LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 23, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

A Call to Action

Bizarre, Apparently Jihadist Slaying in London (Video)

Hell on Earth for Greeks

Revenge of the Bear: Russia Strikes Back in Syria

Another Memorial Day in This Endless War

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
 * NEW! * A Call to Action
Act of Congress
Daily Rituals

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar
The Road

The Road

By Cormac McCarthy

more items

 
Reports

The Pride of ‘Obama’s Orphans’

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Dec 22, 2010

By E.J. Dionne, Jr.

At the beginning of 2009, the choice before Democrats who controlled the 111th Congress was whether they would enact historic legislation, even at the risk of their majority, or whether they would play it safe.

They gave the safe option a pass, with two results: This will go down as the most productive Congress since the 89th, which was even more Democratic because of Lyndon Johnson’s 1964 landslide. And 52 Democratic House incumbents, most elected in 2006 or 2008, lost their seats.

The departing Democrats are, as one in their ranks put it, “Obama’s Orphans.” So many of them cast vote after vote for the president’s program. They were then left at the side of the road while history moved by.

During the recent campaign, these loyalists were accused of being “out of touch,” and they certainly were out of sync with the prevailing mood of those who chose to vote this year. But this accusation begs an important question: To whom did these members owe their real loyalty?

Instead of yielding to the feelings of the moment, they kept faith with those who supported them precisely because of their promises to change the direction of the country. And change the country they did.

Advertisement

Say what you will about the new health care law. It was a response to (how easily we forget) a widely held sentiment that our health system was broken, that too many of us lacked coverage or feared we might lose it. The final product was a start in addressing these anxieties.

It is a tribute to the 111th Congress that its achievements will largely set the agenda for the 112th. The new Republican House majority is devoted less to a bold agenda of its own than to repealing, scaling back or derailing the accomplishments of the outgoing majority.

The fact that wiping out what they call “Obamacare” is a unifying priority for the conservative newcomers is a backhanded compliment to those who enacted it: Yes, it was a big deal after all, and in the forthcoming debate, reform’s supporters will get a second chance to make the case for what they did.

Republicans also hope to undercut financial reform, giving the law’s supporters the opportunity to explain more clearly why a financial system with loose rules becomes little more than a casino operated by people in much nicer suits than those worn by the average croupier.

And some of the 111th’s achievements will stand without challenge because they so plainly reflected the country’s will. Congressional leaders never gave up on ending “don’t ask, don’t tell,” knowing they were building on a three-decade long revolution in the attitudes of average Americans toward gays and lesbians. That really is a change we can believe in.

That so many other reforms have been virtually unheralded is another monument to the efforts of Obama’s Orphans. Bills that in another Congress would have loomed large were passed with hardly a ripple in the media.

Consider: the new food safety rules, the big repair in the student loan program, stronger regulations on the credit card industry, the creation of a financial consumer protection agency, an improved children’s health care program and a broad expansion of national service opportunities.

The startling achievements of this lame-duck session owed to the decision of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and outgoing House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to shun the counsel of those who said they should just pack it in after a bad election. If a certain amount of boldness had cost some of their colleagues at the polls in November, the same audacity would at least permit those on their way out to add to their record. They would use their majorities right to the end.

Our media and political systems are obsessed with presidents. We are also very tough on those who lose, in elections no less than in sports. As a result, end-of-year commentary will concentrate on how much stronger President Obama looks today than even a month ago, and on all he got done. The vanquished of 2010 will get barely a nod on their way to the rest of their lives.

But the president’s accomplishments were possible only because a group of younger, largely unsung politicians—the infantry of political change—refused to think only about polls, politics and their personal ambitions. Obama’s Orphans deserve to take a bow.

E.J. Dionne’s e-mail address is ejdionne(at)washpost.com.
   
