Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
June 19, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     nsa     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Reporter Who Brought Down the 'Runaway General' Dead at 33

The Terror Con

Nate Silver vs. Politico: It's on Again

The Making of a Global Security State

IRS Conspiracy Theory Debunked, Rand Paul Answers Cheney Criticism, and More

Most Comments
Most Emailed

 * NEW! * Greenland’s Great Melt Is Pinned On Climate Change
 * NEW! * The Making of a Global Security State



The Unwinding


Truthdig Bazaar
Becoming Abigail

Becoming Abigail

By Chris Abani

more items

 
Reports

Weiner’s No Longfellow

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Jun 7, 2011

By Amy Goodman

“The troubled sky reveals
The grief it feels.”

Those two lines were written by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow in his poem “Snow-Flakes,” published in a volume in 1863 alongside his epic and better-known “The Midnight Ride of Paul Revere.” Much of the news chatter this week has been about Sarah Palin’s flubbing of the history of Revere’s famous ride in April 1775. Revere was on a late-night, clandestine mission to alert American revolutionaries of an impending British attack. Palin’s incorrect version had Revere loudly ringing a bell and shooting a gun on horseback as a warning to the British to back off.

Pathetically, as well, the media has been awash with New York Congressmember Anthony Weiner’s string of electronic sexual peccadillos. Punctuating the sensationalism, and between the TV commercials from the oil, gas, coal and nuclear industries, are story after story of extreme weather events. Herein lies the real scandal: Why aren’t the TV meteorologists, with each story, following the words “extreme weather” with another two, “climate change”? We need modern-day eco-Paul (or Paula) Revere to rouse the populace to this imminent threat.

If anyone fits that role, it’s Bill McKibben. He’s been speaking, writing and organizing globally to stop climate change for more than two decades. I recently asked him about the extreme weather/climate change connection:

“We’re making the Earth a more dynamic and violent place. ... We’re trapping more of the sun’s energy in this narrow envelope of atmosphere, and that’s now expressing itself in many ways. We don’t know for sure that any particular tornado comes from climate change. There have always been tornadoes. We do know that we’re seeing epic levels of thunderstorm activity, of flooding, of drought, of all the things that climatologists have been warning us about.”

Advertisement

McKibben, founder of the grass-roots climate-action organization 350.org, critiques media coverage of the disasters: “You didn’t see ... pictures from Sri Lanka, from Vietnam, from the Philippines, from Brazil northeast of Rio, where they’ve had similar kinds of megafloods, now Colombia.”

When McKibben speaks of a “more dynamic and violent place,” he’s talking about the climate. But climate change, increasingly, can cause actual political violence. This week in Oslo, people gathered for the Nansen Conference on Climate Change and Displacement, to work on the growing problem of climate refugees. The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Antonio Guterres, warned of two threats: slow onset disasters like drought and desertification that lead to “a tipping point at which people’s lives and livelihoods come under such serious threat that they have no choice but to leave their homes,” and “natural disasters [that] uproot large numbers of people in a matter of hours.”

A principal concern is that these millions, even billions, who are or will be displaced will be denied safe haven. As Naomi Klein, a true Paula Revere, warned recently, “This crisis will be exploited to militarize our societies, to create fortress continents.”

UNHCR’s Guterres notes that most of the climate refugees will be internally displaced within their home country. And you needn’t look as far away as Pakistan to see evidence of that. Just this week in the United States, people have been forced to flee tornadoes in western Massachusetts, flooding in Iowa and Colorado, and wildfires in Arizona. Record-breaking heat levels in Washington, D.C., and Texas are threatening lives, with the hottest summer months yet to come.

Not far from Oslo, in Bonn, Germany, more than 3,000 participants from some 180 countries are gathered to plan for this December’s U.N. climate talks in Durban, South Africa. Addressing the meeting, Tove Ryding of Greenpeace said, “What we are talking about here is actually millions of green jobs, to transform our societies to energy systems that are safe, that are stable and that are based on renewable energy and energy efficiency.”

That move, away from fossil fuels and nuclear toward renewable energy, is being embraced now by more and more countries, especially after the Fukushima disaster. Japan just revealed that there were three full nuclear meltdowns at Fukushima.

Switzerland and Germany have announced they will be phasing out nuclear power. China, Germany and Japan, three of the world’s top five economies, are charging ahead on renewable-energy research and deployment.

