|
|
May 19, 2013
|
|
The Tax War Goes OnlinePosted on Mar 11, 2010By David Sirota Is the Internet everywhere or is it nowhere? This question will strike many readers as a navel-gazing exercise in postmodern existential inquiry, prompting reflections on the 21st century meaning of location (is an IP address really an address?) and space (is cyberspace actually “space”?). But thanks to Amazon.com, it’s become a question about more concrete and imminent issues like budget deficits and tax fairness. Following a 70 percent earnings increase last quarter, the company this week terminated its business relationships with its Colorado affiliates. The move was a response to new Colorado legislation compelling online retailers to either collect the sales taxes that every other business collects, or at least disclose that customers must pay the levy to the state themselves. The bill was pragmatic, seeking to raise much-needed revenues as Colorado’s infrastructure and schools buckle under a $2 billion budget shortfall. But Amazon, indifferent to such emergencies, reacted with punitive petulance, sending a deliberate message to lawmakers in every other state: If you make us play by the same tax rules as other businesses, your state will be punished, too. The company, you see, fears that most capitalist of principles: fair competition. It instead relies on a rigged market. Advertisement In recent years, New York, North Carolina, Hawaii and Rhode Island have woken up to the scheme, passing laws that explicitly apply their local taxes to online retailers. Now, with budget crises intensifying, even more states are pondering similar legislation. And so rather than simply accepting a level playing field, Amazon opted to make an example out of Colorado as a means of pre-emptive intimidation. This is politics at its most bare-knuckled—not surprising, considering it comes from Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, a caricature of Information Age greed. In an economy that could have sprung from the movie “Office Space,” Amazon is Initech and Bezos is the firm’s soullessly saccharine Bill Lumbergh. Like the typical dot-com shark, he shrouds old-fashioned suit-and-cigar ruthlessness in business-casual attire, ear-to-ear grins and Charlie Rose-ready colloquialisms. But beneath the earth tones and triumphalist technobabble is the same boor who offshored a Seattle call center the moment employees pondered a union. Punishing one state’s economy to scare other states is all in a day’s work for this guy—especially because ratio-wise, it could be a brilliant financial decision. Sacrificing some business in Colorado, where the tax was projected to raise $5 million in public revenue, may end up a jackpot investment if the move kills such an initiative in places like California, where it could raise $150 million every year. “If”—it always comes down to “if,” doesn’t it? And this particular “if” is bigger than even Bezos’ corporation. Amazon, as one California lawmaker says, has “built an entire business model based on tax avoidance.” Unfortunately, so have many other firms, as evidenced by America’s $300 billion annual gap between taxes owed and paid. And as more commerce is transacted through tax-avoiding Internet conglomerates, that gap could grow, honest local business could be further disadvantaged and deficits could explode, forcing ever deeper cuts to public services. This is the dystopian outcome that multinational corporations and anti-government activists aim for in today’s tax wars—and they could make it a reality. If—but only if—states back down. David Sirota is the author of the best-selling books “Hostile Takeover” and “The Uprising.” He hosts the morning show on AM760 in Colorado and blogs at OpenLeft.com. E-mail him at ds@davidsirota.com. © 2010 Creators.com Previous item: The Terrorists Newt Gingrich Wouldn’t Stop Next item: The Difference Between a Terrorist and Someone Who Flies a Plane Into a Building New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By Timothy Gawne, March 15, 2010 at 6:47 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
So Wall Street get trillions in bailouts, and the capital gains rate is kept very low.
Report thisWe make it up by raising taxes on wages, and on work and production via sales
taxes. Excuse me. Supporting the continued expansion of regressive, anti-work
and anti-production taxes so we can continue to pump money into the subsidized
speculative casino of Wall Street is just wrong.
By marcus medler, March 14, 2010 at 3:28 pm Link to this comment
It is just so sad, Americans pathological need to
Report thisavoid taxes. The economic bullies, such as
Amazon, benefit greatly from this short sighted
mantra of the weak. Fools.
The average american will cheer as he is eaten
live!
By KISS, March 13, 2010 at 6:23 am Link to this comment
Careful David, your tax and spend is showing.
Report thisNow how about the wasteful needs of spending on fulfillment of salary’s and perks? Most electeds are better paid than their constituents, sad to say.
And than there are the repugs, fulfilling their obligations to make sure the loaf of bread is distributed to big business.