May 24, 2017 Disclaimer: Please read.
Statements and opinions expressed in articles are those of the authors, not Truthdig. Truthdig takes no responsibility for such statements or opinions.
Trump Shows His Hand in Firing Comey
Posted on May 14, 2017
There is a dangerous parallel between President Trump’s firing of James Comey and his efforts to arrest and deport undocumented immigrants and limit immigration from Muslim-majority countries.
Both actions show contempt for democracy and its institutions and push the United States farther down the road to authoritarian government. On immigration, Trump is trying to undermine the power of the courts. By firing Comey, the president is threatening the independence of federal prosecutors and agencies to enforce the law without fear of political interference, whether their target is a kidnapper or president of the United States.
The thought of political interference occurred to me when, as FBI director, Comey was asked by Trump whether he was being investigated in the probe of alleged Kremlin attempts to penetrate the Trump campaign in 2016. According to Trump, Comey said no.
Whether you believe Trump’s account depends on your gullibility. What’s important is that in asking the question of Comey, who was heading the investigation, Trump may have crossed a line and committed the crime of obstruction of justice.
Square, Site wide
In January, Trump issued an executive order that would have banned people from seven Muslim-majority countries from entering the United States for 90 days. It also would have halted admission of refugees for 120 days. That order was overturned by a federal court. Federal judges also threw out a new and modified order. When a judge voided his travel ban, Trump tweeted, “Just cannot believe a judge would put our country in such peril. If something happens blame him and court system. People pouring in. Bad!”
Trump also attacked the courts when a federal judge overturned his executive order withdrawing federal aid to “sanctuary jurisdictions”—states, counties and cities that limit the assistance local law enforcement are compelled to give to federal immigration officers.
His executive orders on immigration and sanctuary jurisdictions had much in common with the Comey firing. All were hastily and poorly drawn efforts to assert the authority of the executive branch. In the sanctuary case, Judge William Orrick, in overturning Trump, wrote, “The order’s attempt to place new conditions on federal funds is an improper attempt to wield Congress’s exclusive spending power and is a violation of the Constitution’s separation-of-powers principles.”
Trump’s actions in firing Comey and perhaps attempting to thwart the Russian investigation are more dangerous to democracy than his practice of heaping scorn on the courts in the immigration and sanctuary cases.
In a valuable article on Lawfare’s blog posted May 11, professor Bob Bauer of the New York University School of Law, who was White House counsel to President Obama, explained how Trump’s firing of Comey, who headed the Russian investigation, violated norms or standards governing federal criminal prosecutions.
He zeroed in on Lester Holt’s NBC interview, also from May 11, with Trump, in which the president said he asked the FBI director whether he was being investigated and Comey replied in the negative. Bauer said that in so doing, Trump had raised “the question of whether the president has now made himself the potential subject of an investigation into obstruction of justice.”
New and Improved Comments
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
Right Internal Skyscraper, Site wide