The Obama administration’s paltry funding for renewable-energy research pales in comparison with the tens of billions in subsidies for the oil, coal and nuclear industries.

The global climate is changing, and humans are the principal cause. Will we in the U.S., the world’s historically largest polluter, heed the warnings of our environmental Reveres, or will the troubled sky, as Longfellow wrote, increasingly reveal the grief it feels?

Denis Moynihan contributed research to this column.

Amy Goodman is the host of “Democracy Now!,” a daily international TV/radio news hour airing on more than 900 stations in North America. She is the author of “Breaking the Sound Barrier,” recently released in paperback and now a New York Times best-seller.

© 2011 Amy Goodman

Distributed by King Features Syndicate


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By billhill123, June 13, 2011 at 8:05 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ztq6oxBMJ2Y&feature=feedlik

Report this

By christian96, June 9, 2011 at 1:24 pm Link to this comment

According to the title I expected to read something
about Rep. Weiner but, alas, the bell tolls for
climate change.  I haven’t heard a good explanation
to explain “climate change” centuries ago long before the advent of burning oil and coal.
What variables exist today which also existed centries ago during the last climate change? Humans! Now there is a significant variable.  Humans! Could it be that hedonistic behaviors in humans contributed to the last climate change?  Resoundingly, YES!  Try dusting off that Bible and
reading about it.  Could hedonistic behaviors
extant globally be arousing anger in God who is bringing about climate change among other painful
conditions in an attempt to turn humans from their hedonistic behaviors?  We could run a global experiment.  The United Nations could ask people
around the globe to turn from their hedonistic behaviors for a year to see if there is an improvement in the climate, economy, environment, etc. Sadly, that isn’t going to happen.  The Bible tells us that though God makes human life miserable humans still refuse to turn from their hedonistic ways.  In fact, the Bible tells us that mankind will almost wipe themselves off the planet but “for the elect’s sake(Matthew 24:22” Jesus will return and
put an end to hedonistic practices.  Are you among “the elect?”  Better think about it!  Conditions are growing rather nasty on earth!

P. S.——I just typed “hedonistic” online.  The
second choice is a “hedonistic lifestyle in the
Canary Islands. Clothing optional.”  Better fire
this off to Rep. Weiner.  His pregnant wife could
stay with relatives while Rep. Weiner shows off his “wiener.”

Report this

By Ralph Kramden, June 9, 2011 at 10:31 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The tittle of this piece, was that deliberate, the Longfellow part? Very funny.

Report this
Leefeller's avatar

By Leefeller, June 9, 2011 at 8:03 am Link to this comment

It is reported sales have dropped at Der Wienerschnitzel, they blame it on the recent negative publicity and unappealing and explicit photos of Mr. Wiernr!

Report this
Blackspeare's avatar

By Blackspeare, June 9, 2011 at 7:32 am Link to this comment

Let me see if I got this straight….

1. A US representative by the name of “Weener” twitters pics of himself aroused in his skivvies.

2.  First he claims his Twitter account was hacked, but then recants and confesses saying there was other sexting going on.

3. While he himself is of the Jewish persuasion, his wife is Muslim with her first name being Huma so she is called Hum-a-Weener.

4. His wife is a close aide to Hilary Clinton who had similar “trust” problems with her husband and is providing advice.

5. One of his sexting partners bares all and even writes an apology to his wife.

6. Now we learn his wife is pregnant except she has been out of the country for most of their married life——no further comment!

7. Breitbart claims to have a real pic of Weiner’s penis except it not circumcized that why he’s call NotsoBreibart!

You’d be hard pressed to make this stuff up and the only thing that could keep legs on this story is if one of his sexting partners turns out to be a trans-sexual and another a shemale!

Report this
Anarcissie's avatar

By Anarcissie, June 9, 2011 at 6:58 am Link to this comment

MeHere—What’s good about putting one’s car out to pasture is not the difference in one’s individual use of energy and other resources, which is vanishingly trivial on a world scale, but that fact that it brings one in contact with what one is talking about.

Report this

By sam, June 9, 2011 at 12:14 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Amy Goodman considered writing a different article called “Weiner Is No Dick…Cheney”, but decided it was too risque.

