JDmysticDJ,

You are simply far too emotional and spoiling for
an argument.  Not interested.

Good luck to you.

Go Right Young Man

Behavioral scientists recognize that behavior is elicited by Nature and Nurture. Clearly you have been nurtured to believe in a “Worldview” that is very similar to the “Worldview” expressed by fascists.

You may feel that your arguments are profound and indisputable, but to me they are nothing more than contorted distortions, disingenuous exaggerations, convoluted fabrications, false equivalencies, and obfuscations.

You claim humanitarian rationales for your fascist mentality, while using sophomoric intellectual theories in an attempt to defend the indefensible.

Your “Worldview” is antiquated and Neanderthal and you are a defender of less than human behaviors, and animal like actions, and an apologist for inhuman policies.

You are tragically misguided, philosophically retarded, and lacking in intelligence. Your narcissistic arrogance would be laughable, if your “Worldview” weren’t so dangerous.

Ardee,
Do SOMETHING to control that irrational rage of yours. It’s making you post really, really stupid stuff.

And be sure to have a nice day!

Inherit The Wind, April 4 at 7:08 am

None so blind, heh ITW? You have, from my first entry into this forum, consistently insulted those with whom you find ideological differences. Unlike a jerk like you, I do understand my sarcastic nature. You, on the other hand post like a “little” child. Perhaps what you find so objectionable in my style is a reflection of what you find intolerable in yourself but cannot face it….

So sad for you…..

GRYM—I’m already pretty old by most people’s standards.

It might really be more reasonable to say “To hell with it, let them kill each other if they like it so much,” except for one thing: as the powers of technology increase and permeate to the people, the struggles for power will become more and more destructive.  There is only one way such a progression can end—and while the last days might be pretty exciting, self-annihilation over the long run is going to be mighty boring. 

Somebody once said, “Formerly, man could not do as he desired.  Now, he can do as he desires; and he must change his desires, or perish.”

I’m here to help.  And though humans do look like pretty hard cases, as Heraclitus said, “Everything flows.”  So there is a little hope.

Anarcissie,

As time goes by, as you become older, you will
know that human nature has not changed in
thousands of years. 

Good luck to you in all things.

Eugene Robinson,

You are nothing but a tool for the war machine.
No scruples yourself,
which makes you much
more dangerous
than any
teabagger.

So, GRYM, you don’t really agree with gerard after all.  You think some political violence isn’t evil.  Far from it; you respect some of its practitioners very highly.

As for changing human nature, human nature changes every day.  We live under radically different conditions than those of our ancestors, and have radically different cultures.  So the situation isn’t quite hopeless.  As long as we worship death machines, though, we’re going to have a very serious and maybe terminal problem.

Anarcissie,

Change the nature of human beings and you’ll find the peace you seek.

Good intentions and good works, such as your own, is always helpful.  The former being the most important and the latter the effect.

History, however, is clear.  There are always tyrants who will seek to subjugate others.  Deterrence, more times than not, keeps the peace.

-

It was not the Founding Fathers who gave the United States her freedoms.  It was not the journalist or the lawyer either.  It was not the pacifist who ended British rule, vanquished German Nazism, Japanese militarism or Communism’s spread.  It was the solder who accomplished the most for the freedoms much of the world enjoys.

Find us ways to change human nature and the entire globe will live in peace.

ardee, April 1 at 5:35 am #

You are a sad little creep actually.
*******************************************

So nice to see I’m not the only one you are calling names in lieu of actually presenting arguments. You like to add “little” to your name calling.

The “sad little creep” here is you.

GRYM—I’m not attributing anything to you except what I quoted.  (You signed on to gerard’s statement that political violence was evil; that’s it.)  From that, I drew various (to me) logical implications which I explicitly stated you had not arrived at (yet).

You see what great difficulties I have in getting across.  Most people eventually learn to ignore what I say and thus remain untroubled by it.

Anarcissie,
RE: April 3 at 8:35 pm

I have no idea what this is about.  Are you attributing everything in your last post toward me?  Do you somehow envision all you’ve opined as reflective of my worldview?  Are you somehow telling me you are a better and/or smarter human being than I may be? 

You engaged me of late for a reason.  Could you try and be frank and succinct?

And no.  I am not here to be confrontational.  I desire no part in it.  Want a sharing of ideas?  A meeting of the minds with honer and respect?  I’m your man.

