LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 24, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

How to Make a Million Dollars an Hour

Three Questions Left Unanswered by Obama’s Counterterrorism Speech

Colbert Slams PBS for Appeasing Koch Brothers

Obama Heckled During Speech, Warren Lands a Book Deal, and More

A Call to Action

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * New York City’s Summers May Heat Up

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
A Call to Action
Act of Congress

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar
The Mitfords

The Mitfords

By Charlotte Mosley
$26.37

more items

 
Reports

Washington Laughs at ‘Revolution’

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Nov 9, 2010

By Richard Reeves

WASHINGTON—There are no outsiders inside the Beltway.

That may be an exaggeration, but it is a slight one.

It is unusual when the liberal Washington Post and the conservative Washington Times agree on anything other than the importance of the Washington Redskins to the survival of the fittest and of the Republic. But on the day after the day after the Republican/Tea Party victory in the 2012 midterm elections, both papers sort of giggled at the new and the recycled anti-Washington loudmouths coming or coming back to our capital city.

The Post’s front page headline was:

“The Agony and the Ecstasy of Washington: New House members may come in seething—and never go home.”

Advertisement

The lead story of the Times’ Commentary section used this headline:

“No Cuts, No Glory: GOP’s piddly promises augur budget disaster.”

So what else is new? Been there, done that.

Said Marc Fisher of the Post: “The victors of 2012, by and large, ran against Washington. They pledged to take back the country, to boot out politicians who had become creatures of Washington. Now they get to live here.”

My goodness! This hasn’t happened since the Republicans swept the 1994 midterms—or perhaps when the Democrats roared into power just two years ago. What the Post did was check what happened to the 73 new Republican “revolutionaries” who followed Newt Gingrich into power back then. Fourteen of them, it seems, are still in Congress. And the rest? More than half reneged on their promises to serve only three terms in this den of iniquity. They and most of the others stayed in Congress or stayed in Washington as lobbyists, lawyers, consultants, journalists, strategists.

“They run against Washington calling it a cesspool and discover that it’s really a hot tub,” said Craig Shirley, who came to town as an aide to conservative icon Sen. Gordon Humphrey of New Hampshire, and stayed to form a public relations company. That’s the usual story.

Linda Killian of the Woodrow Wilson Center, who wrote a book titled “The Freshmen: What Happened to the Republican Revolution,” put it this way: “Most decided, ‘It’s great here in Washington and I want to stay, so I’ll figure out a way.’ People want to take you to dinner all the time and everybody’s hanging on your every word. By and large they become indistinguishable from the people they replaced.”

Bob Barr, a former congressman from Florida, member of that Republican class of rebels, added: “As soon as you get here, you find that a lot of those guys who supported you because you were going to shrink the size of government are banging on your door demanding that you bring home the bacon ... ‘Cut everyone else’s pork, not ours.’ ”

On the other side of town from the Post and the ideological divide, James Bacon of the Times mocked the new anti-government legislators, saying:

“In its Pledge to America, the GOP House leadership vowed to roll back government spending to ‘pre-stimulus, pre-bailout levels,’ thus saving $100 billion a year and ‘putting us on the path to begin paying down the debt.’ Putting us on the path to paying down the debt? Whoever composed that line must have stayed up too late and taken way too much No-Doz. It’s blather. Rolling back spending $100 billion a year won’t accomplish anything.”

“Republicans swore in their pledge,” said Bacon, author of “Boomergeddon,” “to accomplish little more than Mr. Obama has already committed to deliver.”

So in Washington, the more things change, the more they are the same. As far as the deficit is concerned, there are only three options—and probably no chances—to reduce spending: cut Social Security and Medicare, cut military spending or raise taxes. Barring unforeseen crises, we will have noisy gridlock for two years, nothing will be done, nothing will happen.

© 2010 Universal Uclick


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

bonito's avatar

By bonito, November 26, 2010 at 3:31 pm Link to this comment

When through the course of History, A government of a
few Elite, ceases to be a Government for The People,
then it is the Right NAY it is the duty of the Down
Trodden to rise up and overthrow it.

That seems to sum up the only course the Citizens of
these United States have. The cycle and recycle of
the same Politician does little to effect change for
the Working, and Poor classes.  The primary reason
that we ever got anything during the Depression, was
that FDR and by no small effort from his wife
Elenore, was able to fight hard and aided by being
reelected three times, delivered some improvement in
their daily lives.

Report this
joentokyo's avatar

By joentokyo, November 11, 2010 at 9:15 pm Link to this comment

Robert Laurence “Bob” Barr, Jr. represented Georgia’s 7th congressional district as a Republican from 1995 to 2003; he was not a representative for Florida.

