![]() |
|
||
|
Truthdigger of the Week: Sen. Patrick LeahyPosted on Apr 21, 2007
Truthdig tips its hat this week to Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., who proved to be one of the most forceful, and appropriately relentless, interrogators of Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales during his grilling (or perhaps broiling is a better word) by the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday. Committee Chairman Leahy left no doubt as to his own convictions as he laid out his take on the attorney general’s—and the Bush administration’s—roles in the dismissal of eight federal attorneys, accusing Gonzales and “other department officials” of covering up the truth, and, on a broader scale, “duck[ing] real accountability for years.” The senator also noted the shift in power that occurred when Democrats assumed congressional control following November’s elections, accusing his Republican colleagues of creating a “rubber-stamping Congress” while they held the reins in prior years. “The American people have a new Congress,” Leahy declared, one that “will get the truth.” The imperiled attorney general faced off with Leahy three months prior to Thursday’s hearing, when he was called to explain the Justice Department’s actions in the case of Maher Arar, a Canadian citizen who was, and apparently still is, on a terrorist watch list in the United States. Arar was detained at JFK Airport on his way home to Canada in 2002, and, instead of being turned over to his own government for investigation, he was deported to Syria. According to Leahy, Arar was then held—and tortured—for 10 months in Syria. The Canadian government has taken steps to make amends to Arar (Leahy notes that the head of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police resigned over the case), but there has been no similar gesture in the Bush administration. Watch the clip below to see the full exchange, in which Leahy rips into Gonzales as the attorney general contends he must put off the issue until a later date because he is not “at liberty” to discuss Arar in front of the committee. Clearly, being in the hot seat with Leahy staring you down is not an enviable position. Watch and listen: Advertisement Related links: Click here to see another video, posted on truthout.org, of Leahy’s statements regarding the U.S. attorney firings. Democracy Now! has a partial transcript of Leahy’s confrontation with Gonzales, as well as other links about the hearings and Arar’s case.
Previous item: Truthdigger of the Week: Sen. Patrick Leahy Next item: Truthdigger of the Week: Sen. Patrick Leahy Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By JNagarya, April 26, 2007 at 1:14 am #
#65904 by Concrete man on 4/23 at 2:39 pm
(Unregistered commenter)
But Leahy is just another establishment figure dinosaur. He OPPOSES the impeachment of Bush and Cheney. People get caught up in small little details and miss the big picture: The Democrats are part and parcel of the War and Money system which is USA all the way. Not to mention that Democrats receive even more financial support from the Zionist Lobby than do the Republicrats!
The devil is in the “small little details” you ignore—and encourage others to ignore.
Report thisBy Sylvia Barksdale Morovitz, April 25, 2007 at 10:39 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
I say Bravo for Senator Leahy! At last someone has exhibited the courage to stand up and be counted for his knowledge of the Bush criminal empire and the vital need to get them out of any part in American government. For this, he should be awarded the “gold medal” in politics. Let the neocoms and naysayers think what they will, Senator Leahy has taken the first positive step in turning our government around. This is something that should have been done when we first learned that Bush’s war on Iraq had been a set-up; a cause built on scurrilous lies and deceit of Congress and the American people. We’re now living the horrendous consequences of this action having not been taken. Bush, of course, had every member of Congress under his thumb at that time but now is a different time and we have a Congress that will fight him. My Senators and Congressman will certainly hear from me, urging them to join him. If they do not, they’ve had my last vote.
Report thisBy JNagarya, April 23, 2007 at 11:57 pm #
#65904 by Concrete man on 4/23 at 2:39 pm
(Unregistered commenter)
“But Leahy is just another establishment figure dinosaur. He OPPOSES the impeachment of Bush and Cheney. People get caught up in small little details and miss the big picture: The Democrats are part and parcel of the War and Money system which is USA all the way. Not to mention that Democrats receive even more financial support from the Zionist Lobby than do the Republicrats!”
Substantiate any of that.
Report thisBy cann4ing, April 23, 2007 at 10:22 pm #
re comment #65787 by JNagarya. Thank you for your kind words. On the subject of torture, you might want to read my 4/4/07 op ed piece, “Unmasking the real stupidity of torture” which appeared in the Ventura County Star. Go to VenturaCountyStar.com, then go to opinion, plug in my name and it will come up.