GRYM—surely I wouldn’t post messages here if I didn’t enjoy confrontation.  And neither would you.  I’ll confront you with my ideas and you’ll confront me with yours, and sparks will fly!  Or maybe not.  We’ll just have to see.

I admit I was being a little bit ironical in welcoming you to the anarchist party.  I didn’t think you’d really come to the party.  But even irony has its square meaning.  So when gerard asks, “Why don’t people ever consider the evil results of all violent political action—right, left or center—”, and you answer, “I could not agree more.  It’s what I have steadily spoken and written of for a very long time”  I decided to suspend disbelief and take up the literal meaning of what you (plural) said: the results of violent political action are evil.  That is, war is evil, terror is evil, oppression is evil, invasions and occupations are evil—and, because it is a social machine for performing exactly these actions, the state is evil.

Whoa!  I know I went too far—because you haven’t thought it through—yet.  But you got your invitation, at least.

As to what to do about it, I really don’t know.  Aggression and violence are very popular.  Here in New York City, you can go to Food Not Bombs and see half a dozen people handing out food to whoever, doing the works of peace, or you can go to the Intrepid Museum, a disused aircraft carrier gussied up to be a tourist attraction, a gigantic death machine, and see thousands lined up to worship.  The conclusion is pretty obvious: we anarcho-commie-pacifist types have our work cut out for us.

I have been trying to figure out a way to undercut the violence stuff for the last fifty years or so.  People seem very, very strongly hooked on it.  Maybe they could just enjoy it in the movies?  But no, they have to elect Great Leaders who have people killed, and then as you know what goes around comes around, usually having gotten a lot worse. 

Any suggestions (other than drop dead, you dirty hippie commie anarchist scum, which I’ve heard before) would be most welcome.

Anarcissie,

Correction: If confrontation for the sake of it is your agenda or desire I’m -not- interested.

Anarcissie, “So, you’ve become an anarchist and a pacifist?  Welcome to the club!  But this still doesn’t answer gerard’s question, much less solve the problem of what to do about it. - Setting one’s own foot on the path of peace, freedom and equality may be a start, however.”

-

First:  I fail to see how you arrived at your conclusions that I subscribe to anarchy. 

Second:  If confrontation for the sake of it is your agenda or desire I’m interested.

Third:  I’m sorry.  Did I miss the many solutions you offered to gerard’s observations?

Go Right Young Man, April 2 at 6:54 am:
‘gerard, “Why don’t people ever consider the evil results of all violent political action—right, left or center—”
- I could not agree more.  It’s what I have steadily spoken and written of for a very long time.’

So, you’ve become an anarchist and a pacifist?  Welcome to the club!  But this still doesn’t answer gerard’s question, much less solve the problem of what to do about it. 

Setting one’s own foot on the path of peace, freedom and equality may be a start, however.

gerard, “Why don’t people ever consider the evil results of all violent political action—right, left or center—”

-

I could not agree more.  It’s what I have steadily spoken and written of for a very long time.

Why don’t people ever consider the evil results of all violent political action—right, left or center—instead of advocating violent political action which one side or another presumes to be righteous and necessary, and believes will bring good results—a belief that is at least as strong as any religious belief?
  Emotions of fear, hate and revenge cloud people’s minds to the point where they cease caring about what results really come from violence.  They act because they feel a need for relief from built-up emotional tensions.
  They do not realize it’s the tension that drives them, however, and so go forth to battle self-deceived, thinking they are doing the right thing.
  Always, every single time, throughout history, both sides of every battle have believed they were doing the right thing.  Only after they experience the brutality and see the bleeding corpses do they stop, make a superficial “peace” and try to go back to where they were before the violence began.
  Once we admitted, understood, remembered the evil results of all violence, we might invent workable agreements for living non-violently together. The fact that this does happen occasionally, for limited periods of time, indicates it’s a possibility.
  The first step,  however, would be a major shift:  We would have to break age-old habits of believing that fighting is heroic, and we would have to take the financial profits out of organized violence.