Report this
Ghettogether's avatar

By Ghettogether, June 9, 2011 at 12:14 am Link to this comment

Yeah, I understand she (Amy) was dying to use her oh so over the top headline,
but hey, she might as well have just dumped a bucket of paint over her head, and
started laughing at Weiner.  Weiner’s Palin In Comparison To Longfellow.  I might
have let her slide that one on in.As it stands, the sanctimonious left will probably
have to be shot and thrown in the grave they dug for the the sanctimonious right,
by all the illiterate prodigies of their failed social experiments.  Right now, it’s
really hard for Weiner, he should be left to roast on his own…

Report this

By erica, June 8, 2011 at 9:31 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

an unexpected article given the title… thanks so much for going there, Amy!

Report this
THX 1133 is not in the movie...'s avatar

By THX 1133 is not in the movie..., June 8, 2011 at 7:28 pm Link to this comment

rico, suave, June 8 at 10:05 am Link to this comment
THX:

It’s “Gaea” or “Gaia”. So much for your liberal-squishy
bona fides, you right wing spy!
==============================
Oh gee; a spelling error! And that tells you what about
me?
What a maroon and a waste of flesh.

Report this

By MeHere, June 8, 2011 at 6:52 pm Link to this comment

Anarcissie says:

“Sure. You can start by putting your car out to pasture.”

Yes, individual acts of environmentalism are always welcome. But this is also a
trap that leads many to believe that the solutions to our energy and environmental problems will come that way. They won’t. It is a huge issue and we can only start making real changes if most of the population gets behind a national policy designed for that purpose.  I can hear voices saying “that will never happen”.....and they may be right.

Report this

By gerard, June 8, 2011 at 11:03 am Link to this comment

When people are scared they run away.  (Don’t scare people.)
  When people are overwhelmed with scientific information they are not equipped to understand, they run away.  (Don’t overwhelm people with technical data. It increases feelings of inferiority.)
  When people mainly believe the popular media, the popular media must be worked on ceaselessly, in every possible way, and convinced to speak the truth in spite of their advertisers. (tough work, but absolutely essentiall.)
  When people are informed of needs by their friends, shown ways they can help, and organized into groups for maximizing their efforts, they tend to do their best to help.(Work through local churches, schools, organizations, door to door, grassroots organizing)
  When people’s religious/political beliefs are challenged, they don’t hear because often that’s the only “security” they have, it’s very flimsy—and they know it’s flimsy. (Understand the depth of their present and ongoing fears, and try to add as little as possible to their insecurity.  Counteract it with faith in what they can do.)
  Yeah, well .... Who’s going to do this, in this way?  Start with a national program for high school and college kids summer vacation time. putting emphasis on local and regional needs and actions. Nothing to do?  Here, read this comprehensive but simple “story”—“Help Heal Your Most Important Neighbor—Mother Nature.” Right here we need, a.s.a.p. ....
  Use precinct lists to go door to door passing out attractive, simple, reliable information on what you and your neighbors can do for this neighborhood/ region. Organize group activities. Emphasize friendship, cooperation, joy and confidence.
  Pay the kids minimum wages for their time and celebrate successes. Publicize efforts. Establish lines of intercommunication. Publish problems and success stories through local media.

(Note:  Somewhere along the line Americans have lost their gift for organizing.  Recently, I happened to run onto an old Red Cross Organization Manual from 1921 where I found my mother’s name listed among thousands of other Pittsburghers working together, centering at churches and schools, to “help Belgium recover” from WWII—doing everything under the sun from packing and shipping food and tools to knitting socks.  The number of men, women and children involved absolutelly amazed me, proving we can restore a lost art here, and now is our chance.)
  This antique rehash may seem naive and corny to more “modern” “sophisticaed” “hep” “cool” people—but ... any better ideas?

Report this
Anarcissie's avatar

By Anarcissie, June 8, 2011 at 10:25 am Link to this comment

MeHere, June 8 at 8:47 am:

Even if human activity were found beyond a doubt not to be the reason for excess CO2 and temperature rise, aren’t there dozens of other reasons to change our approach to energy use?

Sure.  You can start by putting your car out to pasture.

Report this
rico, suave's avatar

By rico, suave, June 8, 2011 at 10:05 am Link to this comment

THX:

It’s “Gaea” or “Gaia”. So much for your liberal-squishy bona fides, you right wing spy!

