|
|
May 20, 2013
|
|
The Obscenity of WarPosted on Mar 30, 2010
By Amy Goodman President Barack Obama has just returned from his first trip as commander in chief to Afghanistan. The U.S.-led invasion and occupation of that country are now in their ninth year, amid increasing comparisons to Vietnam. Daniel Ellsberg, whom Henry Kissinger once called “the most dangerous man in America,” leaked the Pentagon Papers in 1971. Ellsberg, who was a top Pentagon analyst, photocopied this secret, 7,000-page history of the U.S. role in Vietnam and released it to the press, helping to end the Vietnam War. “President Obama is taking every symbolic step he can to nominate this as Obama’s war,” Ellsberg told me recently. He cites the “Eikenberry memos,” written by U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan Karl Eikenberry, which were leaked, then printed last January by The New York Times. Ellsberg said: “Eikenberry’s cables read like a summary of the Pentagon Papers of Afghanistan. ... Just change the place names from ‘Saigon’ to ‘Kabul’ ... and they read almost exactly the same.” The Eikenberry memos recommend policies opposite those of Gens. David Petraeus and Stanley McChrystal, who advocated for the surge and a counterinsurgency campaign in Afghanistan. Eikenberry wrote that President Hamid Karzai is “not an adequate strategic partner,” and that “sending additional forces will delay the day when Afghans will take over, and make it difficult, if not impossible, to bring our people home on a reasonable timetable.” Petraeus and McChrystal prevailed. The military will launch a major campaign in June in Afghanistan’s second-largest city, Kandahar. Meanwhile, with shocking candor, McChrystal said in a video conference this week, regarding the number of civilians killed by the U.S. military, “We have shot an amazing number of people, but to my knowledge, none has ever proven to be a threat.” U.S. troop fatalities, meanwhile, are occurring now at twice the rate of one year ago. Advertisement The press vilified King. Time magazine called the speech “demagogic slander that sounded like a script for Radio Hanoi.” Smiley told me: “Most Americans, I think, know the ‘I Have a Dream’ speech. Some Americans know the ‘Mountaintop’ speech given the night before he was assassinated in Memphis. But most Americans do not know this ‘Beyond Vietnam’ speech.” Smiley added, “If you replace the words Iraq for Vietnam, Afghanistan for Vietnam, Pakistan for Vietnam, this speech is so relevant today.” Like King, Obama is a recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize. In his acceptance speech, Obama mentioned King six times, yet defended his war in Afghanistan. Princeton University professor Cornel West, interviewed by Smiley, said of Obama’s Nobel speech, “It upset me when I heard my dear brother Barack Obama criticize Martin on the global stage, saying that Martin Luther King Jr.‘s insights were not useful for a commander in chief, because evil exists, as if Martin Luther King Jr. didn’t know about evil.” In early March, Rep. Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio, offered a resolution to end the war in Afghanistan, saying: “We now have about 1,000 U.S. troops who have perished in the conflict. We have many innocent civilians who have lost their lives. We have a corrupt central government in Afghanistan that is basically stealing U.S. tax dollars.” The resolution was defeated by a vote of 356-65. A Washington Post poll of 1,000 people released this week found that President Obama enjoys a 53 percent approval rating on his handling of the war in Afghanistan. The public is unlikely to oppose something that gets less and less coverage. While the press is focused on the salacious details of Republican National Committee spending on lavish trips, especially one outing to a Los Angeles strip club, the cost to the U.S. taxpayer for the war in Afghanistan is estimated now to be more than $260 billion. The cost in lives lost, in people maimed, is incalculable. The real obscenity is war. Ellsberg hopes that the Eikenberry memos will be just the first of many leaks, and that a new wave of Pentagon Papers will educate the public about the urgent need to end Obama’s war. Denis Moynihan contributed research to this column. Amy Goodman is the host of “Democracy Now!,” a daily international TV/radio news hour airing on more than 800 stations in North America. She is the author of “Breaking the Sound Barrier,” recently released in paperback and now a New York Times best-seller. © 2010 Amy Goodman Previous item: Greece Isn’t Europe’s Only Problem Next item: Here We WMD Again: Iraq and the Mythical Pakistani Package New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By amunaor, April 2, 2010 at 11:28 am Link to this comment
***RAE: whoever is pulling the strings on this planet right now is a MASTER at generating fear. The more fear the better.***
RAE, please watch these “The Power of Nightmares” documentries:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/12/22/212041/57/454/425671
or Here:
http://www.google.com/search?q=power+of+nightmares+part+1&tbo=p&tbs=vid:1&source=vgc&aq=1&oq=Power+of+Night
Adam Curtis exposes the public manipulation we sense but usually don’t understand. His BBC documentaries are legendary in Britain but practically unknown in the US. An American network executive who wouldn’t even let his name be used said “we would be crucified if we showed that here”. These documentaries are like a graduate course in how the American and British public has been herded like cattle since the end of World War I.
