LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 25, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Three Questions Left Unanswered by Obama’s Counterterrorism Speech

How to Make a Million Dollars an Hour

Marching in Chicago: Resisting Rahm Emanuel’s Neoliberal Savagery

Colbert Slams PBS for Appeasing Koch Brothers

'Left, Right & Center': Obama Ends the War on Terror

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * A Cooler Century? Wait And See
New York City’s Summers May Heat Up

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
A Call to Action
Act of Congress

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Reports

‘This Is What We Do’: Why I Hated Chrysler’s Super Bowl Ad

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Feb 9, 2011
YouTube

By Aram Sinnreich

Unlike most of the Super Bowl’s 111 million viewers, judging by the effusive tidal wave of tweeted praise that attended its airing, I did not love the new Chrysler ad. In fact, I hated it.

To be fair, I’m a reluctant car owner at best. They’re terrible for the environment, they’ve contributed to the death of the American city, they’re a hassle to buy, drive and own. And I especially don’t care for American cars because on the whole, these faults are even truer of them than of their imported competition.

I also dislike car commercials because they encourage people to take on more debt than they can handle using the same set of timeworn pressure tactics and identity games that inspire the sales of cheaper, more disposable commodities such as clothes and electronics. And, from an aesthetic standpoint, the ads tend to be deathly dull, cloyingly cute or smirkingly prurient. Or all three.

That being said, there was a lot to recommend Chrysler’s $9 million ad. It featured gorgeous cinematography, a cascade of inspiring imagery based around Detroit’s cultural and industrial landmarks, and a dreamlike narrative in which 8 Mile’s favorite son, Eminem, returns to the welcoming arms and reverberating voices of an African-American gospel choir, then breaks the fourth wall and addresses us, the audience, on his city’s behalf.

Eminem’s message, and the overarching message of the ad, is that Detroit is one of America’s flagship cities, on par with New York and Chicago, and that its rebirth, and by extension our nation’s, is in our hands. By buying American cars, the ad tells us, we can help to heal the rifts that have torn our country apart—racial, ideological and economic—and invest in the “know-how that runs generations deep in every last one of us.”

Advertisement

All of this sounds great on paper. Like many Americans, I’m very sympathetic to the plight of American autoworkers and to the communities that have been devastated by the dissolution of the U.S. auto industry. And I would love to see our nation’s wounds healed, and our once-proud industrial sector again become the envy of the world and the engine of our continuing collective self-realization.

Unfortunately, it ain’t gonna happen. Not this way at least.

For present purposes, I’ll leave aside the environmental issue—the fact that American automakers such as Chrysler actively fought against emissions and efficiency standards and did everything they could to kill innovative non-internal-combustion technologies in the womb. I’ll also ignore the fact that they paid dearly for this oversight in the marketplace, as their gas-guzzling behemoths were increasingly passed over in favor of smaller, smarter competitors such as Toyota’s Prius. I’m even willing to forget the massive, taxpayer-funded bailout that ensued as a result of their shortsightedness and greed. What really bugs me about the ad isn’t any of these things; it’s Chrysler’s paternalistic attitude toward the hardworking people the company so adamantly champions, adding insult to incalculable injury.

If you listen closely to the throaty, overearnest voiceover, it becomes clear that the economic logic at the heart of the Rust Belt’s problems is now being presented as a panacea. In the words of our deadpan narrator, “When it comes to luxury, it’s as much about where it’s from, as who it’s for.” In other words, the few remaining autoworkers in Detroit who haven’t been displaced by foreign manufacturers (or foreign labor forces in the employ of ostensibly domestic manufacturers) should take pride in their work, despite the fact that they’ll never be able to own it.

This is a slap in the face of Chrysler’s workers and, by extension, of America’s. Chrysler and the other Big Three automakers have spent the last few decades aggressively closing down domestic plants and exporting operations—and jobs—overseas to cheaper labor markets. As an interviewee tells author Paul Clemens in his recent book “Punching Out,” about the closing of an American auto plant, “The U.S. is becoming a licensing country. You’re not producing anything. You’re just importing and licensing. That’s why all the plants are shutting down, people are getting fired. ... For example, Chrysler was outsourcing their production ... because they would like to outsource a lot of parts from here to those low-cost countries. Everybody’s doing that.”

The Super Bowl commercial, then, is a shell game. Detroit’s pain isn’t the result of some existential crisis of faith, but a direct consequence of the amoral, profit-seeking behaviors of Chrysler itself. And the prospect of “taking pride” in producing luxury goods for the elite class of business professionals who benefited from this structural economic transformation is cold comfort to the millions of impoverished families trying to keep warm by the dying embers of an industry that no longer has any use for their deep-running know-how.

Karl Marx, that keen critic of class relations, called this sleight of hand “false consciousness,” and there’s something downright evil about the falseness of the promises made in Chrysler’s ad. Not only is pride out of the question, but economic rebirth certainly won’t happen just because wealthy and upper-middle-class Americans “believe” in our work force enough to purchase the goods they manufacture. The argument makes about as much sense as “trickle-down economics” (a term coined by another keen social critic, Will Rogers).

The truth is, working people don’t benefit by serving wealthy people; they benefit by organizing, and by serving themselves and one another. They find pride not in abstract and lofty ideals of American greatness, but in concrete and achievable accomplishments in their own lives and communities. Shame on anyone who allows himself to believe otherwise, and shame on Chrysler.


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By Auto Parts, May 9, 2012 at 1:54 am Link to this comment

A large part of the auto industry is outsourced to other parts of the world where production and material costs are cheaper, and while people are busy slamming big companies like Apple for having offshore manufacturing plants, the fact is that majority of businesses are seeking to leverage on the costs savings in the same way.

