LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
May 27, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     robert scheer     barack obama     gay marriage     ndaa     chris hedges
Most Read

Say 'Hi-Ho!' as They Strip-Search You

TED: 'A Money-Soaked Orgy of Self-Congratulatory Futurism'

I Can't Hear Myself Think

A Rare Admission That Money Trumps Everything Else

Massive Wildfire Rages in New Mexico

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Why Bain Questions Matter
OSHA Struggles When Tower Climbers Die

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Better Than We Found It
The Good-Natured Dictator

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar

Our Daily Bread

By Lauren B. Davis

more items

 
Reports

To Deter Crime, Get Tough on Wall Street

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Nov 19, 2010

By David Sirota

Often, the most provocative ideas arise after swigs of whiskey. This is especially true when a Rolling Stone reporter is around—and, as I recently learned, it’s all but guaranteed when that Rolling Stoner is Matt Taibbi, aka the heir to the magazine’s gonzo throne.

I had the chance to hang with Taibbi last week after he spoke to a Denver audience about his new book, “Griftopia,” which argues that Wall Street’s bubble-bailout cycle has been one of the greatest—and least prosecuted—crimes in history. His presentation was serendipitously timed, coming the same week as a local Bonfire of the Vanities-esque scandal was underscoring the speculator class’s privilege. In Colorado’s own Bonfire of the Rockies, a local prosecutor had just reduced hit-and-run charges against a fund manager because the prosecutor said a felony would have “serious job implications” for the Sherman McCoy in question.

Over drinks in my living room, Taibbi and I pondered the financial Masters of the Universe and their maddening infallibility. I asked him why they never fear facing legal consequences. Do they believe they’re untouchable? Or do they know law enforcement won’t pursue them?

“They’re not afraid because other than Bernie Madoff, when was the last time someone on Wall Street faced any real punishment?” he responded. “Sure, a few go to jail once in a while, but they’re usually out in a few months and then on the speaking circuit. That’s not exactly a deterrent against bad behavior that’s making you millions.”

Deterrence—it’s the vaunted idea behind “tough on crime” sentences for violent offenses. Lock the door, throw away the key, and the theory says that heinous acts will be prevented.

Advertisement

However, things haven’t worked out that way because the toughest “tough on crime” policies are most focused on crimes of passion, derangement and destitution—crimes that are often not calculated and therefore not deterrable. This is probably one of the reasons why the murder rate has been higher in death penalty states than in non-death penalty states, leading most criminologists to conclude that capital punishment does not hinder conventional homicide.

But what about crimes of economic homicide? These are the opposite of crimes of passion. When, say, a speculator securitizes bad mortgages and peddles them to pension funds as safe investments, that fraud involves exactly the kind of calculation that might be deterred by the prospect of harsh punishment.

“What if a bank CEO was given life without parole?” I asked Taibbi. “What if instead of country club jail, one of these guys was shown experiencing prison like a regular convict? That would have to stop some of the worst stuff, right?”

“Right, and go a step further,” Taibbi countered. “How about putting a few of them in the electric chair? Are you telling me Goldman Sachs execs aren’t then going to change?”

We both busted out laughing—and hard. Not at the truth behind the theorizing, but at the idea that any of it would actually happen today. In 2005, Washington couldn’t even pass a post-Enron proposal to hold CEOs legally liable for their companies’ corporate tax fraud. So the notion that the same money-dominated capital will now subject CEOs to anything remotely “tough on crime” is, well, far-fetched.

And yet, the hypothetical is compelling, isn’t it? That’s because it highlights how our society misapplies deterrence—and how it might apply the concept more successfully.

The necessity of such a criminal justice shift should be obvious. With financial fraud now so sophisticated and pervasive, we clearly need zero-tolerance solutions to change Wall Street’s culture. Indeed, without true shock-and-awe deterrence, most regulatory reform will likely be an ineffectual thumb in the economic dike—just as the thieves desire.

David Sirota is the author of the best-selling books “Hostile Takeover” and “The Uprising.” He hosts the morning show on AM760 in Colorado and blogs at OpenLeft.com. E-mail him at ds@davidsirota.com or follow him on Twitter @davidsirota.