The Power of Nightmares episode 1 is about the ideological revulsion to the consumer society created by industry and public relations. Simultaneously, Sayyid Qutb resolved to purge the Muslim world of Western consumerism while Leo Strauss resolved to make consuming Americans Crusaders for freedom around the world. Ayman Zawahiri was a student of Qutb and Paul Wolfowitz was a student of Strauss.
The Power of Nightmares episode 2 shows Bin Laden and the Neo cons fighting the Soviets in Afghanistan and how the Soviet collapse left both without an enemy to herd their public with.
The Power of Nightmares episode 3 shows how 911 was used to give those “with the most fear, the most power” and how the Neo cons recreated the terrorist threat.
Peace, Best Wishes and Hope
Report thisBy RAE, April 2, 2010 at 4:47 am Link to this comment
gerard: “Rae, I think it is not a plan that is missing.”
Oh yes it is. A plan is an itemized list, in chronological order, of the steps required to achieve a goal. Please show me the list.
gerard: “It is a belief in the possibilities of the future. So much news now concerns grave dangers that it tends to paralyze people in fear and dread, which inhibits their hope and their vision.”
Believing is not necessarily knowing. Countless millions believe in the most bizarre fantasies even to the point of sacrificing their lives in defense of their believes. My point is that a “belief in the possibilities of the future” is as worthless as hope except as you stated…gotta believe in something - so it acts as a pacifier. Achieves nothing.
As far as the news paralysing people in “fear and dread” goes - well, with all due respect, that’s nonsense. News is news. It is people who self-generate “fear and dread” and all the other useless emotions that are so prevalent today. To immerse oneself in immobilizing emotional expressions is PART OF THE PROBLEM and certainly isn’t part of any solution to anything that I’ve ever experienced. It’s “fear and dread” paired with ignorance and lack of discipline that makes the ostrich stick his head in the sand. Accomplishes nothing.
gerard: “Young people are less susceptible to despair, and so the main hope of the world is in their hearts and minds.”
And your source for such a report is….? Young people watch “adults” for cues as to how to behave. When so many of the adult role models are acting like infantile nincompoops I wouldn’t put much stock in the young “saving the world.”
A long time ago it was said “We have nothing to fear but fear itself.” Fear is the great immobilizer. And whoever is pulling the strings on this planet right now is a MASTER at generating fear. The more fear the better.
Report thisBy amunaor, April 1, 2010 at 9:09 pm Link to this comment
That’s right gerard!
War has morphed into the religion of choice. The bully wielding the biggest fist full of nukes is god; where sanctions are political blackmail against those who do not wish to forfeit their own national resources to the bully. The Industry of War, in concert with the Wall Street Gambling houses, is not worried about Iranian nuclear ambitions. What these Lord of the Fly bullies do wish to posses though, and have from day one, is to, by proxy of other people’s innocent children, place their bloody boots into those Iranian oil pits.
The forces in the universe are neither good nor evil. But, misappropriated into the hands of those who perceive those forces as weapons of power, then do they manifest as evil.
It’s a sad day all around when all that humanity has to show for itself; at the pinnacle of its vain scientific achievements, is a magnificent reflection of a vile, self-serving, killing machine.
Let’s hope that, somewhere along the line, wisdom and understanding prevail, before Gaia tires of our bloody boots and shakes the irritant fleas from her back, or we render our host as uninhabitable, and perish.
Peace, Best Wishes and Hope
Report thisBy JDmysticDJ, April 1, 2010 at 7:25 pm Link to this comment
I’m in sympathy with most of the postings here. They’re well written and they appear to be heartfelt, and rational, but these postings serve no purpose other than preaching to the choir, or pissing off the wing nuts.
