|
|||
|
The Rise of Mad MasculinityPosted on Mar 28, 2011
The first quarter of 2011 has ushered in the year of the “mad man.” From Charlie Sheen to Chris Brown to George Lopez to Jared Loughner and David Prosser, we’ve seen it all: everything from verbal and emotional abuse of women to polygamy to assault and attempted murder. Sadly, this idea of mad masculinity is being turned into a commodity that can be consumed repeatedly across a range of media outlets. What’s sadder is that these examples could be multiplied many times over and aren’t limited to stories on TMZ or headlines in mainstream newspapers. As Phil Molé details in a thorough and important post, “the worst cases of misogyny in the world today are rarely even deemed newsworthy.” But whether we’re talking about India or Indiana, what remains striking is how little we seem to know or care about the frequency of discrimination against women, physical or otherwise. What’s more is that we seem to be entertained by an increasingly blatant contempt for women. Why is Chris Brown invited to return to “Good Morning America” following his morning-show meltdown after he was asked questions about his assault on his onetime girlfriend Rihanna? Why is Charlie Sheen slated to make $7 million from his upcoming national tour, aka “My Violent Torpedo of Truth/Defeat Is Not an Option Show”? Why does George Lopez feel it’s all right to call Kirstie Alley a pig on his talk show? Why don’t we talk about hateful sexist language that Loughner directed at Rep. Gabrielle Giffords before he shot her in January? Why is Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Prosser allowed to use slurs against Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson? When mad men rear their heads in mainstream media—as in the cases of Sheen, Brown, Lopez, Loughner and Prosser—their transgressions are largely dismissed. Or, worse, they are turned into a joke. And when mad men such as Loughner or Prosser attack women in politics, physically or verbally, it rarely commands serious scrutiny or analysis. Mad men are treated as individual bad men and not as part of a society that devalues women. The recent focus on mad misogynist men as entertainment also appeals to an escapist impulse on the part of audiences. More important, it suggests that we’ve become desensitized and are either unable or unwilling to address discrimination against women in a serious and political manner. In the cases of Brown and Sheen, misogyny disappeared in favor of a focus on differential treatment among mad men who assault women. In the cases of Lopez and Prosser, misogyny disappeared in favor of a focus on how the men’s careers will be affected. And in Loughner’s case, misogyny disappeared from the conversation in favor of a focus on his own history of mental illness. Advertisement Instead of fighting to end discrimination against women we have simply allowed misogyny to come out of the contained spaces of homes and workplaces and take over mainstream media. Men who won’t “man up” are called “pussies.” Women who won’t submit are called “total bitches.” And so-called ugly women are referred to as “grenades” and “pigs.” Framing this kind of talk as scandalous gossip and entertainment allows audiences to feel better because we would never dream of using those terms. And even if we secretly would use that kind of language, we are still better than those crazy men with their crude manners who use such words in public. We fail to realize our power to turn these images off and demand that different and more humane images of men and women be the norm. Even more tragically, we fail to acknowledge that consuming these images implicates us in misogyny, regardless of how genuinely we wish they did not. New and Improved CommentsWe are launching a major overhaul of our comments section. In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread. Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts. Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with. Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page. |
By Mike, April 1, 2011 at 7:11 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Of course! I can see the author’s outrage! How is it that we are not punishing every living human male for the erratic behavior of one, (formerly) drug-addled male celebrity? When one man does anything of which hard core extremist gynocentrists disapprove, ALL men should be severely punished! Right on Marcia!!!
Report thisBy RayLan, March 31, 2011 at 5:56 pm Link to this comment
Misogynistic, homophobic, racist and otherwise exotically phobic entertainment is regular fare for the culture of dumbed down dumb ass consumers. Otherwise critical thinking might spread and ruin the mass purchase of perfectly unecessary excesses. What would happen to the GDP, then so carefully monitored by deficit-phobic GOP?
Report thisBy gerry, March 31, 2011 at 2:06 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
congratulations! if the corporate monoliths that couldn’t care less what gender
Report thisor race you are as long as they can use you up…the corporate monoliths who
seemingly own this country wanted to divide and conquer…by creating tense
divisions between people you have played right into there hands. human
interaction bewteen men and women, men and men, and any other secenario
you can envision is first and foremost relational…and ideoligical
understandings are to shallow and alienating…to clumsy to adequately even
begin to address that problem.-this is where a few of the people on this
comments section are wrong. you want to come on here and claim you “always
were curious if other women endured the same treatment” but it sounds like
you have your answer before the conversation even started. this piece is
lunkheaded and lacks sensitivity. talk about angry. you think sheen is treated
with anything even approximating respect by corporate sponsors and network
heads…he’s a commodity….just like brown or brittany spears. you’re a woman
who goes through that then work on empathy yourself. using a individual to
illustrate your agenda…whatever that agenda mayb, whether you think it right
or wronge is exploitive. you should know this
By Inherit The Wind, March 31, 2011 at 12:27 pm Link to this comment
The one inference the author makes that I disagree with is that she says misogyny is not entertainment.
