|
|||
|
Who’s Afraid of Rand Paul?Posted on May 18, 2010
Tuesday’s election results were pretty good for progressives. The retirement of that windbag chameleon Sen. Arlen Specter is long overdue, and pro-labor forces were able to push Sen. Blanche Lincoln into a runoff in Arkansas. Even the big tea party win in Kentucky has its bright side. Count me as one lefty liberal who is not the least bit unhappy with the victory by Rand Paul in Kentucky’s Republican primary for the U.S. Senate. Not because it might make it easier for some Democratic Party hack to win in the general, but rather because he seems to be a principled libertarian in the mold of his father, Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, and we need more of that impulse in the Congress. What’s wrong with cutting back big government that mostly exists to serve the interests of big corporations? Surely it would be better if that challenge came from populist progressives of the left, in the Bernie Sanders mold, but this is Kentucky we’re talking about. Rand Paul, like his dad, is worthy of praise for standing in opposition to the Wall Street bailout, which will come to be marked as the greatest swindle in U.S. history and which was, as he noted on his website, an unconstitutional redistribution of income in favor of the undeserving rich: “Federal bailouts reward inefficient and corrupt management, rob taxpayers, hurt smaller and more responsible private firms, exacerbate our budget problems, explode national debt, and destroy our U.S. dollar. Even more importantly, any bailout of private industry is in direct violation of the Constitution. It is a transfer of wealth from those who have earned to those who have squandered.” Of course the joker in the deck is the word principled before libertarian, and, as many online commentators have noted, Rand Paul is a bit more inclined to waffle on an interventionist foreign policy than is his father. While he would have insisted on a declaration of war before the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan or Iraq, he argues that Afghanistan, where the 9/11 attack was planned, was a legitimate target but that Iraq was not. In either case, as he insists correctly, a congressional declaration of war was constitutionally required: Advertisement In any case, his Republican establishment opponent, Trey Grayson, attacked Paul for his opposition to an interventionist foreign policy as well as for favoring the legalization of marijuana, and on both counts it is a good sign that Kentucky voters rejected those lines of attack. True, to wax warmly about a potential Republican libertarian senator is an act of desperation for a liberal who still hopes that the federal government might be moved by the embattled band of progressive Democrats in Congress to put the power of the federal government at the service of the needy. But when has that happened recently? With a commanding Democratic majority in Congress and a former community organizer as president, the focus of economic policy in this time of enormous economic pain has been on saving the bankers who created this mess. With the Democrats trusting our well-being to the likes of Lawrence Summers and Timothy Geithner, who under President Bill Clinton did so much to enable Wall Street greed, would it not be good to have at least one Republican senator questioning the Washington spending spree? Yes, Rand Paul is bad on a lot of social issues I care about, and no, I don’t embrace his faith in the social compassion of unfettered free markets. But the alternative we have experienced is not one of a progressive government properly restraining free-market greed but rather, as was amply demonstrated in the pretend regulation of the oil industry, of government as a partner in corporate crime. It is the power of the corporate lobbyists that is at issue, and it is refreshing that candidate Paul has labeled Washington lobbyists a “distinctly criminal class” and favors a ban on lobbying and campaign contributions by those who hold more than a million dollars in federal contracts. Heresy, I know, but it is only thanks to Ron Paul, the father and hopefully the mentor of the potential Kentucky senator, that we got a congressional mandate to audit the Fed’s role in the banking bailout. How bad could it be to have another irascible Paul in the Congress?
Previous item: Law & Order: Corporate Crime Unit Next item: A Smorgasbord, Not a Tea Party New and Improved CommentsWe are launching a major overhaul of our comments section. In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread. Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts. Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with. Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page. |
By JP, May 19, 2010 at 5:00 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I certainly don’t embrace the Republican party mantra and the couch potato, Fox News-watching fake TEA party types, but a lot of comments on here seem to be from establishment liberals a-la Salon.com who don’t let themselves see anything good about someone from “the other party.” You’re just as bad as the TEA party oafs by exaggerating (and making up) negative qualities about the Pauls and ignoring the good. Get that talking point speaker out of your ear and think for yourselves.
How many establishment Democrats or Republicans do you hear talking about exposing the Federal Reserve, scaling back our global military empire, cutting off the influence of lobbyists and Wall Street crooks, and ending the culture of debt that allows Washington to continue its insanity?
