LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 24, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

How to Make a Million Dollars an Hour

Colbert Slams PBS for Appeasing Koch Brothers

A Call to Action

Obama Heckled During Speech, Warren Lands a Book Deal, and More

After Oklahoma Disaster, Give Thanks to Government

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * New York City’s Summers May Heat Up
 * NEW! * A Mission on Climate Change

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
A Call to Action
Act of Congress

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar
Shade It Black: Death and After in Iraq

Shade It Black: Death and After in Iraq

By Jessica Goodell, John Hearn

more items

 
Reports

What Immigration ‘Crisis’?

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Apr 26, 2012

By Eugene Robinson

Now that the immigration “crisis” has solved itself, this is the perfect time for Congress and the president to agree on a package of sensible, real-world reforms.

Yeah, right, and it’s also the perfect time for pigs to grow wings and take flight.

Perhaps this week’s most significant news was a report from the nonpartisan Pew Hispanic Center showing that net migration from Mexico to the United States has slowed to a halt and may actually have reversed. That’s right: There may be more people leaving this country to live in Mexico than leaving Mexico to live here.

End of the “crisis”—which wasn’t really a crisis at all, except in overwhelmed border-state cities such as Phoenix. There’s no longer the slightest excuse for histrionics about the alleged threat to our way of life from invading hordes intent on—shudder—working hard and raising their families.

Why the turnaround? The report cites “many factors, including the weakened U.S. job and housing construction markets, heightened border enforcement, a rise in deportations, the growing dangers associated with illegal border crossings, the long-term decline in Mexico’s birth rates and broader economic conditions in Mexico.”

Advertisement

To me, all of that makes perfect sense. Whether they have papers or not, immigrants are rational. As a general rule, they don’t come here to commit crimes; they could do that at home if they wanted. They don’t come here to laze around and enjoy government benefits because, well, what benefits would those be? They come to work.

But the U.S. economy fell off a cliff, meaning there is less work to be had. Mexico’s economy, while not unscathed, is improving. And the Obama administration has dramatically stepped up border enforcement while carrying out a record number of deportations. Suddenly, both for Mexicans who considered immigrating legally and those who might have been tempted to come without documents, the risk-reward equation has changed.

According to the Pew report, there are an estimated 11 million illegal immigrants in the United States; six out of 10 are Mexican. The number of immigrants without papers has actually been falling. Wouldn’t this be a perfect time to take a deep breath and start talking about reasonable ways to engineer a more rational immigration policy?

Yes, it would, but don’t hold your breath. Apparently, we’re going to have a lot of shouting without actually trying to find a solution. On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard arguments on the constitutionality of Arizona’s “driving while brown” law that instructs police to challenge and, if necessary, apprehend anyone they suspect of being an illegal immigrant. The law forbids racial profiling, but the truth is that it effectively guarantees profiling.

The administration argues that the state law usurps the federal government’s prerogative to set immigration policy. The court is expected to decide the case this summer, and the ruling’s impact may be less practical—since illegal immigration, I repeat, is already on the decline—than political.

Democrats will react with thunderous outrage if the court upholds the Arizona law—but if you stand outside the back room where the pollsters and campaign strategists work, you might hear the slapping of high fives. Anything that draws attention to the Republican Party’s extremist position on immigration will only reinforce a tendency that Mitt Romney recently characterized as “doom”—the headlong rush of Latino voters into a waiting Democratic embrace.

Barack Obama won a remarkable two-thirds of the Latino vote in 2008. This year, according to the polls, he’s running even stronger among the biggest minority group in the country. If Republicans don’t find a way to win more Latino support, Obama will be hard to beat. In the long term, if Latinos become a more-or-less permanent Democratic constituency as African-Americans have, the GOP will inexorably go the way of the Whigs.

So that is what this year’s immigration “debate” will be about: how to reap political gain and avoid political loss.

What should our elected officials be talking about? I’d suggest they start with the obvious solution.

We don’t need to build a giant wall along the Rio Grande; Obama has already “hardened” the border. We need a Reagan-style amnesty that would allow the great majority of undocumented immigrants to stay, along with reforms that give Mexicans and others a realistic hope of being able to come here someday.

Assuming they want to.


