LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 18, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

The History That Birthed the Tsarnaev Boys

Jerry Brown: California's Mystery Man

This Is Water: Fishy Advice From David Foster Wallace

'The Daily Show': Stewart Slams Hypocrites Cheney and Rumsfeld

Chris Hedges: The 'Terrifying' State Assault on Press Freedom

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * How the IRS’ Nonprofit Division Got So Dysfunctional
Recurring Nightmares? Wake Up and Take Action

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Act of Congress
Daily Rituals
The Girls of Atomic City

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Reports

What Is the Point of All This Spying?

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Jul 22, 2010
ENTER_ALT_TEXT
AP / J. Scott Applewhite

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton ordered a damage assessment after learning that a retired State Department worker with a top-secret security clearance and his wife had been indicted on charges of spying for Cuba for 30 years.

By Norman Birnbaum

Walter Kendall Myers, a former Foreign Service officer, has been sent to prison for life, and his wife for a lesser term, for espionage on behalf of Cuba. Enthusiastic about the Cuban revolution, Myers for years passed on to the Cuban government information he had acquired as an official of the State Department’s intelligence unit, in which he was a specialist for European affairs. The sentencing judge was very stern, alleging that Myers hated the U.S. and asking why he had not defected to Cuba. What His Honor did not question was whether Myers knew anything at all that could remotely be termed “secret.”

In all probability he did not. I knew Myers slightly as an amiable and informed presence at Washington meetings and gatherings on European affairs, at embassies, foundations, universities. I thought well of him as someone who seemed relatively free of the usual clichés, who was almost as well informed on Western Europe as those of us under no governmental constraints. We read books and the newspapers, talked to our European colleagues, visited with European politicians. He had to read an inferior source of information: cables from our embassies. There were certainly some secrets about military matters, but persons versed in this sphere tell me that these were impossible to conceal from any acute analyst of the Pentagon budget or translator of the technical language of military journals. 

Intelligence, after all, is not always so intelligent. In my one foray long ago into governmental service as a consultant to the National Security Council, in 1978, I proposed an inquiry into the possibility that the German and European movement against nuclear power plants would develop into large-scale protest against preparations for nuclear war in Europe. No one was interested, and very shortly thereafter the demonstrations began. Time passed and Ronald Reagan took office. He was shocked by the Europeans’ lack of gratitude at being covered by what was termed our nuclear umbrella and asked his CIA director, William Casey, to look into the matter.

Casey’s officers (some of the CIA European experts actually knew Europe) told him that the movement was not totally inspired or controlled by agents of the Soviet bloc, and had deep roots in Western European society. Casey’s response was to instruct his staff to prepare another report. He could not burden President Reagan with so obviously preposterous a conclusion.

I do not know what moved Myers to believe that the Cuban revolution was an exception to Rosa Luxemburg’s dictum that all revolutions fail but the last one. He was a descendant of the earnest social Protestantism of earlier phases of American history, and perhaps he thought that Fidel Castro was succeeding where William Jennings Bryan had failed.

Advertisement

Actually, he would have been of far more help to Castro had he pretended to be a Cuban agent and worked closely with the CIA. He could have given the Agency material far more reliable than the fictions about the imminent collapse of the regime fabricated for decades by Cuban exiles.

Come to think of it, even that might not have worked. For some years I was very friendly with the leaders of the Italian Communist Party. One thing about them surprised me—how many of them were Catholic, or very close to the church. At parties at the home of the party leader’s adviser on church affairs, I regularly met senior figures of the church—despite the fact that their host had been excommunicated for his political sympathies very early in the Cold War. The one person in Washington who knew this was a government official of my acquaintance, and he wearily advised me that there was little use in insisting in my writings and occasional advice to the more adventurous members of Congress who occasionally consulted me. “They won’t believe you; they don’t listen to me and I spent years in Italy. If you put it in The Nation, they will interpret that as ipso facto evidence that the Communist Party planted the story to deceive us.”