Report thisBy Concrete man, April 23, 2007 at 6:39 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
But Leahy is just another establishment figure dinosaur. He OPPOSES the impeachment of Bush and Cheney. People get caught up in small little details and miss the big picture: The Democrats are part and parcel of the War and Money system which is USA all the way. Not to mention that Democrats receive even more financial support from the Zionist Lobby than do the Republicrats!
Report thisBy David, April 23, 2007 at 4:21 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Congratulations. Now if only the senator and his other two compadres in Vermont would stand up and follow the lead of the Vermont Legislature to complete the first step in bringing impeachment proceedings to Washington for the president and vice-president.
The state senate just approved the bill. Now it’s up to the house and the federal reps to finish the job of saving this great nation from these war criminals.
Report thisBy Jack Williams, April 23, 2007 at 2:12 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
rendered the underlining meaning is torture, the only reason for sending someone to a different country.
Report thisBy M.Currey, April 23, 2007 at 12:40 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
This administration is running all parts of the government, that Gonzales cannot remember anything is just a smoke screen, if he uses the phrase I cannot recall that is lying without telling a lie any anyone with a brain can see he is stalling and hoping that because the president can recall any of the prosecutors is another smokescreen and the fact is to disrupt any corruption charges to the time when these so called elected officials leave office.
If and when the people can see the only to remove these officials is impeachment than that will go forward.
Bush is going to do nothing but continue on a war effort that can only make this country poorer in the end.
The real reason for going to war has been forgotten by most of the public, the real reason is oil.
If this country once survived without oil can it not do it again.
There is so much wind in the state of Texas that there must be a way to channel that energy. So why this need to use so much oil. The reason can be put this way, so much gas is needed to get a plane down the runway that going all the way across the country by train would use less.
Of course the powers that be think that airplanes are the only way to travel, and any senior will tell you that they would rather than take the train.
Buy Amtrack does not own all their tracks, therefore if a person wanted to go to New Orleans, La. by train and the shortest time would be by way of Chicago, it would be nice if there were not an 8 hour layover there. Even so that is not as much as a barrier as the cost of the train being about $100.00 more than the Grayhound bus system, in fact if all goes well the trip by bus is less by one day than the train. Of course some people will need to be at a certain location within hours but the plane is not fast if the weather causes delays and people have to lodge at a hotel, the cost of air travel is more costly when you factor in the unknown.
The fact is this if there were less airplanes than the public would demand that Amtrack do something to make their transportation mode more attractive. I myself consider the train attractive because you see where you are going, but people who do not have to be anywhere quickly also see things different than people with a need to get anywhere quickly.
Ms. Currey
Report thisM.Currey
By Tom Doff, April 23, 2007 at 5:35 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Senator Leahy is a real harbinger of hope. How refreshing, how exciting, to imagine that our government, once again, can become rational, working for the interests of the people it is supposed to represent.
Blogging these thoughts is pleasant.
Emailing these thoughts to Senator Leahy is important.
Our representatives get a ton of criticism when things go wrong, a grateful ‘Thank You’, when they do things right is appreciated.
Report thisBy JNagarya, April 23, 2007 at 1:46 am #
#65679 by Ernest Canning on 4/22 at 9:16 am
(52 comments total)
Even if it had been truthful, the Attorney Generals statement that we had rendered Maher Arar to Syria on that nations assurance that he would not be tortured was akin to releasing a seven-year old girl to the custody of a known child molester upon his assurance he would not rape her. . . .
The oath to support and defend the constitution and laws of these United States is one that every attorney takes. As someone who has practiced law for nearly thirty years, I cannot begin to convey the level of grief inflicted by this disgraceful moment in our nations history when our nations chief law enforcement officer, a former Texas Supreme Court Justice no less, dissembled repeatedly over the course of a seven hour hearing even while under oath.
One does not need a smoking gun. The circumstantial evidence is overwhelming. There is but one reasonable conclusion that can be drawn from it. A cabal operating within the White House and inside the Justice Department conspired to replace competent federal prosecutors with loyal ideologues for purposes of partisan advantage, including, at the least, illegal efforts to deprive citizens of their lawful right to vote under the cover of bogus voter fraud allegations, and potentially including efforts to obstruct justice by putting a cap on corruption probes.
Lest some of my fellow Truthdig readers look to this shameful episode as a basis for condemnation of all lawyers, I would point out that the senators who were grilling Mr. Gonzales are also lawyers, whose focused questioning exposed the lies.