The empirical evidence shows that it is, very much entertainment, and popular entertainment at that, that sells well, just after Entertainment Tonight! and before Dancing With The Stars.
I’ve long noticed that many of my fellow males will do anything to prevent their fellows from doubting their “manhood”, say anything, commit, ultimately any atrocity rather than face looking weak. Like Marty McFly in Back to The Future who will ruin his life again and again just by someone calling him “chicken”.
Report thisBy Napolean DoneHisPart, March 31, 2011 at 1:02 am Link to this comment
Poor Sheen looks haggard… and sucked dry.
I hope he pulls up soon from his nose dive.
Report thisBy louiss123, March 30, 2011 at 5:10 pm Link to this comment
Men vs women..please. What a waste of time. This article should have been
Report thisabout..how we don’t act like adults. That would be a great article..maybe Ruth
marcus will take that on.
IF..our constitution is the ‘law’ of the land..is Obama acting like an adult in
bombing Libya? He really does not have the authority to do that. So then..is Hillary
Clinton wrong(non-adult like)too? Most members of congress?
Does that mean people like Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinch are acting like adults? As
they oppose Obama?
Are liberals acting childish when they take to the streets when a republican
president bombs a country, but are silent when a democrat does it?
To me an adult means you take complete responsibility for every aspect of your
life. Your word is your bond. You are an example to children.
How would this place look if we took those 3 things on?
By ignorance_perhaps, March 30, 2011 at 3:20 pm Link to this comment
I’m glad this article was written because there is a
Report thison “growing” problem with misogyny mixed media.
Judging from some of the above comments I can see
that the “tolerated by women, encouraged in men”
holds true. Not all. It seems that men (not all
men) have issues with masculinity. To be stuck in the
so-called “man box” is the premise of domestic
violence and rape against women and girls. Women
shouldn’t stand idle when sexist or misogynistic
remarks are made. It reminds me of a time when these Buddhist Monks raised their cowls up to cover their
eyes when a woman wearing next to nothing walked by;
rather than to abdicate responsibility of their own
actions unto the woman, they took it upon themselves
to be accountable for their own actions. Men seem to
feel that they have a right to the objectification of
women, gee wonder where they got that idea from?
Media perhaps? Tony Porter a leading anti-sexist
lecturer and founder of “A Call To Men” covers this
ongoing problem with men and masculinity issues. At
one point Tony goes on to tell other men, “stop
acting like men”....Bottom Line, misogyny and sexism
shouldn’t be mainstream but the fact that it is
should be a clear indication of how desensitized
Americans along with other countries have gotten.
By gerry, March 30, 2011 at 2:20 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
kerry rose,
you’re right, no one should talk to anyone with condensation. If they do they
Report thisshould be either financially penalized or returned to their original gaseous state
By Aarky, March 30, 2011 at 12:52 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Dang! I thought from the title of the article that we would be talking about those huge hulks of fake professional wrestlers on their daily dose of sretoids. Ladies, you ain’t seen nuthin demeaning like being a black down south, even today. For those of you ladies that lament the lack of power, it will do you good to know that three women, Clinton, Rice, and Powers talked Obama into attacking Libya.
Report thisBy Bruce Bethany, March 30, 2011 at 12:27 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
After years of listening to bombastic testosterone
Report thisvictims like Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Bill
O’Reilly, Howard Stern, Don Imus, et. al. it’s
no surprise the hostility level has risen. Any
sample of comments on the internet make those
guys sound tame. It’s in the air. It’s the zeitgeist.
By MK Ultra, March 30, 2011 at 8:09 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Makes perfect sense. The males of the Reich Wing are the most macho ever. Their Bible and their god and their Jesus tells them they have to be that way.
Report thisBy Billee, March 30, 2011 at 7:34 am Link to this comment
Bigotry has become big business like everything else in our corporatized country.
Report thisYou’d think there would have been massive consciousness raising from the O.J.
Simpson horror show. Women have to become more confrontational about all this
abuse. I really don’t understand why Americans are so passive these days after
such a rich history of fighting for equal rights.
