|
|||
|
The New McCarthyismPosted on Mar 10, 2010By Joe Conason The national madness known as McCarthyism began 60 years ago in Wheeling, W.Va., when Sen. Joseph R. McCarthy held up a scrap of paper that supposedly listed the names of 57 State Department officials he said were actually Communists and traitors. Eventually, America learned that the Wisconsin Republican’s famous list was a fabrication, that he was a liar and a demagogue as well as an alcoholic—and that his authoritarian appeals to fear were worse than useless in defending our security. But by then, McCarthyism’s self-serving and fundamentally unpatriotic promoters had inflicted grave damage on the body politic and international prestige of the United States. Today, McCarthy’s heirs are slicker and glibber than he ever was, yet their fundamental methods are the same. When Elizabeth Cheney, William Kristol and their media friends slander Justice Department attorneys as the “al-Qaida 7” and malign the “Department of Jihad,” they are engaging in the smear tactics that became synonymous with McCarthy. What is different now is the cynical hypocrisy of the new McCarthyites, who know that the flimsy accusations they level against Democrats in the Obama administration could just as easily be turned on Republicans who served President George W. Bush. Cheney and Kristol have charged that certain lawyers in the Justice Department represented alleged terrorists held at the Guantanamo Bay prison camp—and that by so doing, those attorneys rendered themselves unfit for government service. “Whose values do they share?” asks an ominous advertisement aired by their front group, known as Keep America Safe. They mean to insinuate that the values of those Justice Department attorneys, President Barack Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder are somehow closer to the jihadism of al-Qaida than to those shared by most Americans. Advertisement As Scott Horton points out in Harper’s magazine, the McCarthyite list would have to include Michael Chertoff, who headed the Justice Department’s criminal division before President Bush nominated him as secretary of homeland security. Among Chertoff’s clients in private practice was a New Jersey doctor named Magdy el-Amir, identified as a conduit for money laundering to al-Qaida and other jihadist outfits. He became a Chertoff client when the state of New Jersey sued him to recoup illicit money from a health maintenance organization he controlled, which had sent more than $5 million by wire transfers to bank accounts “where the beneficial owner is unknown.” In other words, a very dubious character who had been under surveillance by the FBI for years. There was never any reason to believe that by representing Magdy el-Amir (who was recently arrested in a prescription drug racket), Chertoff somehow disqualified himself from government service. But similar phony questions could be raised about Michael Mukasey, the former Bush attorney general whose law firm provides pro bono representation to Guantanamo detainees. Or Rudolph Giuliani, New York mayor at the time of the Sept. 11 attacks, whose firm has also represented detainees because, like all prisoners, they are entitled to counsel. If this seems confusing, here’s a simple principle to keep in mind: Representing someone in an American court does not mean agreeing with that person’s actions or ideology. Here’s another: Guilt by association is an unworthy tactic that ought to raise suspicions about those who use it rather than those against whom it is used. The career of McCarthy and the specter of McCarthyism ended only when a handful of decent Republicans—notably including Prescott Bush, the grandfather of George W. Bush—joined in a Senate resolution of censure against him and his tactics. Perhaps we have witnessed such a moment of truth this week, when 19 prominent Republican attorneys, including Kenneth Starr and several former Bush Justice and Defense Department appointees, denounced the Keep America Safe smears as shameful, unjust and destructive. Conservatives can effectively discredit this disgraceful campaign—and it is their responsibility to do so. Joe Conason writes for The New York Observer . © 2010 Creators.com CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment |
By bogi666, March 15, 2010 at 8:36 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Marcus,Joe Pine was wild and his type of viciousness is suitable for criticizing and describing Repubicans.
Report thisBy berniem, March 14, 2010 at 1:11 pm Link to this comment
Call ‘em what you will, conservatives, reactionaries, or republicans. They’re all of either of one or possibly both stripes: Well-heeled, greedy control freaks or ignorant, paranoid bigots. I know, I know; I’m stereotyping and profiling but the truth is the truth! On the one hand its all about free markets, deregulation,macho military, and privization of everything while on the other its god, guns, gays, and the 3 Ps(prayer, pledge, and paddle) for those still in school. Face it. The elites of this bunch are nothing but neo-fascists while their foot soldiers bare obliging dupes who will work tirelessly towards their own demise as long as they can be made to feel superior to some current scapegoat.
Report thisBy marcus medler, March 14, 2010 at 11:59 am Link to this comment
What an irony that these people willingly expose
Report thistheir stupidity and shameful ignorance. Joe pine
use to have a ball with people like them, the only
difference is he just picked on the weak and
unconnected.