Report this

By REDHORSE, November 10, 2010 at 8:58 pm Link to this comment

GARTH: It’s my understanding that the war represents .5% of the population. If you feel revolving door politics allows the M.I.C. to place recruiters in local High Shools and, Charter Schools are a threat to Public Education, then my suggestion below is for you. Violence may be a possible reality of efforting for organized change, but non-violent change is possible.

  My bet is that allowing anger to reduce fellow Americans to characterizations allows one to avoid the personal responsibility of stepping up to the plate and allows a generation of half-adults to blame others.

  Be the change you want.

  ASTROLOGY: Americans do understand how “Blessed” they are. Hence the rage expressed on this site. Nothing has to “burn”. I SUGGESTED that ACTION is the key. Your “bums—in and out” complaint is the point. Distorted Campaign Finance regulations stop “We the people—” from enjoying true political representation.

    Thanks to you both for your comments.

Report this

By garth, November 10, 2010 at 4:22 pm Link to this comment

All this TALK!! of revolution and CHANGE!! is smoke and self-serving blather. It requires the ACTION on an individual basis that connects like minded individuals and forms COMMUNITY. Defeat is a convenient choice.
—————————————-

That’s it.  Let’s stop the one per cent of the 300 million of us who go to war.  Let us intervene at the high school level.  No more teaching militarism. 

Teach self.  You’ve got one self and so do I, but only one,  If you want to wear a uniform and march, go right ahead.  Keep in mind, though, that all that order all that conformism ultimatelt to disorder, violence and crime.

Come home after you’ve killed a child and her mother and brag about it at the local VFW.

In this new movement toward Charter Schools.  Let’s insist that the fake-ass Majors and the blow hard Colonels leave our Public High Schools.  Teach compromise there. 

If it doesn’t end there, it’ll never end.  I’ll bet on it.

Report this

By REDHORSE, November 10, 2010 at 3:32 pm Link to this comment

All this TALK!! of revolution and CHANGE!! is smoke and self-serving blather. It requires the ACTION on an individual basis that connects like minded individuals and forms COMMUNITY. Defeat is a convenient choice.

    The Latino Community is a great example of ORGANIZATION and ACTION by a self-interested community. It has its own press, finance, public relations, and communications. It turns out for mass demonstrations and can mount “road trips” to deliver protest support anywhere in the U.S.A. and, the press and Washington are scared to touch it. It is a master of spin and manipulates and scares Corporate Business at will. It demanded its own status as a separate Nation-Within-A-Nation with its own culture and language and Washington rolled over without a whimper.

    Another point for WOULD BE revolutionaries is that in fact, no violent revolution is needed. THE “CORE” ISSUE, Campaign Finance Reform (removing $$$$$ from politics) could not only stop the Rethug agenda dead in its tracks, but revitalize Democratic dialogue, identify possible 2012 candidates and force our President to show his true colors. 1000 simple well written flyers on the topic (two sided folded 8.5"X11” cost less that $70.00) or a two line ad in the classifieds saying CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM NOW!!cost pennies a day. It ain’t Rocket Science. Send a letter with copies to your Representatives and local party headquarters. Want to shake’em up, offer to speak on the subject at their next meeting.

    REALITY IS: There are already groups in place fighting for the issue, desperate for volunteers. Join or snivel.

    To paraphrase the Bard, Methinks the Ladies and Gentlemen complain too much.

Report this

By garth, November 10, 2010 at 1:48 pm Link to this comment

Chris Hedges on the Thom Hartmann show yesterday (Nov. 7th or thereabouts) spelled it out clearly.  There is a difference between Revolution and rebellion. 

We don’t want to make ‘systemic’ changes as the right wing mafia is so fond of exclaiming.  We are voicing our disapproval of the way things are being done. 

We want substantive changes without throwing out the baby with the bathwater.

Make change.  Make change possible.  Make it regettable to hold on to what you’ve gained by deception.

Hit ‘em where it hurts.  Find the Achilles heel.

They must have some sense of pain somewhere.

Report this

By angry citizen, November 10, 2010 at 2:28 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

the 2nd amendment was put in our constitution for a good reason - to defend ourselves from corrupt government.  we have a duty to our fellow countrymen to destroy the current corrupt government and replace it with a new one that works for the people.  the corruption has spread so far there is no other means to fix this problem other than a revolution.  we owe it to our kids and grand kids.  this government needs to be abolished now before they do any further damage.