© 2010 CREATORS.COM


New and Improved Comments

We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.

In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.

Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.

Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.

Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.

By reynolds, November 22, 2010 at 5:12 pm Link to this comment

herb; haven’t you noticed a change in its tone? either
it has been roundly spanked, cowed by hyperbolic
pronunciamento, or both.
its all about constructive debate with recto swerve.
haven’t you noticed? it craves constructive debate, to
build a bridge- so it can move in beneath and dare
anyone to cross. not illegal, mind you, but it should
be.

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, November 22, 2010 at 2:25 pm Link to this comment

Careful, Rico!
Limbaugh, O’Reilly, Hannity, Beck, Bachmann, Palin and Gingrich are gonna turn on you and say “He’s not a REAL ‘Conservative’.  He must be a Socialist Lib’rul who just wants to tax th’ rich.”  They’re gonna throw you out of the club (along with anyone else who shows a sign of rational thought).

Report this
rico, suave's avatar

By rico, suave, November 21, 2010 at 6:03 pm Link to this comment

ITW:

Also, what’s particularly troubling for me is the characterization of some of these payments to brokers as “capital gains” income, taxed at 15%, when they are clearly ordinary income and taxable at the max for those high rollers. Now THAT’s a scandal. Not illegal mind you, but it should be.

Report this
rico, suave's avatar

By rico, suave, November 21, 2010 at 1:46 pm Link to this comment

ITW:

Thanks for making the distinction. I totally agree.

herb:

Are you the webmaster here? What’s this “we invited him” crap. And “Rico is a troll.” Is that your idea of “useful discussion”?

Report this

By REDHORSE, November 21, 2010 at 12:31 pm Link to this comment

I heard the Denver Taibbi presentation D.Sirota speaks of in this article last night on ALTERNATIVE RADIO(NPR). I was impressed. Taibbi is a Journalist.

      His observations about his time as a reporter in Russia, and the parallels between the Russian oligarchy and the present American oligarchical D.C./Wall Street collusion made it clear that real Democracy in the U.S.A. has been on life support for a very very long time. And, almost all his thoughts on the Federal Reserve, Wall Street, and reform supported everything FAT FRED and FELICITY have been attempting to hold in dialogue here at TRUTHDIG. He also had some factual insights into MIC war fraud. Joint D.C./Wall Street/MIC looting/collusion is the disease destroying us. They are a separate entity with no concern for Democracy or “We the people—” whatever.

        RICO S. I’m not sure if laws were broken or not but Wall Street financiers knowingly cooked, packaged and sold fraudulent securities that brought the American Economy to its knees. Lives were destroyed Worldwide and the perps walked. If you’re arguing that written law supersedes moral responsibility, or just shape shifting for effect, either way, it’s a bad scene and a lot of people were hurt. On the books or not, it was criminal. “Just sayin’”.

      Taibbi also offered insights into the way news is gathered and reported in the U.S.A. and his conclusions support the opinion of many TRUTHDIG posters. A key observation was the tendency of reporters both “Left” and “Right” to feed their audience “red meat” for kneejerk emotional effect and to report political press releases (spin) as fact without investigation. TRUTHDIGGERS would have loved his admission that often the reporters we depend on for our news know less about an issue than we. He acknowledged that MSM policy is set to punish journalists who don’t conform. Cash, book deals, social status and access to the “elite” are the “perks” that hold our “free” press in silence while Truth begs for light.

        I don’t know how a citizen contains and confronts the destructive anti-human, anti-social, anti-Democratic criminal reality now destroying America. The Russian people and many other populations of the World simply endure. Do our struggles for freedom and human dignity, the blood and bone we’ve given, our lives and childrens future, mean so little?

        Taibbi closed the talk with the sure declaration that citizen voice and action DO MAKE A DIFFERENCE.

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, November 21, 2010 at 12:13 pm Link to this comment

Rico:

I have no desire to do that to Bill Gates or Steve Jobs or anyone who actually produced something.  I don’t even have a desire to strip the wealth from someone who inherited it.