Report thisBy Eugenio Costa, May 19, 2010 at 4:50 am Link to this comment
Will the US military fire on American citizens if ordered?
Sure. They always have.
So what?
Report thisBy Cynthia Chace, May 19, 2010 at 4:45 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Go Rand Go. You just stay on subject of small govt, individual rights, free market, low taxes, little govt and this ought to be a winner. Never mind what your oponents say. Those of us with minds and can think for ourselves know the truth.
You are wonderful.
Report thisBy Eugenio Costa, May 19, 2010 at 4:43 am Link to this comment
The US duopoly is (1)Right Wing (Democrats); (2) Even More Right Wing (Republicans).
It has been the ‘50’s.
Both are Corporatist and Imperialist.
In the ‘60’s there was a breath of serious fresh air with the emergence of the New Left, followed by the counterrevolution begun by Reagan and moving rightward with every administration since.
A lot of “Progressives” are just slightly uncomfortable Corporate Fascist Democrats who still have nocturnal emissions over FDR, who was himself a Corporate Fascist middle man, intended to coopt the Communists and Socialists and prepare the US for World War.
Even most American Socialists are not really Socialist—their aim is Capitalism with social welfare, which is not Socialism.
The miniscule Communist Party USA is mostly FBI agents.
And those who are not, though valuable resources, are rigid ideologically and a century behind the times.
The Labor Unions with a few exception are Corporate accoutrements, and they know it.
So what is left?
It’s brewing in and out of the US.
When the smell of genuine revolution is in the air, you’ll know it.
It doesn’t smell like coffee. It smells like fiesta.
But first people have to get REALLY REALLY REALLY fed up.
That requires a certain amount of education, some of it hard knocks, some not.
One thing is certain: there is not going to be a revolution by ballot box. Nor by twitter or internet.
Report thisBy RdV, May 19, 2010 at 4:37 am Link to this comment
What I find particularly disgusting is that Obama is convening a deficit commission stacked with those whose agenda has been to slash Social Security & Medicare. After running up the deficit to bailout the class he serves and wage wars without end, he seeks to take it out of the hide of the already suffering citizenry. The dead give-away is he frames these safety net programs that people pay into their entire working lives, as “entitlements”.
Report thisWhat is wrong under Bush, is wrong under Obama.
Unfortunately, so many are still caught up in the cult of personality sales pitch of “hope and change” and continued to be suckered while they ram this stuff through that Bush could only dream of—from off-shore drilling to cutting Social Security.
By psickmind fraud, May 19, 2010 at 4:10 am Link to this comment
This being Kentucky, I have to wonder how many people thought they were voting for Ru Paul.
Scheer doesn’t mention that Paul’s opponent ran a milquetoast, traditional campaign and resorted to attack ads. And being an elected official when the state government is so screwed and the legislators once again failed to pass a budget didn’t help him either.
It will be interesting to see if Palin’s support will alienate voters in November.
Report thisBy keeperofthefire, May 19, 2010 at 4:07 am Link to this comment
i feel we have two ways to begin to stop this madness&take; this country back from wallstreet&the; corporations without an all out revelution,namely,1,VOTE ALL THE LEECHES&BUMS; OUT &2.USE THE WAY WE SPEND OUR MONEY EVERYDAY TO STOP CORPORATIONS THAT ARE F"ING UP THE PLANET!!!!!!!!take oil co’s for example,if “we the people” can get smart&brave; at the same time by parking the car and doing our shopping with bikes or our feet more,we can take the power for the oil co’s and totally change our world!!think back to the selma,alabama bus boycot by blacks in the 60s-damm did it work!!!come on folks we can take these bums on&beat; them at their own games,if not then this country&the; world is finnished!!!!
Report thisBy Big B, May 19, 2010 at 4:02 am Link to this comment
First of all, who cares what happens in Kentucky?
That great state (sorry, commonwealth)is best described by this old joke, The day the world ends I hope I am in Kentucky, because it won’t happen there for another 30 years.
How much longer are we going to ignore the Neo-nazi links to this “new” libertarian movement. I have always found it amazing that anyone in the US with links to communists or socialists is a traitor to america, but if you are a skinhead you are just practicing free speech.
