|
|
May 25, 2013
|
|
Time for Our Second Bill of RightsPosted on Dec 1, 2009
In his powerful new book, “The Healing of America,” T.R. Reid asks, “Which inequalities will society tolerate? Is it acceptable that some people are left to die because they can’t see a doctor when they get sick? That question encompasses a more basic question: Is health care a human right?” President Franklin D. Roosevelt had the answer when he offered his “Second Bill of Rights” as the nation was nearing the end of World War II in 1944. He looked ahead to a postwar world where Americans had the right to a decent job, home, education and “adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health.” President Barack Obama and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid are pursuing that long-sought goal as they muster support for legislation that would greatly improve an unfair, inadequate system that denies affordable health insurance to many, including most of those with preexisting medical conditions, calamitous illnesses or no access to group insurance. On Nov. 21, Reid put together the 60 votes needed to send the measure to a Senate debate. It was a big victory for Obama, and it came as critics from the left and right—and the Washington media mob—mocked him as a hapless loser. His strategy of giving the ball to Democratic congressional leaders, rather than dictating his own health plan, now looks like a smart move. Unfortunately, the significance of the vote was buried by the mass of bad reporting and punditry on the president’s nine-day Far East trip, which began Nov. 13. The trip was generally portrayed as a journey of submission, if not surrender, to the Chinese and even the Japanese. (An American president bowing to the emperor? What would Gen. Douglas MacArthur have said?) Advertisement anti-pollution targets. Diplomacy can work. As James Fallows wrote on the Atlantic’s Web site Nov. 28, “… ten days after the trip’s completion, the apparent results are closer to the high end of what the Administration could reasonably have expected than to the across-the-board humiliation and disappointment that ‘analyses’ of the trip generally proclaimed. There is evidence of at least first-stage engagement by China on all the issues that mattered to the United States. First-stage is not completion, but it’s something—and something most of the press, viewing the trip as if it were a campaign swing, missed at the time.” The challenges facing the president are immense. He has the all-but-impossible job of convincing an increasingly skeptical nation that Afghanistan is not a quagmire. He must move ahead quickly and decisively to reduce rising unemployment. The Republicans, dripping crocodile tears, say this is too much for Obama to do. “The war is terribly important,” Republican Sen. Richard Lugar said Sunday on CNN. “Jobs and our economy are terribly important. … I would suggest we put aside the health care debate until next year. …” What a phony argument! The Republicans ignored Afghanistan in their support for President George W. Bush’s Iraq disaster. Suddenly, Afghanistan is their cause. And their solution for a still-weak economy and joblessness is tax cuts for the wealthy. The only reason they want to “put aside” health reform is to kill it. The legislation is imperfect. Rather than reform the health system by providing Medicare for all, or single payer, the legislation passed by the House and awaiting Senate action merely improves the health insurance system. And the most important feature—creation of exchanges where people can buy policies without current restrictions—wouldn’t begin operating until 2013. Still unsettled is the huge question of whether the government would sell policies—the public option—on the exchanges to provide competition to private insurance companies and control costs. As it stands now, these companies remain big winners. But the reform promises immediate help in several areas, available as soon as President Obama signs the bill. The House-passed bill would immediately create an insurance program for those who are without insurance, providing policies until the exchanges get started. Premiums in such programs would be limited. In addition, insurance companies could no longer cancel policies when sick people filed claims unless the firms could prove fraud. Young people could remain on their parents’ policies until they were 27. Insurance companies could no longer impose lifetime limits on coverage. Drug benefits for Medicare recipients would be improved. Exactly what will emerge is unclear. In the Senate, Republicans will try to insert many amendments and to filibuster. Each time, it will take 60 votes to break the filibuster. This will take weeks. You may want to turn away in frustration or boredom. But don’t. It will be a historic moment when the federal government begins to accept responsibility for all Americans’ health. Even critics of reform can see the importance. “Reform would make us a more decent society but also a less vibrant one,” David Brooks wrote in The New York Times on Nov. 24. “It would ease the anxiety of millions at the cost of future growth.” President Roosevelt did not have such a crimped view. With the Depression ended and wartime victory in sight, he saw a nation rich and imaginative enough to provide the health care promised in his “Second Bill of Rights.” We are still that nation. This is what we have to remember as the Senate immerses itself in the politics and numbers of health care beginning this week.