For some time now, I’ve thought that one of the questions on the form that’s filled out when a gun is purchased ought to reference to what extent the applicant is attracted by tales of biblical violence. The more deeply connected a person is to that nonsense, the more likely it is that they’re able to justify killing them all(god’s enemies) and letting god sort them out. Whenever I hear of one of these loonies doing something “in the name of god,” I shudder, wondering who’s being attacked this time. At least a couple of these armed jeezo-nuts have murdered abortion doctors and voiced that nonesense when being arrested, as if it explains everything. They think that book gives them license. These days there’s only a tiny thin line between holy and crazy, and sometimes it vanishes completely.

dejeanco etal:  Out of curiosity, have any of you actually fought in a War, not a police action, a War?

dejeanco, March 31 at 12:59 pm

Apparently your body of knowledge fails to include the Constitution out system of Justice, our method of electing our leaders and our foundational majority rules.

You are a sad little creep actually.

norman michael harman—Your equation of the Left with state power is so depressing to me I don’t seem to find the energy to answer it.  I suppose you think Mussolini (“everything within the state; nothing outside the state; nothing against the state” was a leftist.

As for the “free market”, there is no such thing as a free market, except maybe flea markets.  In order to have a market one must at least have property, laws about property, and armies and police to enforce the laws.  Usually, as well, there are all sorts of rules about who can trade what, to whom, when, and how much.  The regulations of the stock and commodities exchanges are thick books with hundreds of pages.  “Free market” is a myth.  A useful myth, an ideal, perhaps, to some, but not something that exists in the real world.

Libertarians who think things have been moving their way in the last thirty or forty years must be taking interesting drugs.  Federal expenditures, war, imperialism, foreign military aid, domestic surveillance and spying, the virtual abrogation of the Fourth Amendment, tremendous bailouts and takeovers by the government under the last two regimes?  Not what I’d call a libertarian’s cup of tea at all.  Unless, as I say, it was pretty funny tea.

Mr. Robinson is right.  The right-wingers do have the guns.  And we know how to use them.  And we are willing to fight for our country.  And we do believe in the constitution.  And we’re not afraid of war.

The left-wingers might want to keep this in mind when we decided it’s time to take our country back by force.

Mr. Robinson,

Have you ever spent time reading the excessive vitriolic hatred and deplorable insults from this very Web site?  Had you ever seen Bill Maher talk about how Vice President Cheney needs to die?  Have you ever seen John Kerry talk of killing someone at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. in order to end the Iraq war?  Did you see Michael Moore prominently displayed next to President Carter at the Democratic convention?

Was it Right Wing Tea Baggers who wrote, produced and released a movie depicting the assassination of the previous U.S. President?  You defended that film as an “expression of free speech” and stated, very clearly, that all those who didn’t agree with the film being made or shown were “puritanical” and attempting to “squelch freedom of speech”.  You claimed the movie was simply a sign of the people’s discontent with Washington and the Bush administration.  You defended the movie to the hilt.

Was it right wing fanatics who prevented the first President-Elect in American history from walking to the Capital on inauguration day in 2000 due to things being thrown from the crowd? 

Was it an “Neo-Con” who shot up the Holocaust Museum last year?

Was it not purple shirted SEIU members who attacked a black vendor at a Tea Party march months ago?  Was it not a purple shirted SEIU member who bit the tip of a finger off of an Tea Party protester?

Is the ELF group made up of Right Wing nut-jobs? 

Was the professor, an avid supporter and campaign volunteer of the current president, who shot and killed her co-workers last month part of the Tea Party protests?

Was the Virginia Tech shooter coming from Right-of-Center when he wrote and spoke of the Zionist plots, the ills of capitalism and corporate America?

Was it Right Wing protesters who repeatedly talked of how Vice President Cheney needed to shoot himself in the face?

Was it Neo-Con’s who carried the THOUSANDS of placards with bloody bulls-eyes in the middle of of the faces of Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld?

-

Each of the actions above are illustrative of a small number of people.  Whack-jobs who do deplorable things.  Plain and simple.

You dislike and speak against a large group of people you have never, apparently, taken the time to listen to.  You label the other side of politics as, plainly, bad and stupid people.  And why?  Because they think and act differently.

You’re a bigot Mr. Robinson.

And did Eugene write any articles complaining when Sarah Palin was hung in effigy?  Was it right-wing nuts that threw tomatoes at her at her book signing?  Did he complain that so many “progressive” sites found it hysterically funny when Bush, who was then President of the USA had a shoe thrown at him? Was it right-wing nuts that threatened Tavis Smiley and his mother with death because Tavis allowed some CBC, including Congresswoman Tubbs-Jones, at the State of the Black Union conference to speak out against the harassment they were receiving from CBC Obama supporters?  Was it right-wing nut jobs that called and threatened CBC members who were Hillary Clinton supporters so frequently that they had their telephone numbers changed?  Was it right-wing nuts who made up and distributed lies about the Clintons being racists?  Was it right-wing nut jobs who just happened to be wearing ACORN shirts and waving Obama signs who illegally blocked the entrance to the caucus area here in MN to the extent that some elderly voters gave up instead of trying to fight their why past that crowd…..and just went home.