Report this
JDmysticDJ's avatar

By JDmysticDJ, June 8, 2011 at 9:57 am Link to this comment

By WarrenMetzler, June 8 at 5:39 am Link to this comment

“There very well may be a gradual warming tendency. But there is not a smidgen
of evidence it is to due to man’s activities. And it is truly unfortunate that no
scientifically trained person who can articulate the man-caused global warming
scam’s masquerading as science is being listened to.”

**************************************************

Hum…? Not a smidgen? My dictionary defines smidgen as a very small amount. Are you saying there is not even a very small amount of evidence indicating global warming due to man’s activities?

“National and international science academies and scientific societies have assessed the current scientific opinion, in particular on recent global warming. These assessments have largely followed or endorsed the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) position of January 2001 which states:

An increasing body of observations gives a collective picture of a warming world and other changes in the climate system… There is new and stronger evidence that most of the warming observed over the last 50 years is attributable to human activities.[1]

No scientific body of national or international standing has maintained a dissenting opinion; the last was the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, which in 2007 updated its 1999 statement rejecting the likelihood of human influence on recent climate with its current non-committal position.[2][3] Some other organizations, primarily those focusing on geology, also hold non-committal positions.”

I have to conclude that you are more than just a smidgen of a right-wing ideologue who has been indoctrinated to ignore scientific evidence, and to deny reality when that reality contradicts right-wing ideology, and when that reality supports the findings of the overwhelming body of science, but I won’t argue the facts with you, you’re ilk are obsessed with denying facts, and will dispute the facts, even when you know the facts are indeed factual. You and your ilk value your ideology more than you value facts or truth.

Now, I’m not aware of how the scientific community views Naomi Klein’s theories and observations, but I fail to see any connection between Naomi Klein’s theories and observations, and your contention that there is not even a smidgen (very small amount) of evidence that the shows man’s activities contribute to global warming and climate change.

As stated earlier, arguing with your ilk is futile, and long after you have been shown to be an idiotic ideologue, you will continue to dispute the facts until people are laughing loudly and exchanging comments about your idiocy.

Report this

By DigThis, June 8, 2011 at 9:46 am Link to this comment

REPLY TO:

“Anarcissie
...Doing something about potential climate change…
...especially after you’ve been told…
...There’s quite a difference between apocalypses.”

PRESSING MY POINT ABOUT NASA A LITTLE FURTHER:

THE ONLY UNCERTAINTIES ACCORDING NASA ARE IN FORCASTING WHEN AND THE EXACT IMPACT BY REGION.

PEOPLE ALREADY KNOW THIS.  WE ARE TEACHING OUR CHILDREN TO CHANGE FOR US BECAUSE AS ADULTS, WE ONLY CHANGE IN RESPONSE TO DISASTERS.

http://climate.nasa.gov/kids/
http://climate.nasa.gov/education/

Of course, this may be too little too late…. but this is who we are as a people.  Unlike these folks:

http://www.pvpulse.com/en/news/world-news/bolivia-set-to-pass-historic-law-of-mother-earth-which-will-grant-nature-equal-rights-to-humans

Report this
Leefeller's avatar

By Leefeller, June 8, 2011 at 9:10 am Link to this comment

It feels so nice and fuzzy to know when I pay close to five dollars a gallon for fuel at the oil company gas station, and watching all those adds on television about how environmentally caring and nice the oil folks are, and learning, that I in my own small way helped additionally to pay for those advertisements,....  its like we are all members of one big dysfunctional family!

Mother nature does not exist and neither does climate change, so there is nothing to worry about here, no war on the climate, because then things could be a bit sticky and so they would be so damn inconvenient.  Anyway, we have enough wars going on right now, the war on terror, the war on women, the war on drugs, the war on education, the war on the drivel, the war on gays and especially the war on sanity sponsored by the Republicans, ...way to many damn wars, we just do not have room for one more war ask the special sponsored interest folks!

Report this

By MeHere, June 8, 2011 at 8:47 am Link to this comment

Even if human activity were found beyond a doubt not to be the reason for excess
CO2 and temperature rise, aren’t there dozens of other reasons to change our
approach to energy use?  There’s no doubt that the quality of our air, soil, and
water is increasingly being damaged by human activity motivated by ignorance,
excessive greed, and wishful thinking. Energy use needs to be viewed and
discussed as a comprehensive issue.

