|
|
May 23, 2013
|
|
The Uninspired GOP ElectoratePosted on Feb 7, 2012
OK, now it’s settled, right? I mean, it must be settled by now. Mitt Romney is going to be the nominee. Eat your peas, Republicans, and then fall in line, because Romney’s the guy. Right? Probably. Even at this point, after Romney trounced Newt Gingrich in the Florida primary and the Nevada caucuses, there are some fairly compelling reasons for Republicans to pause before bowing to the party establishment’s decision that Mitt must be It. First is the fact that so many GOP voters still can’t summon much enthusiasm for their likely standard-bearer. In a poll released last week, the Pew Research Center found that an incredible 52 percent of Republicans and GOP-leaning independents consider the field of candidates only fair or poor. Just 46 percent assessed the field as good or excellent—compared to 68 percent who were satisfied with the contenders at the same point in the battle for the nomination four years ago. In Florida, exit polls confirmed Pew’s findings: Nearly four in 10 GOP voters said they were unhappy with their choices. It is reasonable to assume that many Republicans who didn’t bother to vote—and thus were not sampled in exit polls—are probably even less enthusiastic. Advertisement Still, somebody is going to get nominated. At this point, Romney has shown he can beat Gingrich almost everywhere. But that “almost” is important. Gingrich won big in South Carolina. And while Romney rolled up huge margins in the southern and central parts of Florida, Gingrich beat him in the panhandle counties that border Alabama and Georgia—a part of the state, demographically and culturally, that isn’t South Beach but, rather, just plain South. This is significant because the South is the Republican Party’s heartland. Romney has shown in other contests that he can put a check mark in every ideological box—that despite Gingrich’s taunt of “Massachusetts moderate,” he can still win the support of voters who call themselves “very conservative” or who say they are tea party members. But maybe the relevant pejorative is the “Massachusetts” part. So far, Romney has not shown that he can connect with and excite voters in the South the way Gingrich does. If the bruised, battered, underfunded Gingrich campaign can survive long enough—and if Gingrich can rediscover the in-your-face mojo that gave him such a lift in the South Carolina debates—he could potentially beat Romney in Georgia and Tennessee on Super Tuesday, March 6, and in Alabama and Mississippi a week later. At that point, if I were a GOP pooh-bah, I’d have to worry about going into the November elections with a candidate at the top of the ticket who had received so little love from the party’s most loyal supporters. Maybe the Gingrich insurgency will prove to be nothing more than a sad, divisive ego trip. Maybe Romney will show that he can win—or at least compete—in the South. Realistically, chances are that his superior resources, organization and discipline will prevail in the end. Then what? Well, if you believe the polls, Romney probably loses to President Obama in the fall. A new Washington Post poll, released Monday, shows that Obama leads Romney by 51 percent to 45 percent among registered voters. The poll also showed that Obama’s approval rating is at 50 percent, the first time it has reached that benchmark since May, right after Osama bin Laden was killed. On protecting the middle class and dealing with taxes, international affairs and terrorism, voters believe Obama would do a better job than Romney. But perhaps the most important figure—found not in the poll, but in Labor Department statistics released Friday—is 8.3 percent. That’s the unemployment rate for January, and it is the lowest since February 2009, right after Obama took office. Romney’s central argument for the presidency is that he will do a better job of managing the economy. Despite their overall preference for Obama, many voters buy that premise. But if the unemployment rate continues to fall, it won’t matter whether Republicans go with the safe bet or the mercurial firebrand. Economic recovery almost surely equals four more years.
Previous item: Why Russia Just Can’t Quit Syria’s Dictator Next item: The Price of a Good Night’s Sleep New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By D.R. Zing, February 7, 2012 at 9:08 pm Link to this comment
When your policies are asinine it’s only logical a stable of
jackasses will enter the race.
The Republicans did well in the 2010 elections because the media fell
in love with the Republican Tea Party and let candidates across the
country tell the lie we can cut expenditures without cutting military
spending and we can balance the budget without raising taxes.
President Obama compounded the problem by holing up in the White
House and not coming out with blistering attacks on the media and its
Republican allies. 2010 came and went. We got a bunch of delusional,
obstructionist Tea Party Republicans in Congress. Nothing got done.
People got screwed. Many people finally realized Tea Party is just
another word for Republican do nothings. The Republican Party is
floundering.
And they don’t know what to do. They’ve banked on the
superstitiously religious, the Luddites, the condemners of science,
the truculent, the haters of government, the racists, the bigots—
that’s the big tent of the Republican Party, not all are any one
thing, not all are racist and bigots, but there’s plenty of nuts to go
around.
What’s that get you?
Newt, a vicious blowhard.
Perry, who is indubitably ignorant and profoundly stupid (thank God
he’s gone).
Romney, who comes from the callous corporate culture regarding human
beings as exploitable numbers, an outlook he cannot shake no more
than he can comb out that helmet o’hair of his.
Ron Paul, who, despite being the sanest of the bunch, is still pretty
whacky in his own right.
Santorum, a superstitious microbrain who would be like George W.
Bush, except worse on social issues.
The further you go down the list the nuttier it gets.
But that’s what happens when your platform leaves standing room only
for the superstitious, the bigoted, and well-heeled thieves.
Make no mistake. It’ll be a close race till the bitter end.
Report thisThere’s plenty of jackasses behind the microphones and cameras.
They’ll keep it interesting.
By MeHere, February 7, 2012 at 11:48 am Link to this comment
A wonderful article with nothing that is meaningful about the dysfunctional political process we have. Mr. Robinson has a real talent for this kind of stuff.
Report thisBy GoyToy, February 7, 2012 at 8:21 am Link to this comment
Why does this site carry articles by MSM hacks like Robinson and E.J. Dionne? If I wanted Robinson’s opinion, I’d subscribe to WashPo.
Report thisBy John Poole, February 7, 2012 at 7:06 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Others on this site have suggested that someone like Jeb Bush may be drafted at
the Republican convention.
The Republicans know that the numbers coming from the Obama administration
Report thiswill be cooked in Obama’s favor as we approach November (another perk of the
incumbent) so out of the likely chaos it may be the perfect time for a third party
movement. It wouldn’t really be a third party but merely a second party running
against the two wings of the one percent party.
By John M, February 7, 2012 at 6:11 am Link to this comment
Bob Dole
Report thisJohn McCain = Bob Dole 2.0
Mitt Romney = Bob Dole 3.0