“Remember all the violent and incendiary slogans blazoned on sign asking for Bush to
be impeached or assasinated.”

It’s ludicrous to portray calls for impeachment as equivalent to calls for assassination. A free people must have the ability to impeach their leaders for crimes against the constitution. Hell, the GOP impeached Clinton for lying about oral sex.

I attended several giant anti-war protests and never saw a single sign calling for violence against Bush.

Let’s be honest here: the violent rhetoric and action is overwhelmingly on the right.

ardee, March 30 at 7:41 am

It pleases me, and may surprise you, to let you know I agree with your post on this subject.

Events of the last decade have caused chaos in political beliefs. Those who were conditioned to believe that the left were reprobates are confronted by the truth of what happened in the last decade, and they find themselves unable to find their political bearings.

The abuses of Wall Street, and the failed policies of the right, have caused many to believe that there are no solutions to our current problems. One would think that the failed policies of the right would cause a shift to the left, but that has not occurred. Instead, a large portion of the electorate has become what I will call the disillusioned radicalized center.

Further complicating the issue is having a centrist president who has been portrayed as being extreme left by the right. Obama is slightly left of center on domestic issues and right of center on foreign policy, and national security issues, as was Lyndon Johnson.  Obama is a corporatist, and a believer in American exceptionalism, which causes many to believe that the left is not a viable solution to current difficulties.

The simple truth is that the left have always been the opponents of capitalist abuses, advocates of social justice, and the opponents of militarism. The right has resisted every improvement in human conditions from child labor laws to health care reform, and the right has always pursued militarist, and corporatist agendas. Corporatists have used every weapon in their arsenal to discredit the left, and they have been extremely successful in doing so, which has lead us to current difficulties.

The Tea Partiers, in their ignorance, have been indoctrinated by fascist demagogues who advance corporatist agendas, and the political chaos has lead to misdirected hatred, and acts of violence.  This has happened before, and the chaos and violence will only increase, unless the American people put up a united front to stop it.

Radicals, whether left or right, are sure they know what is best and use their rights of speech and assembly to get together and push their assurances onto others.

Less radical members of the left and right are not sure they know what is best and therefore hesitate to push their beliefs. They are slow to act as a group.

It is reasonable to assume that, modern life being vastly complicated,  nobody can be sure he/she know what is best and therefore a certain amount of tolerance for differences is necessary for the sake of living together.

The sad and dangerous thing is when people who are sure what is best start punching each other out, or shooting each other in either/or brawls rather than getting together and trying to work things out for mutual benefits. 

Bad government thrives when factions fight each other because it then uses “disorder” as an excuse to bring in “superior” force which in the past has more often led to fascism than to socialism/ communism - though it ain’t necessarily so.

What is pretty sure to happen is that people on both sides lose whatever power they had in the good old days before “disorder broke out” so that government forces are “required” to “preserve order.”

All this makes it more and more necessary to learn to talk together without anger, to create social spaces for discussing and learning, and above all, to listen to each other with sympathy.

Where on earth do you learn to do that?  In school?  In church? At the grocery store? From TV?  And wny not?  Because without realizing what we are missing, we scream on, getting separated, left versus right, till “government” is required to come and pull us apart and take the weapons away, under the guise of “national security” or “keeping the peace.”

Why don’t we catch on to the pattern? It is in the interests of everyone to stop being so naive and get beyond the simple-minded Stimulus/Response reaction.

Anarcissie - I sometimes wonder if the far right actually has a clear understanding of what they’re for or what they’re against.

Decrying the ‘government’ as they seem to do, they in turn have no problem with Congress trying to override a brain-dead woman’s husband’s decision to have her plug pulled - according to her previous wishes (in fact they applauded it.)  Nor do they balk at the ‘government’ being the ultimate decider in cases of pregnant woman wanting to end their pregnancies. 