Report this

By Matzpen, November 9, 2010 at 7:26 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The victory of the Tea Party this election cycle will be like the Newt Gingrich’s Contract on America victory in 1994 in that in ‘94 the Republicans may have won the election but they were totally unable to get anything they wanted passed
http://sherrytalksback.wordpress.com/2010/11/08/make-glenn-beck-cry/

Report this

By garth, November 9, 2010 at 5:22 pm Link to this comment

Amarcissie says:

“This reminds me of something by Andrei Amalrik, a Soviet dissident who, against all conventional wisdom, predicted the demise of the Soviet Union in his not-too-distant future.  Writing in the 1960s, he said of the Soviet nomenklatura:

‘There is another powerful factor which works against the chance of any kind of peaceful reconstruction and which is equally negative for all levels of society: this is the extreme isolation in which the regime has placed both society and itself. This isolation has not only separated the regime from society, and all sectors of society from each other, but also put the country in extreme isolation from the rest of the world. This isolation has created for all—from the bureaucratic elite to the lowest social levels—an almost surrealistic picture of the world and of their place in it. Yet the longer this state of affairs helps to perpetuate the status quo, the more rapid and decisive will be its collapse when confrontation with reality becomes inevitable.’

In the United States, however, the problem is not just the people ‘within the Beltway’ but in other high offices in the ruling class everywhere.  It is part of their incompetence, their progressive degeneration and dissolution.  But the principle is the same. “

——————————————-

In each iteration of this madness throughout history, the mind-bogglers at the top and ones behind it think that their scheme will succeed for one crazy reason or another.

In this instance we have the reason being, technology and the government’s backing to group the NSA, Homeland Security, the State Department, CIA and FBI, and the News media together to scare the bejeebers out of most Americans.  And they keep an eye on them at the same time. 

Drones, courts, and psychopathic killers in uniforms.  They think it can never be overcome.

Johannes FuckFace, the cop who killed Osacar Grant on the BART in Oakland, caught on film, was sentenced to two years.  Two years ago he agreed to something or other when he turned himself in. What in the world was that about? He, a ‘killer’.

Some gotta live and some gotta lose.  Good Time Charlie’s got the blues

But when the shit hits the fan, I don’t want to be on their side wearing uniform, carrying a rifle.

I’d cut a choagie and head for the Badlands.

Report this

By felicity, November 9, 2010 at 3:47 pm Link to this comment

Reminds me of a Bill Maher quote:  “Republicans say
government doesn’t work and then they get in it and
prove it.”

And when the newbies get to DC they quickly devolve
into DC regulars.  Devolve, because Washington is a
town that pays more attention to loyalty and discretion
than to vision or success.

Report this

By Micah'sbestfriend, November 9, 2010 at 3:23 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

A revolution, even the thought of it, is never funny!  However, at times it may be necessary.  Some revolutions are just and some are not.  Either way, in post-revolution, people will have to deal with what happens.  Sometimes, years after a revolution is even worse for the country than it was before.  Then again though, this does depend on which side one is on.

I must confess that the 2010 election has finally cemented in my mind that the US elections are a farce.  They are a complete joke!  Not only that, but this election demonstrated both the cons of a democratic Republic, and the tragic effects of negative propaganda running rampant.  No wonder why nothing gets done here!  There is no one in position to call the shots.  Pretty much everything has to be done by consensus and even then 99.9% of the time it’s watered-down so much that it renders itself ineffective.  Only Americans believe that politics is “the art of compromise.”

The propaganda here has reached fever pitch; using “freedom of the press” to justify having pundits on TV and in newspapers, with zero journalism credentials, rather than having REAL journalists.  Obviously, this is taking place!  When I think of liberal media, I think Democracy Now or NPR.  When I think of conservative media, I think FOX, MSNBC, or CNN - the latter being mainstream media. Anyone who believes the contrary merely demonstrates the evidence of how much people are inundated by propaganda.

Should a revolution happen?  I hope not but it might anyway.  I hope people are willing to accept the consequences, should a revolution happen.  Of course, millions of Americans will die during a revolution.  For example, Mexico lost roughly ten percent of their entire population during their revolution a little over a century ago.  I am not sure about the casualty count of the revolutions in Russia, France, and Cuba; but I am sure they were enormous. So..

Report this
Anarcissie's avatar

By Anarcissie, November 9, 2010 at 2:12 pm Link to this comment

JDmysticDJ, November 9 at 5:50 pm:
‘The data shows that “We the People” have nearly no respect for those inside the beltway. Human nature being what it is, I’ll suggest that those inside the beltway have an equal lack of respect for “We the People” and that they will continue doing what they have been doing, and the people be damned. ...’

This reminds me of something by Andrei Amalrik, a Soviet dissident who, against all conventional wisdom, predicted the demise of the Soviet Union in his not-too-distant future.  Writing in the 1960s, he said of the Soviet nomenklatura:

“There is another powerful factor which works against the chance of any kind of peaceful reconstruction and which is equally negative for all levels of society: this is the extreme isolation in which the regime has placed both society and itself. This isolation has not only separated the regime from society, and all sectors of society from each other, but also put the country in extreme isolation from the rest of the world. This isolation has created for all—from the bureaucratic elite to the lowest social levels—an almost surrealistic picture of the world and of their place in it. Yet the longer this state of affairs helps to perpetuate the status quo, the more rapid and decisive will be its collapse when confrontation with reality becomes inevitable.”