© 2010, Washington Post Writers Group


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By Enlightened Cynic, December 28, 2010 at 5:32 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Check out this article at the World Socialist Website that cuts to the heart of the bullshit.  The title says it all:

The media and Obama: Image and reality
28 December 2010

http://www.wsws.org/


“The shift on Obama exemplifies the ceaseless efforts of the corporate-owned and controlled media to artificially create political realities by means of image making. Obama’s election was largely the result of a media marketing operation, backed and financed by sections of the ruling class that saw the need for a change in image and personnel after the foreign policy disasters of the Bush years and in the face of public hatred for Bush and the Republicans.

Now, the media is seeking to repackage and repair the badly discredited Obama administration. Why? Because it is dutifully doing the bidding of the financial aristocracy.

Obama is presently being built up because he has made clear that his cave-in on tax cuts for the rich is only the prelude to a further shift to the right on social policy. Appearing Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press” program, Obama aide Valerie Jarrett, a multimillionaire Chicago real estate investor who is described as Obama’s liaison to business, said Obama would focus in the immediate future on reining in the deficit and improving his relationship with American business.

The administration has already called for a freeze on non-defense discretionary spending and federal employee pay and backed proposals for cuts in Social Security benefits, increased taxes on consumption, and a broad “reform” of the tax system that will sharply reduce income taxes for the rich as well as corporate taxes.

The content of Obama’s so-called rebound is an accelerated attack on ever-broader sections of the working class.

Not accidentally, the media has in recent days largely dropped the Tea Party movement. Built up by the media in the pre-election period as a mass movement on the right reflecting popular angst over budget deficits and coercive government interference in the market, the Tea Party was used to shift Obama and the Democrats further to the right and engineer the Republican victory in November.

For the present at least, with that mission having been accomplished and Obama making all of the right moves, the Tea Party is being pushed to the background. It stands ready to be revived by the media when the ruling elite deems it politically expedient to do so.”

Report this

By berniem, December 28, 2010 at 2:59 pm Link to this comment

“Historic” achievement? To revive an old cliche its more like “lipstick on a pig”! Not only were bills that passed watered down practically to transparency(excuse the pun) but when funding appropriation time comes around, may in all probability evaporate. Please don’t tell me that provisions which don’t come into effect(maybe) by 2014 or regulations which provide for waivers obtained for the flimsiest of reasons or offer countless opt-out loop holes as well as other semantic or rhetorical catch 22s will do anything to alter the ever expanding gulf between the monied special interests who benefit from the privatization of the profits and the rest of us who are thre recipient of the socialized losses! Its getting to be time for the times to be a-changin’!

Report this

By ardee, December 26, 2010 at 1:33 pm Link to this comment

I hope that the author of this fantasy view of Democratic Party “effectiveness”, of the worth of the Health Care Bill that is only a guarantee of inferior care and more profits, the fact that most of the legislation passed under Obama and a Democratic controlled Legislature are shams and frauds welcomed by the industries they supposedly regulate, finds his loyalty to his party to be far too heavy a cross to bear.

Report this

By Hotrod, December 26, 2010 at 1:20 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Sorry E.J.,

Your essay plainly does not wash.

What we have witnessed in the last few weeks is this:  Don’t screw with the economic order (tax breaks for business and the uber rich) and we will give you a few crumbs to boast about like a cocky rooster.  DADT is good policy but affects how many people in reality?  I’m guessing 5000 at the most. The START treaty was a no brainer, even for the war mongerers.  Jon Stewart singlehandedly brought relief to the 911 workers, although for billions less than requested. Republicans should have been crucified for voting against it, but will pay no price now.

Mark my words, Obama will set us up for draconian cuts to Medicare and Social Security. Only a so called Democrat could pull that off and Obama is as so-called as they come.

Report this

By Devon J. Noll, MPA, December 24, 2010 at 12:42 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

“The startling achievements of this lame-duck session owed to the decision of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and outgoing House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to shun the counsel of those who said they should just pack it in after a bad election. If a certain amount of boldness had cost some of their colleagues at the polls in November, the same audacity would at least permit those on their way out to add to their record. They would use their majorities right to the end.”