Report this

By Jeremy_Hughes, February 22, 2012 at 12:02 am Link to this comment

I am so used to seeing these car commercials and buying into their propaganda to buy cars that I have forgotten about the problems they add to the world. After reading this article, I definitely have a another perspective. However, the american society is too entrenched in the tradition of car ownership that it is hard to change things with an article. More people need to sit up and realize the damage that the automobile industry is doing.

Report this
LocalHero's avatar

By LocalHero, March 2, 2011 at 7:08 pm Link to this comment

It should also be remembered that, as much as this ad seems to be promoting the iconography of the noble “union worker,” it was these same corporations that destroyed (by ANY means possible - up to and including murder) the labor movement of the 20’s & 30’s. Now they’re using it to sell their deadly-dull cars.

And, speaking of this particular deadly-dull car, they HAD to use the Chrysler 200 in the ad because that is the ONLY Chrysler product assembled in Detroit. Imported from Detroit indeed.

Report this

By zonth, February 12, 2011 at 8:09 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Indeed.  What an emotive producing piece of pathetic rhetorical propagands.  Previously MK has broken down all of its assertion into their appropriate fallacies of rhetoric.  Indeed well done MK.  I was fortunate to leave Detroit. I have empathy for for the folks who cannot get up and leave. 
Most of Detroit looks like a post nuclear catastrophy.  The bits that remain should be burned down, and urban farms should be constructed in their place.
Detroit automakers failed in foresight.  Their were engineers whom put forth insights and plans for biofuel, and environmentally sound automotive technology but were marginalized 10-15 years ago.  Indeed some engineers had foresight but one cannot stop the greed of buffoons.

Report this
mrfreeze's avatar

By mrfreeze, February 11, 2011 at 7:01 pm Link to this comment

THE ultimate “smell test” for commercials which is incredibly useful is the one expressed in the prophetic book, “Amusing Ourselves to Death.” Niel Postman REALLY GOT IT RIGHT when he suggests we always ask ourselves this simple question when watching a commercial:

“Is it true?”

But of course, 99.999999999999999999% of the time NOTHING in commercials is true. With regard to this particular piece-of-shit commercial, the rule is incredibly helpful.

Report this
thebeerdoctor's avatar

By thebeerdoctor, February 11, 2011 at 6:39 pm Link to this comment

Let me see, “when it comes to luxury, it’s as much about where it’s from, as who it’s for”...oh yes, the difference between a living room rug made from textile machines, and those hand made ones produced by slave child labor in India and Pakistan. It is a question of blood quality.
Oh and I almost forgot to blame it on labor. Those no good wage and benefits demanding unions. Everybody knows that the worker only needs a full lunch pail and a dollar a day (and they should be proud of it).
Since television is the genuine oracle, everybody knows that George Washington defeated the British by driving a Dodge Challenger. The automobile I am told, represents personal freedom. Be happy dear ones: slaves should embrace their chains.

Report this

By hasapiko, February 11, 2011 at 6:39 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

As a mechanical engineer, I can’t help recalling a colleague 30 years ago in Boston who told me he quit Ford because they wouldn’t accept innovation. Indeed, in response to the gas crisis we got warmed-over 50-year old technology in the Ford Pinto and the Chevy Chevette while the Japanese were giving us truly new and beautifully crafted cars.
To the reader who wrote that we are a capitalist society I say hooey. The reason we got second rate cars from Detroit for so many years was precisely because we are not a capitalist society. We are a quasi-fascist society run by corporations who controlled our government through the likes of John Dingell and other bought politicians. And the reason we need cars so much to begin with is again due to politicians controlled by the real estate industry. Anybody who has been to Europe understands. They have solid, vibrant cities surrounded on all sides by gorgeous lush countryside while we have exurbs. its all about the politics of development.

Report this

By mumabird, February 11, 2011 at 5:37 pm Link to this comment

Yeah, I’m sure I’m gonna be reallp popular in this forum, but, uh, we ARE a capitalist society. The thing that killed “Detroit” (i.e. - the big three, the motor city, which by the way references the entire southeastern Michigan area, because we are ALL part of the system that builds the cars# was the UAW’s and its constituents’ refusal to accept the reality of globalization, and the need to invest in human capital instead of clinging desperately to the fantasy that, given the same equipment and training, there is something innate in an American that renders his ability to rivet a door hinge superior to that of a Mexican, Japanese, Chinese or Indian worker’s. Your employer is not your daddy. The union representing the auto-workers stiff jawed it’s members into obsolescence. Combine that with a very corrupt government on the city level, and a bipolar commitment to good business practice in the Big Three as well as the state government, and there you have it. Sum it up in one word: entitlement. There was a time around here when you were likely to get a brick thrown through your Toyota’s window, and an edjucated person was regarded as the pejorative “management”. Our industry and locale has basically been run by a bunch of self-indulgent toddlers.

Incidentally, yes, Sterling Heights IS a suburb of Detroit, and NO, that’s NOT a big difference. Chrysler headquarters is in Auburn Hills. What about it? “Detroit”, in this context, refers to the American #Michigan, specifically# based auto industry. And, they DID show the blight. What the hell do you think those factory shots of the rouge river plants were? #Quibble quibble. I’m unmoved.#

That was the POINT. We are no Emerald City. But, we’ve got soul, if that counts for anything. I think this is a great direction. Instead of trying to be all things to all people, we can reinvent ourselves as a brand with history and strength and, yes, CAPITALIZE #huuuh! Gasp!# on our beauty-for ashes, exquisite toughness. Think : Harley vs Honda in the motorcycle niche.

Anyway, peace out, naysayers. If you ever want to come visit Detroit some time, I recommend the Jazz fest in the summer, and going to Cliff Bells. Don’t worry, we won’t hurt you. Grown folks don’t mess around with children.

Report this

By samosamo, February 11, 2011 at 4:04 pm Link to this comment

****************

 

Underneath, the boys and girls at the department of marketing
in the ministry of truth are surely living up to their reputation of
playing the ‘consumerist’ button, IF this ad sold a bunch of those
black cars in the ad AND promoted that m&m to some loftier
status for his contribution, then it certainly worked.

