LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
May 27, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     robert scheer     barack obama     gay marriage     chris hedges     ndaa
Most Read

Say 'Hi-Ho!' as They Strip-Search You

TED: 'A Money-Soaked Orgy of Self-Congratulatory Futurism'

I Can't Hear Myself Think

A Rare Admission That Money Trumps Everything Else

Massive Wildfire Rages in New Mexico

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Why Bain Questions Matter
OSHA Struggles When Tower Climbers Die

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Better Than We Found It
The Good-Natured Dictator

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar
Fidel Castro Reader

Fidel Castro Reader

by Fidel Castro (Author), David Deutschmann (Editor)
$13.57

more items

 
Reports

Turning the Camera on the Police

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on May 19, 2011
Stewart Butterfield (CC-BY)

By David Sirota

What’s good for the police apparently isn’t good for the people—or so the law enforcement community would have us believe when it comes to surveillance.

That’s a concise summary of a new trend reported by National Public Radio last week—a trend whereby law enforcement officials have been trying to prevent civilians from using cellphone cameras in public places as a means of deterring police brutality.

Oddly, the effort—which employs both forcible arrests of videographers and legal proceedings against them—comes at a time when the American Civil Liberties Union reports that “an increasing number of American cities and towns are investing millions of taxpayer dollars in surveillance camera systems.”

Then again, maybe it’s not odd that the two trends are happening simultaneously. Maybe they go hand in hand. Perhaps as more police officers use cameras to monitor every move we make, they are discovering the true power of video to independently document events. And as they see that power, they don’t want it turned against them.

But wait—why not?

Advertisement

Though you’d expect that uncomfortable question to evoke dissembling, Fraternal Order of Police spokesman Jim Pasco was quite straightforward about it.

Police officers, he told NPR, “need to move quickly, in split seconds, without giving a lot of thought to what the adverse consequences for them might be.” He added that law enforcement authorities believe that “anything that’s going to have a chilling effect on an officer moving—an apprehension that he’s being videotaped and may be made to look bad—could cost him or some citizen their life.”

Obviously, nobody wants to stop officers from doing their much-needed job (well, nobody other than budget-cutting politicians who are slashing police forces). In fact, organizations such as the NAACP have urged citizens to videotape police precisely to make sure police are doing ALL of their job—including protecting individuals’ civil liberties.

This is not some academic or theoretical concern, and video recording is not a needless exercise in Bill of Rights zealotry. The assault on civil liberties in America is a very real problem and monitoring police is absolutely required in light of recent data.

As USA Today reported under the headline “Police brutality cases on rise since 9/11,” situations “in which police, prison guards and other law enforcement authorities have used excessive force or other tactics to violate victims’ civil rights increased 25 percent” between 2001 and 2007. Last year alone, more than 1,500 officers were involved in excessive-force complaints, according to the National Police Misconduct Statistics and Reporting Project.

Considering this, Pasco has it exactly wrong. We should want more officers feeling “apprehension” about breaking civil liberties laws, we should hope more of them “give a lot of thought to what the adverse consequences” will be if they trample someone’s rights and we should crave an immediate “chilling effect” on such violations.

That’s what the practice of cellphone recording is supposed to do—not mimic the national security state’s Big Brother culture, but prevent that security state from trampling our freedoms.

Law enforcement officials, of course, don’t like the cellphone cameras because they don’t want any check on police power. So they’ve resorted to fearmongering allegations about lost lives. But the only police officers who are threatened by cellphone cameras are those who want to break civil liberties laws with impunity. The rest have nothing to worry about and everything to gain from a practice that simply asks them to remember the all-too-forgotten part of their “protect and serve” motto—the part about protecting the public’s civil rights.

David Sirota is a best-selling author of the new book “Back to Our Future: How the 1980s Explain the World We Live In Now.” He hosts the morning show on AM760 in Colorado. E-mail him at ds@davidsirota.com, follow him on Twitter @davidsirota or visit his website at www.davidsirota.com.

© 2011 Creators.com


New and Improved Comments

We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.

In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.

Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.

Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.

Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.