I see nothing wrong with doing it to scoundrels like Ken Lay and his fellow thieves at Enron, or to Bernie Madoff, or to Paulsen, or anyone who gets money rather than makes it.  People who knowingly sell bad investments, hiding their crappiness in fine print and obscure language KNOW they are add no value but are simply finding ways to transfer wealth.

There’s a HUGE difference. between getting money and making it.  It’s called “adding value”.

Report this

By herb, November 21, 2010 at 11:51 am Link to this comment

Rico is a troll.  We invited him into a useful discussion and now that discussion is
over.  De ja vu all over again.
h

Report this
rico, suave's avatar

By rico, suave, November 21, 2010 at 8:48 am Link to this comment

ITW:

Which is pretty much the goal of modern leftist progressivism in my humble opinion.

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, November 21, 2010 at 8:21 am Link to this comment

Execution? Prison? Nah!!!!

“The best way to hurt rich people is to turn them into poor people.”—Billy Ray Valentine, aka, Eddie Murphy

Report this
rico, suave's avatar

By rico, suave, November 20, 2010 at 9:34 pm Link to this comment

boggles:

Oh.

Report this
bogglesthemind's avatar

By bogglesthemind, November 20, 2010 at 6:35 pm Link to this comment

By rico, suave, November 19 at 9:29 pm

“What laws did any of them break? Just asking.”

Thou shalt not steal ~Eighth Commandment

Report this
rico, suave's avatar

By rico, suave, November 20, 2010 at 3:16 pm Link to this comment

FFred:

Not doubt laws/regs must be tightened up. But big bankers are like computer hackers- you set up a fire wall, someone comes up with a way through it.

None of these repackagings were illegal or fraudulent- immoral, sneaky maybe- but it’s up to Congress to chalk the sidelines and throw them in jail if they go out of bounds (had to use a football analogy- it’s Saturday afternoon).

Calling for the electric chair gets the rabble roused, but doesn’t add to any useful discussion of solutions.

Report this

By reynolds, November 20, 2010 at 1:50 pm Link to this comment

they didn’t break any laws; that’s the problem, you
dolt.

Report this

By REDHORSE, November 20, 2010 at 12:47 pm Link to this comment

I enjoy Taibbi’s straight on reporting but the comparison to H.Thompson is a little out there. It’s apples and oranges. Does the word “gonzo” translate to: “—you gotta be crazy to tell the truth—”. (By the way, I enjoy D.Sirota.)

      This article opened the door to the “punishment” question. MSM propagandist have been able to insert the unspoken idea, that certain individuals are “above the law”, into the American psyche. It’s an extension of the “too big to fail” spin. That a D.A. can reduce charges to let a rich perp walk on a hit-and-run when armed Swat Teams are kicking in the doors of a family home, and seizing computers, because a kid filmed a traffic stop tells us all we need to know.

        Bow Wow Wow G.ANDERSON. Spot on!!

        FAT FRED is correct. We (I) don’t understand or at the least, fail to take the money game seriously. Probably because we’re shut out of “pay to play”, discussion of the topic is bottlenecked by the MSM and the machinations of the Federal Reserve exist in such a murkey shadowland. I always enjoy the “links”.

        My observation/opinion: For the first time I can remember there is open recognition that foreign money is having as great as influence on American politics as “We the people—”. If American Democracy and destiny has been reduced to a financial hog trough FAT FRED is right in his “wake up” call. Most agree that it is the man-behind-the-man (see the Weill piece). It IS about the $$$$$, so that’s where the fight and discussion should be.

        Regulate the slop trough with financial regulations and prosecutions and demand a transparent financial system. The hogs will squeal—-but remember, pork is the other white meat.

        Campaign Finance Reform. New Financial Regulations and a transparent Federal Reseve. Those are the core problems and every one of them emanates from the thugs on Wall Street.

Report this
Lafayette's avatar

By Lafayette, November 20, 2010 at 12:04 pm Link to this comment

I’d bet that would bring about reform.

