|
|
May 25, 2013
|
|
War Is Too Tragic for Weak Balance of PowersPosted on Feb 26, 2012
By Dina Rasor, Truthout This piece originally appeared at Truthout. [In early February] I wrote a column on how President Obama, as with some presidents in the past, fired military generals who tried to end run his civilian authority in Iraq and Afghanistan. That is just one of the areas where our Constitution chose to spread around the responsibility for waging war to two branches of government and to keep the war-making decisions in the hands of government civilians. As much as I am glad that some of our former presidents fought to keep the generals from pushing them into war decisions through intemperate leaks of misinformation to the media, I can also see presidents and the executive branch have been leaching away the power to declare war from the Congress. The last time the Congress used their full constitutional power to declare war was World War II. After that, war or “armed conflict” got messier and more complicated, and the Congress allowed presidents to take more of their power away in Korea and Vietnam instead of finding ways to adapt to the new world and still keep their very exclusive power to declare war. Some of these presidents have purposely misled Congress before and after the Congress, disturbed by the overreach of presidents in the Vietnam “conflict,” passed the War Powers Act in 1973 overriding President Nixon’s veto. This law was an attempt by Congress to insert some control of when we go to war, but also continued to grant the president part of their power to say when we go to war. The Congressional Research Service recently issued a report on the issues of the War Powers Act and they describe the power of the act as it was intended when it was passed:
Note the last two paragraphs above where “every President has taken the position that it is an unconstitutional infringement by the Congress on the President’s authority as Commander in Chief” and “The courts have not directly addressed this question.” Between decades of legal murkiness and the increasingly complex and fast-moving conflicts around the world, the power for Congress to declare war is nothing like our founders envisioned when they fashioned the Constitution in past times of slow-moving communications and large wars between nations. The legal mess is a huge impediment to putting the powers back into balance, but I would like to illustrate just how damaging it can be to this country not to have the Congress insert their constitutional powers. Many people know that Daniel Ellsberg was responsible, in the late 1960s, for leaking a highly classified history of the emergence of the Vietnam War, known as the Pentagon Papers, that showed the lies and misleading facts used by past presidents to justify the war. He almost went to jail for life to expose these deceits to the American public. But what many don’t know is that he was involved in the same deceptions at the very beginning of the Vietnam War while working at the Pentagon.
1
2
3
NEXT PAGE >>>
Previous item: The Arrival of the Warrior Corporation Next item: Obama’s Tenuous Lead New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By agelbert, February 28, 2012 at 2:57 pm Link to this comment
I’m in total agreement with gerard, Maxshields, Jay and EmileZ.
As to whether Daniel was gamed by and for the CIA or not, it’s entirely possible but the main issue, as raised by others here is the morally bankrupt mindset of humans in general and our policy makers in particular.
It all boils down to the fact that humans require X to thrive (see Maslow’s hierarchy) but, give a group of humans a slight advantage in the privileges they enjoy and they turn into monsters willing to justify the exploitation of their fellow humans with any contrived excuse, doctrine, religion or some other ‘erudite’ exercise in bullshit. Humans are quick to forget the humanity of other humans; thereby losing their own humanity.
Sure, hormones and biochemistry play a role in this pecking order insanity and constant jockying for position and privilege but it’s long past the time that we stopped behaving like bacteria eating up all the agar in the petri dish. We have reached the edge and we must overcome our refusal to make egalitarianism, with the consequent elimination of war, the law of the earth or perish.
In short, sustainable living is not optional; it is imperative and anything else is insanely suicidal.
Report thisBy gerard, February 27, 2012 at 7:42 pm Link to this comment
Max Shields: I rail against U.S. policy and behavior because as a citizen I have a birthright obligation to try to bring about change for the better here. However, I do not think the U.S. is uniquely an “unmitigated warring nation.” It seems to be that the idea of nation-states has resulted in an unknown number of self-isolating societies who feel driven toward the use of force and violence (against other nations or their own citizens) in order to maintain their addiction to a psycho-political drug called “ruling power”.
Report thisGetting rid of the “nation-state” idea might help, but then another addiction might occur unless we were smart enough to prevent it: The idea of “world dominance” as in nonsense like “the American Century” (world domination) or “the Autonomous Civilized Gloobal State” or “the Consolidated Union of Wealthy Free Enterprizers” or “the Federation of Free Trade Nations, or ultimately, perhaps, the “Galactic Commu-Social Political Cooperative” and so on and on to other violent absurdities.