By purplewolf, March 13, 2010 at 6:21 pm Link to this comment
PatrickHenry: Doesn’t Dicko have a pacemaker? And if so, why not expose him to the Raethon microwave weapon developed during the reign of terror from the Bush years of fear and terror they inflicted upon others. Why not try it out on the very people who are so hellbent on making more types of weapons to use on people everywhere in their insane attempts to make America a world wide empire. Or the NWO or PNAC member where a few of the insane who are/were in a position of power to try to make their own version of the world in their just way they want it to be. Problem with that is, will they keep enough of the peons who actually know how to provide the services they will need to survive in their own little Eden.
I can see it now, these don’t know how to do anything whiners trying to support themselves when they haven’t a clue as to how survive without others doing it for them.
Report thisBy PatrickHenry, March 13, 2010 at 5:48 pm Link to this comment
By Paul_GA, March 13 at 1:25 pm #
Point taken, I do try to live by that abstract.
Report thisBy Paul_GA, March 13, 2010 at 8:25 am Link to this comment
Two objections, PatrickHenry, with all due respect:
(1) I don’t believe in waterboarding anyone—not even Dick Cheney (“what you would not like done unto yourself, do not unto others”—Confucius);
(2) I doubt his weak heart could stand it.
Report thisBy PatrickHenry, March 13, 2010 at 7:01 am Link to this comment
Is this the same justice department whose lawyers under Gonzales said that torture wasn’t against the law thereby effectively letting Cheney off the hook?
I still think Cheney should be waterboarded to find out what he knows about 9/11.
Report thisBy Joe, March 11, 2010 at 9:30 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I don’t think its wrong to use strong language to condemn things you disagree with.
So for instance I would have no problem calling Bill Kristol a racist and a supporter of mass murder.
Report thisBy bogi666, March 11, 2010 at 8:28 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
McCarthy was being paid by the Chinese Nationists also, for the purpose of creating fear of Communism.McCarthy being an alcoholic, from which he died, at least he had an excuse for his being a despicable, disgusting, ingrate whereas Cheney, Kristol don’t they just do it sober, being despicable, disgusting ingrates.America’s race to the bottom of conduct reflect’s on the country and the fact that American’s have been dumbed down to being ignorant, illiterate, narcissistic, glutton, consumerists which are easily manipulated by people that disdain them and America the most the likes of Kristol and Cheneywhom have never accomplished anything worthwhile resiting on the reputation of their fathers.
Report thisBy purplewolf, March 11, 2010 at 8:03 am Link to this comment
Funny how Prescott Bush is classified as a decent Republican. Wasn’t he the same Prescott Bush who aided Hitler? Yes, he was. There is nothing decent about him. And as for Liz’s rant, she must include her father as an accessory in the Pentagon attack in which he made our American interceptor aircraft to stand down so America became a sitting target for the terrorists, just as he planned it. Otherwise why make our military stand down? He is more guilty than those Liz accuses because Dick actually was a part of the terrorists acts against America.
If Liz were honest with herself, a strange concept for Republicans, she would see her father for the terrorists he is. Keep America safe? Lock up daddy, his cronies and associates who went about continuing the fear mongering and terrorism from 9-11-2001 onward.
Report thisBy Paul_GA, March 11, 2010 at 7:20 am Link to this comment
Methinks Dick Cheney wants daughter Liz to be the first female president (or at least the first female GOP president—Sarah Palin be damned) and cement his poisonous legacy as a totalitarian and neocon Israel-idolater.
Report thisBy ocjim, March 10, 2010 at 11:07 pm Link to this comment
With today’s media, you have to go far afield to score negative points of credibility, or wax almost insanely ludicrous with distortions and charges that get negative notice.
I liked especially the Rachel Maddow mocking rant that traced Liz Cheney’s “Joe-McCarthy-like” list of suspects and associates of al Qaeda terrorists to a circle that finally encompassed Liz and Dick themselves.
It is often the case that the cycle of abuse, corruption and deception often so emboldens their purveyors that arrogance takes over – the belief of superiority in intellect and the belief of being “bullet-proof” that often accompanies it.
It finally sank the Bush administration, Tom DeLay and Cheney associates like Scooter Libbey. Liz Cheney’s strident arrogance and her demonizing rant was followed by a network of criticism from both Republicans and Democrats, but it took the former to awaken the corporate media to Liz Cheney’s paranoid parsing. The corporate media usually embraces progressive criticism, or at very least, ignores it.
When will responsible conservatives do the same to other blowhards who lie, distort, and deceive, with the intention of demonizing enemies: all progressives but mainly Obama. Some remarks and songs are racist, some hate-inducing, and perhaps some even inciting violence.
Whom do I have in mind?
Just turn on Fox Noise and Clear Channel stations – you know—and listen.
Report this