How about some “salafist” retribution. We cut off the hand they used to steal with. Their choice ... ;^)

Report this
godistwaddle's avatar

By godistwaddle, November 20, 2010 at 6:26 am Link to this comment

It’s hard to convict them under laws they wrote, so, perhaps, a bit of extrajudicial justice: 100 bankers dripping from gibbets in Mrka’s largest malls, or 100 bankers dangling from lamp-posts at Mrka’s busiest cloverleafs.  I’d bet that would bring about reform.

Report this
Lafayette's avatar

By Lafayette, November 20, 2010 at 1:30 am Link to this comment

WHY NOT?

DS: Lock the door, throw away the key, and the theory says that heinous acts will be prevented.

No, that wont work either; but it will help. Better than letting them get off scot-free.

I suggest the ancient method of public disgrace that was the pillory. Of course, that is difficult to do nowadays, but some well televised perp-walks and TV-coverage of an ensuing trial will do the same.

But, of course, they must be sent to trial for that to happen. And we have the duty to ask, Why they are not being prosecuted? Please Mr. Attorney-General of New York City, why are they not being prosecuted for fraud?

If I went into a bank in NYC and robbed it of a megabuck, Mr. A-G, you’d be all over my ass. Re-selling Toxic-Waste as bona fide triple-A rated Structured Investment Vehicles is fraud, fraud, fraud. Even if they argue “We didn’t know!” Then it’s professional negligence - they should have known.

(If GM sells you a car with serious flaws, is it not liable for the personal damage its product might provoke?)

And the real-estate agents at the origin of the fraud, in connivance with local banks and credit-agencies. Were they not in infraction of the Truth in Lending Act?

And where are the class-action law suits to recuperate lost funds from the Greatest Swindle of the New Millennium?

This article is dead-right. Without prosecution of crime, these nerds will be up to it again—and in no short time. Why the hell not?

At an effective marginal income tax rate of only 32%, why should they not be reaching for the Golden Ring on the Finance Merry-Go-Round?

Why not, pray tell, Why not?

Report this

By MeHere, November 20, 2010 at 12:41 am Link to this comment

Another great article by D. Sirota.  Taibbi is an excellent journalist. And yet, there’s always someone on this site who will ask something like “What laws have they broken?” I like the humor in that question but just in case it’s a real question, I’ll say: How on earth can they break the law when they themselves are the architects of law-making and they influence the administration of justice. They invest plenty in the political system to make sure they won’t be breaking any laws. I thought everyone knew this by now….I suspect everyone does but many find it hard to accept the truth.

Report this
Blackspeare's avatar

By Blackspeare, November 19, 2010 at 11:14 pm Link to this comment

In a capitalistic society, based on economic survival of the fittest, swindling money using innovative financial transactions, is an acceptable practice.  However, owing money to predatory and corrupt financial institutions and failing to pay, is a criminal act.  Madoff is an interesting example.  Like the Mafia, when a head of a family voluntarily capitulated, his family was cared for.  Same with Madoff, his gave himself up to save his family and that is why neither his wife, sons or brother are being pursued.  It’s an honor thing.

Report this

By john, November 19, 2010 at 10:41 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I wonder how many people have killed themselves because of Wall St. shenanigans. In the 30s the Wall Streeters killed themselves; today, it’s the people they suckered.

Report this
Fat Freddy's avatar

By Fat Freddy, November 19, 2010 at 7:09 pm Link to this comment

rico

There was plenty of fraud to go around. Whether it was the people writing the liars loans at Countrywide, IndyMac and Aurora, or the douchebags at Lehman and Goldman that were packaging them and selling them with AAA ratings. The fraud was/is widespread. In fact, Goldman did pay a fine for one of those, Abacus, or something. And that was only because an email was obtained.

Bill Black has covered this very thoroughly. However, the only true way to know is to open up the books of these zombies, but the government won’t do that.

Report this

By ocjim, November 19, 2010 at 4:53 pm Link to this comment

What is the reason for Sirota’s sterile statements of crime and his jocularity about retribution potential?
Why isn’t there a proposal for changing practices or changing laws to bring fairness back to our justice system.

Do we think that our system of justice is so far gone that we don’t even think of how to correct it? We throw our hands up and say, “If only…”

To me this indicates that we are pretty far gone as a viable democracy. Is the next thing that we advocate an enlightened dictatorship, getting rid of the rotten politicians?