By gerard, May 22, 2011 at 1:33 pm Link to this comment

blogdog:  “Imagination’s what’s lacking.”  I couldn’t agree with you more on that statement. And you know what?  Psychologists are now noticing the
widespread lack of “empathy” in modern societies, plus the apparently sudden rise in “autism” which manifests itself in several ways, one of which is—guess what—“lack of empathy” or “inability to recognize how others feel.”
  And after that, make a leap to the rapid increase in the “modern” world of cruelties beyond belief—incessant wars, ever-more destructive killing machines, the increase in PTSD as a result of “too much cruelty”.  Add to that the willing tolerance of massive starvation, abuses of all kinds, and rampant diseases, plus environmental breakdown.  Wow!  Who’s autistic now?  The occasional kid born with a deviation from “the norm”—or the norm itself?
That is, you and me and Tom, Dick and Harry who don’t have enough imagination to try to discover ways of changing for the better—and that, non-violently.

Report this

By Adamah, May 22, 2011 at 11:20 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Honest people doing honest actions do not mind being photographed. It is best to immediately forward your videos to a site, so that the video is not lost or destroyed. Only criminals do not want to be photographed or videotaped. Cops protect the judges and prosecutors and they protect the cops. They pass laws now that forbid you video taping of photographing their actions, which violates the constitutional protections. And hypocritically, they want to photograph you and film you too, but make it a crime to do the same to you, violative of the constitution. Those of you talking about Libertarians do not know what you are talking about and have not researched it. The basic philosophy is less govt. is better govt. Our govt. it too top heavy and is bringing this country down. Also, our tax monies is going to other countries instead of helping our own country. Crime would go down if people were employed and had opportunities to build their dreams. As to cops being photographed, it needs to be done, to keep them honest. We need citizen oversight. And people need to learn from Fully Informed Jury Association. And Circumstantial Evidence needs to be outlawed, as it is only sophistry to confuse people to get false convictions. I suggest also going to the site, The Innocence Project, to see all the atrocities that occur in this country. They have documented many abuses of the system. This will open your eyes to the truth. Go to the original one at the Yeshiva University and go through their links. Remember, evil does not want their wrongs exposed to the light of day. Rodney King is only one example. See many more at the Innocents Project.  And yes, I am a Libertarian. Check into Backwoods Home Magazine and read their political views as they explain it in plain English. I challenge you to make this country what it once was, Land of the Free, Of the People by the People, For the People. Not of the govt. for the govt, with us as their puppets and slaves. Remember, taxation is the perfect form of slavery.

Report this
blogdog's avatar

By blogdog, May 21, 2011 at 11:28 pm Link to this comment

stealth cameras in every public place archiving wireless offsite - archives free and open
for one and all to use as they will- citizen protection initiative - catch every thug in
action - anytime, anywhere - civil rights attorneys standing by - if Bill Gates wants to do
something for humanity, this is it

what’s that you say, worried about all those drug deals being filmed? - baloney: legalize,
tax, fund rehab clinics - simple solution for a dumb society that couldn’t do it in 100
years

what’s that you say, worried about all the philanderers’ lives in ruin? - likely they’re
already that, but what they hey? - enough reality tv footage to last a lifetime - this
system pays its own way

imagination is what’s lacking

Report this
Virginia777's avatar

By Virginia777, May 21, 2011 at 10:31 pm Link to this comment

why look here, its Mr. Obama-bot himself, David Sirota.

Why he has been watching NPR and has recycled one of their pieces into his.

LAME.

Report this

By Textynn, May 21, 2011 at 10:23 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The argument that police will be hindered from doing their job is a bad one and operates in a false paradigm.  People know that police are going to make bad decisions from time to time. They are humans. But just how bad is the decision ...that is fair game. 

People have the right to capture any behavior they deem as destructive and dangerous just as they have the right to call authorities on neighbors or even loved ones. I can understand it to a degree but it’s just not realistic.  If people see anyone being abused, it is their duty as a citizen to let others know. Video taping is the height of fairness. It is objective and it is not colored by weakness of mind or experience. It just is. 

The police demand that the truth is sacred when they put people in jail and punish them, even execute them.  They, like all of us, have to stand by our behavior for better or worse.

Report this
BR549's avatar

By BR549, May 21, 2011 at 10:19 pm Link to this comment

Martha,
Indeed, it takes a special form of sociopath to be a politician, one who knowingly puts himself out as being better able than anyone else to represent the people’s interests through the “public trust”, and then systematically uses that position of power to then squash any ability the people may discover to wrest those parasitic bastards from their lofty perches.

These sociopaths are virtually incapable of doing anything productive in society except convincing others that actually DO work for a living how much everyone needs them in order for life to continue on this planet. They laterally parasitize the people around them because, when all is said and done, these people have such a poor relationship with any sense of the divine that they feel they have to steal energy from everyone around them in order to survive.