Report thisBy Ouroborus, May 19, 2010 at 3:56 am Link to this comment
Reminds me of Thailand; anarchy, chaos, and no defined
Report thisdirection.
U.S. politics are at an all time low and doomed to not
solve the real problems.
Corporate anarchy rules and we don’t!
By Go Right Young Man, May 19, 2010 at 3:56 am Link to this comment
I believe there is little doubt that Rand Paul is a direct result of the rapidly growing Tea Party movement.
I’ve been writing here for months how more and more “independent” voters are joining the movement. How it is independents who decide elections. How it’s been a stupid, bigoted and short-sighted mistake for ITW and others to so vehemently denigrate millions of independent thinkers.
Simply listening, with a mind to understand (not hate), would have been a great deal easier.
Mark my words and throw them back at me if I turn out to be wrong: Progressives will suffer tremendously in the next election cycle. Outrageous and unrepentant violence, hatred and bigotry toward protesters will be its cause.
Report thisBy marta, May 19, 2010 at 3:31 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Rand is a republican on the inside, and wishes to lead the Tea Party Movement that is only the remake of the American Liberty League, that backed the Republican Prescott Bush,-[ grandfather of our previous president]—when Prescott and his wealthy friends tried to form a coup to oust FDR, and implement fascism in the US,—1934
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, May 19, 2010 at 3:08 am Link to this comment
Rand Paul is like Chris Christie in New Jersey: A nihilist masquerading as a Republican. Christie is going to force the state government to shut down on July 1, part of the classic “Starve The Beast” strategy to end needed government programs and controls. Everything from police, fire, hospitals, tollbooths and even the MVC (DMV to you) will shut down. Somehow chaos is supposed to be better.
Sometimes I think Scheer has such a big axe to grind he gets downright irrational. I’m sorry Mongiardo lost to Conway but Conway will still be a shining spot after that nitwit Bunning is gone.
Report thisBy PatrickHenry, May 19, 2010 at 2:57 am Link to this comment
Even if he only lasts one term I am happy we have gotten rid of these tiresome encumbents.
I hope to vote against Steny Hoyer soon.
Report thisBy thebeerdoctor, May 19, 2010 at 2:37 am Link to this comment
Having been in contact with the Libertarian party 30 years ago, I soon discovered that their isolationist and civil liberty policies are merely a Trojan horse to usher in their insane free market, Ayn Rand nonsense (hence the candidate’s name) based upon the so-called Objectivist Russian Science Fiction of her silly books. Like L. Ron Hubbard and Scientology, this great thinker so adored by folks like Alan Greenspan, is best left where she applied her trade: Hollywood.
Report thisBy Eugenio Costa, May 19, 2010 at 1:20 am Link to this comment
Neither Rand Paul nor his father are Libertarian.
You might as well try to find “Libertarians” at Liberty University, which Falwell bought and kept the name of.
The elder Paul rushed into impeaching Clinton,for example, while admitting it was the wrong grounds (read his speech at the time) but when Kucinich moved to impeach Cheney and Bush, Paul became suddenly very scarce, arguing that he was not sure Cheney or Bush were guilty of any impeachable offenses.
In the primaries Paul got under the table Neo-Con support exactly t defuse the anti-war vote. In New Hampshire, for example, he got anti-war cross over votes, then ran anti-immigration campaign ads on NH TV.
When he did, despite all his transparent idiocy, begin to get fifteen or sixteen percent support, mostly anti-war, he suddenly suspended his campaign, pocketed the remainder of the $35 million in campaign funding he had swindled, and said his goal was to save the Republican Party.
This just scratches the surface. He is a Born Again Fundamentalist Creationaist, a white Protestant crypto-racist, a certified member of the medical guild that makes its living on state-certified monopoly, a gold bug supported by gold interests—on and on and on.
He is also a concealed nativist jingo—working as a US army medico during Vietnam, for example, he moaned and suffered over the poor US helicopter pilots that were wounded but had not one word to say about the literally millions of Vietnamese peasants and civilians the US was mowing down with free fire zones and carpet bombing.
Report thisBy Commune115, May 19, 2010 at 12:25 am Link to this comment
The Pauls offer very little that would actually help the working class in the long term. Ron Paul’s foreign policy stances are absolutely honorable, but his economic policies are almost anarchism without the socialist aspects.
Report thisPage 6 of 6 pages « First < 4 5 6