Report this
politicky's avatar

By politicky, November 19, 2010 at 4:09 pm Link to this comment

How right you are again.  Thanks.

Report this

By Mark Jameson, November 19, 2010 at 3:56 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Take it a step further and imagine if the top couple of hundred war criminals in the Bush administration, plus now in the Obama administration, were put in jail for 20+ years or executed—sentences similar to what the top Nazis were given.

Few of our citizens, and none of the major media, even think of our actions as war crimes. The Wall Street Journal the other day reported on plans in the Obama administration to have civilian CIA operators of Predator drones, to kill civilians at will in yet another country with which we are not at war—Yemen.  And it was presented in a rather matter of fact way.  McChrystal and Petraeus have been promoted for running assassination squads with no accountability at all as to who is being killed.

Report this

By Big B, November 19, 2010 at 3:52 pm Link to this comment

It’s funny how few people out there get it. What we are experiencing is the next logical step in capitalism. Now that competition has eliminated most of the weaker players, consolidating economic control and capital in the hands of a realive few, the next step has begun. That step being the trip down road to totalitarianism. The only way the uuber wealthy can protect their massive fortunes is to see to it that the people don’t rise up. Now that we are a nation choking on debt, making us unwilling to rise up against our new corporate masters, our only recourse against the Big business Facists is regulation, through a stong centralized government, of the people. But now, after years of buying influence, the few control the media, so they control the message. They control the courts, so the rights of the few that already control almost everything will be protected above all. Now that they have proven that they can purchase the members of the “peoples” government, the final move to consolidate and protect their power (riches) has begun. The proof lies in the fact that our federal government alone now resembles a country club, none millionaires need not apply.

We are just a couple of decades away from national elections being suspended (maybe sooner) It will happen when the combined debt of everyone in the USA, and the States and Federal government, exceeds the value of everything in the nation. By then the idea of the people governing themselves will be a distant joke, for our debters will have carved up our nation, and the wealthy that started this ball rolling will be rewarded with control over the 21st century fifedoms that they created.

The wildcard in this is the american people. We are armed to the teeth, and by then, we should have nothing to lose. But also consider that petroleum products will begin to be scarce by late 2020’s, and by 2040, it will be all but gone. But just like most wars and calamities in human history, those who were rich before the shit hit the fan, will most likely be rich after.

Report this
rico, suave's avatar

By rico, suave, November 19, 2010 at 3:29 pm Link to this comment

What laws did any of them break? Just asking.

Report this

By herb, November 19, 2010 at 2:19 pm Link to this comment

The more things change …  Way back we fought a revolution against corporate
hegemony in the form the British East India Company that was using the
Parliament, the King and the Navy to dispossess the colonies on behalf of many
very wealthy shareholders, many of them in the Parliament itself.  Now we are
called to foment a revolution against corporate hegemony in the form of the
international banking cartel using the Congress, President and Supreme Court to
dispossess helpless people around the world, including here in the US, on behalf
of shareholders, many of them in elected office.

Sounds pretty repetitious to me, but what do I know.  I don’t have an MBA.

Report this

By Tobysgirl, November 19, 2010 at 10:09 am Link to this comment

G.Anderson has it right. Calvinist philosophy (though Calvinists themselves disagreed on predestination) rules our nation, and succinctly explains why we do not have national health care, free education, public transportation, decent housing for all, etc, etc. Those without health care do not deserve health care, those without housing do not deserve housing, etc.

It is not shocking that the wealthy hold the view that they are blessed by their god; what is shocking is that ordinary people, even those who claim their vision of society is egalitarian, can be found to hold the same view: that the deprived brought it on themselves.

I do not believe in the state’s taking anyone’s life, but there are other ways to teach these greedy sociopaths that there is a price to pay for their behavior.

And, by the way, how can anyone living in the U.S., a nation that elected a farting, smirking idiot, call Chavez a clown? We will never have a Chavez because we will never have a military man radicalized by being called upon to kill his own people.