Eugene Robinson’s e-mail address is eugenerobinson(at)washpost.com.
   
© 2012, Washington Post Writers Group


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By timbo, April 30, 2012 at 3:55 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Assertions are not the same as facts.  This is a technique perfected by right wing
pundits to lend credence to their point of view.  They begin with an assertion,  then
make their point based on the the assertion which they made up out of whole
cloth.

Report this
Anarcissie's avatar

By Anarcissie, April 30, 2012 at 11:54 am Link to this comment

During the 1960s and ‘70s, Canada had more Americans (USAans) moving in than Canadians moving to the U.S.  They were duly complained about by many natives.  If they worked, they were taking jobs away from good Canadians.  If they didn’t, they were loafers.  If they were rich, they were fat American pigs trying to buy the country.  If they weren’t, they were destitute scum trying to get on Welfare.  Etc., etc., etc., etc. Racism, tribalism, and xenophobia are not a U.S. monopoly.

Report this

By timbo, April 29, 2012 at 9:32 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I think it’s funny that people blame immigrants for lowering the pay of American
workers when it’s the employers (Americans) who are destroying living wage jobs
by hiring the immigrants for less.

Report this

By heterochromatic, April 29, 2012 at 12:41 pm Link to this comment

joe—-I wonder do Mexico, Panama, Poland, and other countries complain about
the influx of immigrant retirees from the US——-


do the retirees amount to anything approaching even 1% of those nation’s
population?

although I could well understand Mexico complaining about the self-alleged
presence of moonraven…they sure don’t need no stinkin’ badgers.

Report this

By bluejeanne, April 29, 2012 at 11:58 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

There must be a Master Plan where the One-World- Government is divided between the Rich and the Poor.  Soon the Middle Class will be an archaic ‘thing of the past’, but the Rich will continue to enjoy their servants who cook and clean for them and take care of their well-manicured lawns no matter where in the big wide world they decide to have their McMansions.

Report this
Anarcissie's avatar

By Anarcissie, April 29, 2012 at 6:44 am Link to this comment

Another interesting fact about immigration is that currently net immigration from Mexico is zero, or less—Mexicans are going back.  So one has to ask what, exactly, the excitement is about, although one can guess.

Report this

By Salome, April 29, 2012 at 5:34 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

A moratorium on all immigration—-including “high-skilled” immigrants who will be given preference over Americans for the highest paying jobs—-until unemployment is below 5%.

Report this

By Mark Dolce, April 28, 2012 at 7:21 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

No amnesty. No deportation on a massive scale. These are not viable options. Get the
people who’re in the US without citizenship to come forward. Or round them up
peaceably and humanely and offer them citizenship or work visas or a working visa/path
to citizenship. Or if they do not want either - they leave. Either way they must choose.
This would be the ‘amnesty.’ The process to citizenship must be stream lined to five
years. Immigrants can stay and work toward citizenship and pay taxes. The immigrants
who want to work here and not be citizens can pay taxes also. The law that says if you
are born in the US and you are an automatic citizen should be amended to if you are
born in the US to a US citizen then you are an American citizen.

Report this
joentokyo's avatar

By joentokyo, April 28, 2012 at 5:15 pm Link to this comment

I wonder do Mexico, Panama, Poland, and other countries complain about the influx of immigrant retirees from the US that live there to take advantage of cheaper living costs and medical services?

Report this

By Dave Francis, April 28, 2012 at 12:55 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

8. 
The lead attorney Paul Clement, for the State of Arizona, pushed two arguments at the hearing. First, this administration failure to enforce immigration laws has caused a calamity in Arizona that made it indispensable to enact SB 1070. Second, SB 1070 is not preempted since it does not conflict with federal law or fabricate its own system of immigration rulings. Instead it emulates federal law and aids the central government to impose it.