We need to take part in non-violent action, in the form of political protest and demonstration.
“I and all my classmates are very sad because of the situation in our homeland. When our teacher said in the class that many people have been killed in Afghanistan, I and my all classmates started weeping because everyone has relatives there. I expect America not to kill the poor Afghans. They are hungry and poor.”
“There was just a roaring sound, and then I opened my eyes and I was in a hospital,” said the boy, called Assadullah, speaking in Peshawar after being taken across the border for medical help. “I lost my leg and two fingers. There were other people hurt. People were running all over the place”.
“A US bomb flattened a flimsy mud-brick home in Kabul on Sunday blowing apart seven children as they ate breakfast with their father. The blast shattered a neighbour’s house killing another two children”
“We pulled the baby out, the others were buried in the rubble. Children were decapitated. There were bodies with no legs. We could do nothing. We just fled.”
“……..better stand clear and fire away. Given this implicit decision, the slaughter of innocent people, as a statistical eventuality is not an accident but a priority—-in which Afghan civilian casualties are substituted for American military casualties.”
“Even though civilian deaths have not been the deliberate goal of the current bombing—-as they were for the attackers of 9/11—the end result has been a distinction without a difference. Dead is dead, and when one’s actions have entirely foreseeable consequences, it is little more than a precious and empty platitude to argue that those consequences were merely accidental.”
“If it were not for the missiles the West has sent into Kandahar and Kunduz, these children whose faces we now see in our newspapers would not have had to take to the roads, desperately trudging the hills and deserts and sitting in tents on a bare plain.
And don’t think that just because they have suffered so much during the last generation that their grief is any the less now. Or because they don’t get obituaries in The New York Times that each of the civilian lives lost in Afghanistan isn’t as precious to their loved ones as the people who died in the Twin Towers.”
These wars were horribly wrong from their inception, in addition to the human suffering, death and destruction; these wars have displaced millions of people, cost trillions of dollars, and destabilized that whole area. The Afghanistan government is corrupt, and does not have the support of the people. Afghanistan, is, Viet Nam all over again. (Even the “Phoenix Program” has been revived.)
Our addiction to oil led us to intrude into an area of the world where we had no right to be. Is it any wonder that militarists from that area of the world responded to those intrusions? The “elitists” who endorsed these intrusions were fools, and they lacked understanding of basic human responses, let alone the most basic of moral precepts.
We need to end our wars of empire by actively calling for bringing the troops home, now!
Report thisBy Calabashe, April 1, 2010 at 5:42 pm Link to this comment
I just don’t subscribe to the notion that all our ills are a result of the Corporate Oligargy. Maybe I’m not Left enough for some. Don’t get me wrong. I don’t mind seeing the Enrons & AIGs put out of business but I also don’t believe the masses are capable of running the means of production.
I’m also not ready to rush off to war at whim, but 3000 innocent people were murdered one September morning. I still want Osama been Forgotten’s head on a pole for that. Part of the Tillman Brothers’ legacy is the one can be Left, even progressive and still be patriotic enough to defend US.
The analogies of Afghanistan to Viet Nam are apparent and more established every year. IMHO, it was the diversion at whim of Iraq that bogged US down.
Now we are starting a blame game rather than addressing a problem. The hole was dug so deep that it’ll probably take 4 Left (or Left-Center) Presidential terms to recover.
Report thisBy gerard, April 1, 2010 at 5:13 pm Link to this comment
Rae, I think it is not a plan that is missing. It is a belief in the possibilities of the future. So much news now concerns grave dangers that it tends to paralyze people in fear and dread, which inhibits their hope and their vision. Young people are less susceptible to despair, and so the main hope of the world is in their hearts and minds.
Many of them are more world-minded and alert than previous generations, and the internet is helping to bring people together. Governments are reaching the end of their rope, and, along with the UN are moving at a snail’s pace toward—if not peace—at least a better understanding of inter-related problems like nuclear weapons, environmental damage and the unsustainable gap between a few rich and many poor people. Corporations are still hung up on control through financial dominion, but, contrary to popular belief, I think they are probably just about as scared as the rest of us.
Report thisFear won’t do the job,but at least it might provide a period of suspended animation, so to speak, where urgent needs have time to work their way into a majority of consciences worldwide.
I know it’s a fragile—maybe vacuous—hope, but it’s all I can see to believe in at the moment. One has to believe in something—and for me it is not war and has not been war since WWII.