Actually, given the all-over-the-place platforms of either the ‘left’ or the ‘right’ the case seems to be, finally, I’m ‘left’ because I’m not ‘right’ or I’m ‘right’ because I’m not ‘left.’ As a result there are bound to be glaring contradictions among the beliefs on both sides of the political spectra not to mention that neither side has a clear picture of WHAT it believes.

felicity, March 30 at 12:15 pm:
’... I don’t understand the growing discontent of the far right with the direction the country is going since the country has been moving to the ‘right’ for at least 30 years (at least its political, social and economic policies have been moving right.) ...’

That depends on what you mean by “right”.  Many people construe libertarians as rightists, and the country certainly hasn’t been moving in their direction.  Others considered right-wing are social conservatives (racists, homophobes, etc.) and religious fanatics.  They have gotten very little from the Republican Party they adopted in the 1960s.  In 2008 they could not prevent McCain from being nominated, nor Obama from being elected.  If you look around the media in general and this web site in particular, you will see that the centralization of state power and the diminution of individual rights, which many self-styled rightists claim to oppose, is considered a Good Thing by many who designate themselves as “liberals” or “progressives” or even “leftists”, including the awful Health Care bill.  So I don’t think the non-ruling class right-wingers have much to be happy about.

Yet again the specious argument, “crazies on both sides” is used to somehow rectify the situation?  Everybody does it so it’s okay?

Aside from this, I don’t understand the growing discontent of the far right with the direction the country is going since the country has been moving to the ‘right’ for at least 30 years (at least its political, social and economic policies have been moving right.)

I think it’s more the case that we’ve become an unhappy bunch of citizens and people will overcome their unhappiness either by behaving as aggressively as possible OR by clinging to a fixed moral code (which they make up.) And here we are.

Normally I’m not one for relativism.

However, it all depends on your point of view, and your political preference. This country doesn’t do a very good job of nurturing sanity, anyway.

Do crazy people, share political delusions, yes of course. When they share them, it’s so much harder to treat them psychologically. 

Somehow, we always look at the politics instead of the individual behind them. 

How many billions of dollars does this country spend each year on psych meds, street drugs, cosmetics - sickness in every shape and form.

And what would our country look like if it wasn’t filled to the brim with movies, and videos, and violent video games, etc. Who would be sane enough to bear the silence? Not to have every waking moment available for some sort of diversion? And we consider this as normal, sane?

This country is fertile ground for those who present extreme political views, whether they are feminist ones or right wing ones.

But don’t for a second think that someone who holds political views opposed to you is stupid, or ignorant. Or that high intelligence, makes one sane. Instead, intelligence often creates a greater capacity for insanity and delusion.

Hitler was a madman, but Germany almost took control of the whole world. And if it’s heavy water experiments weren’t delayed, it would have had the means to deliver thermonuclear weapons to England, winning world war II.   

Madmen, without conscience, often are the victors in political contests. History is full of them.

Allowing people anywhere to acquire and carry any weapons appears the wrong thing to do.
And in a society that is as miseducated as the one in US, miseducated people cannot do much right on political scene.

In some countries a child can be caught in web of lies spewn by ‘relig’ns’, ‘schooling’, holliwood, media, advertising, etc.

Disinformed an miseducated people and arms don’t mix well.
The way out is as always an enlightening education that wld give children an useful tool in combatting any deceiving! tnx

More empty rhetoric from the main democratic party apologist to publish here. Of course there are nut jobs on both sides, its almost a mathematical certainty in fact.

That left wing violence is in abeyance these days points more to the disorganised state of that wing of American politics than it does to a greater degree of sanity among said lefties. Extremism is what it is, what it isnt is yet another tiresome talking point from one like Robinson who has nothing to say and says it nevertheless.