Exaclty right, especially on the last point. The out-of-context snippet from Shakespeare that “first, we kill all the lawyers,” leaves out the context: d the speaker was a conspirator in a drive to establish dictatorship.
On one side are lawyers who took an oath to protect and uphold the Constitution and laws of the United States of America, and are focused on doing that. On the other side are criminal thugs, and their lawyers, who publicly swore the same oath (excepting such as unelected Rove and Card), and that of “protecting and defending” the Constitution and laws against “all enemies, foreign and domestic”.
But in private took a fact-free, lawless, “divine right”-based oath of loyalty to a person, as a personality cult equivalent to those around Hitler and Tojo, and Stalin and Mao. And Saddam Hussein.
I am impressed with Sen. Leahy’s perfectly articulated laying down of the legitimate ground rules and limits—directly and without equivocation to the core evil of the person most responsible for rationalizing a transparently anti-American lawlessness in defense of the most morally depraved of human behaviors: torture.
I too am profoundly a/grieved, but more than that compelled to speak out against the growing tyranny, and against any views which assert that the only effective response to tyranny is an escalation and dissemination of another tyranny under such as the NRA’s Second Amendment lie. Those who push that lie are the very people who voted for the Bush gang, and would vote for him again, in their continuing effort to establish that anti-American lie as their means to assist Bush in making his tyranny final and permanent.
Bush claims “divine right” as exemption from the rule of all law, including the Constitution itself. The NRA’s “responsible gun owner” liars also claim “divine right”. For the realities which refute both lies in actual defense of “freedom” and “liberty,” see the film “A Man for All Seasons”—
“. . . . What would you do then, the laws all being flat, when the Devil turned ‘round on you? Yes: I give the Devil the benefit of law _for my own safety’s sake_.”
Gonzales shows that lawlessness will label anyone—anyone—“Devil”.
Report thisBy JNagarya, April 22, 2007 at 11:42 pm #
#65685 by Douglas Lindsay on 4/22 at 10:03 am
(Unregistered commenter)
Thanks to Senator Leahy and any other elected leaders willing to shed light into the dark corners of this Executive Administration. Hopefully this light will result in the outrage of an apathetic populace. There is so much to be angry about. One needs only to look and to care and then to register and to vote.
The “populace” is not apathetic. Rather, there is a significant number who pays so little attention that they actually believe the “populace” is apathetic.
And, rather: ours is a _REPRESENTATIVE_ democracy: “we” jabber that the gov’t is to follow the orders of “We the people,” and they “we” bitch that they don’t follow “our” orders, in effort to “overlook” that “we” are AWOL from our responsibility to _communicate_ the orders.
Impeachment is to originate with and be urged by We the people, from the grassroots, as informed citizens, not infotaimnentbloated couch ptatoes who assert that the “populace” is apathetic. Or making excuses that they are apathetic because the gov’t isn’t obeying “our” orders.
And it is to be, and be seen as being, a clean, aboveboard, non-partisan process based upon actual hard evidence obtained by proper, aboveboard investigation. And the responsiblity of the investigators to lay out and give context to the evidence.
_Communicate_ your views to your elected representatives—they cannot respond to a message they do not receive.
Report thisBy SadButTrue, April 22, 2007 at 5:37 pm #
Reading the post, one gets the false impression that the clip comes from the testimony last Thursday relating to the Prosecutor Purge scandal. It doesn’t, and was put on YouTube on January 23.
A significant part of the clip deals with Gonzales’ assurances that more information on the Arar case would be forthcoming in a week. I know that he did not follow up on this, and Leahy was still waiting for the promised information at least into the beginning of February. So, what happened? Is Gonzo still stonewalling on the Arar case (and by extension on the issue of rendition in general)?
As has so often been the case, the pursuit of one Republican scandal gets deflected by the emergence of yet another one. As the views of previous commenters reflect, their are still a lot of people who remember what real American values of justice are. We can only hope they are not lost forever down the neocon memory hole.
Report thisBy Margaret Currey, April 22, 2007 at 5:32 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
There is a piece of information posted on the website Truthout written by a Ms Eliazbeth de la Vega about how the Dept of Justice is run under the Bush Regime and they want to push this thing called Voter Fraud by the Democrats one person was filed because there was no merit in going after some cases, but the neocons want information out there so even if nothing happens they will act like there is something to hide, the real truth is the Bush Regime has a lot to hide, this Gonzales is not the fool that the Bush Regime would want you to believe, the thing that should happen is everyone should call for an impeachment of Bush/Chaney/Rice/Rove because if they are allowed to stay what more harm could they do?