By RAE, April 1, 2010 at 4:44 pm Link to this comment
It seems we’re unanimously in agreement that war is an obscenity.
It’s clear we all have long lists of reasons that support our views.
It’s equally clear that none of us has any plausible, workable plan that will bring about the changes necessary to eliminate war. All we do, it seems, is sit around and howl at the moon.
All we can do is HOPE.
Regrettably, hope is not a plan.
Report thisBy gerard, April 1, 2010 at 4:09 pm Link to this comment
Now that someone mentions religion, I have to jump in here. War is the modern religion—not Christianity, Islam, Judaism or Shamanism, Buddhism, Hinduism or Voodoo. All religions differ from each other in some way and waste energy quarrelling or trying to convert people.
Report thisWar stands alone as the unconsciously chosen Master of us all. The more outrageously destructive its weapons, the more we believe in it, hence the more power it holds and the more dangerous it becmes.
People who do not believe in war are either silenced by threats of disloyalty or prevented from making effective contact with powers that could stop it.
More resources, energy and money are devoted to war than to all other human efforts. Why? Because we believe in war—or if we don’t believe, are passively dragged along the lines of least resistance.
War is even preached in our churches when the going gets rough. War is supported by our governments. Methods, techniques, strategies, tactics are taught to our kids in schools and via games nd sports. Of course it is disguised as “righteous” or “athletic” or “competitive training” or “makes men out of boys,” etc. It rules corporate behavior where the weapon is money.
When you stop to think of it, it’s everywhere. We are swimming in it. Be need to get out before we drown.
By Historian4U2, April 1, 2010 at 3:43 pm Link to this comment
It is now painstakingly evident that Obama is a token
Report thislike the “house niggas” of the slavery era, the reasons are All the campaign lies he has produced like 1. Public option(healthcare), 2. Transparency in Gov., 3.Iraq war troop pullout in 11months, 4. tax credits for childsupport paying fathers, 5. Stoping torture/rendition or holding the prior admin. accountable and closing Guantonimo to name a few. He is a puppet to the ruling banking families & Isreal with the dual citizen Rahm Emmanuel dictating pro-Isreal American taxpayer funded policy(6billion per yr.)while they commit genocide against the palestinians Unsanctioned and the corrupt drug dealing Afghan Gov./Wally(Karzai’s brother)dealing drugs by the ton and funded by American Taxpayer money while we die in the streets and are incarcerated at staggering rates for crumbs comparably. Obama’s war is no different than Bush’s Iraq or LBJ’s Vietnam. He is a spineless figurehead and is bought off and the current Republican/Democratic farce is like our sports/entertainment industry, distracting americans from the truth’s that the MSM won’t report but a growing number of Americans are finding thru internet news like this site!. A lie is a lie and murder is murder nomatter which presidents facilitates it!. The true leaders willing to stand for truth and justice have been murdered or silenced as few are willing to put their lives and become mayrtrs for Gods truth like MLK. Obama and All previous presidents backwards with the exception of Carter/JFK have cowtowed the line of the Banking elite evidenced by his appointments of the very scoundrels responsible for previous wars and the financial meltdown to his administration to continue the carnage at the taxpayers expense(R. Gates/H. Paulson to name a few). Revelations prophecies are true and it’s obvious that the massively corrupt/infiltrated American Gov. will play a central role in the fulfillment of Gods word. Pray for our children and your families salvation for Divine intervention is the only power capable of stopping the “principalities of evil in High places and the wicked rulers of this earth!” Ephesians 6:12 God Bless!
By rico, suave, April 1, 2010 at 2:48 pm Link to this comment
logkAW:
Report thisThen why was he complaining that the stat weren’t available?
By logkAW, April 1, 2010 at 2:23 pm Link to this comment
“The reports are easy to find at DOD under press releases.”
He just told you, dummy!
Report thisBy rico, suave, April 1, 2010 at 11:16 am Link to this comment
T Mauel:
Report thisIf all these casualties are going unreported, how do YOU know?
By Jean Mc, April 1, 2010 at 11:12 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Dear Amy,
Report thisThanks for the heads up on Tavis’ program. I was left with two things (among others): as a very young woman at that time and as a huge admirer of Dr. King (saw him in person at my college in 65?), I don’t remember being aware of his 70% ostracism. I DO recall he was harshly criticized for his stance on VietNam, but I was one of those who were awed by his courageous stance. Finally, a voice of the people against that hideous debacle.