But they don’t see that. They are so consumed with their own pathetic survival that they would steal life jackets from children in order to save themselves on a sinking ship. And lastly, the reason why everything in Washington seems to always get worse than when these parasites started working on things is because they have no sense of optimism or faith that mankind is capable of doing anything constructive with a spiritual focus; things like planetary stewardship and what 2000 presidential candidate John Hagelun had proposed for our school systems ...... yoga and meditation. What a concept!

We’ve had a number of promising political candidates, who have had dreams of making society a better place, but their efforts have been systematically thwarted by people in power, like Rockefeller, the Rothschilds, Kissinger, and all those politicians who can’t seem to muster up any of the moral discipline they sold themselves to us as having. They hide in the shadows like snakes under a rock, because life to them is, well, all about them and has nothing to do with anything related to developing a symbiotic relationship with their environment or members of their own species; rather pathetic when you think about it.

If any one group brings the human species to the point of extinction, it will be this pathetic bunch.

Report this
MarthaA's avatar

By MarthaA, May 21, 2011 at 8:32 pm Link to this comment

It is true, BR549, the majority population has had a great con job
pulled on them and now the majority population are going to have
to stop looking to DC as the folks up there don’t give a shi_, at
least that would be good for fertilizer, which would be too much
benefit for the majority population, who will soon not be allowed
anything, if Conservatives and Republicans get their way. 

After all war against other countries that did not attack the USA is
the conservative priority, because other countries need
democracy, especially if they have oil as a resource, so democracy
in the USA is put in the toilet—wonderful conservative plan, NOT.

http://www.independent.com/news/2011/apr/29/big-con-job/?print

Report this
BR549's avatar

By BR549, May 21, 2011 at 6:01 pm Link to this comment

I should have said ....
“..... has failed the people by NOT insuring that they (our students) understand why we have the Constitution, before turning the graduates loose on society.”

Report this
BR549's avatar

By BR549, May 21, 2011 at 3:05 pm Link to this comment

Re: MarthaA, May 21 at 2:42 pm

Martha,
Probably the most insidious aspect of this whole social takeover has been the intentional defiling of our educational system by the legislature. They run through all the motions of being “for the people”, but both parties, probably the Democrat party most of all, has failed the people in allowing them to understand why we have the Constitution, before turning the graduates loose on society. 100 years ago, sixth graders knew more about history and civics than our high school graduates do today.

But while all this was going on; caving in to the banking interests through the Federal Reserve, and selling out the citizenry through Trojan Horses such as Social Security, we still have all the politicians who continue to pontificate through no shortage of hot air, while they look to the heavens for guidance and sport a fresh new American flag lapel pin. (Excuse me while I vomit.)

Report this
MarthaA's avatar

By MarthaA, May 21, 2011 at 1:42 pm Link to this comment

SoTexGuy, May 21 at 2:18 pm,

Because the Common Population in the United States is NOT
represented in either the making or the enforcing of legislated law
and order, even though they are the majority population, it
doesn’t matter, all that matters is that the people of the majority
population do not understand that they are not represented, 
need to be represented, and make a choice to be represented in
the making and enforcing of legislated law and order in the
Congresses of the United States, because they could be—the
Common Population are represented in the making and enforcing
of legislated law and order in England and other civilized countries
and the majority common population should be represented in the
making and enforcing of legislated law and order in the United
States, but they are not.

Report this

By SoTexGuy, May 21, 2011 at 1:18 pm Link to this comment

One small Border community here has just endured the spectacle of their Police Chief committing suicide (official story, not currently contested).. on the heels of that the department put out new rules restricting who could be filmed or photographed in official capacity and who could do the filming..

Scuttlebutt is that the department is involved with the violent Mexico cartels smuggling people and other contraband into the country.. and the chief was caught up in aiding or abetting that association. Who knows? For the sake of his family and friends I prefer to think he was an honest man with personal problems.

Recently, I was detained by the roadside in south Texas for some time by ICE officials.. one of the first demands made of me was that my digital camera (I’m a wildlife photographer) be turned off and put away.

What is the difference exactly between the armed thugs of the criminal cartels and our law enforcement people on the ground here? One has a public charter to operate? In Mexico and in spillover here the cartel enforcers seek out a specific level of publicity to inform the public of their intentions and capabilities.. but shun close scrutiny of who is involved and what exactly is
going on. They punish transgressions.