Madder than a wet hen from the state of Washington, city of Vancouver.
Report thisBy Lee, April 22, 2007 at 4:29 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Sorry can’t talk about it. No, can’t explain why. We’ll get back to you on that. Thanks so much for the forthright clarification Alberto.
Alberto Gonzales should be made head of the World Bank and Paul Wolfowitz should be made Attorney General. That’s how things are done as by the Bush administration.
Prison for them all, the only justice and the only remedy. And if Nancy Pelosi refuses to allow the word impeachment to leave her lips, she needs to be impeached also.
Report thisBy wb, April 22, 2007 at 3:06 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
This exchange with Gonzales and Leahy took place on 1/18/07 not on 4/19/07. Your description is in error; Leahy stayed on task with a description of how the U.S. attorneys were dismissed.
Nevertheless, I’ve never heard that Leahy received satisfaction on the Leahy issue in the week after 1/18/07.
Report thisBy Douglas Lindsay, April 22, 2007 at 2:03 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Thanks to Senator Leahy and any other elected leaders willing to shed light into the dark corners of this Executive Administration. Hopefully this light will result in the outrage of an apathetic populace. There is so much to be angry about. One needs only to look and to care and then to register and to vote.
Report thisBy cann4ing, April 22, 2007 at 1:16 pm #
Even if it had been truthful, the Attorney General’s statement that we had rendered Maher Arar to Syria on that nation’s “assurance” that he would not be tortured was akin to releasing a seven-year old girl to the custody of a known child molester upon his “assurance” he would not rape her. As documented by Stephen Grey in “Ghost Plane” and elsewhere, the core purpose of the extraordinary rendition program was to outsource torture.
The oath to support and defend the constitution and laws of these United States is one that every attorney takes. As someone who has practiced law for nearly thirty years, I cannot begin to convey the level of grief inflicted by this disgraceful moment in our nation’s history when our nation’s chief law enforcement officer, a former Texas Supreme Court Justice no less, dissembled repeatedly over the course of a seven hour hearing even while under oath.
One does not need a “smoking gun.” The circumstantial evidence is overwhelming. There is but one reasonable conclusion that can be drawn from it. A cabal operating within the White House and inside the Justice Department conspired to replace competent federal prosecutors with loyal ideologues for purposes of partisan advantage, including, at the least, illegal efforts to deprive citizens of their lawful right to vote under the cover of bogus “voter fraud” allegations, and potentially including efforts to obstruct justice by putting a cap on corruption probes.
Lest some of my fellow Truthdig readers look to this shameful episode as a basis for condemnation of “all” lawyers, I would point out that the senators who were grilling Mr. Gonzales are also lawyers, whose focused questioning exposed the lies.
Report thisBy Hammo, April 22, 2007 at 11:49 am #
Others in Congress should follow Leahy’s lead and act with strength and assertiveness in uncovering the corruption of the Bush-Cheney gang.
The Dems proceeded cautiously after the recent election, and that was appropriate. Now, Americans see that they can lead responsibly.
At this point, many more Americans are realizing the depth of the many kinds of corruption of the Bush-Cheney administration and their warmonger, war-profiteer, chicken hawk and neocons associates.
More on this at:
“Winds of change again blowing across America”
PopulistAmerica.com
Populist Party of America
April 20, 2007
http://www.populistamerica.com/winds_of_change_again_blowing_across_america
Report thisBy kol Klink, April 22, 2007 at 11:24 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
We are seeing a real patriot at work. Thank you Senator Leahy and your entire committee.
Report thisI believe that we are just witnessing the beginning of the fireworks. The best is yet to come.
By Sarah From Canada, April 22, 2007 at 10:16 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Breath of fresh air. Thank you Mr. Leahy!
Report thisBy rtscott, April 22, 2007 at 9:52 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
What happened to the follow-up promised by Gonzales and Senator Leahy in that case?