Report this

By John Poole, June 8, 2011 at 8:32 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

An Imam is reportedly have said that oil was the Devil’s sh.t.  If we had to
experience the planet destroying timed explosive combustion that occurs in the
piston chamber of our cars without firewalls, mufflers, and cabin “comfort”
amenities we’d change our lifestyle.  Engine block heat alone dooms mankind!
Each one of us has a closed pit bonfire blazing away in front of us while we tool
down the highway in air conditioned comfort. 
  Perhaps humans are exiles on this planet (for whatever reason) with gravity as
punishment. We’re attempting a jail break with our shuttles and dooming
ourselves even more. And what about tens of thousands of multiple jet engined
planes hourly emitting poisonous vapors freely. Ever see a catalytic convertor on
a Rolls Royce jet engine?

Report this
Anarcissie's avatar

By Anarcissie, June 8, 2011 at 8:31 am Link to this comment

DigThis—War is fun when you don’t have to pay for it and someone else has to fight it.  And everything can be done in 22 minutes between the SUV ads.  Doing something about potential climate change isn’t, especially after you’ve been told that the world is coming to an end anyway no matter what you do.  So there’s quite a difference between apocalypses there.

Report this

By DigThis, June 8, 2011 at 8:20 am Link to this comment

Reply To:

“Anarcissie
...his style of apocalyptic doomsaying…
...appeals to authority and ad-hominem attacks…”

THIS APPROACH ALWAYS SEEMS TO WORK FOR THE US GOV’T WHEN IT NEEDS SUPPORT FOR A NEW WAR SOMEWHERE.

Report this

By abikecommuter, June 8, 2011 at 7:26 am Link to this comment

Neck deep in the big muddy may describe Mississippi, etc today but it was written to
describe Vietnam. Check out this toon
http://blog.cagle.com/2011/05/schedule-change/

Report this
Leefeller's avatar

By Leefeller, June 8, 2011 at 7:25 am Link to this comment

The strange thing about humans, they will believe in a 3000 year old goat herders manual, and kill other people to prove it, but global warming has not a bit of evidence from the same people.

We may as well be having a discussion on the existence of god for proof will be just as forthcoming.

How does one prove or disprove anything to a believers satisfaction or the unbeliever for that matter? Humankind seems in some ways just like water it seeks its lowest level, the advantage of water, it does not have the capability or problem of belief and denial.

Report this

By CarlG, June 8, 2011 at 7:15 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

When there are too many fish in the bowl, they resort to cannibalism.  We are in a state of global cannibalism.  The big fish are eating the small fish and consuming all the resources in this fish bowl commonly referred to as the planet earth. 
We need to get serious about reducing the human population to less than one billion.  I know, God said “be fruitful and multiply”, but we have more than fulfilled his request and He’s probably wondering when we’re going to figure that out. 
The human population is going to decrease whether we take action or not.  This will occur naturally through disease and famine as well as global war over the dwindling supply of resources (hint: this has already begun).  I prefer a more modest approach.  What if we decided that for each mating pair we would have only one child (sound like China, those damn commies)?  This is not going to happen over-night, but we must begin to embrace this idea.  We will not get a handle on climate change, pollution, dwindling resources, etc, until we get a handle on population because population drives all these other problems.
Unfortunately, there does not seem to be a single voice with the balls to bring this concept to the table.  Maybe we should start by castrating politicians, after all, Mr. Weiner would not be having all these problems if it wasn’t for his weiner.

Report this
Anarcissie's avatar

By Anarcissie, June 8, 2011 at 7:12 am Link to this comment

I don’t know if McKibben is a prevaricator—I think he is probably quite sincere—but his style of apocalyptic doomsaying has been extremely harmful to the cause he espouses.  That harm has been amplified by the fondness of his supporters and fellow believers for appeals to authority and ad-hominem attacks upon infidels and skeptics.  I wonder if the damage can be reversed in time to actually deal with the problems.

Report this

By DigThis, June 8, 2011 at 6:50 am Link to this comment

Reply To: 

“WarrenMetzler
...there is not a smidgen of evidence…
...no scientifically trained person… 
...How do we know that…
...Is there is smidgen of proof that…
...Not a single piece of evidence!...
...Not a single piece of evidence…”

I’M MUCH MORE INTERESTED IN WHAT NASA HAS TO SAY ABOUT GLOBAL WARMING: 
http://climate.nasa.gov/keyIndicators/
http://climate.nasa.gov/causes/
http://climate.nasa.gov/effects/

Report this

By Dr. Leo, June 8, 2011 at 6:23 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Warren Metzler, just read the UN IPCC report, it’s all online and the ice core evidence proves the increase in CO2, not the opposite.  Fear and denial work well together, but climate change is here and Naomi Klein is right, what do you read?  By the way, it really is only Amerika that denies climate change, Europe and Australia are doing something about it.  You know, like health care, they way ahead of us.

