Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
June 19, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     nsa     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Reporter Who Brought Down the 'Runaway General' Dead at 33

The Terror Con

The U.S. Military and the Unraveling of Africa

Greenland's Great Melt Is Pinned on Climate Change

Nate Silver vs. Politico: It's on Again

Most Comments
Most Emailed

 * NEW! * Greenland’s Great Melt Is Pinned on Climate Change



The Unwinding


Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Reports

These Devils Wear Privilege

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Apr 1, 2010

By David Sirota

With the beginning of the ever-optimistic spring season, the television is delivering yet another thrilling college hoops clinic, meaning it’s time for us to gulp down our annual swig of Haterade—specifically, the blue-tinted kind. Once again, Duke basketball is upon us, and analyzing the root cause of widespread Blue Devil enmity has now become a Kremlinology-like sub-specialty among the sports cognoscenti.

Some, like ESPN’s Bill Simmons, suggest that Duke is loathed because it supposedly gets preferential treatment—i.e., better bracket placement—from NCAA officials. Columnist Paul Wachter goes further, asserting that Duke foes believe the team unduly “gets all the press and all the calls.” Meanwhile, NBC’s Mike Celizic proffers the mishmash hypothesis: “Haters think the Devils’ fans are arrogant snots, that the coach is a pinch-faced biddy and that few of the players are NBA-bound.”

Having grown up in Philadelphia during the city’s championship-less dark ages, I’ve developed a particular expertise in (and appreciation for) such virulent sports resentment—and in the Great Duke Debate, I side with The Nation’s Dave Zirin. Combine all the leading explanations, add in Duke’s status as an upper-crust, ultra-expensive private school, and I subscribe to his theory that says our penchant for hating on the Blue Devils reflects America’s larger, more complex relationship with privilege.

This makes sociopolitical sense. A country founded on anti-royalism and defined by anti-aristocrat political rhetoric will naturally profess disgust for, say, Ivy League presidential candidates and incumbent congressmen—just as it will loudly claim to despise Duke basketball (and Yankee baseball and Cowboy football and ... you get the point). In short, purporting to abhor inequality, advantage and dynasty has long been as red-bloodedly patriotic as loving mom, adoring apple pie, and, yes, booing teams like the Blue Devils—teams that seem to wear their privilege on their jerseys.

And yet, evidence suggests our righteous inveighing against privilege is depressingly shallow—and possibly fraudulent. Note this recent New York Daily News report:

Advertisement

“When considering why Duke was conveniently placed on a fast track to (the Final Four by NCAA bracket makers), the power of the Blue Devils as a TV attraction must be factored into the equation,” wrote the paper, adding that simply put, “Duke has a history of juicing TV ratings.”

This cannot be explained away as a mere product of Duke’s alumni fan base or the watch-em-because-we-hate-em crowd. Those die-hard audiences, however passionate, are too small to account for such inflated national viewership figures.

We can hence conclude that a large segment of basketball fans who say they detest Duke—and who may consciously believe they detest Duke—actually secretly or subconsciously adore it and its privilege.

Which, again, makes sociopolitical sense. As populist as America’s political pablum is, and as much as our liberal and conservative protests perennially berate elites, we typically put one of those elites (Ivy League or otherwise) in the White House, almost always re-elect our money-privileged incumbents and even vote for those incumbents’ progeny based exclusively on their dynastic surnames—just like we reward the Blue Devils (and Yankees and Cowboys) with higher TV ratings.

Of course, perhaps this moment will shift the paradigm—after all, sports, the economy and, well, everything are so deeply and grotesquely stratified these days that maybe a backlash is in the offing.

Maybe audiences finally become more interested in the NCAA’s up-from-the-bootstraps underdogs. Maybe voters in the next election throw all the bums out of office. Maybe—just maybe—we start reconciling our contradictory impulses about privilege.

Then again, maybe this is just my March madness still talking in April. But hey, it’s springtime—anything’s possible, right?

David Sirota is the author of the best-selling books “Hostile Takeover” and “The Uprising.” He hosts the morning show on AM760 in Colorado and blogs at OpenLeft.com. E-mail him at ds@davidsirota.com.

© 2010 CREATORS.COM


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By Inherit The Wind, April 8, 2010 at 4:24 am Link to this comment

robert puglia, April 5 at 7:17 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

i think embellish with wind should have its own column
that we might be safe to read other articles without
suffering its scintillating insights.

**************************************

Nobody is holding a gun to your head and forcing you to read my posts.  I skip the posts of those who I feel have little to contribute.

You should do the same rather than bitching about it.

I was at UNC when Coach K was hired. I watched him build his program.  He’s the best coach in the business and he just won his 4th national title.

Report this

By christian96, April 5, 2010 at 10:15 pm Link to this comment

Out of curiosity, does anyone know how much money
Duke University received from the tobacco industry
over the last several years?

