LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
May 27, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     robert scheer     barack obama     gay marriage     ndaa     chris hedges
Most Read

Say 'Hi-Ho!' as They Strip-Search You

TED: 'A Money-Soaked Orgy of Self-Congratulatory Futurism'

I Can't Hear Myself Think

A Rare Admission That Money Trumps Everything Else

Massive Wildfire Rages in New Mexico

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Why Bain Questions Matter
OSHA Struggles When Tower Climbers Die

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Better Than We Found It
The Good-Natured Dictator

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Reports

The World Liberal Opportunists Made

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Oct 25, 2010
AP / Dario Lopez-Mills

Mexican protesters wear Obama masks during the president’s 2009 visit to Mexico. Disenchantment with the hopebringer is not limited to these shores.

By Chris Hedges

The lunatic fringe of the Republican Party, which looks set to make sweeping gains in the midterm elections, is the direct result of a collapse of liberalism. It is the product of bankrupt liberal institutions, including the press, the church, universities, labor unions, the arts and the Democratic Party. The legitimate rage being expressed by disenfranchised workers toward the college-educated liberal elite, who abetted or did nothing to halt the corporate assault on the poor and the working class of the last 30 years, is not misplaced. The liberal class is guilty. The liberal class, which continues to speak in the prim and obsolete language of policies and issues, refused to act. It failed to defend traditional liberal values during the long night of corporate assault in exchange for its position of privilege and comfort in the corporate state. The virulent right-wing backlash we now experience is an expression of the liberal class’ flagrant betrayal of the citizenry. 

The liberal class, which once made piecemeal and incremental reform possible, functioned traditionally as a safety valve. During the Great Depression, with the collapse of capitalism, it made possible the New Deal. During the turmoil of the 1960s, it provided legitimate channels within the system to express the discontent of African-Americans and the anti-war movement. But the liberal class, in our age of neo-feudalism, is now powerless. It offers nothing but empty rhetoric. It refuses to concede that power has been wrested so efficiently from the hands of citizens by corporations that the Constitution and its guarantees of personal liberty are irrelevant. It does not act to mitigate the suffering of tens of millions of Americans who now make up a growing and desperate permanent underclass. And the disparity between the rhetoric of liberal values and the rapacious system of inverted totalitarianism the liberal class serves makes liberal elites, including Barack Obama, a legitimate source of public ridicule. The liberal class, whether in universities, the press or the Democratic Party, insists on clinging to its privileges and comforts even if this forces it to serve as an apologist for the expanding cruelty and exploitation carried out by the corporate state.

Populations will endure repression from tyrants as long as these rulers continue to effectively manage and wield power. But human history has amply demonstrated that once those in positions of power become redundant and impotent, yet retain the trappings and privileges of power, they are swiftly and brutally discarded. Tocqueville observed that the French, on the eve of their revolution, hated the aristocrats about to lose their power far more than they had ever hated them before. The increased hatred directed at the aristocratic class occurred because as the aristocracy lost real power there was no decline in their fortunes. As long as the liberal class had even limited influence, whether through the press or the legislative process, liberals were tolerated and even respected. But once the liberal class lost all influence it became a class of parasites. The liberal class, like the déclassé French aristocracy, has no real function within the power elite. And the rising right-wing populists, correctly, ask why liberals should be tolerated when their rhetoric bears no relation to reality and their presence has no influence on power. 

The death of the liberal class, however, is catastrophic for our democracy. It means there is no longer any check to a corporate apparatus designed to further enrich the power elite. It means we cannot halt the plundering of the nation by Wall Street speculators and corporations. An ineffectual liberal class, in short, means there is no hope, however remote, of a correction or a reversal through the political system and electoral politics. The liberals’ disintegration ensures that the frustration and anger among the working and the middle class will find expression in a rejection of traditional liberal institutions and the civilities of a liberal democracy. The very forces that co-opted the liberal class and are responsible for the impoverishment of the state will, ironically, reap benefits from the collapse. These corporate manipulators are busy channeling rage away from the corporate and military forces hollowing out the nation from the inside and are turning that anger toward the weak remnants of liberalism. It does not help our cause that liberals indeed turned their backs on the working and middle class.

The corporate state has failed to grasp the vital role the liberal class traditionally plays in sustaining a stable power system. The corporate state, by emasculating the liberal class, has opted for a closed system of polarization, gridlock and political theater in the name of governance. It has ensured a further destruction of state institutions so that government becomes even more ineffectual and despised. The collapse of the constitutional state, presaged by the death of the liberal class, has created a power vacuum that a new class of speculators, war profiteers, gangsters and killers, historically led by charismatic demagogues, will enthusiastically fill. It opens the door to overtly authoritarian and fascist movements. These movements rise to prominence by ridiculing and taunting the liberal class for its weakness, hypocrisy and uselessness. The promises of these proto-fascist movements are fantastic and unrealistic, but their critiques of the liberal class are grounded in truth. 

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.

In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.

Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.

Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.

Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.

kerryrose's avatar

By kerryrose, October 25, 2010 at 7:23 am Link to this comment

vincente

I am pursuing an EdD because I thought I could make a difference by teaching Higher Ed and committing my students to pursue worthy goals, and also being able to write to an audience that could effect change.

You are right, though.  I am being funneled to behave already with my dissertation ideas being axed by my advisor because I am trying to empower student voices, through non Western structures.  I been told ‘there are plenty of structural possibilities from OUR culture, and why would you want to encourage dissent?