Report this

By WarrenMetzler, June 8, 2011 at 5:39 am Link to this comment

It is truly unfortunate that Amy has done so much hard work for revealing news
stories the main stream media overlooks; I most remember East Timor; has so
succumbed to prevaricators like McKibben and Klein.

There very well may be a gradual warming tendency. But there is not a smidgen
of evidence it is to due to man’s activities. And it is truly unfortunate that no
scientifically trained person who can articulate the man-caused global warming
scam’s masquerading as science is being listened to.

I’ll give one example. How do we know that co2 has increased in the
atmosphere over the past hundreds of years? By ice core samples in the Arctic
apparently. Is there is smidgen of proof that ice in the arctic has increased a
standard amount (about one inch) each year in the past centuries, so that if we
did a certain depth we can use the sample we collect to know the co2 amount
that year? Not a single piece of evidence! Is there any evidence that the amount
of co2 in any one sample reveals a world wide average of co2? Not a single
piece of evidence. So to claim co2 is responsible for temperature rise, and it is
man’s activity producing that excess co2 is a scam of monumental proportion.

Similarly with Naomi Klein, and her various crackpot theories. Has any of them
ever been proven to be valid? Not is one. She just gets high is some way,
dreams up a communist-light big money scandal, and writes a book. And the
assessment challenged left buys lots of copies, and it is then assumed she told
the truth. When, in truth, she just provided one more imaginary delusion with
which a lot of world citizens are being kept in the dark.

Report this

By Edward Kerr, June 8, 2011 at 4:55 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Well put Amy. Unfortunately the individuals (Govt & Corporate) who could affect immediate positive change are in such denial of humanities predicament that they will lead us to catastrophe to maintain our fragile “status quo” and their wealth and power. The coming loss of life will be unimaginable but some will survive. Though they may be meek, they will also be smart. If any who read this wants to be among them you will need save yourself through knowledge and planning. Relying on the failed system will be a mistake. The technologies that could lead us to a sustainable paradigm exist today. Learn as much as you can and insist that they be implemented on a public scale and, more importantly, implement them in your personal life if you can. Be very careful of what you eat. Produce your own electricity if you can in a carbon neutral way (wind, solar or bio-fuel). Be as energy frugal as you can. Be suspicious of “big govt-corp” motives as they don’t have your best interests at heart. Teach your children well. Care for each other.

Report this
THX 1133 is not in the movie...'s avatar

By THX 1133 is not in the movie..., June 8, 2011 at 4:30 am Link to this comment

“We’re making the Earth a more dynamic and violent
place. ...
======================================
Poetic justice, no? “We’re” far more violent and Gia
responds in kind…

Report this

By JJW, June 8, 2011 at 3:46 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The US Government is not going so do the right thing while the masses dull their brains watching corporate sponsored nonsense.  Like all prior Empires, America is self destructing from greed, laziness, and corruption.

Americans have a poor concept of history as displayed by Sara Palin and even Obama seems not to understand what life is like for African Americans prior to 80s.  Obama is willing to indenture (mandate) all Americans to global corporations that pay no US taxes.

Report this
Leefeller's avatar

By Leefeller, June 8, 2011 at 3:29 am Link to this comment

Thanks for th change up Amy, I am sick and tired of the focus on stupidity and partisan politics, far as I am concerned they are all a bunch of wieners!

As a professional cynic, I would like to deny climate change, but what the hell is going on? It seems the money driven opportunists will deny anything which may effect their bottom line and our politicians seem to be the enablers.

Now, I do not know if all these things happening around the world are caused by the claimed climate change or just natural events, but I do feel the carbon footprint is mpacting on mother nature in some way.
All the huddled masses of the world must have something to do with the impacts on climate, just cutting down all the forests for starters seems a likely culprit?

Climate change exists, just who decides what that really means remains to be seen, as long as it is not the status quo power and oil companies. I need to get up to speed and be more aware of climate change. Everything seemingly becomes so overwhelming.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.