The recent poll about the Arizona’s Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act, SB 1070 shows:
•  65% of voters favor the law, while 31% oppose it.
• 
•  84% of Republicans favor Arizona’s law, while 46% of Democrats do. A 51% majority of Democrats opposes the law.
• 
•  Independents favor the law by a 40 percentage-point margin, 67% in favor, 27% in opposition.
• 
•  72% of voters who live in the West and 69% of voters who live in the Midwest approve of the Arizona immigration law, compared to 61% of voters who live in other regions of the country.
• 
• 
•  No administration or its predecessors have secured the border fence. Both political parties have failed miserably to protect this country from the illegal alien occupation.  Additionally the American voter must push, track and use the severe pressure of their vote to verbally intimidate every Republican, Democrat and Liberal, informing them that they will unseat them.  It is imperative that whatever the outcome of the Arizona court conflict, is to force passage of E-Verify.  E-Verify mandated law would authenticate whether somebody can get employment or not? Other persons flagged will have the choice of clearing up their problem with the Social Security administration near them?
• 
• 
•    Voters must demand from GOP House speaker John Boehner, to stop blocking the bipartisan E-Verify “THE LEGAL WORKFORCE ACT” from being initiated in Congress by Texas Senator Lamar Smith. Taxpayers are continuously afflicted at the hands of dishonest politicians who have sold us into financial bondage by allowing illegal immigration to persist almost unimpeded in coming here. A second law to support The Legal Workforce Act H.R. 2885 is to amend the Birthright Citizenship Act of 2011 (H.R.140); the country cannot maintain in subsidizing billions of dollars being extracted from the 50 states? Not just the bad politicians should be thrown out of office, but state Governors, Mayors, Judges and all elected officials, and substitute them with Fresh Tea Party leaders who will insure everybody gets their fair share of the American Dream and enforce all laws attributed to the Constitution and the Rule of Law.
• 
• 
•  Their seemingly no consequences of expectant Mothers smuggled across our border fences, who fly in just to take advantage of the U.S. unfunded mandates laws for hospital deliveries and that taxpayers are on the hook for years.  Don’t know who to phone in Washington, and then call 202-224-3121?  The switchboard will connect you with your Representatives aid, and then you tell him you’re angry?  Every prospective contender, including Mitt Romney would be well advised to read the immigration sullen statistics advanced by “The Heritage Foundation”. According to American Federation of Immigration Reform (FAIR) there is a 2.5 Trillion dollars price tag to legitimize the 20 million plus Illegal’s who have already settled here? All patriotic Americans, citizens or legal residents and should join your local TEA PARTY chapter. The Tea Party is the people’s party and it welcomes every citizen and lawful resident who came to America legally. On the American Patrol website,  covers the illegal alien issue, but a daily helping of the e-media from the National media, revealing everything that is against “the Rule of law’ and the sovereignty of this nation, constantly apathetic by Obama people.

Report this
Anarcissie's avatar

By Anarcissie, April 28, 2012 at 8:29 am Link to this comment

I live in New York City, whose population is about 37% immigrant.

Report this

By Marian Griffith, April 28, 2012 at 12:34 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

@NANYBC
—-but talk to the long-term unemployed American carpenters who have seen their wages crushed from $18-25/hour decades ago, to now $8/hour.—-

That is exactly the problem here. One can, barely, live on $8/hour wages ($1300/month) while supporting a family. In many parts of the USA the cost of living is higher than that actually.

Yet many jobs pay even less than that, leaving a family with unpalatable choices like having both parents have several jobs for more than 8 hours per day in total, or doing away with living in a house.

So an American will not take that job because it is less than useful. They can not live on it, at least not the way American society defines living, and entering that line of profession they are locked in it, unable to get better jobs in the future. They will be living on subsistence until the day they day (young, from accident or malnourishment or easily prefentable medical conditions).

The illegal immigrants on the other hand can take these jobs because they do not expect to stay, because even the lower income is still higher than they could get at home (allowing them to save money) and because they have very little expensive needs (seeing how they are sleeping in hovels, tents and barracks and work too long hours to have any leisure time).

Economically speaking the problem is lack of productivity. A job needs to be either productive (making more money than it cost) or necessary (in which case generally the society is expected to pay for it). It turns out there are a lot of jobs that are not sufficiently productive at even $8/hour wages but that we still want to be done. If mechanisation were possible it would already have been done. This leaves either subsidising them (i.e. raising taxes to pay for them) or lowering the wages further (either by offshoring the work or by hiring people who can work for less than what is needed to survive). Initially the choice was made to hire illegals who can or do work for lower wages. And increasingly the choice is made to use subsidised slave labour in the form of chain gangs. Which says a lot about the state of the union.

