LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 24, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

How to Make a Million Dollars an Hour

Three Questions Left Unanswered by Obama’s Counterterrorism Speech

Colbert Slams PBS for Appeasing Koch Brothers

Obama Heckled During Speech, Warren Lands a Book Deal, and More

A Call to Action

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * New York City’s Summers May Heat Up

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
A Call to Action
Act of Congress

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Reports

Turkey in Position to Lead Region Out of Tumultuous Century

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Jun 14, 2011

By William Pfaff

Looking backward, there is a great deal to be said for leaving well enough alone, which is more difficult than one might think. Western Europe in the 19th century is now generally looked back upon as having constituted a pinnacle of Western civilization. Certainly in literature, music and the plastic arts this was so, the last-named in the century’s final decade, when painting ceased its period as domestic decoration and exploded into a myriad of ways to perceive not only the external world but the interior universe as well.

The modern Western intelligence was invented then, and the world has since played variations on 19th century political themes: nationalism, colonialism, imperialism, populism, class liberation, revolution, anarchism, class and racial warfare. The Napoleonic wars began the century and transformed its political institutions. The Franco-Prussian War ended the century, setting the scene for the hyper-destructive 20th century.

Better to have stayed in the peaceful years of before.

The Ottoman Empire finished the century in decline, its political implosion impending, certainly with the West Europeans observing or actively promoting the Balkan and Crimean wars, trying to take the Hapsburg and Ottoman Empires apart (the “Eastern Question,” to Western statesmen of the period), and finally succeeding in doing just that in what was appropriately named “the Great War” (it became the “First” World War only when the “Second” one arrived).

There was an article a few days ago in the International Herald Tribune by Anthony Shadid, writing in Gaziantep, Turkey—an old Hittite city, bordering Syria, strategic during the Crusader wars, center of Turkish resistance to the French occupation in 1920-21. He wrote of its people’s nostalgia for the Ottoman past when Turks and Syrians “were brothers.”

Advertisement

“What really divides us?” asks one of the people Shadid spoke with in Gaziantep, having been born across the border in present-day Syria, once an ancient Ottoman province and before that a center of the Arab Empire.

Shadid writes of the possibility of new (or resurrected) identities being established these days in what once was a single realm (the Turkish state replaced what had been the Ottoman polity in only 1923). Today Syrians crowd the Turkish borders in flight from their own president, Bashar al-Assad, and his family-controlled security forces and army. Prosperous modern Turkey’s Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and the United Nations Commissioner for Human Rights publicly decry this ruthless suppression of Syrian protest.

The Ottoman and Hapsburg empires were medieval in origin, the Ottoman being the eventual version assumed, under the invading rule of Central Asian Turks, of the Muslim Caliphates created when the desert Arabs explosively emerged from Arabia under the inspiration of Muhammad’s teachings, and rapidly conquered the eastern and southern Mediterranean peoples, invaded Spain, and were stopped only by Charles Martel and a French force in the Pyrenees. These “Moors,” as they were called, ruled Spain for seven centuries.

The Turks’ expansion into Balkan and Central Europe was stopped only at Vienna. The recent war of Yugoslav succession, in which Serbs and Croatians tried to drive Muslim Bosnians out of the former Yugoslavia, could be considered the most recent episode in this centuries-old war.

The Hapsburg Empire was more conventional in origin, a product of feudalism and dynastic wars, broken up, like the Ottoman empire, by 19th century nationalism, commonly thought a result of the French Revolution but probably more precisely described as a product of education. Back then, the peasants and townsmen of Europe knew who they were, as did the aristocrats. As literacy and education spread after the Reformation, a class of teachers and aspirant intellectuals came into being who were not content to be the passive subjects of undeserving monarchs and aristocrats, but who wanted to learn and embellish the origins and history of their native lands, to celebrate its ancient identity and alleged virtues, and eventually—why not?—to rule it themselves.

Their emigrant American relatives eventually agreed, and, by the early 20th century, American presidential candidates were promising to liberate oppressed lands in the “Old Country.” Woodrow Wilson and all of them. By mid-century, a Second World War objective of the Roosevelt administration was to put an end to French and British imperialism.

And so the European empires came to an end. Have their former subjects benefited? If you consider the Yugoslav War, the chaos produced by Israel’s Mideast presence, and America’s wars and other military interventions in the former Ottoman region, you can scarcely say yes. What formerly was the Hapsburg world is for the most part a different and peaceful place.