The rhetoric from both sides of the aisle is now becoming so incendiary that it is hard to tell who is not crazy.
Mr. Robinson, while the facts remain that there are a growing number of Far Right Wing Nut groups that share a common enemy, namely factual information, the left too has its share of numerous groups that would shutter
government and give rise to anarchy.
Although, given the climate today, this is highly unlikely, as it is the Far Right Wing Nuts, who in the debate leading up to the so-called, Health Care Reform Act, talked about ‘reloading and using their weapons!’
Why does the fact that socialized medicine exists in this country bring out the worst of the worst in those who are Fundamentalist, Right Wing conspiracy nuts? I may have one explanation, it wasn’t in the cards for any health care reform. The insurance companies are the only people who will benefit from the health care debacle and I do mean people as defined by the Supreme Court of the United States, the best judges that money can buy.
We, the American people are now at the mercy of, and economic slaves to the ‘corporatocracy.’ We are the sheeple of the past who funded all the wars, voted in selections that have no meaning and are still without true universal health care, which by the way,
every other civilized country in the world has.
The Congress and President have the best health care in the world, yet the American people, do without the
same benefits. WHY the INEQUITY? Because the corporate power elite structure does not want the people thinking that they are anything but economic slaves to the corporate machinery.
If we, the people, got real health care we might just
get real ideas of freedom and democracy, and have redress to the Constitution and Bill of Rights again.
I am ashamed, not for the first time, to be an American. We cannot even take care of men, women and children, without recourse to the corporate structure
and the powerful elite of this country and the world banking system.
Someday, maybe someday, the sheeple will wake up and start the revolution again, and then, we the people, will arise and again take up the mantle of government that was ours to begin with.

Yeah, I don’t remember a serious left-wing terrorist since they caught the Unabomber in 1996—the same year Eric Rudolf bombed the Olympics in Atlanta.  And the Unabomber had been the only one for at least a decade.

PETA has been known to throw paint on women in fur coats—doing that to MY wife would incite ME to violence—and breaking into labs to release animals, but that’s about the worst I know of that they’ve done.

That’s always the rationale of apologists “The other side does it too!”

Thanks Eugene, it needed to be said. 

A free society is a voluntary thing requiring a population with good will
and information to preserve it.  Information has pretty much been
denied the citizenry for 3 decades and been replaced by mind numbing
diversions, and marketing hypnosis.  The People on both sides
understand that something very big is amiss.  Those responsible, and
those most benefitting from this imbalance preserve their position by
pitting the People against the People.  We are being manipulated apart.

Eventually both sides will awaken to this and the problem will be fixed. 
I hope it doesn’t take an escalation of the stupidity to bring it about,
and I fear that it will.  The very soul of America is ill right now. It is a
tightening circle of military excess, greed, and the dissipation of what
was the Spirit of America.  The very soul of America is ill right now.

The shortcut to healing would be to stop our international bad actions,
prosecute our war criminals, and restore an independent free press,
and restore the concept that Government exists to serve those
governed. The candidate Obama might have been able to do this, but
the President Obama does not seem to be up to the task. He has joined
those who spin rather than do.

In the meantime, the informed ones must be vigilant in not getting
swept up in the hate storm being used to sap the People’s power.

Just because “a federal indictment alleges” something does not make it true. Sometimes government agents instigate the “conspiracy” (remember Ruby Ridge?) so they can make highly publicized arrests. But thanks, Mr. Robinson, for not blaming it all on Sarah Palin.

Of course it doesn’t matter that the previous President of the US of A not only was a self-professed Christian, he also claimed that God talked to him. Yet he sent the official, therefore legal, military to Iraq where more than a million people were killed (not just plotted against). And most of the men and women in the armed forces espouse some sort of Christianity. What does the claim to religion have to do with any of this?

I might not be able tooooo watch Beyond Viet Nam
  special by Tavis.  because I tooooo

  had my Sat, antenna, and cable disconnected
  because, what is offered ,isn’t worth the money
  and give up watching pro sports anyhow.
    (which is just what the NCAA tournament is)

Pease,  everyone watch Tavis Smiley on PBS

  Wednesday night…...

    B E Y O N D   V I E T   N A M

  You toooo EUGENE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The timing of Holder’s sting operation was

  just perfect for you,  was it not EUGENE…..?????

Thats your job Eugene, from now to election time

  keep reporting the fringes….

  The Democrats are desperate to keep the minority vote
  aren’t they Eugene.????.
  Eric Holder handin you crumbs to keep the racism
  flame burning until election time.
  There are a bunch of thieves and crooks Holder ought
  to be going after,  mostly in this Admin and the
  last Admin. !!!!!!

Sir,

While I agree the crazies on the Right tend to be more violent or find it easier to get caught up in a violent act, to say that the crazies on the left don’t exist is just absurd, there is a group of left wing radicals that believe that they have the right to say and do whatever they want no matter what pain or affliction is caused to others, thankfully we live in a system where most of those “crazies” as you put it no matter what political agenda they tend to follow are people who are imprisoned to keep us and our communities safe.

All I have to say is that this looks like a great
fund raising opportunity for the Southern Poverty Law
Center. Quick everybody, send your money.