No doubt, the frauds now being perpetrated by the experts on terror and Islamism (like the earlier distortions of the Cold War) have their uses: They legitimate policies which would be pursued under any circumstances. To suppose that the government agencies which welcome this sort of ideological reinforcement know more than the rest of us is to make a very large mistake. Castro, in secret, gave his American friend Myers medals. He would have done better to encourage him to retire from the Foreign Service and lobby for the Cuban tourist industry.


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By diman, July 26, 2010 at 4:28 pm Link to this comment

Welcome to the club Arabian Sinbad. I posted something harsh directed at what the site has become, guess what, they deleted the comment, I guess they are too soft for that kind of comments.

Report this

By Arabian Sinbad, July 26, 2010 at 5:34 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Is Truthdig moving to join the main stream controled and censored media?!

Was my latest comment on this topic too strong even for Truthdig censors to handle?! If this is the case, may I suggest that you add to your name the word “relatively” so your new name should be “Relatively Truthdigging.”

Report this
JDmysticDJ's avatar

By JDmysticDJ, July 26, 2010 at 3:28 am Link to this comment

Who actually determines U.S. Foreign Policy? Is it the Executive Branch of Government and the Legislative Branch of Government, or is it an elite group of cultists, who daily brief the President on Foreign Policy issues, and brief Representatives of Congress on a regular basis?

How good is, and has been, the information provided to our elected representatives by this secretive elite group? Does this elite group pick and choose from an overwhelming collection of data to provide accurate information to our elected representatives, or do they pick and choose data according to their paranoia induced agendas.

John F. Kennedy said he wanted to “Splinter the C.I.A. into a thousand pieces.”  We now have thousands of splinters in our costly ineffectual bureaucratic intelligence gathering agencies. Those splinters should be incinerated, and the ashes discarded.

“Open covenants, openly arrived at”

Report this
MarthaA's avatar

By MarthaA, July 25, 2010 at 10:11 pm Link to this comment

IMHO all charges need to be dropped and peace needs to be made with Cuba, who means the United States no harm what so ever.

The United States needs a NEW form of Capitalism for the U.S. Economy, which should be ——Social Capitalism——so that Private Capitalism will not always be burdening the populace with having to cover for the Aristocracy’s greed, as is always the case, when the aristocrats take advantage of the U.S. Economy.

With this new form of Capitalism, the United States should not feel so much animosity toward the Cuban government, because the United States government will then be able to take care of the United States citizens as well or better than Cuba does their citizens, and may also be able to help other countries, as Cuba does, and the two nations will be able to work together as friends, instead of enemies, as the United States sees Cuba.

Report this

By diman, July 25, 2010 at 5:02 pm Link to this comment

By Patrick Henry:

“The Cuban embargo has got to be one of the most ill concieved and immoral things the United States have ever done”

Well, actually it is only a continuation of the entire U.S. policy in the entire Latin America, the policy to destroy any democratically elected government which doesn’t sing to the CIA tune, the policy to destroy any economy in this region which doesn’t submit into “Free Market” slavery, just look at Panama, Chile, Salvador, Nicaragua and Venezuela.

Report this

By diman, July 25, 2010 at 4:53 pm Link to this comment

“Time passed and Ronald Reagan took office. He was shocked by the Europeans’ lack of gratitude at being covered by what was termed our nuclear umbrella and asked his CIA director, William Casey, to look into the matter”

Norm, your government put the people of Europe under a direct Soviet nuclear strike, and Reagan was shocked? Don’t you think people of Europe didn’t understand, that they would have been the first ones to be slaughtered?

Report this

By Arabian Sinbad, July 25, 2010 at 10:19 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I don’t know which is worse: The American attitude towards the world during the cold war era, or the the American attitude towards the world in the post 9/11 and the global terrorism era!

But I do know that both were founded on fear, insecurity, arrogance and misguided policies by the American political-military establishment. And both attitudes were based on the fact that America was doing a lot of bad and evil plotting in many parts of the world, including unprecedented evil espionage work in many parts of the world to promote unpopulor sellout leaders who were/ are puppets of the USA.

But it escapes the petty minds of the American policy makers that for each action there is a reaction similar to it in nature and opposite to it in direction. So the American establishment contributed more than any country of the world to promote evil espionage and counter espionage. And the story of this Cuban agent is a minor example of the proverbial chickens coming home to roost.