What a load of garbage!  If those two had done through 2009 and 2010 what they did on their way out of power, if the DNC had actually done its job with the media, this would not be the end of the most productive congress since 1964, but would be just the beginning of a more progressive, people-oriented Congress, instead of the disaster that looms on the horizon next year!  These two, with their “we will not be dictated to by this White House”, have put up a smoke screen of supporting the President’s agenda, but when you look closely, they barely did that, and now without major concessions that essentially vacated any good on any major bill, and in the end set up the gridlock that will occur in the next Congress so that nothing can be accomplished again, while making sure through their lack of support that the decent, strong progressives like Alan Grayson did not return to show them up as the Cowards they are and were!

This congress accomplished a lot, but to give credit to Pelosi and Reid for it is just plain wrong.  It got done because people like Grayson and Weiner and Feingold pushed and prodded and embarrassed moderate Dems into acting correctly for the American people, while rightly condemning those Blue Dogs, faux Progressives, and GOP for abandoning the American people in favor of their padded campaign funds and special interests.

“Obama’s Orphans” should be proud of what they accomplished against the deceptive work of the Rahm Emanuel led White House and the Congressional leadership.  “Obama’s Orphans” were the only decent members of Congress from what I could see, and that President Obama failed to support them either directly or through his staff, which was told to ignore them, is shameful.  These men and women worked hard for him, and in this election cycle, he abandoned them because they were progressives and the DNC wanted Blue Dogs.  When is this president going to realize that he is wrong to listen to old guard Democrats like Clinton, Pelosi, and Reid, and start surrounding himself with people like Grayson, Weiner, and Feingold?

Report this

By Big B, December 23, 2010 at 7:04 pm Link to this comment

Shadesofgray

You hit this one out of the park.

this is just another Barry sell-out. he just traded the meaningless DADT and bullshit START treaty for at least a trillion more in giveaways to the plutocrats. Many more deals like this and the only thing left on the farm to give away will be the out house.

Report this

By shadesofgrey, December 23, 2010 at 11:19 am Link to this comment

It never ceases to amaze me how DC and all its sycophants spin the narrative.
Health Care Reform? It was health INSURANCE reform that married another big
business to govt.
Food Safety? A bill written for and by Monsanto, renewing it vows with govt.
Credit card regulations? Moldy bread crumbs for the rubes who, by now, should
know better to eat that tainted stuff. The banks and their relatives, the
politicians, still dine on exquisite tortes with heaps of cream, paid for by main
street 401k’s, pensions, and muni bonds.
All the while ignoring that stinking steaming pile of excrement in the middle of
the room that has become a self perpetuating cancer - war.

I propose an exit fee, a reality tax, for anyone wanting to venture outside the
fantasy world of ‘productive’ govt business and mingle with the lesser folks who
actually work 40+ hours a week, pay their taxes, send their kids to public
school, cook their own meals, do their own laundry. Why would any of these
important decision makers and their PR people even want to leave their
comfortable environment? Just ask John ‘thank God I escaped that pit’ Boehner,
or our ‘I need a gym full of hopeful faces’ President.

The divide between ‘life has never been better’ DC and 98% of Amurika grows
exponentially day by day, year by year. Nice try, E.J., but I’m not swallowin’.

Report this

By Jim Yell, December 23, 2010 at 10:28 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

May we ask why Obama is suddenly being presented as having developed a backbone? He gets nuclear treaty passed which may or may not have much meaning and he gets DADT removed, which is only fair and right. Certainly it is more honest and honorable to acknowledge that gays have always served in our military and many of our best troops were secretly gay people. So a pass of sorts.