And interesting poll to take would be who actually likes products
from chrysler and a poll of who actually likes and is influenced
by m&m. Then them in marketing can put all those figures in
their demagogue for demographics to sell more better cars and
music.

Herr goebbels is quaintly smiling down on the future he
contributed in building. Certainly has some warranted reasons
for good or bad about fucking the past and not giving a shit
about the future for whoever may be left.

Report this

By 1957mercury, February 11, 2011 at 12:41 pm Link to this comment

I followed Chrysler’s promos for electric vehicles, which seemed to be on track until early 2009 - two of which looked much more marketable than anything on the market. When Benz ditched Chrysler there was a total blockade on any news of electric vehicles by Chrysler. Even the trade newsletter EV World had no information.

It is clear to me that the coalition that bailed out the auto industry, UAW, US and Ontario governments failed to use their equity to demand that the most advanced engineering goals be kept moving. Instead the electric engineering crew was disbanded.  It is kind of timid that the only electric program now is a tiny Fiat 500 model that is on the drawing board. This is a bit ironic when you consider the aptly phrased by MK, of the Leni Riefenstahl-eque ambiance of the Superbowl ad. Rollzone is right that a massive emphasis on electrics is what would have justified the grandiosity of the ad.

The most compelling economic projects are those that involve the worker owned co-ops along the Mondragon model. This is where economic democracy has a chance to meet its potential, and would be a quantum leap in business maturity in North America. It is too bad that the public and union benefactors are allowing a pay back of the 2009 loans without a fundamental change in the shareholder equity along the CED (community economic development) social economy model.

Report this

By What!?!, February 11, 2011 at 12:40 pm Link to this comment

FYI - People in Detroit and surrounding areas loved this ad.  So many people, who have never driven, owned or leased an American car love to say they drive an import.  Lets face it cars will be our main mode of transportation for some time to come - electric or gas.  When I heard “When it comes to luxury, it’s as much about where it’s from, as who it’s for.” I thought differently.  Obviously it’s “for” the person looking for a car and it comes “from” a company that knows a lot about making cars.  Do you know where this car is made?  Not Detroit but Sterling Heights (a suburb of Detroit) - big difference eh?

Report this

By Mailtrain, February 11, 2011 at 11:43 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Choir full of black people singing for one white dude? Nuff said…

Report this

By CJ, February 11, 2011 at 11:40 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

@  laceration

Totally agree with the content of your post, the auto-culture way of life is
unsustainable at best, and totally destructive to not only the environment but
society at worst. The more time people spend in their cars (by choice or
necessity), the less time they have to interact and “get-to-know” their
neighbors. The necessary solution is liveable, walkable communities, where
citizens actually interact with each other and empathize with each other. I have
lived in places like this - most notably in Latin America - so I know it exists
and is possible for America, but it requires a radical shift in our values.

Another good resource is the book Asphalt Nation
(http://www.janeholtzkay.com/asphaltnation/index.html) by Jane Holtz Kay. Definitely
worth the read for history on the automotive lifestyle, its nefarious and broadly
ranging impacts, and suggestions for moving beyond said lifestyle.

Cheers!

Report this

By Michael Parido, February 11, 2011 at 10:34 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Maybe we should all give up indoor plumbing and electricity while we are at it, right?

Report this

By elenore, February 11, 2011 at 10:30 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Detroit is bigger than New York,It is over 300 yrs old and believe it or not has had suburbs almost as long since the French Canadian and Anglo East Coasters couldn’t get along,which is why we have 2 newspapers.4 million people live in surrounding suburban neighborhoods which is basically also the City of Detroit.Our issues are much more complicated than blaming the Auto industry which has been the first to equally pay,promote,and educate minorities and Women, BTW Auto industry has always paid workers well even before the Unions.If environment is your issue,Cars are 4-6% of pollution,Coal is the natural pollution disaster of this Nation.Environment,Michigan is one of the most environmental states in this country,reforesting,cleaning our over 11,ooo lakes and rivers as well the the Great Lakes.BTW the Car industry is also responsible for things like heart pumps and many medical advancements and PBS getting of the ground and much,much more R&D.We have been a part of every American war,Arson of Democracy for 2 wars while President Wilson was attacking our German population and President Roosevelt crammed people into over loaded neighborhoods and they both ignored racial fighting of Southern migrants to the city,We have has 3 where the National Guard was needed and many small ones.American car companies got a loan Big Deal,foreign car companies get Social programs paid by Government as well as Loans.Metro Detroit(not including Windsor our Sister city in Canada) is most racially and religiously diverse Metropolis in America,that is why the suburbs work for us.Biggest problem for Detroit is services and income.Detroit (Old City Proper) taxes are high and services are poor so most people live in Metro suburbs(or new Detroit).Many people have been left behind and we don’t know what to do for them.Moving back is difficult because of crime and poor schools.BTW we are like the only state to have had a continuous Socialist party.And Democratic Liberal policies are part of Why people moved out of Old city and into new one.Our state has a very stupid and old law that even Coleman Young who pushed to pass it, wanted it removed.It basically let’s City Unions negotiate for higher wages and Benefits,but the Income of tax revenue of City is not used for negotiation which is not done in a court system either.So city workers have received higher wages but they have to fire some workers or raise taxes,Detroit has done both,now they can’t do either.So their are few Police,Fire fighters,and other city maintenance but it doesn’t end there the law also states that Volunteers can’t replace Police or Firefighters or city workers.That is why there are so many Townships in Metro Detroit,because Townships get around those laws.That is why there are so many small tiny little cities,mashed to make a giant Metropolis that takes up 5 counties.BTW Michigan and Detroit do have other industries as well like one of the largest Chemical Companies in the World,2nd to California for Commodity Crops,and much more.If you want to know what really has hurt Detroit workers was when in the late 90’s they move production of household appliances to places like Mexico than China.That’s right we used to make things like Microwaves,toasters,irons,etc…And we had the water to do it,why do think China has droughts they are diverting water from farming to manufacturing.And destroying there landscape.Metro Detroit problems are ours,we know that.But the Federal Government constantly allowing Trade deals for slave labor is hurting workers.