It is because of this that any nationalist leader who is demonized by the American establishment must be a good noble leader to his people, whereas any leader or country that receives special favors with the American establishment must be an evil puppet of America working against the interest of their own people. That’s why people like Castro of Cuba, Chavez of Venzuella, Ahmadinajad of Iran are noble good leaders in my book, while leaders like Husni Mubarak of Egypt, King Abdullah of Jordan, King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, and of course, evil Israel are all American allies in evil and corruption on earth.

Report this
PatrickHenry's avatar

By PatrickHenry, July 25, 2010 at 6:05 am Link to this comment

Why can’t the Myers get a sweet deal like Kadish got for spying for Israel?

The Cuban embargo has got to be one of the most ill concieved and immoral things the United States have ever done.  We have fought a war with the Vietnamese and can now fly there and be a tourist.

90 miles away and begging for tourism and growth.

Report this

By Perivail Benway, July 24, 2010 at 1:07 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The outcome is an indicator of several things. The most interesting but unspeakable matter is that the elite is afraid.

Report this
JDmysticDJ's avatar

By JDmysticDJ, July 23, 2010 at 11:18 am Link to this comment

“You shall know the truth… maybe not. Never mind.

Report this

By felicity, July 23, 2010 at 10:46 am Link to this comment

He probably did.  Thousands of documents etc. are
‘classified’ daily - more often than not based on a
‘maybe,’ and by people way down on the chain of
command.

I recall that during the Cold War the Russian leader at
the time, Kruschev, said that he got enough
‘information’ from “Time” magazine to keep him abreast
of most anything he needed to know.  In other words,
what the government ‘classifies’ as secret etc. is
stuff that’s common knowledge.

Report this

By gerard, July 23, 2010 at 10:10 am Link to this comment

Now let’s mention this salient point before we go any farther:  Surveililance and the entire spyster/shyster business is jobs, production, and sales to the tune of billions of taxpayers’ dollars.
Its sole purpose is to incorporate in the public consciousness a simple-minded dichotomy— “them against-us”—a mindless hysteria that can be jacked up at any moment to promote shooting wars against this or that nation for this or that reason—whatever sells.
  Fearful people go for “surveillaillance and security” like mice go for cheese.  They hunger for excitement in their own dull lives, ignorant of sun, moon and stars.
  Education is the answer, whether you believe it or not. That’s one reason why we can’t be allowed to have good public schools and good public media.

Report this

By Old Man Turtle, July 23, 2010 at 6:42 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

“It’s a small town, son, and we all support the team.”  OR ELSE!!

Report this

By Jim Yell, July 23, 2010 at 6:30 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The group which commits the most treason in this country are Corporations. They destroy the economy for increased profit, send material aid and information to belligerant nations and groups, foment destruction thru lies and pre-empt the US Military to carry out their ambitions against the interest of the country.

Why aren’t they in Jail?

Report this

By Hank from Nebraska, July 23, 2010 at 5:14 am Link to this comment

I have a colleague who ends discussions with “No one really progresses beyond junior high school.”  Here is yet another example.  We just get a bit more socially sophisticated, and we add a whole lot of self-reinforcing mental justification for what we are and what we do, but we don’t really behave better or think much more deeply as we age beyond 13.  It always comes down to being part of this group or that group, even if we learn to package those feelings in much more sophisticated ways.  So Myers’ crime was “hating America” because he was seen talking to those other kids!  Whether this really mattered and any real damage was done is not the issue.  He talked to those other kids.  End of story.

Report this

By berniem, July 23, 2010 at 4:46 am Link to this comment

The world of geopolitics is a cynical and paranoid game comprised of elements from Monopoly and Stratego. I don’t mention Chess as this a game of intellect played for enjoyment whereas geopolitics is a noir delusion in which ultimately there can only be one winner on the world stage and like the narrow bushian view one can only be “for or agin’ us”. Thus we have the Cuban embargo, sanctions on Iran but hands off Israel, wars for resources but forgetfulness for Haiti and Darfur, and prisoners of conscience to dissuade sanity and debate.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.