New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By Chris Bieber, December 2, 2009 at 3:45 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Shilling for socialism….
very good and very consistant.
“Rights” come from…
a person?(The Wise Strong Leader”????
a group?(Congress-the “majority” - society)
a piece of paper? (The Constitution - Communist Manifesto)
Since they dont they come from our Creator.
You know the rest…....those inalienable things…..
NOT “given” nor “granted”
The ONLY Legitimate purpose for government is to GUARANTEE and PROTECT those INDIVIDUAL not!! “group” rights of life, liberty and private property.
A government, however well-meaning and well-sounding, that is powerful enough to “give” something is powerful enough to “take” away or “deny” the same.
Stealing is stealing….robbing Peter to pay Paul is stealing…illegal, immoral, unethical….
So is LEGAL stealing…..robbing me(and the producers in society) to pay Paul(the State and whomever the State and its OPERATORS “feel” deserve it more/better than you.
Redistribution of wealth.
Gee didnt we Americans sacrifice labor, taxdollars, our blood and the blood of our relatives to fight AGAINST that philosophy/society in the Cold War???? and didnt we “win”??????????????????????????
Report thisBy ann oymous, December 2, 2009 at 2:46 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
“democractic society” means the PEOPLE MUST PAY; more & more & more; it is NOT 4 the PEOPLE: exploitation is the “way” “democracy” works????
Report thisCharades & theatricals: NOT ONE GOVERNMENT AGENCY from Fed, to State, to County, to CITY: is FOR the PEOPLE! STOP: THINK, and REALIZE: THIS nation went to CHINA in 1949: told them to set up the SAME scenario: Pretend to LISTEN to the PEOPLE: write the LAWS they wanted and do whatever you wanted to do. THUS: the PEOPLES REPUBLIC of DEMOCRATIC DICTATORSHIP of CHINA was formed.
CHEMICALS (monsanto & dow) names are interchangeable with politicians: and they ALSO own the PHARMACUTICALS; want to GUESS how many MILLIONS of times MORE we are BILLED for the MEDS? they are not going to lose $1.00! they declared once folks got hip to the fact CHEMICALS are used in EVERYTHING: our PAINT, TILES, countertops, drywall, carpeting, flooring, FOOD: and they no LONGER have to LIST ingredients: Forever Deceiving Americans: cuz the TRUTH IS SIMPLE: SET TRUTH (nutrition etc) ASIDE: and present A DIFFERENT “idea” for the GREATER GOOD of their POCKETBOOKS!
FOLKS: this nation has NEVER told the truth: to the PEOPLE: and ignored all laws anyway; those of the USA; those of Congress, international laws; they SET UP the UN: just as SHADY as THEY ARE!
Insurance companies do NOT have to provide ONE THING: FEDERAL LAW: if it EFFECTS their PROFITS: it is LEGALIZED SLAVERY: with CORPS & GOV working UNITEDLY against the PEOPLE;
Why do people live BETTER and LONGER elsewhere? EASY: they KNOW our “gov” is corrupt; bullies and tyrants: and wondered why WE the PEOPLE put up with this for so long; THEY will NOT BUY a THING from THIS nation cuz of the CHEMICALS! and would not DREAM of EATING what is put into OUR food chain!