In my dreams I see other possibilities, but something very vital has got to change first that will liberate us all from selfishness and fear.
By MaxShields, February 27, 2012 at 5:36 pm Link to this comment
gerard while lack of spirituality may be one way of stating it I agree with your general assertion. We have to recognize that this has become an unmitigated warring nation. It is trigger ready and will go to war at a moments notice with no real provocation/threat.
A Congress that would vote almost unanimously to support the wars against humanity that Israel has waged against the Palestinians, is not a check on a President. I see no resolution which can fetter this nation’s proclivity to wage endless war. It is at the core of that issue, the causes, and the exceptionalism that puts it above morality that must be our greatest pursuit. No, the founders did not expect this, but this is what we’ve become. And until that changes we will continue until there is simply no energy left in the coffers and total collapse is upon us.
Report thisBy Jay Lindberg, February 27, 2012 at 3:32 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Our species has at least one fatal flaw.
We have an appreciation for killing because the victim
forfeits their possessions and an adversion to peace
because pillaging is about power.
I sincerely believe that this is the foundation for
Report thiswar.
By EmileZ, February 26, 2012 at 4:24 pm Link to this comment
@ Carl
I wish there were more Daniel Ellsbergs trying to “penetrate” the anti-war left.
Bring on the Daniel Ellsbergs.
Report thisBy Carl, February 26, 2012 at 3:01 pm Link to this comment
From the G2mil.com blog:
Retired USAF Col. Fletcher Prouty revealed that the “Pentagon Papers” were a planned CIA leak to shift blame for the failed war in Vietnam from the CIA to the Pentagon. The documents were real, but only certain documents were released. Prouty wrote the other reason for this “leak” was to upset the Nixon administration, which it was trying to destabilize in hopes of ousting Nixon. That President was upset that the CIA refused to provide him with requested documents concerning the Bay of Pigs and the JFK assassination. Nixon also angered the “Power Elite” by withdrawing American troops from their profitable business venture in Vietnam and improving relations with Red China.
Nixon was ousted with the help of covert CIA agent Bob Woodward, working undercover as a reporter at the CIA co-founded “Washington Post”. Gerald Ford became President, who just happened to be a member of the discredited Warren Commission that engineered the cover-up of the JFK assassination!
I’m not sure if the leaker of the “Pentagon Papers”, career CIA agent Daniel Ellsberg, knew he was being used, but he was never prosecuted and allowed to retire and collect his CIA pension. Before becoming a leaker, Ellsberg spent a few years in Vietnam working directly under the senior CIA spook there, Edward Lansdale, pictured in my Nov. 23 blog at the scene of the 1963 JFK coup in Dallas. Bradley Manning is a young, lowly soldier who will spend years in prison, yet Ellsberg was a senior official who knew the consequences of releasing thousands of pages of classified information. Yet he was never prosecuted AND allowed to retire and collect a government pension! No one on the American “left” questions this obvious red flag, and they celebrate Ellsberg as a hero. Ellsberg may be a great guy, but
I wouldn’t be surprised if he reports to the CIA in Langley regarding his insider contacts with today’s anti-war movements.
Can you think of a better cover for a CIA agent to penetrate the anti-war left? Is this former career CIA agent that clever?
Report thisBy gerard, February 26, 2012 at 1:08 pm Link to this comment
I’ll stick my neck out here and risk being taunted as “a religious nut” etc., but a great deal of evidence indicates that the only way out of the cycle of war after war is to recognize the spiritual sickness that it manifests and to treat the economic causes and the psychological symptoms at the same time. Nothing short of an about-face on our faith in violence will do. And nothing better than the U.S. legislatively taking the first step (instigated by both enlightened politicians and by public insistence) will start a worldwide avalnnche of peace-making choices. The more “progressive” and “enlightened” nations are responsible to invent and support the specifics of such a change.
Report thisNothing is clearer today than the worldwide evidences both of spiritual bankruptcy, and yet at the same time, of mental and technological abilities and desires to move forward toward a more humane future. The call is crystal clear, and though much effort is made to prevent hearing it, billions of the world’s people are far from deaf.