Report this

By John Poole, February 11, 2011 at 10:25 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Who better than Eminem to shill for Detroit? His raps suggest he is at best only
partially self aware of society’s present predicament.

Report this
Lafayette's avatar

By Lafayette, February 11, 2011 at 9:50 am Link to this comment

HUBRIS & NEMESIS

lacer: People in the US cannot see that there is a way of life other than ass fixation to one’s driver’s seat and that cars, roads, sprawl is not a part of nature like the sky, the air and the sun.

Well put.

We’ve isolated ourselves into vehicles on four wheels as well as behind PC screens in hour cocoon of a home. We have manged to tightly incarcerate ourselves away from inter-relational society such that direct human contact is minimized.

A good reason to get out and around, shopping, is also being brought into our homes by the Internet. Even work - the unique opportunity to enjoy human contact - has a small but growing tendency to be done at home, either partially or fully.

Sunday morning church services are televised into the home or we can go (in some places) to a large parking lot church and attend them in a car.

Our lives have become a passage through a virtual reality ... and we go through the motions thinking that this is the way life should be because, after all, this is the way we are living it.

It’s the American way, so by definition it is right and proper.

As the Greeks defined a long, long time ago, hubris (excessive pride or presumption) is as hubris does - that is, it leads ultimately to nemesis (decline and downfall),

What did they know about life that humanity has either forgot or never ever learned.

Report this

By prgill, February 11, 2011 at 9:21 am Link to this comment

Hold on, tp66, let’s not be too quick to blame the big three. We might for instance, consider our own responsibility in letting all of this happen.

The problem was obviously created by market conditions, but it was exacerbated by our attitude toward our public spaces. There is always more land just beyond the county line, just out of site of the mess we keep making of our collective nest. It is only fair that we recognize our own complicity in our misfortune.

We should all have a look in the mirror when it comes to judging the social behaviors we learned as a result of our consumer-ist lifestyles and the way we govern our public spaces.

Report this
Lafayette's avatar

By Lafayette, February 11, 2011 at 8:51 am Link to this comment

BYE, BYE PONTIAC

AS: This is a slap in the face of Chrysler’s workers and, by extension, of America’s. Chrysler and the other Big Three automakers have spent the last few decades aggressively closing down domestic plants and exporting operations—and jobs—overseas to cheaper labor markets.

Yes, that which has happened to Detroit’s Big3 is lamentable. But the above comment borders on rhetoric, because the author posits the consequence without mentioning its cause.

Big3 salaries were hallucinatory both on the shop-floor and in Top Management. All it took for the Automotive House of Cards to come tumbling down was a sufficiently deep recession - which had begun in 2008.

Can Detroit build cars? No doubt, it can. But which cars? It cannot build small cars for which the labor input is a significant cost-component. That is, it can build them - but at the price necessary to recuperate costs (and make no profit), it cannot sell them into the American market.

It must build small cars elsewhere. Ditto for Europe, which sources most of its smaller cars not from China but from India.

Detroit can build the larger mid-size and top-of-the-line cars, which it will continue to do - but let’s not expect any competitive prices with the same models built in lower-cost manufacturing climate.

The US cannot shut the doors to foreign imports, thus giving American-made products a huge advantage. To do so will simply start a tit-for-tat Trade War - the consequences of which, for instance, will be to lock out Boeing’s US made aircraft with GE’s or P&W jet engines.

Explain that to American workers at Boeing, GE and P&W ...

The Game of Global Competition, like it or not, has its rules. Nobody can expect to earn great salaries simply in order to spend the money forever on cheap goods from the Far East. That is not how competitive global markets work.

America, for the longest time, had markets that were like impregnable preserves - due to a combination of factors. For Detroit, it was the ability to put together steel made from iron ore sources not that far away, with labor skills that were channeled through an assembly line (pioneered by Henry Ford himself).

But those days are long gone. In the meantime, with colossal hubris, Detroit kept thinking it could pass on the ever higher cost of producing cars to the American public—all the while losing market share to first the Japanese, then the Koreans and now Japanese-engineered cars manufactured in India.

Who’s at fault for the blindness? Both Detroit Management and Unions. They kept up their little game literally till the roof fell in and everything drastically stopped.

Which was dumber-than-dumb. Because salaries have been reduced in the Big3 companies to those practiced at foreign manufacturing plants in America. And despite the fact that the Big3 are once again building cars that Americans want to buy, it will never gain back the market share it has lost.

America’s part of global car production now stands at 9.3%, the lowest in history. (See production history here.) It will likely continue to degrade.

Bye, bye Pontiac, Plymouth, Mercury ...

Report this

By tp66, February 11, 2011 at 8:18 am Link to this comment

mk!i was thinking the exact same things all night. I’m from the D and this commercial makes me want to fight somebody. The images of black servility, the appropriation for corporate geed of our beloved Rivera mural. To hell and back? when did Detroit get back from hell? they just closed like 90n schools this year and lets not even discuss they housing and job markets. And in any event its the Big 3 and their ilk that put Detroit through hell in the first place.