SEEDS of DECEPTION: spell out EXACTLY how THIS nation ALWAYS uses for EVIL what COULD be used for GOOD! WHO PROFITS from SICKNESS & DISEASE? Rockefeller, Clinton, Bush, ALL of your TOP POLITICIANS and PENTAGON members and JUDGES: THERE IS NO 2 party system folks: and JUSTICE left our land years ago; and is spreading GLOBALLY: cuz PROFITING by PURPOSELY POISONING the PEOPLE and PLANET (as well as WAR) profits the SAME PEOPLE:
Laws are on the books 4 LOOKS ONLY: and of course, the DECEIVED world of SLAVES never BOTHERS to CHECK OUT the LIES given by the MEDIA; as well they know. So much EASIER isn’t it to have a so called “authority” get the so called FACTS and give you LIES? Like HITLER said: to DECEIVE the MASSES: tell GREAT BIG LIES!
And YES: it is ILLEGAL to do so as this is what HITLER DID so no one KNEW what he was up to. He in fact, was the FIRST to purposely poison for profit.
And it was the NEW YORK HERALD TRIBUNE on 5/4 who claimed that HITLERS BODY had been HIDDEN: (note: the DNA tested on Hitler’s supposed skull showed it was that of a WOMAN: THIS nation stated “it was the RUSSIANS fault”: AMAZING isn’t it what a little INVESTIGATING turns up!
The WHOLE FOCUS is FINANCIAL GAIN for the FEW: by TARGETING and HARMING us the PEOPLE: NOTHING is done for the PEOPLE or the ENVIRONMENT: nor will it ever be as LEGALIZED SLAVERY and CRIME pays so WELL in the USA!
To STOP sickness/disease to get health: will NEVER BE until there is a CHANGE: and the NEW PEOPLE: must take an OATH: to NOT HARM the PEOPLE nor the ENVIRONMENT: but are all the GOOD MEN DEAD? or simply frightened into being EVIL?
Cuz the ONLY REASON for EVIL to prevail: is for GOOD MEN to do NOTHING!
By prole, December 2, 2009 at 11:32 am Link to this comment
Another Trojan horse by the baleful Boyarsky, posing as a champion of human rights, of all things! What a grotesque joke! This is the same belligerent Boyarsky that was reveling in the human rights catastrophe in Gaza last January when the zionazi wehrmacht was murdering and maiming Palestinian civilians. Aren’t human rights a ‘human right’?!! Or doesn’t that apply to Palestinians??? “Unfortunately, the significance of” Boyarsky’s message “was buried by the mass of [his] bad reporting and punditry on” health care. So under the pretense of promoting the ‘human rights’ – at least of Americans and Israelis – the cunning Boyarsky manages to slip in a few plugs for some of his favorite causes i.e. “China joined with Russia in voting to demand that Iran stop building a nuclear facility that the Islamic Republic had long kept secret.” But unfortunately, we’re still waiting for the U.S. to join with China and Russia to demand that Israel stop building up its nuclear facilities that the Jewish State has long kept secret. Boyarsky’s unaccountable digression continues with a lengthy blurb from the right-wing ‘Atlantic’ and then proceeds to plump for the equally bellicose Obama’s zionist-inspired agenda by reminding that he “has the all-but-impossible job of convincing an increasingly skeptical nation that Afghanistan is not a quagmire.” What a phony argument that will take! Talk about phony arguments, Boyarsky has them in spades! “The Republicans ignored Afghanistan in their support for President George W. Bush’s Iraq disaster. Suddenly, Afghanistan is their cause. And their solution for a still-weak economy and joblessness is tax cuts for the wealthy. The only reason they want to ‘put aside’ health reform is to kill it.” You don’t need Republicans to kill it, you’ve got that old zionist comrade Joe Lieberman to kill it (at the same time that he’s helping to kill Palestinians to Boyarsky’s great applause!). And as is well known, all the top Democrat’s supported Bush’s Iraq disaster and economic bailout “for the wealthy”. In fact “It will be a historic moment when the federal government begins to accept responsibility for all Americans’ health”…and for the health of Palestinians and Iraqis and Afghans and Iranians and many others impacted by American imperial foreign policy; and that of its human rights-less client states like Israel. Any “Second Bill of Rights” has to start with the rights of all, even Palestinians. “This is what we have to remember as the Senate immerses itself in the politics and numbers of health care beginning this week.” But don’t expect the deceitful Boyarsky to remember that.