Report this

By C.Curtis.Dillon, November 19, 2010 at 10:05 am Link to this comment

Simple but improbable solution: strap a few of the most egregious crooks to the big bull on Wall Street and shoot them while everyone is wandering around on their lunch break.  Let them dangle for a few days until they start to smell really pungent.  Then bury them under the street in front of the NY stock exchange.  Put big headstones for everyone to see.  That might deter the crooks for a while.  Nothing like a little embarrassment to get their attention.

Report this

By Rev Unruh, November 19, 2010 at 9:53 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I have an idea on how to make things change dramatically. The story of the
century is how we are going to save things by legalizing weed. You really do
want to go talk to this guy,

Re: Hundreds March for Jailed Marijuana Activist Rev. Roger Christie
http://www.420magazine.com/forums/hawaii-mmj/130986-thc-ministry-
update-we-need-your-help-now.html

He is not kooky or crazy, he is inspirational, and that is why he is in jail. Please,
go see him. Meet the people who know him, find out what he needs, please, do
it for me.

Thank you,

Sister Lauren

Report this

By tedmurphy41, November 19, 2010 at 9:35 am Link to this comment

The real punishment would never be execution but intolerably lengthy spells in prison, with television supplied as a mandatory addition, which would be programmed to show people enjoying themselves, in complete freedom, with a comfortable, assured life ahead of them, as opposed to these miscreants, who would be tormented by having to watch this being played, on a daily basis, and very likely never to be able to join them.

Report this
G.Anderson's avatar

By G.Anderson, November 19, 2010 at 9:18 am Link to this comment

The wealthy believe, that they are innocent because they are wealthy. They also
believe that the poor are guilty because they are poor. The middle class are merely out
on parole. This is the divine right of kings to make the law in their own image. To kill us
all by poisoning us all slowly, their innocence pre ordained by battalions of lawyers and
crooked courts.

Report this

By Face It, November 19, 2010 at 9:14 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

It is curious that our society focuses only on punishing the down and out.  Intuitively, one would think that the rich and powerful would be the ones most easily dissuaded from crime by the prospect of punishment.

Bob Dylan said it best: “When you got nothing, you got nothing to lose”.

Report this

By SarcastiCanuck, November 19, 2010 at 9:01 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Since you and Mr.Taibbi are just postulating,how about postulating this.You both do articles in your respective media and ask how many readers would be willing to pull the switch on the proposed electric chairs with the Wall Street honchos comfortanly seated in them.Yes,ask them if they would be willing to fry these crooks with thier own hands.I for one would be fascinated to see how many volunteers you’d get.My bet is the number would be huge.I’d like my CEO medium rare please.

Report this

By ghostcommander, November 19, 2010 at 8:34 am Link to this comment

Without enforcement of the rule of law America is just another sub standard country.

What the Wall St. Fraudsters and their stooges did was more damaging to the USA than what all our foreign enemies combined could have done.

Report this
de profundis clamavi's avatar

By de profundis clamavi, November 19, 2010 at 8:27 am Link to this comment

“Right, and go a step further,” Taibbi countered. “How about putting a few of them in the electric chair? Are you telling me Goldman Sachs execs aren’t then going to change?”

We both busted out laughing—and hard.

* * * * *

Why are they laughing? This sounds like the most sensible suggestion I have heard in years.

Report this
Mike789's avatar

By Mike789, November 19, 2010 at 7:43 am Link to this comment

eir ~ aptly put.

If “We the People” had any gumption and were not as misdirected as the Tea Party, we would have, long since, barracaded K-Street allowing lobbyists to only depart and not return. There’s the rub.

Calling out the National Guard would play well on MSM.

Report this
Fat Freddy's avatar

By Fat Freddy, November 19, 2010 at 7:42 am Link to this comment

Put bankers in jail? That won’t work because they run the Federal Reserve. If you put the bankers in jail, who is going to control the money supply? Politicians? The answer is so glaringly obvious, I still can’t understand why the so-called intellectual class doesn’t get it. I’m tired of beating around the bush. You people are either really stupid, or you like the present system. Which is it?