Report this

By Artful Dodger, February 11, 2011 at 7:21 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The problems in Detroit have much to do with a war time economy that has existed since World War II. Often I hear that Detroit does not know how to innovate. That can only happen when we don’t have market place that has 3 big auto companies predominating.For awhile there was American Rambler and Packard among them. With World War II, many small companies could not compete for the war money, and yet they could not produce for the domestic market because of war rationing. That crippled competition at the outset. Many of our best engineers and scientists were used for government military contracts. Slowly but surely the consumer economy was crowded out by the war economy. Tariffs were lowered on imported goods as the free trade movement gained ground, and the quality of American consumer goods woresened. This added to the decline as other national economies weren’t bled out for war expenditures. There was no natural curb to the war socialism as fiat money replaced our commodity backed standard. In times past bank note redemptions for specie would have soon choke government expenditures that tended to debase the worthiness of bank notes. Such money was the ultimate veto on corrupted government. There is no natural check on money creation being used for military projects. With this money creation there have been other malinvestments besides weapons creation such as mortgage debt, consumer debt, and derivatives. The government has an unlimited balance sheet to spend more money on police state projects. It seems that when the military complex has run out of external enemies, it can always declare its own citizens as enemies. It doesn’t pay to innovate or to be creative as the money is no good anymore. It is a wasting asset that is not conducive to longterm capital projects. Why risk making better cars when it is too easy to put money to work in General Dynamics with guaranteed coverage for cost overruns? If you are a government contractor there is no need to worry about risky free markets. Bribery, blackmail and deeply captured government will work better than fickle mass consumers.  GM did far better as a bank than as a car company until the credit collapse occurred. So we have an economy of weapons makers and bankers instead of industrialists.

Report this

By prgill, February 11, 2011 at 3:46 am Link to this comment

Right on, tp66! I couldn’a said it better!

The Chrysler ad is fatuous and offensive in the extreme. It is all rhetoric no substance. This is the kind of garbage you can say, but never believe. Pure sales talk. Mindless boosterism. Yech!

Since when is “quality” defined as the best imagery, top editing and voice talent and hyperpremium advertising space? In fact, I’d be willing to be that alot of the upclose shots weren’t even shot in Detroit. Certainly the cameras, editing equipment and talent used in the ad had nothing to do with Detroit.

Chrysler should fire the ad agency and creative team that proposed such hogwash, and deep-six the brand manager that approved it.

Report this

By mk, February 11, 2011 at 12:17 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Wow, there was a lot to see in this slickly produced propaganda. I liked the soundtrack, but the schlocky Conserva-tard messaging throughout was a pitch-perfect dog whistle to the Fox Troops. Diego Rivera spins in his grave. My favorite line:

“That’s our story—now it’s probably not the one you’ve been reading in the papers, the one being written by folks who’ve never even been here, and don’t know what we’re capable of…”

With the sarcasm dripping heavy on the phrase “the papers.”  [Translation: it’s us against the nerdy elitists: you know, people who read.]

“Been to hell and back” over a visual of the American flag against an empty, ominous sky just screams “9/11,” in case anyone’s forgotten. [Translation: it’s us against the A-rabs!]

The closeup of the dark iron-fist sculpture appeals to this type’s desire for strong authority figures. [Translation: do as Dear Leader says or we will crush you!]

“Now, we’re from america” [J I N G O, and Jingo was his name-o.]

The fact that it all climaxes at “FOX” theater [big closeup] was too on-the-nose for this otherwise artistic (in a Leni-Riefenstahl sort of way) achievement. [Translation: everything good happens at Fox. We love Fox! Fox rocks!]

Another commenter has already spoken to the gratuitous use of blacks (choir and doorman, all safely in their place), while it takes a white boy to get in front and tell the message.

Underneath all this “100% American” hooey is the fact that Daimler (a German company) recently bought and sold Chrysler, then they filed bankruptcy and got bailed out by the government [Socialism alert!], and are now in the process of being majority owned/controlled by Fiat (an Italian company).

Yeah, I’m ready to buy 200.

Report this

By vote, February 11, 2011 at 12:12 am Link to this comment

Shareholders can live anywhere.

  Multi millionaire private owners can, too.

  Most of them probably spend most of their time in the Mediterranean, the Caribbean, and the wealthiest areas of the world’s largest cities.

  Good luck trying to explain this to the people with the “buy American” and “America, love it or leave it” bumper stickers.

Report this

By rollzone, February 10, 2011 at 11:08 pm Link to this comment

hello again. i am infrequent, from amateur hoser
infiltrators from the millennium agenda, knowledgeable only about their culture, but paid to
influence ours, posting hilarious rebuttals to
comments, that are a waste of time to argue, like
pigs and shit. however, the American way of life is
not to be tread upon. if you equate your freedoms
within a one mile radius of your home, and expect to
live out your world in that little bubble, that’s
your right. my seat behind the wheel from suburbia to
workplace, and driving vacations, and visiting
friends, and shopping where i chose, eating where i
want- requires reliable, affordable transportation:
without price fixing and gouging, defective
manufacture, or a tax payer subsidy or bail out.
petrodollars could have financed the expansion of
Government Motors into Brazil and China markets- but
the American tax payers got to pay for it, while
having electric vehicles pushed further down the
road. we have to buy oil until we pay for Dubai. free
hydrogen energy is abundant in the Detroit area, but
then how will we pay for the sand jockeys’ castles in
the sand? do not tread on my way of life, thinking my
liberties damage your little bubble world, or i need
to sacrifice for you. every American experiences the
freedoms of America behind the wheel of their first
motorized vehicle, and perhaps you should come here
and experience it for yourself. it is a very
responsible privilege that is good for your
character: freedom truly like nowhere else.

Report this

By laceration, February 10, 2011 at 5:17 pm Link to this comment

I was excited when I saw this article because because I thought it would address one of the most fundamental critiques of our society that is all but ignored except for http://www.kunstler.com.  That’s the Automobile way of life so that entrenched into the infrastructure in the USA.  The salient problem is not that Detroit did not jump on alternative technologies or that the workers got screwed, its that our massive investment in Suburban build out and all of its attendant problems is unsustainable. And not only that, it sucks.  People in the US cannot see that there is a way of life other than ass fixation to one’s driver’s seat and that cars, roads, sprawl is not a part of nature like the sky, the air and the sun.  The thing about the Chrysler ad was that is was one of about 20 Automobile ads.  This tells me more than than anything specific in the Chrysler ad.  If you think the future of America lies with a revived auto industry building cars that run on used french fry oil and other techno fixes, good luck.  I’ll opt for livable, walkable communities and bicycles. And check out James Howard Kunstler at the above link—imo he’s the greatest social critic out there, even better than Chris Hedges and Robert Scheer.