Last night I was left with how prophetic he was: “America is going to hell”. How horribly, tragically, mournfully prophetic. It seems we “ordinary” citizens are helpless no matter how many petitions we sign, how many times we vote, how much we care.
Sincerely,
Jean Mc in S.J., CA
By LocalHero, April 1, 2010 at 10:54 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
“Who is it, precisely, who is “increasingly” comparing it to Viet Nam?”
No rfidler, that would be the sane people.
Report thisBy amunaor, April 1, 2010 at 10:36 am Link to this comment
That high-speed buzzing sound that you hear is not an echo, but Orwell spinning in your head.
In a uni-polar world, there is no right or left, only perpetual deception. If your not deceived, then you must need to see your local pharmacist to get placed on a steady diet of Prozac or one of those other mind-bending conformity pills.
Peace, Best Wished and Peace
Report thisBy thecrow, April 1, 2010 at 9:32 am Link to this comment
You know where the root is, Ms. Goodman. Why are you content to do topiary?
http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2010/02/22/meanwhile/
Report thisBy NYCartist, April 1, 2010 at 9:30 am Link to this comment
Good title. Good concept. Good article. Sanda
Report thisBy Tobysgirl, April 1, 2010 at 8:42 am Link to this comment
There will never be change as long as overwhelming numbers of people within any country, any empire, identify with the powerful. Identification with the strong man/men seems deeply imbedded in the human psyche; why else would so many people follow leaders who are, in essence, screwing their followers? I wish this were not true, but it helps to explain much of human history.
Report thisBy Tom Mauel, March 31, 2010 at 11:29 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
US combat casualties in Afghanistan are almost never reported in the corporate press. Lately these casualties have escalated yet I have not seen any recent reports at Democracy Now, Antiwar and other alt. sites. How can there be growing anger at this war if no one hears about the consequences?
Report thisThe reports are easy to find at DOD under press releases. On Wed. March 31 it was reported at the DOD site that a US soldier was killed by an IED on Monday.
At least five US soldiers have been killed in Afghanistan in the last week and all have gone unreported.
By DennisCMyers, March 31, 2010 at 9:11 pm Link to this comment
I just watched the Smiley program.. It portrays the Riverside Church speech as the launch of Martin King’s dissent from the Vietnam policy and the occasion of his break with Lyndon Johnson. It was not. That had happened with his FIRST speech on the war at the Nation Institute in Los Angeles five weeks earlier. The Riverside speech was partly an answer to the criticism he received for the Nation speech, and the Smiley program misrepresents the sequence and the history. It’s good that Dr. King did not fall silent after criticism of the Nation speech, but the first speech was the benchmark, the one that took the greatest courage because it was such a break with the past, with the president, with some other black leaders. It was easily the more important of the two speeches. And it meant so much to us at the time.
The Nation speech can be read at http://www.aavw.org/special_features/speeches_speech_king02.html
Report thisBy rico, suave, March 31, 2010 at 7:07 pm Link to this comment
Who is it, precisely, who is “increasingly” comparing it to Viet Nam?
The echo chamber of the wacko left, maybe?
Report thisBy amunaor, March 31, 2010 at 2:38 pm Link to this comment
Thank You Amy!!!
Keep on nipping at the heels of despotism!
“Our President Is Deceiving the American Public”: Says Pentagon Papers Whistleblower of President Obama and the Wars in Afghanistan and Iraq:
Watch Video:
http://www.democracynow.org/2010/3/30/our_president_is_deceiving_the_american
Former Commandant, U.S. Marine Corps, Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler stated that, “War is a racket and patriotism is nothing but the last refuge of scoundrels”.
Indeed it is! And, peace is the perpetual enemy to this industry of war. An army of soldiers can do anything but sit on their bayonets. They must either use them, or lose them.
WAR! What the hell is it good for!?
ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!!!
Peace, Best Wishes and Hope
Report thisBy Hammond Eggs, March 31, 2010 at 12:32 pm Link to this comment
Obama at last dons the warrior’s leather jacket. He is now officially The National Tough Guy. From now on he will conduct all his press conferences talking out of one side of his mouth while a smoking cigarette dangles from the other side. Someone get him a codpiece.