Here’s a little food for thought, if you guys actually know how to think:

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/december-7-unofficial-pan-european-bank-mutiny-day

Report this
Gloria Picchetti's avatar

By Gloria Picchetti, November 19, 2010 at 7:18 am Link to this comment

It would be a start in the right direction but it will not happen. The conservatives need Wall Street to finance their adgenda. The rest of us can starve to death.

Report this
fearnotruth's avatar

By fearnotruth, November 19, 2010 at 2:59 am Link to this comment

RE: ...that Rolling Stoner is Matt Taibbi, aka the heir to the magazine’s
gonzo throne.

Tally Ho! Celebrity Journalism - hell why not, this nation doesn’t need artists nor
intellectuals, only celebrities…and, why after 10 years has this so little traction?

http://www.ceedweb.org/iirp/ushouseres.htm

THE TOBIN TAX - nominal (ca. 1% tax on financial transactions)

U.S. Congress Concurrent Resolution
on Taxing Cross-border Currency Transactions to Deter Excessive Speculation
(H.Con.Res.301)

Congressman Peter DeFazio (D-OR) and Senator Paul Wellstone (D-MN)
(Introduced April 11, 2000)


It is the sense of the Senate and the House of Reprentatives that the United
States should show leadership by enacting, in concert with the international
community, transaction taxes on short-term, cross-border foreign exchange
transactions to deter speculation. The adoption of such Tobin-style taxes
should be done in coordination with a large number of nations, in a fully
transparent and accountable manner, with the revenue dedicated to urgent
global needs.

A. Introduction

WHEREAS every day over $1.8 trillion in currency exchanges moves across
national borders, a volume far greater than in the last decade; and

WHEREAS such rapid movement of foreign currency has created some additional
opportunities for legitimate productive investment, but also has created the
potential of triggering national currency collapses and resulting financial crises;

I. Currency Market’s Volume and Volatility

WHEREAS daily trading in currency markets increased from $0.2 trillion to over
$1.8 trillion in just over a decade, from 1986 to 1998; by comparison, the trade
in goods and services for all countries for an entire year is only $4.3 trillion;
and, therefore, in less than a week, foreign exchange transactions exceed the
entire annual volume of world trade in goods and services;

    (first 3 of 20 precepts)

Now, therefore be it resolved by the U.S. House of Representatives, that -

(1) It is the Sense of the House that -

(A) The United States should show leadership by enacting, in concert with the
international community, transaction taxes on short-term, cross-border
foreign exchange transactions to deter speculation. The adoption of such
Tobin-style taxes should be done in coordination with a large number of
nations, in a fully transparent and accountable manner, with the revenue
dedicated to urgent global needs;

(B) The United States should build support for and advocate this position at the
World Bank and the IMF, as well as within other regional and international
organizations, including the OECD, the G-8, and the newly established G-20;

(C) This should not be done in isolation of other initiatives for reform of global
finance. Instead, the United States should continue to explore other options
together with the international community. These options include, but are not
limited to: tougher transparency rules, tighter reserve requirements, creation of
exchange rate “target zones”, national currency controls, cash requirements for
mutual funds, and stronger source-country measures such as disincentives for
short-term lending.

Report this
The Old Hippy's avatar

By The Old Hippy, November 19, 2010 at 2:45 am Link to this comment

Justice is dead.  It has been dead since the Supreme Court pulled a coup and put their man in office.  With the court stacked with law breakers, why should any law be obeyed.

eir says it will take a revolution.  Will eir lead it?  Will he throw petrol bombs at the tanks they send?  Will he or any of us.  We have no leader since a declared leader would be guilty of treason.

I don’t have the answers, just more questions.  What we really need is our own Hugo Chevez.  He may seem like a clown, but he is kicking the elite’s collective asses and getting money and services to the poor people of his country.  His success scares the all the politicians in the “free World.

Report this

By NZDoug, November 19, 2010 at 1:43 am Link to this comment

I always thought a capitalist sniper-assassin would make an interesting plot for a
modern Robin Hoodlem future classic for “Truth , Justice and the American Way”.
Nuking Tel Aviv was brave, and , amazingly, the insanity plea was given “home
detention”.

Report this
Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.