I’m a law abiding man and I support law enforcement and lawful society .. increasingly I see the lines between organized crime and the law enforcement industry being blurred.

Adios!

savagery..  Criminal gangs keep

Report this
BR549's avatar

By BR549, May 21, 2011 at 10:21 am Link to this comment

tedmurphy41, May 21 at 2:02 am
........ the police services are interpreting this surveillance as an intrusion on their right to carry out their duties unimpeded by “hostile” influences. ......... and yet there are people prepared to take on and highlight this rotton core, even though their lives are at risk.

The outcome of this “rotten core” you speak of, which I assume are the once proud public safety officers now turned dysfunctional law enforcement officers, can best be seen when cells in the human body start attacking the very cells they were entrusted to protect; it’s called an auto-immune disease and it will eventually kill the very system that brought it into being. THAT is the future for these meat-headed adrenaline junkies and eventually, although we can’t expect IQ levels that low to comprehend concepts that large, they will hasten the demise of their own families and their own bloodlines. They never were being paid to actually ‘think’.

It employs, unfortunately on a far grander scale, the rules of Darwin, because unless they and the returning throng of foreskin headed jar-heads that still operate under the illusion that they were headed to the middle east to preserve freedom and democracy, a lot of people are going to have to suffer at their hands. Hopefully, we have a much higher percentage of Pat Tillmans in the service that know what the truth is and are just laying low.

I have speculated for a long time that, while the various legislatures and puppets in the White House have for decades been conditioning the US public to believe that WE have some God-given RIGHT to send troops anywhere we want, at any time, on some flimsy “preemptive” basis, that they have created a situation where too many of our fighting level citizens have signed up to protect us from men in caves and hoodwinked into thinking that the battle is overseas. The battle was never about men in caves; it was about men in $3,000 suits too willing to sacrifice our disillusioned youth to feed this auto-immune disease. Like a Trojan Horse, these traitorous members of the legislature have positioned those members of our families who could best defend them, somewhere other than on the home front; the same homefront that is being attacked from within. They also continue to allow for tens of thousands of foreign troops to be stationed in the US under the guise of “training”, for that one day when all hell breaks and they can then “justify” calling on the UN to please help with the conflict they had knowingly created; all a part of Brzezinski’s Grand Chessboard.

Assuming that some of them might be a little “slow” but still well-meaning, how many of these congressmen and senators are now realizing the wisdom within the Constitution and striving to bring our government back into compliance? ...... Silence ...... That’s what I mean. Where then does the average citizen begin to tackle the problem since those we had entrusted and are still being paid to preserve the Constitution are busy themselves getting ready to desert a sinking ship? Instead, that TV tube, no matter what manner of jibberish is pumped through it, becomes something a little easier to deal with ..... that and a six pack.

Report this

By gerard, May 21, 2011 at 9:34 am Link to this comment

Rodney, 20;9:21 bears repeating, especially since it comes from real life experience: 
  “We live in a society where average citizens in many states are allowed to carry weapons. Criminals can get guns as easily as purchasing a soda. High unemployment,gangs, militias and the use of high capacity weapons have made this society the most dangerous it has ever been. Yet half a million law enforcement officer leave their homes and families everyday not knowing whether or not they will return. Videotape in the long run protects all
of us. No matter how good it does or doesn’t look.”

  PTSD is also an important factor to consider, and do something about—to the extend that repair is possible. 
  In the long run, giving up violence as the answer to social and political problems is the only viable answer, but it requires a huge shift in belief systems.

Report this
Fat Freddy's avatar

By Fat Freddy, May 21, 2011 at 8:58 am Link to this comment

Some friends of mine from the NJ Libertarian Party in Camden, NJ while protesting loitering laws: 

NJLP Loitering Protest Interupted by Police
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jw3qUj3vkho

Report this
MarthaA's avatar

By MarthaA, May 21, 2011 at 7:33 am Link to this comment

Police ONLY protect the law.  Laws have been made in the best
interest of the upper two classes and cultures, the American
Aristocracy and the American Middle Class, and are NOT made in
the best interest of the majority population, the American Common
Populace.  The laws that are made and are continually being made
are laws that the above two classes and cultures deem to be in
THEIR OWN best interest, NOT THE MAJORITY POPULATION.