Report thisBy gerard, March 31, 2010 at 10:39 am Link to this comment
Rae: If expressing a need for morality and cooperation is “wallowing in naivete” we are indeed down the drain already, as some TD people insist.
Report thisMy plea is premised on the fact that human beings have lost morality and cooperation many times, and have struggled to reclaim them by coming together at last with a common vision. Lose the vision and you lose all.
By gerard, March 31, 2010 at 10:39 am Link to this comment
Rae: If expressing a need for morality and cooperation is “wallowing in naivete” we are indeed down the drain already, as some TD people insist.
Report thisMy plea is premised on the fact that human beings have lost morality and cooperation many times, and have struggled to reclaim them by coming together at last with a common vision. Lose the vision and you lose all.
By J N Wesner, March 31, 2010 at 9:51 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Ike had it right. When he, on leaving office, warned of the takeover by the “military-industrial complex” most of us had little idea of what he meant. In the half century since, it has become painfully clear. The military gets its way (“They must be right; they’re the ones doing the fighting.”)and corporations get ever richer making—though no longer in the United States—weaponry, vehicles, supplies of all sorts for these wars. Recently, they’ve even been providing soldiers, but at an outrageously higher cost. Some of us thought Obama would be different. He may be, but only in degree. Does anybody see a possible way out of this mess?
Report thisBy Gerald Sutliff, March 31, 2010 at 7:29 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Dear Ms. Goodman,
Report thisWell said. I well remember MLK’s “Vietnam” speech; my reaction was an uncharitable “What took him so long?”. I still have faith that our president knows he can’t get off the “war horse” and still govern.
Cheers to “By gerard, March 30 at 10:23 pm #”, as well.
By RAE, March 31, 2010 at 6:14 am Link to this comment
I fully agree with you, gerard, about how we need to move from “exploitation to morality and cooperation”.
However, as we both wallow in our naivete, “the wealthy” maintain an iron grip on the helm of the economic con game - our “primary obscenity.” And they aren’t ever going to let go willingly. Stack a dollar up against a moral and the moral loses every time.
To pull hugely profitable wars out of the equation would be as devastating to the “American way of life” as to ban oil. If you are correct that “vision of better ways motivates people to change” then I think we’re doomed to endure the status quo for generations to come. Any vision that threatens the largess enjoyed by BIG CORPA will very quickly be blinded and handed a white cane as compensation.
Report thisBy BBFmail, March 31, 2010 at 4:44 am Link to this comment
As Larry Pinkney of BlackCommentator wrote so long ago about Obama:
This is a man who has enjoyed the fruits of America at the blood and expense of Black Americans and others, but who has paid virtually no dues.
This is a man whose father had also enjoyed the fruits of university schooling in America but subsequently returned to his native Kenya.
This is a man, who also like his father before him, neither served in a branch of the US military nor in any organization in America opposed to US military adventurism.
This is a man who as a deeply corporate military industrial complex US Presidential candidate, has called for “unilateral” US military actions in other nations. [And why not? After-all, his father, himself, or his wife and children were not and will not be the ones killing and being killed.]
Report thisBy gerard, March 30, 2010 at 7:23 pm Link to this comment
The economic system is the primary obscenity—a system that is rigged to favor the wealthy at the expense of everybody else except the minority at the top. That economic system depends on the dominance of war production and engagement for both jobs and revenue, as well as for American power.
Report thisIt is entirely possible, but difficult, to re-direct that economy away from the military-industrial complex which we have learned to depend on to keep our economy running. Because so many millions of us are dependent both directly and indirectly on this huge military expenditure, we ordinary people are not even very conscious of the fact that we are living off of the destruction of foreign countries and the killing and wounding of foreign people.
It is easier for us to believe that the wars are necessary to stop “terrorism”, or that “wars are inevitable” even though both ideas are probably false.
As Americans we are guilty of crimes of omission (what we do not do) as well as crimes of commission (crimes wo do commit). We need to change our economic system, but guilt doesn’t motivate people to change. Vision of better ways motivates people to change.
Vision is lacking. We not only need whistle-blowers like Ellsberg. We need people who can envision how to move America from exploitation to morality and cooperation for a better world.
Such people are probably already out there, getting ready to build for tomorrow. We need to take our left/right squabbles and pessimism and get out of their way.