I don’t understand why having a voice is considered dissent except that it is a suffocated voice crying out from bottoms of the power structure.

Report this

By Devamitta, October 25, 2010 at 7:14 am Link to this comment

Hedges is like a John the Baptist, a voice in the wilderness calling for making straight the paths of those in the wildnerness.  That is a good thing. What bother’s me, and not because I look for and rely on “saviors” is that he has little of the Jesus in him.  He is great at identifying problems, but never seems to give any direction of where he thinks citizens should go to get out of the wilderness. His rants are like a map that leads him in circles so that he always comes back to the same place. Still, if you are satisfied in the desert living on honey and locusts, then Hedges is your server.  I prefer those whose menu has the other half, the dessert in the desert, the path to a more promising land.

By the way, good critique by Alphysicist in his/her post.

Report this

By still trying, October 25, 2010 at 7:13 am Link to this comment

Excelent analysis Chris. You really help me clarify my unarticulated misgivings. Now I understand better why I am so totaly pissed off at my “liberal friends.”

Report this

By vicente carranza, October 25, 2010 at 7:11 am Link to this comment

Alphysicist I have never agreed with anyone comments 100% but I do with you.  It is great what you said and it is true.  I have lived a lot of it.  Thank you.

Report this

By Bill Day, October 25, 2010 at 7:10 am Link to this comment

I basically agree with the substance of this article, even if its tone is a little strident.  It frames the problem nicely, but it says little about what needs to be done. Perhaps the book lays out a plan?

Report this

By tedmurphy41, October 25, 2010 at 7:05 am Link to this comment

For the “lunatic fringe” of the Republican party to make sweeping gains, you do need the help of a “lunatic electorate”.

Report this

By vicente carranza, October 25, 2010 at 6:40 am Link to this comment

I have been a full time activists for 41 years.  I have the honor to worked with all kinds of groups all over the United States, Mexico and So. America.  What I personally saw was that things in the struggle were made harder by LIBERALS and Democrat lawyers.  When it came to the final action or voting or anything else LIBERALS and Democrat lawyers never took a stand. Plus it is real hard to work with a LIBERAL that has a college degree, especially a PhD. A LIBERAL PhD is useless. To me they were fence riders because they were to scare to commit because they wanted to be part of the ruling class. Right Wingers are 90% wrong in all they do but they don’t care plus they believe their own do-do and always take a stand. So if the Liberal class in dying blame the LIBERALS and the Democrat lawyers.

Report this
kerryrose's avatar

By kerryrose, October 25, 2010 at 5:32 am Link to this comment

Chris Hedges new book ‘The Death of the Liberal Class’ is available at B&N.  It expands on the ideas in this article.  I haven’t finished it yet, but so far it doesn’t fail to edify.

Report this

By Alphysicist, October 25, 2010 at 5:02 am Link to this comment

Dear Chris Hedges:

  Great article, and I also liked your book Empire of Illusion.  At a fundamental level I disagree, however: the so called liberal class is not a group of people who just stood by as Wall street raped the country and so forth.  This point of view assigns them a rather passive role.  But they were ACTIVE PARTICIPANTS, not to mention beneficiaries in what happened.  The Ivy League trained (Nobel-Prize winning) economists were not making mistakes when they advocated deregulation (which was championed by the Clinton administration): they were providing the ideological and pseudo-rational background for what was happening (an example of non-negligible and willful participation for prestige and generous pay in return). 

  The anti-segregation and the anti-war movements of the sixties were also corrupted by the liberal class into something that they were not intended to be.  Political correctness was introduced to stifle criticism of the elites: for example the criticism of AIPAC or even to mention the U.S.S. Liberty was for a long time (and still is) treated on the same level as genuine racism.  Justified anger of African-Americans is very often channeled into hate of the white working class neighbor (because they happen to be on average marginally better off), rather than used as a basis for genuine progressive reform.  It is now more a kind of “divide et impera” politics.  As mass uncontrolled immigration also threatens the jobs of the working class (especially the un-skilled working class) it would be the job of the liberal class to stand up against it.  However, as usual, they use the term “racism” to stifle criticism of this form of outsourcing.

The anti-war movements of the sixties were diverted in the direction of the “sexual revolution”, an extension, in the end, of the consumer culture, which had strong profit motives (the rise of the porn industry, which you detail in your book, could not have been made possible without the sexual revolution).  (Please read for example the book “Elementary Particles”, by M. Houellebecq, or see the BBC series on the life of Eddie Bernays.)

For the killing of culture, Hollywood and the mainstream media bears a large fraction of responsibility.  The Jerry Springers and co. are not by any means arch-conservatives.  But also, the why study “dead white males” movement at universities (which also uses the struggle against racism as a cover) is one of the factors which lead to Dickens and co. being forgotten.

The problem with the so called liberal class is that they end up corrupting the idea of solidarity.  The Republican right is openly pro-business and pro-profit in most cases, so it is not as corrupt of them to act accordingly.  A Wolfensohn (ex-president of the World Bank)  playing the role of the champion of the poor is just like Madonna presenting herself as an actress.

Reading your book it occurred to me that liberal class is somewhat of an oxymoron: liberal thinking, which is open and critical, is by its very nature a subversive activity.  The idea of a class (in the sense in which your article uses it), however, assumes some sort of connection or participation in institutions of power.

Report this

Page 3 of 3 pages  <  1 2 3

Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.