The majority population ARE a class and culture,
the COMMON CLASS AND CULTURE,  but the
majority population have yet to
learn that they are a class and culture that should be involved in
the making and enforcing of THEIR OWN legislated laws in THEIR
OWN class and cultural best interest along side the other two
classes and cultures, the American Aristocracy and the American
Middle Class; therefore, laws are NOT made or being made that
represent the 70% majority population’s class and culture at all,
which is why it is a felony for the majority common population to
tape a member of the Aristocracy and Middle Class’ protectors of
THEIR laws, since it is their law, and THEIR LAWS do not include
the 70% MAJORITY COMMON POPULATION.

      It is imperative that the majority common population of the
United States realize that they are a 70% majority population
class and culture, the COMMON POPULATION CLASS & CULTURE,
the American Common Populace, and demand their rights in the
making and enforcing of legislated law and order on the behalf of
the majority common population’s class and culture, the American
Populace.  As long as the majority common population keep
clinging to thinking they are the middle class and the poor, they
will never be able to organize into a powerful class and cultural
force for their part of the making and enforcing of legislated law
and order in the United States that will represent the MAJORITY
COMMON POPULATION’S interests, and it is sad, because the
majority population is most of the country. 

It is time for the common population in the United States to
understand that they are not the middle class, the middle class
abdicated responsibility for the common population as a class and
culture and only represent their own class and culture; and as
long as the majority population think they are the middle class,
laws will be made against their best interest and they will be
unable to do anything about it, because they have not accepted
the responsibility of their own class and culture and must accept
who they are as a class and culture in order to obtain equality in
legislated law and order—70% of the population are the Common
Population, the rest are the Middle Class and the Aristocracy.  The
worst thing one can do for our country is to fool yourself into
thinking you are something you are not, which is what has
happened and has been happening in the United States to the
majority common population.

Report this

By bogi666, May 21, 2011 at 5:35 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

To recite what the standard line that the police use, “if they are not doing anything illegal, wrong the police have nothing to worry about” Unquote. The fact that the police observe the politicians corruption, abuse of powers, stealing, lying, abusing the public with arrogance and hubris, the police feel they are entitled to do the same. I mean they protect the corrupt officials so why shouldn’t they be immune from criminal, gangster conduct as well. Like the police say “if you’re not doing anything illegal or wrong what have they got to worry about citizen surveillance of police conduct/misconduct”.

Report this

By tedmurphy41, May 21, 2011 at 1:02 am Link to this comment

It’s normally called accountability.
However, the police services are interpreting this surveillance as an intrusion on their right to carry out their duties unimpeded by “hostile” influences.
Germany’s media and the general public suffered this class of harrassment prior to Hitler taking power.
Mexico is now suffering a murderous harrassment during years of official corruption with no end in sight, and yet there are people prepared to take on and highlight this rotton core, even though their lives are at risk.

Report this

By Morpheus, May 20, 2011 at 6:36 pm Link to this comment

That’s what happens when your government owns you.

“WAKE UP PEOPLE!”  -  JOIN THE REVOLUTION
Read “Common Sense 3.1” at ( http://www.revolution2.osixs.org )

We don’t have to live like this anymore.
“Spread the News”


FIGHT THE CAUSE - NOT THE SYMPTOM

Report this
MarthaA's avatar

By MarthaA, May 20, 2011 at 5:11 pm Link to this comment

heavyrunner, May 20 at 5:00 pm,

Catching a police criminal being a criminal if it’s on camera is criminal
for the common majority, because police can’t be criminals in a police
state; therefore like DA’s, police seek immunity for their criminal
activity, but oh my, there’s so many cameras.  What’s a criminal
policeman to do?  There’s cameras everywhere—shooting a running
unarmed citizen in cold blood could be clicked on camera now, so will
policemen aim for the legs, instead of to kill?  Or will citizens with
cameras be made felons for catching the criminal acts on camera by
class and cultural law that plainly does not represent the citizens of
the majority populace’s class and culture.

Report this

By heavyrunner, May 20, 2011 at 4:00 pm Link to this comment

There are so many cameras now that I think the police and other authorities must just assume they are being recorded. It would not be possible to beat everyone with a camera like they could 40 years ago. And cameras are so tiny now that it would not be possible to catch them all.

