people, by the people representation means versus the aristocracy representation of the oligarchy that controls our facade of a republic.
And damn it, the people still don’t care how subverted and
Report thisdeconstructed our republic is as they sill live on BS msm crap.
By Jim Pandaru, January 28, 2010 at 8:47 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Howard Zinn was and will always be the man and conscience of the People. He led by example and taught us why we must speak truth to power. When we decide to take that first crucial step to stand up for what’s right and just, that’s when we’ll discover the inner strength and courage we had tucked away suddenly burst forth. Watch over us Howard. May the memory of what you spoke of and stood for guide us in building a better world.
Report thisBy doublestandards/glasshouses, January 28, 2010 at 4:25 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Zinn on Moyer’s Journal in three parts last year.
Report thishttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zIERifyW_aI