(p.s. the next logical step in this regression is corporations building barracks and dormitories for their workers. Uni-sex of course as they would not want their indentured workers being distracted by anything during their 14 hour workdays) with children staying in the women’s baracks until they are 6, after that they get a 2 year training program before being put to work. And the most trusted peons may get the right to marry and have a two room apartment of their own (want to reward slavish cooperation after all…). Women naturally are encouraged to get pregnant often so the corporation has an garantueed influx of new workers to replace those it uses up and tosses aside.)

Report this
Psychobabbler's avatar

By Psychobabbler, April 27, 2012 at 10:35 pm Link to this comment

I live in San Diego, and it seems to be pretty popular elsewhere to make fun about the border states as if life doesn’t exist here. Go ahead and put me in the box of racist etc. etc. HA HA!

How convenient it is that people can get all ideological about this and that, without having to live amongst the consequences, including most people who live here from elsewhere (before the crash, only 5% of the housing on the market was affordable to the median income here) HILARIOUS!!!!!!!!!

Regrading the drug wars (for example). D.C. was too busy focusing on their own Cocaine problems to acknowledge the much more serious Methamphetamine epidemic. Just a side note compared to Pharmaceutical abuse that continues to persist. HA HA HILARIOUS!!!!!!

Isn’t life just neat?

Report this
Anarcissie's avatar

By Anarcissie, April 27, 2012 at 5:09 pm Link to this comment

Almost everyone wants profit, though.  Capitalists want profit because profits are their living and their raison d’etre.  Governments want profits because they want something to tax.  Workers and those dependent on them want profits because they are attached to the capitalist system and want the jobs, goods and social order which it produces, or is thought to produce.

Report this

By El_Pinguino, April 27, 2012 at 4:53 pm Link to this comment

Let us put this in perspective:

Corporations (and other legal entities) who could offshore jobs and reap profits by doing so ... well.. they did so.

Those who could not offshore jobs realized the same gains by importing labor through turning a blind eye on the borders.

Don’t read anymore into it than one word: profit

Report this
Anarcissie's avatar

By Anarcissie, April 27, 2012 at 4:33 pm Link to this comment

Actually, immigrants increase jobs and wages, because most immigrants are young, healthy, intelligent, and ambitious—they have enough wits and initiative to pull up stakes and get here—and don’t require investment in their education and the non-productive years of their upbringing.  Many of them bring skills and money.  Thus, they make businesses more profitable and increase commerce, which in turn increases capital, profits, demand, employment and wages.  The smart thing to do for the economy would be to open the borders.

Report this

By NABNYC, April 27, 2012 at 3:46 pm Link to this comment

The immigration crisis is that there are currently 12 million unauthorized migrants living in the U.S., presumably having children and creating more problems for our immigration system.  Just to start.  The crisis is that the U.S. construction workers who used to be carpenters were thrown out of work and replaced by unauthorized migrants who worked for $8.00/hour, destroying building trades jobs for Americans for almost two decades.  Not a problem for a journalist perhaps, but talk to the long-term unemployed American carpenters who have seen their wages crushed from $18-25/hour decades ago, to now $8/hour. 

It’s sad that both left and right recite the meaningless mantra of the Chamber of Commerce demanding that we need immigration reform.  What reform, and why?  Exactly what is proposed?  Another amnesty?  Followed by what?  The next time the economy picks up, we do it all over again?

We have a complicated series of laws governing immigration.  We allow more people to immigrate to the U.S. every year than does any other nation in the world.  We’re quite generous in that way.  There are also millions of people brought in under visas to take American jobs.  What more can anyone possibly want, and why?  In a time of 10% unemployment (conservatively) we should halt all immigration, not invite people to simply ignore the laws and come here to take our jobs.

It is not liberal to give away your neighbor’s job.

What the government should do is enforce the laws.  The unauthorized migration problem has not been solved.  It’s just that the number coming in equals the number leaving, so we continue with the base of 12 million unauthorized migrants in our country, taking American jobs.  Like I mentioned, if each of them has 4 children, we now have an additional 48 million poor people that we have imported into our country at a time when we have schools being closed down, no investment in infrastructure, no public health, collapsing local economies, with the rich paying less taxes every year.  How about a proposal to support those 48 million people.  Why not get honest about the situation. 