Report this
oddsox's avatar

By oddsox, February 10, 2011 at 3:23 pm Link to this comment

..as for Eminem, in my mind he is forever-linked to his close encounter with Bruno at the 2009 MTV Movie awards.

Report this
oddsox's avatar

By oddsox, February 10, 2011 at 2:56 pm Link to this comment

The Chrysler 200 is a Sebring with a facelift and a fancy sound system, as far as I can see. 
4-cyl, FWD, 30mpg, .053 HP/Weight ratio.  Adequate, but hardly revolutionary.
“All dressed up like a well-kept grave,” as WC Fields once put it.
Wrong car for a “ground-breaking ad,” I doubt Oprah would even give these away. 

Even the slogan is a rehash.
“Imported from Detroit” was the intended breakout battle cry for the Mustang in ‘64. 
Changed at the last moment before its unveiling.

If Chrysler had wanted to make an impact, we’d be seeing an all-new 300hp electric or hybrid Chrysler 300 w/ AWD. 
Something Sinnreich would lust after, secretly, of course.

Report this

By tp66, February 10, 2011 at 2:35 pm Link to this comment

This add is an insult to anyone who is from Detroit. Here we see a corporation daring to co-opt Diego Rivera and Joe Louis, all to prove that Detroit knows about “luxury”. What does a city that has no money give a d about “luxury”? Its a slap in the face. Couldn’t they have promoted a car for the people? It played on the emotions of really stupid people who, seeing pictures of Detroit said to themselves “wow, thats Detroit!” I’m from Detroit, I am those pictures, and if your going to uses those images, you better tread carefully, which Chrysler didn’t. I’m not so desperate to see Detroit during the Super Bowl that I’m gonna let them get away with this. And lastly I’m black, and I’m more than sick of black choirs being pimped out of the church to give credibility to whoever will pay, its primitivism, its exoticism, its exploitation. Its the 21st century equivalent of happy dancing slaves providing entertainment for a plantation party. See the happy darkies sing!

Report this

By thethirdman, February 10, 2011 at 2:08 pm Link to this comment

ardee:

I had bellicose inclinations last night.  No excuse for ad hominem attacks,
you’re right.  But let me explain.

I’m a bit tired of comments like:

“The Big Three needed to turn to foreign markets because their competitors
were based in them, so they had to turn the tides because unpatriotic people
prefer foreign cars,” a la Adam.

or

“when people are proud we are powerful, we are united. we believe in those
“lofty ideals of American greatness”—capital P-Principals—and then have the
foresight and the mental and moral fortitude to actually develop those
“concrete and achievable accomplishments” which the author is so clearly
distinguished and capable enough of knowing yet for some reason unable to
explain here. We all know what hard work that kind of imagining is, we’ll cut
him some slack—he probably had to teach a class,” from the enlightened
Michael.

“Unpatriotic,” really?  “American Greatness and capital P-Principals”, is that a
joke?  To add insult to injury Michael tries to belittle the author by implying,
gasp, he is an intellectual, or worse yet, a professor…
Maybe this foolish pride in the American work ethic and patriotism is what got
us in this mess in the first place.  I won’t deny there is unchecked greed at the
highest levels, but it sure takes a lot of non-thinking selfish twats at the
bottom to pull their weight in a society that kneels at the alter of consumption
(and according to the latest obesity stats, they have more than enough heft to
get the job done).
Please, enough with the sanctimonious American Worker business.  You think
others around the world don’t work hard?  Because Chryslers and Dodges are
such good automobiles, right?  The ad sucks because we can literally see the
desperation of a (state supported) company that can’t compete, pleading with
Americans to buy their shit autos based on the fact that a vile celebrity acts
tough about revitalizing a city that evidently NOBODY cares about.  Or maybe
the message is that we should buy a shit car so that we can support our fellow
Americans when our government chooses not to?  Detroit had a chance to be a
WORLD changer.  All it had to do was embrace change and make products we
wanted.  Who killed the electric car?

Report this

By Jim Yell, February 10, 2011 at 12:42 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Neither party is addressing the mentioned issues. They won’t because they have become wholly owned organism of Corporate and Investment establishments.

Our auto industry died because, as they have pointed out here investment and industry could ignore our environmental regulations and labor by exporting the jobs. Of course, I have to wonder who they think will ultimately keep buying their junk when no one has a profitable job?

One thing that the government could do is to station our military in previously used military sites across the country there by seeing that more of the country benifits from servicing the troops, rather than a few areas in politically powerful sites.

Secondly we should start protective tariffs and if private enterprise will not pick up the slack than the government should start the industries from the ground up. Instead of the profits going to a few people at the top the money could go into the National Treasury to help provide the services we so badly need.

Thirdly we could target Detroit for contracts to build tomorrows trains and public transportation and yes alternate energy industry. Should actually be enough business to help many old industrial areas. Our country has been committing suicide by allowing the stock market and industry to be rewarded for their treason. We should stop tolerating Democrats or Republicans (which is really all republicans) who ignore the results of their selfish grab for wealth.

Report this

By jltnol, February 10, 2011 at 12:40 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

My problem is with Eminem…  he is a least a polarizing spokesman. As a gay
person, I’d never buy a Chrysler based on this spot.

Report this

By Andrew Plonsky, February 10, 2011 at 11:15 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

If Chrysler and Eminem had any interest in proving
their authenticity and “keepin’ it real” in the Motor City they should have shown some footage of the abandoned, neglected, and blighted Detroit, instead of showcasing only a few very TV-friendly areas. Lacking the courage and honesty to do so, this ad failed in that respect.