The Cold War kept Eastern Europe under Soviet occupation, but in the meantime the European Union was invented by West Europeans who had had enough of international and internecine war, and were convinced that above all Germany had to be fitted into a European system that could tame it. This succeeded (even if the Germans today are defying the world on monetary matters!). Twenty-seven European states, all at one or another time part of warring dynastic, nationalistic or ethnocentric imperial state systems, have now found peace.

It has been an astounding achievement that in 1945 few believed could succeed, and in 1939 none could imagine. Turkey has for years struggled without success to become a member of this European community of peace. Possibly the failure was destiny. There is a Muslim community of peace for Turkey to inspire.

Visit William Pfaff’s website for more on his latest book, “The Irony of Manifest Destiny: The Tragedy of America’s Foreign Policy” (Walker & Co., $25), at www.williampfaff.com.

© 2011 Tribune Media Services, Inc.


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By gerard, June 16, 2011 at 10:00 am Link to this comment

diman:  You certainly have a point.  I’m just trying to resurrect the country the United States once tried to be (according to the Constitution).  Also, anything to get us off the war kick.  Just an idea, a hope and a prayer.

Report this

By diman, June 16, 2011 at 8:38 am Link to this comment

By Gerard:

“But the U.S. is even more obligated to lead in this direction—and that, by peaceful means, by organizing nonviolent initiatives wherever “trouble spots” occur, moving beyond mere nationial interests to help raise up the quality of life on the entire planet, by “studying war no more.””

I don’t think, that a country where corporate and personal greed is the official way of life, where illiteracy among its citizens is rampant, where the ruling 1% owns the majority of the country’s resources, where one of the major reasons for personal bankruptcy is inability to pay medical bills and where the quality of life is measured by the quantity of consumer garbage owned, should lead this world anywhere, unless we want to follow this dying empire into its grave.

Report this

By gerard, June 15, 2011 at 12:20 pm Link to this comment

Actually, the United States, as the financially and militarily “strongest” nation today, is just as “poised” as Turkdy to lead the Middle East away from war and into mutual agreements and understandings.  Further, it has broad possible influence in Europe and parts of Asia. There is also a United Nations structural arrangement for agreement and adjudication whose influence the U.S. could vastly strengthen if it so chose.

These opportunities and openings are not just the result of World Wars I and II. Perhaps the real truth revealing itself is that super-militarism and current imperial U.S. warring has reached a point of ghastiliness where, in spite of “superior weaponry”
modern war is proving to be “unwinnable” and self-defeating. War has become too disastrous to be “practial”—for perpetrators as well as for victims.

Turkey may be currently endowed with powers that can help move the entire Middle East away from out-dated autocracies—more or less nonviolently.  But the U.S. is even more obligated to lead in this direction—and that, by peaceful means, by organizing nonviolent initiatives wherever “trouble spots” occur, moving beyond mere nationial interests to help raise up the quality of life on the entire planet, by “studying war no more.” War is wearing itself out, wheezing and gasping for air.

Report this

By diman, June 15, 2011 at 6:00 am Link to this comment

Bullshit article, given the current situation in the region. Turkey - the country that can lead the region out of tumultuous century, yeah right, after they pay back all the loans to the predatory IMF, but wait, how are they going to do this, when most of the recent graduates of the booming university industry there can’t find work after they get their diploma.

Report this

By diamond, June 14, 2011 at 9:50 pm Link to this comment

Well, who did YOU have in mind, ITW?

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, June 14, 2011 at 8:05 pm Link to this comment

Amazing that someone of Pfaff’s great knowledge and experience could start off an article with two paragraphs so badly and blatantly wrong.

I hate when political writers try to write about art. They are inevitably parochial and provincial.  Take Pfaff’s statement:
“the last-named in the century’s final decade, when painting ceased its period as domestic decoration and exploded into a myriad of ways to perceive not only the external world but the interior universe as well.”
Had he never viewed Bosch, or El Greco or Goya?  Each of them was exploring deep into the psyche and sending a message as well. 

Or his second paragraph that the Franco-Prussian War closed the 19th century.  Excuse me but THAT war ended in 1871, just as the Indian Wars were getting under way, and as the Boer Wars had yet to be fought.  The Boer Wars and the Spanish-American War closed out the 19th century. True, the Franco-Prussian war was the last between European powers, in Europe, but neither the last war between them or involving them.

Nor does this seem to have a hell of a lot to do with the thrust of the article, of the rather remarkable and chameleonlike-Erdogan stepping in as possibly the best and only “honest broker” in the Syrian civil war.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.