By wilbur101, March 30, 2011 at 1:42 am Link to this comment
what an ill-written rant this article is. lumping all
these men under the banner “mad men” seems ridiculous
to me.
discrimination and misogyny are very real issues and
Report thisdeserve a more serious treatment than this tabloid pap.
By prisnersdilema, March 30, 2011 at 12:08 am Link to this comment
It’s interesting to me that some women seem to feel that they have the right to speak for all other women. And not only that, they have the right to decide what is best for them, what their hopes should be, what their political view should be, and what they should think.
They go so far as to belive that those who think and feel differently than they do are defective in some way, and need to be viewed as defective, and that their views are defective because they come from a defective individual….
Report thisBy Shamemen, March 29, 2011 at 9:10 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
The comments to this article prove that misogyny still rules and that scores of
Report thismisogynists are attracted to the site to attack any person who identifies herself as a
woman.
If it was not clear that misogynists are not rational, one would think that the comments
were satirical of misogyny a la Colbert style.
No such luck.
By aacme88, March 29, 2011 at 8:08 pm Link to this comment
Creativity in Modern America
Hey. I think we can work with this “mad man” trend and tie it in with the “Kill Team” story and come up with at least some fab T-shirts and other stuff. Let’s see. We just need a slogan. How about
Report this“Uuhh, cause it’s fun.”
No, wait, how about…
By OzarkMichael, March 29, 2011 at 7:43 pm Link to this comment
So the article above mentions some important examples such as: “Why does George Lopez feel it’s all right to call Kirstie Alley a pig on his talk show?”
I have heard liberals, educated liberals, in fact educated feminist liberals, say things about conservative women much worse than the above. Well, such awful remarks… i wont repeat them… lets just say that some of them are recent and fit perfectly into this article… but its strange… they are missing from this article.
Here is a clue for you, Marcia Alesan Dawkins: You cannot free some women from bondage and leave the rest in chains. By your silence about the terrible treatment of conservative women, you give tacit approval of that treatment, yes, you approve the chains that you wish conservative women to remain burdened with, which I say backfires on you, Marcia Alesan Dawkins. Because by approving bad treatment of conservative women, you unfortunately empower everyone to treat all women that way. Get it?
Do you care? Please answer.
Anybody?
From the article: “We fail to realize our power to turn these images off and demand that different and more humane images of men and women be the norm. Even more tragically, we fail to acknowledge that consuming these images implicates us in misogyny, regardless of how genuinely we wish they did not.”
You liberals certainly do ‘fail to recognize’, and it certainly is ‘tragic’; but how ‘genuinely’ you wish for an end to misogyny is questionable. I am a conservative fundamentalist Christian and even i can see how dumb and weak and false the article is. Yes, even a mind that is pathologically burdened by religious memes sees the glaring hypocritical flaw which everyone passes by without a thought.
Very very poorly done. Awful.
Heart breaking. I like to argue and debate but this is just too much.
Here is some good news: You Leftists can get rid of me at last. If you cant even acknowledge this elemental point: that all women need to be treated fairly: especially the women whose political opinions you dont like. If you cant bridge the gap here, surely nothing I can say about more complex topics could ever be understood by you. Because this particular case is so easy, so elementary, so obvious.
Yet this is the fundamental problem on almost every Truthdig article. You want your side to be free to use all sorts of methods for your own causes. You do not understand the consequences of what you are saying, you do not think things through to the bottom line, and this causes ineffectiveness and over time results in more rage against conservatives and even each other.
If you want prejudice, if you want distance, if you want ineffective rage, you get plenty here on Truthdig to keep you stoked. Who am I to disturb you?
Report thisBy kerryrose, March 29, 2011 at 5:45 pm Link to this comment
DavidByron
What a spew of hatred and violent emotions along with speaking to me with condensation and disrespect for simply, without accusation, making an important observation of my life.
Your reaction is typical of the shut-down response. I’m not interested in having a conversation with you on this site—- ever.
Report thisBy Lilith, March 29, 2011 at 4:47 pm Link to this comment
I read nothing but the same old stuff said here in these comments that have been said for decades .... sigh. How about a real life example. Many years ago I was on a message board with a man who was about to have a sex change. Of all the things he imaged would happen in his/her life, she never ever imagined the about, intensity, and level of hate, intolerance, bigoted assumptions and expectations the she got after her surgery to become a woman. All I and the women on the message board could say was “Welcome to our world”.
Report thisBy Allan Krueger, March 29, 2011 at 4:43 pm Link to this comment
Hey Charlie, you are looking pretty old these days! You might try a little more…... sleep!
Report thisBy zonth_zonth, March 29, 2011 at 3:39 pm Link to this comment
A tyrant beating an innocent can seem as inhuman as observing a collective grovel in the dust. It is degrading and dehumanizing for an individual to ascribe himself to a collective. It is also a fear of freedom.