Report thisBy KDelphi, December 1, 2009 at 7:13 pm Link to this comment
There is no bill yet, and, have you even read the House version? Its crap…the “subsidies” will largely be tax credits, private insurance cant turn you down for pre-existing conditions, but they can charge you up to 5x as much; 3x as much for elderly not eligible for Medicare. Medicaid payments to drs will be cut 25%, expecting the states (broke right now, partly thanks to Dems not directing more “Stimulus” money to states rather than tax credits, which were useless neo-con crap) to pick up the tab. (the expansion of Medicaid to 200% of poverty—if it passes—will be funded for 2 yrs, then dropped by the fed)
I salmost blew chow when I heard him say how much we are going to give Pakistan in military aide, and how we will rebuild Afghanistan, when people here are living in the streets.
The for-profit medical industrial complex bailout. If thats your idea of historic, I guess.
It will go down in history as blocking true reform for decades to come.
I am tired of hearing excuses as to why the US cant do a national plan. That is all they are—excuses.Many countries had private plans, and, still do (for rich folks, or else the REGULATE them) There is only one reason we DONT do it (not cant) and thats money—lobbying money. Donations to Obama and Dems. Thats why. They are the corporate party now.
Good quotes, FRTotus
If we will not have a national plan, the very least that Congress can do it remove insurance industry’s protection from anti-trust (if health care is indeed a “product”—which , if Congress is making you buy a private plan, they surely think that it is and NOT a human right—which, people of conscience, know that it is)
Whatever happened to “the same health care that Congress has”? What bullshit. This bill should NOT pass—-it is insurance indusstry candy
Report thisBy purplewolf, December 1, 2009 at 6:39 pm Link to this comment
FRTothus: for the quote you listed, I think Afghanistan is more like a quicksand pit, almost always lethal for those who end up in one.
The constant drumming of fear, hate and endless war is similar to George Orwell’s book 1984.
Republicans boldy state that health care is not a human right, yet they are obsessed with banning abortion, trying to ban all birth control and some of these depraved cretins want laws on the books that if a couple is married for three years and has not produced at least one child, that they divorce and marry someone else to procreate with. Seems these heartless Repubs only want women as incubators to fill the need for cannon fodder for their endless wars and when these unfortunate soldiers who do survive the wars for entertainment for the rich, deny them medical coverage by all means necessary, that was promised them. After all, paying for the actual medical expenses needed by American society might cut into the $57,000.00 an hour these high paid crooks, I mean CEO’s steal by outrageous premiums for medical insurance.
We need to be like other countries who have medical insurance for their people, however, in those countries these insurance companies are non-profit unlike the ones in America. If our insurance companies were mandated to become non-profit as the rest of the world,according to my latest research, we would see a huge drop in medical cost. Perhaps this is the best solution, make all insurance companies non-profit, pay employees, including the higher-ups a reasonable wage and not the out and out greed and thievery we have now.
Report thisNow that would be change I could believe in.
By rollzone, December 1, 2009 at 6:21 pm Link to this comment
hello. completely agree, these oafish windbags will never write me a voucher for an operation. militarism has only been (parden the slaughtering)the funnelling of tax dollars to corporations. the far east only wants the dollars to keep flowing in their direction, and are willing to backtrack when necessary. the media propaganda machine lies so regularly that they believe their own phony polls. America is on the verge of a new bill, and it will be the demopublicats using America’s credit card: and they ought to be stoned, tarred, and feathered.
Report thisBy Jon, December 1, 2009 at 5:12 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Couldn’t agree more.
American citizens are vilified for: being Constitution aware, for believing in the 2nd Amendment, for questioning citizen wiretapping, for questioning telecom immunity and the Patriot Act’s provisions, and more.
And corporate and banking interests have decided that Americans are not individuals, but individual profit centers. Corporations and Congress have decided that Americans are ATM machines, and that the kids of Americans are also profit centers, especially when the go to college, taking loans that accrue interest while in school, and which build to 100’s of thousands of dollars after four years. Insanity.