To say that the unauthorized migrants “only” want to work is meaningless.  So do Americans.  Their jobs have been given to foreign labor.  That’s exactly the point.

I’m so tired of people demanding immigration “reform” because they think it sounds liberal, yet they have no concrete proposals about how to deal with the challenges.

The Pew research group did an study and determined that each unauthorized migrant with less than a high school diploma (which is most of them) costs the local and state communities $94,000 during the course of that migrant’s life.  That means the cost of social services they use exceeds the taxes they pay by $94,000.  Do the math.  Each of these people has children who attend public schools.  They use the roads, sewer, water, police, fire.  It’s economics that needs to be addressed.  This is money taken from the pockets of American working people to support the foreign labor that came illegally then stole our jobs. 

Ask the American people what they want.  They want jobs, communities that work, and justice.  Cheerleading for unauthorized migrants who take our jobs is not justice.  It’s that meaningless liberal knee-jerk reaction that ignores the working people of this country.

Report this

By Sophie Locke, April 27, 2012 at 3:45 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

11 million illegals is still a lot of illegals. Eugene Robinson would sing a different tune if they were putting him out of work, or forcing him to work for 20% of whatever he makes now.

Report this

By Marian Griffith, April 27, 2012 at 11:44 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

@Surfboy

Actually, illegals coming to work in the USA is not breach and trespass, but willing to work for less than subsistence.
In other words: Americans want to have the work done but are unwilling to pay for it. Illegal immigrants do not, generally, have a house of their own, nor a car or children’s tuition and being illegal do not qualify for health care insurance. All these things they do not have to pay for are things their ‘employers’ to not pay them for. The work gets done and much more cheaply than an american -could- work for.

And if the supply for these illegal workers dries up the unemployed americans are not champing at the bit to take over, simply because they can not live on $1/h salaries.
And so the employers resort to other options of labour that allows them to not pay a living wage to their workers. Mostly they use slave labour in the form of chain gangs (and then have the gall to complain about them not working very hard), but I suppose they would not mind to be able to draw from a permanent underclass of people who work for subsistence level income without the ability to ever save any money, until the day they get an accident or a disease and get tossed by the wayside like so much roadkill, or simply drop dead from being overworked and underfed.

American exceptionalism indeed.

Report this

By Trebla, April 27, 2012 at 11:42 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I am recurrently impressed the east coasty-types have no idea what the illegal
immigration problem looks like up close. Add to that the insularity of having never
earned a pay check with a shovel, and we get this gross insensitivity to the plight
of Americans and Legal immigrants.
The pay of our labor-intensive jobs is depressed. (competition)
The cost of housing is raised. (competition)
The quality of education possible for our kids is diminished. (overcrowded)
Billions os dollars earned in the US are not spent here, but sent “home.”
The possibility of paying for health care for all has disappeared.(nobody is denied)

Mexico needs a second Revolution to rid itself of the oligarchy and run the country
for the benefit of all its people, but we delay that day of justice by providing the
pressure valve.

Report this

By SoTexGuy, April 27, 2012 at 8:23 am Link to this comment

Reports of the waves of illegal crossings from the south being over are optimistic and premature. Or just plain lies.

It’s off the radar of the national media and not polite to talk about in political circles but the local news here is all about this problem. Vans with twenty illegal crossers, stash houses with seventy ‘migrants’ .. high speed chases, multi-jurisdictional swat teams crashing the stash houses and running down the ‘coyotes’.. firearms and narcotics are often involved.

The only thing that competes with news of yet more illegal migrants being detained in the area are the Pols and LE officials lining up to reassure us all this terrible violence and lawbreaking has nothing to do with the dreaded ‘spillover’ from cartel violence in old Mexico.

For some reason; kidnaping, human trafficking, prostitution, shootouts, murders at illegal cock-fighting rings and all that is ok!.. as long as it can’t be said to be connected with the Narco-insurgency in Mexico just a few kilometers to our south and west.

Robinson wants this; a second Obama term. The only thing ‘Reagan’ he admires was that man’s ability to have any controversy or calls for accountability bounce off him! .. and settle on his detractors.

Adios!

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.