Report thisBy Wayne Smyer, April 22, 2007 at 9:46 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
To Sen. Leahy: How did Jack Abramoff get the attorney general from Guam fired?? Was Gonzalez involved in this conspiracy? Lwayno
Report thisBy Wayne Smyer, April 22, 2007 at 9:39 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
How many attorney generals were fired by Gonzalez for investigating REPUKES? Keywords: Jack Abramoff: Guam, AG Black
Report thisBy Victor Berry, April 22, 2007 at 9:30 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
When Gonzales said he heard complaints about the US attorneys, why didn’t someone jump on his statement to ask specifically 1) who complained? and 2) what were the complaints?
As to the 27 Nov 06 meeting to discuss the firing of the US attorneys, why didn’t someone ask Gonzales to produce the meeting minutes.
Of couse, two more “I don’t recall” responses would be redundant, but maybe an admission that “when we’re not being incompetent, we’re way too corrupt to put anything we discuss in writing.”
Report thisBy Mad As Hell, April 22, 2007 at 9:01 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
I’m just amazed he didn’t threaten to hold that lying weasel in Contempt of Congress. You KNOW Gonzo was one of those who made SURE this poor slob was “rendered” to Syria to be tortured.
Alberto Gonzalez is one of the team that believes ANYTHING is justified to maintain, solidify and increase Mad King George’s power and dictatorship. They believe we are the New Roman Empire and should conquer the world and rule it.
Why are this bunch of traitors any different than the Moslem extremists who want to conqure the world and rule it? They both believe in torture, summary executions, conformity, and religious doctrine instead of law.
The President and Vice-President need to be impeached and ousted, and the ENTIRE Executive branch purged of these corrupt politicizing fascists.
Then the Federal courts need to purged of every impeachable judge, all the way up to corrupt Mr. Spit-in-your-face himself, Justice Antonin Scalia.
Congress HAS the power to restore the USA to Constitutional law and rule. All they need is the guts and will to exercize it.
Report thisBy Outraged, April 22, 2007 at 2:41 am #
I’ll second that motion!
#65590 by QuyTran
Dear Sen. Leahy,
The whole civilized world is looking at you. We think that youre the ones and only who could clean up the U.S. image before humanity. Were all proud of you and your committee in fighting against crimes.
Report thisBy JNagarya, April 22, 2007 at 1:04 am #
Sen. Lahey’s words are the real thing, actual US values—unlike the fake “patriot” extremist chickenhawks who stole the flag, executed Saddam Hussein for having committed the war crime of torture, while at the same time committing the war crime of torture.
And in his opening statement that morning, he mentioned the torture memoes, which tie directly to Gonzales, and to Bush, and to Cheney and to Rumsfeld.
And war profiteering.
The Democrats have wasted no time getting directly to the issues. They are doing exactly as they were elected to do: restore the check of Congress against an out of control—deranged—Executive branch. Actively do oversight.
Even the appearance of wrongdoing must be avoided by the Executive, or the appearance of wrongdoing must be investigated and the evidence gathered.
One gets the facts and evidence before one has a trial, not after. The foremost reason to do that is that it is justice under democracy.
A coincidental reason is to show Bush the actual meaning and process of justice under US law, as contrasted with justice under fake Texas cowboy.
Report thisBy Roger Drowne EC, April 21, 2007 at 11:34 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Great Work Pat
Vermont brings out the best in people, Why ?
Our Hats R off 2 U
Keep It Up…
Roger Drowne EC
Report thisMoscow, Vt, Earth
By QuyTran, April 21, 2007 at 10:14 pm #
Dear Sen. Leahy,
The whole civilized world is looking at you. We think that you’re the ones and only who could clean up the U.S. image before humanity. We’re all proud of you and your committee in fighting against crimes.
Report thisBy James Yell, April 21, 2007 at 8:55 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Watching this creepy, smirking Gonzo, made me wonder if he takes smirking leasons from Bush?
This lawless and lying man and he is our Law Inforcement official, appointed by George Bush, who swore to uphold our consitution and laws? Why are these people still allowed to abuse our laws and then say when they may or may not present requested information.
I remember another smug, deceitful Republican. Ollie North, believing that admitting that he misdirected the his answers to questions asked during an investigation, but clearly thought that didn’t mean he was a liar. Well I think at that time he was under obligation to tell the truth and misdirection is not the truth. If Senator Leahy even gets the information in a week it will most likely be doctored and may even make a bald statement claiming Executive Privelege that doesn’t exist in this criminal matter. Impeach Bush/Cheney, clean out the liars and hypocrits, cleanse the government of people having an agenda to destroy our Constitution.
Report this