In the United States, however, the problem is not just the people ‘within the Beltway’ but in other high offices in the ruling class everywhere.  It is part of their incompetence, their progressive degeneration and dissolution.  But the principle is the same.

Report this
JDmysticDJ's avatar

By JDmysticDJ, November 9, 2010 at 12:50 pm Link to this comment

The data shows that “We the People” have nearly no respect for those inside the beltway. Human nature being what it is, I’ll suggest that those inside the beltway have an equal lack of respect for “We the People” and that they will continue doing what they have been doing, and the people be damned.

I heard recently that Harry Reed, Joe Lieberman, and Mitch McConnell are good friends. At the height of the Health Care debate Joe Lieberman single handedly destroyed hope for a public option. When Harry Reed was asked about Joe Lieberman, he snapped, “Joe Lieberman is the least of my worries.” These people are totally disconnected, and possess an, us vs. them mentality. I’ll suggest that nearly all these representatives of “We the People” have their own agendas, and are willing to sell out because they consider their personal agendas more important than their personal integrity.

All the leading social commentators, political pundits, etc. identify the problems, but they stand aloof, offering no viable solutions. We are in need of a reform, but only those who are in need of being reformed have the power to carry out that reform, and they are not likely to do so, they are too busy trying to advance their personal agendas. I’ll suggest that moderates tell themselves, “I’ve got to stay in office or my moderate voice will be lost,” while more radical and reactionary politicians use the same type of rationale. Meanwhile, the injustices, atrocities, corruption, and insanity continue unabated.

The buck stops with Obama, and only he is in a position to evaluate the situation and to understand the real need for a consensus in order to accomplish positive goals. Personally, I see no positive accomplishments coming during the next two years, quite the contrary. Obama, because of who he is, and because of his life experiences, will compromise his best instincts, and submit to his critics in order to create a consensus. There will be no progress, only continuing reactionary regress. I fear that Obama will be remembered by history as the first black president, and as the most ineffectual president in history. A well meaning impotent, who amounted to nothing and who accomplished next to nothing, except to serve the interests of tyrants and warmongers.

Report this
JohnMcD's avatar

By JohnMcD, November 9, 2010 at 12:31 pm Link to this comment

I’m trying real hard to not spiral in to defeat.  At
the very least, we’ve got Rand Paul as a Republican
Senator calling for military cuts.  We’ll also see
shortly whether or not Ron Paul is able to run the
monetary committee he should be in line for.

Yea, otherwise though, there ain’t a lot of reason to
expect any sort of big changes.  I mean, the House was
already writing Republican-friendly legislation…

Report this
G.Anderson's avatar

By G.Anderson, November 9, 2010 at 12:22 pm Link to this comment

That’s good to know, and my suggestion to Washington is to keep on laughing, and laugh all the louder, knowing that you got away with larceny….

Laugh in the halls of congress, and in the senate, and down on K street, and at the White House…

Laugh, Laugh, Laugh, Laugh until your sides split, and until tears run down your eyes…

We won’t be laughing along with you…instead we’ll be sharpening our pitchforks…

America is watching, and we no longer buy your two party divide and conqueor scheme…

and remember this, he who laughs last, laughs best…

Report this

By gerard, November 9, 2010 at 12:21 pm Link to this comment

Preaching the inevitable does not help bring about change.  But it don’t cost nothing, so what the hell?

Report this
johnnyfarout's avatar

By johnnyfarout, November 9, 2010 at 11:13 am Link to this comment

What’s this!? Republicans with a tea bag on their lapels will not end the American Empire!? There will be business as usual!? Whew! Thought for a minute there I was going to have to stop being curmudgeonly. So, I can rest easy, and be assured that all the joys and bells and whistles are still corrupting and fabulous, and can spin all the heads of the gosh gollies from the hinterland. Michelle Bachmann and Rand Paul in the same hot tub, … boy that vision gets my cuckolds ahacklin’! Partéé baybee.

Report this
rico, suave's avatar

By rico, suave, November 9, 2010 at 10:07 am Link to this comment

Yup. That about sums it up. The new gang hasn’t even been sworn in yet and I’m already pissed off. Not because of anything specific, but just on prinicple.

I know deep down in my gut that those spineless prettyboys and -girls won’t do squat except repeat ad nauseam, “You don’t understand. It’s not that simple…”

Report this

By SemiFrost, November 9, 2010 at 8:06 am Link to this comment

Piece is extremely concise; not an excess word, reference or quote.  And exactly correct.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.