Report thisBy DavidByron, March 29, 2011 at 2:30 pm Link to this comment
kerryrose, no doubt you are used to your sexist crap spewing going without comment, but when someone does comment on it you don’t get to pretend they were “violent”, OK? Can’t actually inflict violence by reading a comment.
Your comment is an example man-hating by spreading ridiculous and fraudulent rumours of male violence about.
Next I expect you to accuse me of raping you.
Report thisBy kerryrose, March 29, 2011 at 2:25 pm Link to this comment
DavidByron
wow such a violent reaction. Need I say more?
Report thisBy art guerrilla, March 29, 2011 at 11:54 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
fuck ‘identity politics’: WE ARE ALL circling the toilet
bowl, and talking about how this person gets to ride on
a big turd, while that person has only a turdlet to
cling to, is idiotically misdirected anger at this
point…
say EVERY SINGLE SELF-INTEREST gruppe gets what it
‘wants’, what good does that do when we are mired in a
system which SCREWS US ALL, ALL THE TIME, FOR-fucking-
EVER ? ? ?
i’m not a huge george lopez fan, but kirstie allie IS a
pig… sorry, the truth hurts, i guess… she’s also a
scientologist shill, bogus/hypocritical diet
spokesdroid, and generally an unlikable person, from
what i’ve seen… why a no-talent like her remains on
the infotainment stage -other than as a reality
freakshow- is beyond me…
art guerrilla
Report thisaka ann archy
eof
By DavidByron, March 29, 2011 at 10:56 am Link to this comment
kerryrtose is another example of the man-hating sexist.
Just as with the Nazis and the KKK the bigot has to constantly make up fraudulent examples of the hated group allegedly “oppressing” the haters, or having bizarre conspiracy plots against them.
So kerryrose imagines all men despise her because of some weird conspiracy. She doesn’t consider that maybe people in general, regardless of the gender, show and receive disreespect all the time and that’s just life.
Oh no. it’s all the jews fault you see. or all a Catholic church plot. or in her case its men doing evil. THAT is the reason.
Simple bigotry.
Report thisBy DavidByron, March 29, 2011 at 10:51 am Link to this comment
Bobi6 repeats feminist lie #1:
“I was shocked to learn that women still only earn about 63 cents to every dollar earned by men - for the same jobs, same working history etc.”
That’s a bigoted lie. This sort of filthy lying sexist shit is what helps destroy the pseudo-left in America.
Report thisBy DavidByron, March 29, 2011 at 10:49 am Link to this comment
Another knee-jerk man-hating feminism piece.
To be male is to be evil and violent according to feminist bigoted logic. The Nazis said much the same about the Jews and all hate movements say such things about their hated groups. Feminism differs only in that it is acceptable in its society (as Nazism once was in Germany).
In fact men are the victims of violence far more than women and our popular culture celebrates violence against men. Violence by women against men is seen as “empowering”. One recent popular movie featured the male lead being raped by a woman and then having to apologise to his gf for “cheating” on her. Male rape in prisons - so popular it may dwarf all rape outside prisons of either sex—is a joke on late night TV.
This anti-male bigotry (feminism) is a cancer on the pseudo-left in America. Fortunately not many feminist articles appear at this site.
Report thisBy Donnie, March 29, 2011 at 8:16 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Backwards attitudes in the media are nothing shocking. Pop culture is garbage.
Report thisHave you seen the people that follow Sheen, George Lopez, et al? It’s hardly
surprising that these are the type of people that use terms like “pussy”, “man up”,
and “total bitches”. I turned on the Discovery channel last night for a minute and
saw promos for two new shoes. One is about a family of rednecks who run a
taxidermy shop, the teaser showed men carrying a huge stuffed elephant head.
The tagline was, “You know you’re a redneck when you spend more at the
taxidermist than on your kids college education.” The other new show was a family
of rednecks that make ridiculous types of guns. In addition to Discovery’s other
popular shows which chronicle loggers, fisherman, miners and pawn shop owners,
it’s not hard to see how Discovery channel’s shift from a bonafide documentary
channel to a cesspool of testosterone mirrors larger changes in society.
By SarcastiCanuck, March 29, 2011 at 8:02 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Ms.Dawkins,what a lame piece of crap this article is.You link hollywood and alleged reality t.v. to your theory on misogyny.If you watch these shows carefully you will see that there are just as many female idiots as male ones,so how’s that for equality.To use this handfull of sorry ass examples as justification for a greater evil going on in society is both lazy and irresponsible.Maybe you’d be better off working for a gossip rag.