But, does this mean that he has suddenly become effective or is it just a theater piece, a set piece to make him look good. He has conspired with the Republicans to validate the worst features of Bush/Cheney, the complete failure to punish or regulate the banking investment theft that has lost many people their jobs, depressed the wages that they might expect to make and has actively damaged Social Security. No I think Obama has failed over all.

Report this
G.Anderson's avatar

By G.Anderson, December 23, 2010 at 9:43 am Link to this comment

If Obama had supported them maybe they wouldn’t have been Orphans. But that’s not
his style.

Where to begin, each supposed sucres is a cave. A gift the to plutocracy.  Faux reforms
designed to confuse the public, written by lobbyists.

Where to begin. Food safety that put small farmers out of business, exempting food
grown overseas from inspection. It will increase the import of food grown overseas
sprayed with pesticides banned in the US. Student loan reform increases the availability
of debt slavery to the young, amnesty for he dead after 25 years of servitude.  Financial
reform? Credit card reform?  Really? The law is filled with loopholes. Companies are
already Increasing fees and jacking rates. Obama still hasn’t made up his mind about
whether to completely cave to the banks on Elizabeth Warren yet.

Health care reform? Really, the biggest sell out of all…Republicans won’t fight this one,
they already get too much money from industry lobbyists.. Are you enjoying your
premium increases? The health care companies will fight tooth and claw to keep the
gravy train from the government open and pumping them money. What he should have
done is break up the pig three as monopolies.  No it’s been a good two years for wall
street record bonus, record profits, while food stamp use is up 16 percent.

When social security gets gutted they will call it reform and make it purposefully
confusing, to hide their larcenies in plain sight behind a big smile. Cosmetic change is
all we will get under the big O.  It’s a political carnival of fooling the rubes and counting
the cash in he back room.

Report this

By John K, December 23, 2010 at 9:11 am Link to this comment

What nonsense. Spin this all you want - his presidency is a huge disappointment for me.

Report this

By FiftyGigs, December 23, 2010 at 8:59 am Link to this comment

“They were then left at the side of the road…”

By progressives.

In one of the most remarkable feats of dysfunctional politics in history.

A Republican anti-American strategy of obstruction and deliberate destruction caused a reaction among progressives AGAINST ITS OWN INTERESTS, resulting in the further expansion of a bizarre practice—heretofore thought isolated to the Tea Party, which supports candidates who defy the very principles the Tea Party stands for.

In November, progressives empowered a radical Republican base that believes dinosaurs and mankind co-habitated on the planet and that has dedicated itself to making everyone believe that.

Incredibly, progressives today still think they “made a point”.

Report this

By Steve E, December 23, 2010 at 5:58 am Link to this comment

Maybe this article is a way to fulfill a need for so called balance in opinions,
nothing more.

Report this

By esi42, December 23, 2010 at 3:23 am Link to this comment

Its getting deep in here; time to go get my boots on

Report this

By Frank, December 23, 2010 at 2:41 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Well said Gerard! This pro Obama garbage is sickening to read. This should be on the MSNBC website as opposed to Truthdig!

Report this

By Lincoln, December 23, 2010 at 1:06 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I don’t think the people are fooled.  More shellacking is highly likely.

Report this

By gerard, December 23, 2010 at 12:21 am Link to this comment

Well, ... er .. yeah, maybe.  But the real Orphans of the economic Storm are the millions of lower and middle ordinary Joes and Janes who can’t make enough money to buy food and pay their mortgages.  For them this Congress meant very little in terms of relief from hardship and denial—compared to the funding that would have been available, that is, if the wars in the Middle East had been shut down and that money put into job recovery, health care, infrastrutture, education and lower taxes.
  It is the fashion among conservatives now to regard benefits to the laboring classes as “give-aways”. State budgets are being forced to cut back. Thousands of working class people will be having a slim Christmas this year, but that miserable fact won’t even register in the upper levels of “private enterprise.”  Sad and sickening injustices everywhere!  Happier New Year (I wish)  though I don’t see any signs of that coming soon.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.