Report this

By rollzone, February 10, 2011 at 10:45 am Link to this comment

hello. to look at this jester’s coiffed appearance, and
notice no hair roll, tattoos, or facial jewelry- the
paradigm of appeal has shifted. the eerie ghoulish skin
tone scares my attention. poor artwork depictions and
convergent themes clouded the message. a wealthy
propagandist living outside the realities of Detroit
believes in nationalistic monopolist empire. love
wealth, not people. what a tool. i challenge him to
bring completely electric vehicles to Detroit.

Report this

By samosamo, February 10, 2011 at 10:45 am Link to this comment

****************

 

I didn’t like it but I liked the idea it that it shows m&m as what
he is to his fans and this country. He’ll take the high road and
they take the low road as long as they keep paying him for his
type of whatever it is.

Report this

By robertaustin, February 10, 2011 at 10:32 am Link to this comment

By Michael Redd, February 10 at 3:56 am
“the right to work is good for people.”

Isn’t that part of the point of the article? The “right to work” has effectively been taken away from many Americans by the selfish and greedy leaders of US corporations, who dump their domestic workers like garbage and abandon their domestic plants in favor of cheap labor and low taxes elsewhere.

I won’t speak for all foreign car makers, but what about the German ones like Volkswagen? These cars have long surpassed American cars in terms of safety, quality, and fuel economy. German workers are well paid, well organized, have good health plans and work fewer hours than equivalent American workers.

Several European and Japanese automotive companies have plants here in the USA. They presumably are subject to all the same regulations as our domestic manufacturers, but they seem to be doing fine.

Instead of complaining about emission standards, etc. Our American auto manufacturers should have been pushing for a national health plan and other domestic improvements that would have helped to reduce their costs and make it easier for them to keep their business at home.

Have you been to Europe? If you want to buy a good Ford, buy a European one. For some reason, Ford can make nice models in Europe that compare favorably with German cars. Why isn’t Ford making those cars in Detroit?

Report this
RayLan's avatar

By RayLan, February 10, 2011 at 9:43 am Link to this comment

thethirdman
Eminem is pushing 40 - no spring chicken

Report this
PatrickHenry's avatar

By PatrickHenry, February 10, 2011 at 9:34 am Link to this comment

I drive a Ford F-250 and often find myself running down jaywalking lobbyists on Capitol Hill as I survey work around town.

It’s the little things in life which make it worth living.

Will consumers turn out in droves to buy Chrysler because Enimem was paid a shitload of money to shill for them?  I do know he follows in the footsteps of George C Scott and Ricardo Montalban who also cashed in on their celebrity to sell U.S. made Chrysler cars.

Report this
RayLan's avatar

By RayLan, February 10, 2011 at 9:20 am Link to this comment

Hip Hop is soooo dated. The narcissistic thugish attitude typifies that of the culture which believes in its own magical exceptionalism - with obvious disastrous results.

Report this

By makeitno, February 10, 2011 at 8:56 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

forget crysler and all the other u.s. companies that betrayed their communities. it was worker competance, skills, and energy that made them what they were. But the capitlists back in the day of reagan declared war on working people and their unions. the result is what we see all around us.  What has been swept away by globalization, corpoatism, neo-liberalism, and the myth of free markets was represented in the ad: civil society, public space and art, civic institutions,community. the narrator says - they don’t know what we can do. Not crysler, we = workers and that doesn’t include the CEO. Think of it-there are cities in Europe that are hundreds of years older than any u.s. city and yet our capitalist have laid low Detroit and so many other cities in less than a century. What thuggery, what canabalistic greed. The ad was beautiful to watch and contained some powerful images of labor. The summation ‘imported from detroit’ for me captured all of the betrayal.

Report this

By HC, February 10, 2011 at 7:45 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Oh, great, now you did it Mr. Sinnreich, that was such a well written piece that I had to go to the author page to find out more about you, and your book, and now there’s one more item on my reading list…

Report this

By Lynn Fischer, February 10, 2011 at 7:21 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Great piece of logic and writing.  The nightmare is not just the truths behind it, but the blind ignorance of some whose comments I’ve heard since the Ad appeared.  Can’t they see…don’t they think?..can they really not know?

Actually, it should be the ‘Big Three’ having the discourse here, not us, the victims of their
corporate disinterest.  But my comments do have quite a bit of bearing on this.

After 5 American cars wreaked havoc on my personal economy (and sanity) during the six years between 1968 and 1974, I decided to buy a Toyota. In the 36 years since then, I’ve bought 3 more; the last is a 1998 Rav-4, which still runs beautifully.  They all did.  More importantly, I purchased each one after I decided to do so, not because someone in Detroit forced me to need another one. 

What would YOU choose?—The necessity to replace a car every 1.2 years (on average)because of built-in
rapid deterioration, or to buy a car every 9 years
(on average) because you Want to; a car that doesn’t
let you down 15 minutes before you need to be somewhere, that gets 27+ mpg (the other 3 got more!),
that never needs serious maintenance beyond oil changes and new tires, and again - one you replace when You want to, (with trade-in value to boot) etc?
One choice is rational; the other is insane.

And, oh yes, talking about manufacturing towns, I come from Buffalo NY, and all my family and their friends worked the steel mills. So I’m not in any position to patronize anyone, despite being the one to benefit from the college education they all chipped in for. I am merely grateful.

But..products are only as good as the will of the people who make them.  Noone forced the Detroit car
manufacturers to relentlessly cheat their customers,
close down engineering labs to fund outrageous bonuses, to the point whereby their own planned obsolescence made them obsolete.

And still it goes on—how it galls me to see their government-backed arrogance as they freely and shamelessly feed at the public trough.  Don’t we all agree on this matter?