Report thisBy kerryrose, March 29, 2011 at 7:34 am Link to this comment
I have always thought that it was just me, but from the time I was a child I have noticed that the men in my life, despite any accomplishments or caregiving, from my brothers, to my ex-husband, to my teenage boys, and to professors and co-workers speak to me with condensation and/or disrespect.
I have always been curious if other women endured or ignored or never experienced this treatment.
Report thisBy gerry, March 29, 2011 at 6:34 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I don’t think Sheen should be either compensated or penalized financially for
Report thishis insanity or domestic turmoil but rather on the basis of the quality of his
work…man or woman that should be the case and unfortunately it simply isn’t
(certainly brittany spears got publicity when she melted down)....but the
author on the very basis that she felt compelled to use Sheen much in the
same manner I’d assume his bosses at the network did…for there own agenda,
in a way answers her own question by doing so. There are after all more then
enough men and women out there who never raised a finger themselves to
anyone and yet are responsible for far far more brutality and manipulation in
the world. why not speak about them rather than their patsy’s? the women’s
studies class banalities just aren’t cutting it…want to talk about mad? you
could start with the president…he could have five wars going on at once and
never get a crease in his suit…perfect gentlemen right? work your way down
from there…might even get a few women in the mix…all of them probably
make sheen look like a damned boyscout.. hillary clinton makes more money
than all of us…just sayin’
By redteddy, March 29, 2011 at 2:17 am Link to this comment
*Addition*
After all misogyny just like racism doesn’t just affect the particular group in
Report thiscontrol even if its rendered illegal, what happens is the attitude imbeds itself into
the fabric of a culture expressing itself within those who we would consider
victims as well as perpetrators of behaviour.
By redteddy, March 29, 2011 at 2:08 am Link to this comment
I agree wholeheartedly with Prisnersdilema’s summation of the issue here.
Its interesting Dawkins focuses on celebrity culture as opposed to the misogyny
Report thistucked away in mainstream culture *yes folks media culture is NOT reflective of
the mainstream but a grandiose distortion*. Instead of focusing on Sheen why
not focus on the women who allow themselves to live as sex objects for money
or fame? Lopez language isn’t a picture of misogyny but rather reflective of
how society views the obese and overweight. Loughner’s mental health IS the
issue not his rant concerning women. ‘Sister Wives’ about a polygamist
Mormon family is also not a sign of misogyny since all of the women have
decided to enter such a union out of some fundamentalist religious convictions;
I personally don’t see anything wrong with these women choosing to marry one
man. In American contemporary culture we should be asking why women are
opting for the role as the sexual object as opposed to gaining attention from
their other attributes, its something feminism needs to address as society
becomes more and more pornified. The real issues are still living wages for
women, reproductive rights and the attack on abortion and PP. The real issues
are women still having no where to go or social assistance when they are trying
to leave abusive husbands, after all they are the real ‘mad men’.
By prisnersdilema, March 28, 2011 at 11:50 pm Link to this comment
Not really, why should the media bemoan something that is soley a creation of itself..
How foolish, to pursue the old liberal ideas of cosmetic change, after the battle has been lost, and liberalisim has turned into nothing but a lighter version of right wing conservatism.. Because, it offers nothing that is substantive..
The corporate owned media, has created Charlie Sheen, and those like him, he is a perfect reflection, of it’s values, and its betrayals, of this country…
This has nothing to do with discrimination against women, cosmetic change has never meant anything, it is only another diversion…
Report thisBy samosamo, March 28, 2011 at 10:46 pm Link to this comment
****************
Report thisI bet natalie kenly’s parents are beaming with joy that she is
‘comforting’ charles during his long exhausting trips. Guess that
keeps them from paying her an allowance. Somebody need to
check that olsen girl’s I.D. Not that it would matter, celebrities
get away with murder with out the responsibility.
By Bobi6, March 28, 2011 at 10:33 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Correction in above comment. It should be SCOTUS not POTUS.
Report thisBy Bobi6, March 28, 2011 at 10:30 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
It’s gotten worse. It never lets up though. Now we shall see if POTUS is
Report thisout to demean women too in the Walmart case tomorrow. But it does
seem to have gotten worse since my days working in the Women’s
Movement. I was shocked to learn that women still only earn about 63
cents to every dollar earned by men - for the same jobs, same working
history etc. People forget because there are a few highly placed women
in the corporate and government. In fact for most women working
conditions have remained the same.
By Wikileaks for Nobel, March 28, 2011 at 8:19 pm Link to this comment
Nothing to disagree with here.
Report this