Report this

By robert puglia, April 5, 2010 at 4:17 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

i think embellish with wind should have its own column
that we might be safe to read other articles without
suffering its scintillating insights.

Report this

By tdbach, April 5, 2010 at 7:32 am Link to this comment

“Inherit” clearly knows what he’s talking about (I’m assuming gender here).

It’s nice to see Sirota having a little light-hearted fun here, and not succumbing to “christian96’s” impulse to unrelenting seriousness. But I think Sirota has gotten carried away with his theme. Duke’s privileged state – as in being a private, exclusive institution, has nothing to do with the animosity poured onto it. Rather, what people resent is the privilege it enjoys as a perennial contender. It’s all about recruitment in big-time college sports. And nothing draws the cream of the recruiting crop more powerfully than winning on a national stage. Coach K not only consistently makes it to at least the elite 8, he also has the well-earned rep of being the best basketball coach on the planet. Any high-school grad with aspirations of NBA riches and the chops to go along with it would be nuts not to at least give Duke a hearing.

America’s “complicated relationship with privilege” isn’t really all that complicated. As a rule, Americans – being a society built on entrepreneurialism – honor and admire success. To a point. Once that success becomes self-perpetuating, at least a vocal segment of us start hating them.  Of course, Americans are human beings like any others (much as we hate to admit it), which means that a majority of us like to associate ourselves with winners (its Darwinian). Which is why the Dukes, Yankees, and Tigers of the world attract a disproportionate number of eyes to the goings on. It only SEEMS like they are universally hated because their admirers are rather shy and embarrassed by their affection, whereas the haters are proud and flamboyant in their animosity.

Report this

By P. T., April 2, 2010 at 12:38 pm Link to this comment

Being pretty much told over and over by sportscasters that Duke players are actually literate gets kind of tiresome.

Report this

By neoconscience, April 2, 2010 at 6:43 am Link to this comment

christian96, So we must be in a constant state of turmoil, and whoa to those who seek any diverson from a constant state of madness!

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, April 2, 2010 at 4:20 am Link to this comment

Nobody understands Duke-hating better than a North Carolina fan, like me.  And I remember when Duke-hating was SOLELY the province of ACC fans—North Carolina, NC State, Wake Forest, Virginia, Maryland, Clemson and Georgia Tech.

The bottom line is the Coach K is simply the greatest college basketball coach in the game today, and up there as one of the 4 or 5 greatest ever, with John Wooden, Adolph Rupp, and Dean Smith.

Mike Krzyzewski came into a program in disarray. He had one blue-chip player, Vince Taylor. Mike Gminski had graduated and North Carolina was THE hated team.  Likewise Jim Valvano came to NCSU at the same time—two young coaches with success at small schools—K at Army, Jimmy V at Iona.  They became friends and stayed friends, but OH! the post-game interviews they had to endure explaining losses…

I saw one game, I think it was Taylor’s last visiting UNC, where the lights went out about 4 minutes into the game—power was off for 45 minutes on a Saturday afternoon.  When it came back on, James Worthy, Sam Perkins and Michael Jordan (Yes, THAT Michael Jordan, just a freshman) pounded the Devils into the ground by well over 20 points.  Coach K had only one comment after the game “We would have been better off if the lights had stayed off!”

Krzyzewski then recruited “The Twin Towers”, Mark Alarie and Jay Bilas who were supposed to turn them into a national contender.  It took a couple of years but they did.

But what Duke-haters forget is that the Blue Devils went to a lot of final 4s, and several championship games, only to come home empty-handed. “Coach K can’t win the Big One!” wrote the press—just like they had for years and years about Dean Smith—especially after UNC’s loss to Bobby Knight, Isaiah Thomas and the Indiana Hoosiers in 1981. (Isaiah Thomas was a dirty player then, who got away with more fouls than you can believe.)

When Duke FINALLY pulled it off, and then repeated, Duke-Hating became a national pastime.

Now, after 30 years, the program is STILL running like a well-oiled machine and what had been a blue-chip program before Coach K, is now a legend up there with Wooden’s UCLA or Rupp’s Kentucky.  It’s been an amazingly scandal-free program and Krzyzewski has gone from a barely-30 young man to his 60’s in Durham (as in Bull Durham) and is STILL putting top teams out every year.

And he still gets the Christian Laetners and Grant Hills to come play for him.

Despite my admiration, I’m still a Carolina fan and want the Tarheels to whip the Blue Devils’ butts every time they play.

Report this

By christian96, April 1, 2010 at 11:34 pm Link to this comment

This article strongly confirms my belief truthdig
is sorely lacking for substantial writing material.
I’ll try to be of help with the following quote by
Alexander Tyler:  “A democracy ALWAYS collapses over
loose financial policy and is ALWAYS followed by a
dictatorship.” Chew on that one for awhile.  Duke?
What a joke!

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.