This is the East India Tea Company scenario all over again. (please Google) We have to stand up and purge corporate power and banking power from Congress and the US in general. Whatever it takes. Our forefathers rolled the hard six and fought for the 13 colonies’ sovereignty. Now it is our turn to stand up. Or not.
Report thisBy Smoove, December 1, 2009 at 3:01 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
If health care is a right, then it is a “provided right.” That is, your “right” requires someone do something for you. It is my firm belief that any right that requires that someone take action or fund your “right” is not a right at all. For example, you have a right to free speech but no one is required to provide you with a soapbox on which to stand.
The purpose of the Bill or Rights is to guarantee every citizen has equal rights and protection under the law. It does NOT, however, guarantee equal outcomes.
Report thisBy FRTothus, December 1, 2009 at 2:57 pm Link to this comment
Within what imaginary universe does this nonsense hold? Obama is no FDR, and he and Reid are not “pursuing that long-sought goal”...“where Americans had the right to a decent job, home, education and ‘adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health.’” In fact, quite the opposite is the case. Need we go into the billions and trillions handed over to the banksters, the mountains of cash handed over to the war makers? Lies about Iran’s “secret” nuclear facility, which they are entitled to build, and are nonetheless not keeping secret, continue to be endlessly parroted by “journalists” who seek, by the alchemy of repetition, to turn the self-serving lies of a belligerant empire into accepted fact.
Boyarsky claims “[Obama’s] strategy of giving the ball to Democratic congressional leaders, rather than dictating his own health plan, now looks like a smart move.” Mandating that the citizens buy policies from the very companies that profit from denying coverage could be characterized quite differently. The “move” is “smart” only if the constituancy is limited to the corporations, but falls apart as venal when the citizens, the majority, are included.
Boyarsky asks, parenthetically, “What would Gen. Douglas MacArthur have said?” Let’s ask him, how about?
“Our government has kept us in a perpetual state of fear - kept us in a continuous stampede of patriotic fervor - with the cry of grave national emergency. Always there has been some terrible evil at home or some monstrous foreign power that was going to gobble us up if we did not blindly rally behind it ...”
(US General Douglas MacArthur)
Boyarsky did get something correct, though: “The challenges facing the president are immense. He has the all-but-impossible job of convincing an increasingly skeptical nation that Afghanistan is not a quagmire” In other words, how does Obama convince a nation that is getting wise to the lies that seek to justify endless war, and convince them to disregard the evidence and accept those same lies as truth?
That’s some challenge, but I’m certain the corporate press, and the lapdogs who provide the trivia in-between the ads will, as ever, do their damndest.
“The propaganda system allows the U.S. leadership to commit crimes without limit and with no suggestion of misbehavior or criminality; in fact, major war criminals like Henry Kissinger appear regularly on TV to comment on the crimes of the derivative butchers.”
(Edward S. Herman)
“With unfailing consistancy, U.S. intervention has been on the side of the rich and powerful of various nations at the expense of the poor and needy. Rather than strengthening democracies, U.S. leaders have overthrown numerous democratically elected governments or other populist regimes in dozens of countries ... whenever these nations give evidence of putting the interests of their people ahead of the interests of multinational corporate interests.”
(Michael Parenti)
“The corporate media and pundit class increasingly function as press agents for whoever is in power.”
Report this(Adolph L. Reed. Jr., The Progressive magazine, November 2001, p18)
By Blackspeare, December 1, 2009 at 2:12 pm Link to this comment
Wishful thinking——maybe in 20 years. The present health care system is too entrench to be so easily dislodged. What the US will get in the current health care bills is akin to Medicare D——a plethora of private companies with a myriad of plans vying for the chance to put their hands in your pockets. Currently seniors have the option of Medicare, Medicare advantage plans, Medicare D, and supplemental plans to augment Medicare. It would be hard to come up with a more confusing system——who thinks up these things?!
Report this