Report this
LocalHero's avatar

By LocalHero, May 20, 2011 at 2:26 pm Link to this comment

Fascists never like the light of truth shined toward them of course. And, since the majority of these thugs hired are knuckle-dragging, steroid-pumped jarheads returning home fresh from their war crimes in Iraq & Afghanistan, it’s only going to get worse.

Report this
Fat Freddy's avatar

By Fat Freddy, May 20, 2011 at 2:20 pm Link to this comment

JDmysticDJ

Unfettered? What is this “unfettered” I keep hearing about? The best definition I could come up with is “not restricted”. That is not true of libertarians. We are restrained. Even more-so than liberal progressives.  You see, we adhere to something called the Non-Aggression Principle. In summary:

is an ethical stance which asserts that “aggression” is inherently illegitimate. “Aggression” is defined as the “initiation” of physical force against persons or property, the threat of such, or fraud upon persons or their property. In contrast to pacifism, the non-aggression principle does not preclude violent self-defense. The principle is a deontological (or rule-based) ethical stance.

Your characterization of libertarians supporting anything “unfettered” is blatantly and flagrantly false.

FAIL

Report this

By heavyrunner, May 20, 2011 at 11:34 am Link to this comment

I just read your piece posted at TruthDig entitled “Turning the Camera on the Police.” Cops smashing cameras is nothing new. As a 17 year old boy in the summer of 1968 I was living along Lake Michigan in a little resort village named Frankfort. A friend and I hitch-hiked down to Chicago, some 350 miles, to check out the “action” at the demonstrations against the Viet Nam war during the same week as the Democratic Convention that summer. Yes, those demonstrations. We were there when Abby Hoffman climbed up on the statue in Grant Park and that famous photo was taken.

The next afternoon, Wednesday, I think, we were in the crowd of demonstrators on Congress Avenue, just off Michigan. The three networks had cameras set up on a platform at the corner of Michigan and Congress. There were 12,000 police and a like number of National Guard troops massed in all the streets to the west of Michigan Avenue. There was a total of about 3,000 demonstrators. A signal was given and the mob of “pigs” rushed the crowd. But they didn’t wade into the crowd beating everyone to a pulp right away. A few hundred cops came first and beat up all the cameramen at the Volkswagen sized cameras of the networks and elbowed their way through the crowd to anyone with a camera and smashed their cameras and beat anyone who had a notebook. After that was completed, which was a terrifying sight, because it was obvious what they were up to, another signal was given, and then the thousands of cops came en masse and beat the hell out of anyone they could get their hands on. I have always believed that my friend and I got away because we were just a little younger than everyone else and the pigs were afraid to beat us. It seemed like they were killing people all around us. The tear gas was thick and it was hard to see or breathe.

I am very discouraged when I think about the fact that Barack Obama recently appointed the son of the man in charge of that police riot Chief of Staff at the White House.

Report this
Samson's avatar

By Samson, May 20, 2011 at 11:11 am Link to this comment

BTW, speaking of being on this for awhile, us left-wing
anarchists have been their for awhile.

The whole concept of Indymedia around and after the
Seattle protests was to get video cameras out in the
street filming the police.  And hoping that this might
protect some from police abuse ... although, instead of
causing restraint it usually just causes the cops to
attack the cameras.

Report this
Samson's avatar

By Samson, May 20, 2011 at 11:09 am Link to this comment

Interesting that he doesn’t mention Denver, his home
town.  Denver’s had a bad run of cop after cop getting
his picture taken as they beat people up.  I tried
doing a bit of a compilation a while back ...  This is
of course examples of why the police don’t want their
picture taken.
http://commondebate.blogspot.com/2011/01/sometimes-
you-see-yourself.html

Report this

By Lisa Simeone, May 20, 2011 at 10:51 am Link to this comment

Trend?  Trend?  Impossible!  Why, that’s the hysteria of a conspiracy
theorist!  There can be no such “trend” in the USA!  This is Amerika! 
Land of the Free and Home of the Brave!  We have nothing
resembling a police state here!

Report this

By BR549, May 20, 2011 at 10:41 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

There was a time when, if a policeman needed the assistance from the citizenry, the public would have understood that part of their civil obligation and chipped in. Now, there is a large fraction of LEOs that are just flat out socially dysfunctional paranoid misfits, thinking that the citizens and criminals are BOTH out to get them. Perhaps it is true to some degree. With the way the LEOs have been abusing their authority and totally sidestepping our (and ultimately THEIR own family’s) civil rights, I think many people would just walk the other way if they saw an officer getting his due, and who would blame them?