It should never enter anyone’s mind to think of the
Japanese as ‘cheap foreign labor’; the facts speak for themselves: They outsource their jobs—to US. Their autos are produced here in their American plants, by and for the Americans who will drive them.  Americans workers are paid for their work and
the plants maintain the high quality control standards the parent companies insist on.

The Japanese continue to make engineering refinements and improvements, reducing emissions and fuel consumption and enhancing safety features.  With innovation, mistakes must be made— innovation is the child of error.  Problems must be investigated, measurements made, testing done, adjustments engineered and installed.

And by the way, it is safe to say that if there had never been a Prius, the Volt would certainly not exist.  The ‘Big Three’ would never have thought of it, or if they had, their company practices would have made it a prohibitive venture, one not likely taken.

Everybody loved those big bally-hoos over Toyota recalls last year—what CNN, et al, never mentioned is that the ‘Big Three’ all had recalls during that same period.  Combined, the Americans’ recall totals exceeded those of Toyota by 45%.

We need to look in the mirror and ask the person standing there if they can take pride in producing junk.

But again I state the same as when I began here: it should be the ‘Big Three’ having this discussion. How
wonderful f the result would be the positive and sustainedefforts by all car manufacturers towards the successful accomplishment of the goals that we all want.  And after the car manufacturers….who knows?

Upon reading what I have just written, I believe that all of us in this discussion, andI certainlyh include myself, need to change our way of thinking so that disagreement does not give way to dangerous bi-lateral harm. Disparagement gives no solutions.

Report this

By Simon Girty, February 10, 2011 at 7:15 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

This, after Detroit’s mayor nixed the RoboCop Statue:
http://blog.moviefone.com/2011/02/08/detroit-mayor-robocop-statue/ Eminem shilling for iL Duce’s Fiat owned Chrysler… It’s so damn silly, pathetic and scary. RoboCop, filmed mostly in Reaganomics devastated areas of Pennsylvania, Texas and West Virginia (which used Pittsburgh’s decrepit fleet of Ford cop cars) was two decades ahead of it’s time. Way better than Blue Collar and on a par with They Live:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-9005367754264973286#

Report this

By ardee, February 10, 2011 at 6:50 am Link to this comment

thethirdman, February 10 at 10:34 am Link to this comment

The first two commenters are a joke.  You guys must both be over 50.  Keep
towing the company line boys.  That American dream is just around the corner

Might have served your reputation better had you actually noted what it was about those comments that you disliked. But no, instead you make suppositions about the authors, whatever, kid wink.

I didn’t watch the Super Bowl, chose to take advantage of the pretty day here to take a long ride into the Sierras instead. But , curiosity being what it is, I went on line and watched all the ads. Unimpressed with most I confess but liked the Darth Vader VW ad and thought the Eminem ad in question was a good one actually. Just my opinion.

Report this

By thethirdman, February 10, 2011 at 5:41 am Link to this comment

I guess that would be *toeing the line* wouldn’t it?  Too young for those idiomatic
expressions.

Report this

By thethirdman, February 10, 2011 at 5:34 am Link to this comment

The first two commenters are a joke.  You guys must both be over 50.  Keep
towing the company line boys.  That American dream is just around the corner…

Report this

By Ted J., February 10, 2011 at 5:06 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Save for the last sentence in which there is a silly jab at teaching (teaching is work americans should be able to find pride in too), Michael Redd is correct in finding fault with Sinnreich’s opinion piece.

America has lost a certain narrative, and a sense of nostalgia for that narrative does not necessarily mean false idealism.  Expressing a sense of nostalgia for organized and skilled laborers producing durable goods at a hard earned but livable wage in Detroit should not be so quickly conflated with trickle-down, outsource incentivising, Reaganomics (policies which have been carried on for the past 30 years in this country). 

It takes a European company (Fiat) perhaps to remind us of that forgotten narrative.

Report this

By GrantL, February 10, 2011 at 3:13 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

“unpatriotic people prefer foreign cars”...wahahahaha. You must be a Republican to come up with bullsh*it like that! Or you work for Chrysler and haven’t gotten your head around the fact that the old play-on-the-emotions-patriotic-guilt-trip doesn’t really hold water with people other than seriously well-trained non-thinkers.

Report this

By Michael Redd, February 9, 2011 at 10:56 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

passing over the bulk of this small prick of a story, let’s skip write to the closing lines:
“The truth is, working people don’t benefit by serving wealthy people; they benefit by organizing, and by serving themselves and one another. They find pride not in abstract and lofty ideals of American greatness, but in concrete and achievable accomplishments in their own lives and communities.”

coming not only from someone who’s never lived in a manufacturing town or an auto town but who has such a patronizing paternal mythologized cute view of ‘the people’ that he takes to an all encompassing “they,” it is not surprising to see such shortsight.
the right to work is good for people.
it builds pride. when people are proud we are powerful, we are united. we believe in those “lofty ideals of American greatness”—capital P-Principals—and then have the foresight and the mental and moral fortitude to actually develop those “concrete and achievable accomplishments” which the author is so clearly distinguished and capable enough of knowing yet for some reason unable to explain here. We all know what hard work that kind of imagining is, we’ll cut him some slack—he probably had to teach a class.

Report this

By Adam, February 9, 2011 at 10:10 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The reason Chrysler fought against environmental standards is that they were set unrealistically and that foreign car makes didn’t have to obey them, though they might one car that can run maybe 40 miles at best in Detroit before running out of energy.  You mention the Prius vs the American car makers, that’s one single car… and frankly, the Volt, an American car, is far superior.  The Big Three needed to turn to foreign markets because their competitors were based in them, so they had to turn the tides because unpatriotic people prefer foreign cars.  I’m sorry the writer failed to see the ad was really for the general support of Detroit and all the American car makers, not one particular car as a whole.  I believe the statement is any American car is luxurious, which probably isn’t true.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.