It’s sad, really, and so unnecessary, but that’s what happens when the media refuses to portray to the American public what is really happening in this country and who is responsible. The issue is around integrity and adherence to the oaths they swore to when they agreed to perform their function in accordance with our Constitution’s guidelines. By that, I refer to all three branches of government, plus the military, and our tarnished constabulary, but if I had to pint one single finger, I would save that one for the politicians who have for so long intentionally held back on the truth.

We are a nation of lies and secrets; the bastard child of a smoldering British Empire that refused to give up its hegemonic clutches which systematically sought to tear down any form of sovereign citizenship anywhere around the globe if it didn’t fall into step with the politically passive-aggressive festering boil sociopathy of the British Crown.

Try bringing these issues up to the average LEO with an IQ of a spongy cantaloupe and it’s easy to see why all they can do is focus on what they were told to do. They are then paired against the American Idol addicts with a similar IQ, neither group having a clue that they are being used as mindless pawns in a grand chess game for control of the planet. They just can’t go there.

Imagine for a moment if a LEO turned to someone who was taking his picture, and instead smiled and said, “Just be sure to get my good side.” The very people we are hiring to professionally diffuse some difficult social situations are instead becoming a part of the problem, but again, they can’t see how they are being “used”.

Report this

By berniem, May 20, 2011 at 10:17 am Link to this comment

Ah, the not so subtle whine of the ever expanding police state! The tragedy of all this is that there is a significant percentage of the population that is so pitifully stupid as to believe that what is happening is for THEIR benefit! If all Americans pointed their cell phone cameras at cops everytime they did anything ever so slightly questionable it would quickly overload the system ‘cause they can’t mess with everybody. Also, something needs done now because when all of those people comeback from the shooting gallery guess what jobs they’ll fit right into? You betcha, they’ll be the icing on the security apparatus and will do whatever they’re told by the regime unless we do something now to develop legal safeguards! Hope it’s not already too late!

Report this

By Jimnp72, May 20, 2011 at 9:28 am Link to this comment

A lot of them have been raised as crass american bullies, so they enjoy pushing people around and terrorizing them.

God has it backwasrds. he should be taking all of the brutish bozos, including the evil repugs, off of the planet so the rest of us can live in peace.

Report this
JDmysticDJ's avatar

By JDmysticDJ, May 20, 2011 at 9:11 am Link to this comment

Fat Freddy

If I understand you correctly, you and your Libertarian brethren see the dangers of unfettered, unregulated police. Now, if we could just get you to see the dangers of unfettered, unregulated capitalism, an “L” would replace the “tarian” in your self identification.

Report this

By rend it, May 20, 2011 at 8:29 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I’ve long said that the geometric shape that the left/ right spectrum exists on is not a ray but
instead a circle. Whats in front of us in what the political media class calls the “middle.”
That’s where madness sits. It’s around the back of our heads where this madness is
inverted and again the left and right meet only there do you find balance and sanity of
course no one cares to see it. But we perceive it.

Report this

By Rodney, May 20, 2011 at 8:21 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Being in law enforcement for the past 30 years I have
no problem being videotaped. If you do your job in a
professional manner and in accordance to rules and
regulations no officer should have a problem being
videotaped. A lot of what police officers isn’t
pretty on videotape. Several officers attempting to
handcuff a violent felon or mentally disturbed person
never looks good on videotape. It looks even worse if
the person is small in stature. Additionally if a
police involved shooting occurs, everyone wants to
know why the officer didn’t shoot the weapon out of
the suspects hand or shoot the person in the arm or
leg to preserve the suspects chances of survival.
That is almost impossible to do during a moment with
that level of stress. We live in a society where
average citizens in many states are allowed to carry
weapons. Criminals can get guns as easily as
purchasing a soda. High unemployment,gangs, militias
and the use of high capacity weapons have made this
society the most dangerous it has ever been. Yet half
a million law enforcement officer leave their homes
and families everyday not knowing whether or not they
will return. Videotape in the long run protects all
of us. No matter how good it does or doesn’t look.

Report this
Fat Freddy's avatar

By Fat Freddy, May 20, 2011 at 4:41 am Link to this comment

Better late than never. Us evil, greedy, right-wing libertarian anarchists have been on this for quite some time now. Particularly, Reason Magazine. Glad you could join in. Here’s the latest via Mike Shanklin:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PBH67OYPCXc

Report this
Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.