LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 19, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Truthdigger of the Week: Sen. Angus King

Letter From Birmingham Jail

Chilling: Arctic Tundra ‘Will Turn to Forest’

The IRS and the Real Scandal

'The Daily Show': Stewart Slams Hypocrites Cheney and Rumsfeld

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Act of Congress
Daily Rituals
The Girls of Atomic City

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar
The Lizard Cage

The Lizard Cage

By Karen Connelly
$11.90

more items

 
Reports

The High Cost of a Broken Metaphor

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Mar 13, 2011

By E.J. Dionne, Jr.

“We’re broke.”

You can practically break a search engine if you start looking around the Internet for those words. They’re used repeatedly with reference to our local, state and federal governments, almost always to make a case for slashing programs—and, lately, to go after public-employee unions. The phrase is designed to create a sense of crisis that justifies rapid and radical actions before citizens have a chance to debate the consequences.

Just one problem: We’re not broke. Yes, nearly all levels of government face fiscal problems because of the economic downturn. But there is no crisis. There are many different paths open to fixing public budgets. And we will come up with wiser and more sustainable solutions if we approach fiscal problems calmly, realizing that we’re still a very rich country, and that the wealthiest among us are doing exceptionally well.

Consider two of the most prominent we’re-brokers, House Speaker John Boehner and Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker.

“We’re broke, broke going on bankrupt,” Boehner said in a Feb. 28 Nashville speech. For Boehner, this “fact” justifies the $61 billion in domestic spending cuts House Republicans passed (cuts that would have a negligible impact on the long-term deficit). Boehner’s GOP colleagues want reductions in Head Start, student loans and scores of other programs voters like, and the only way to sell them is to cry catastrophe.

Advertisement

Walker, of course, used the “we’re broke” rationale to justify his attack on public-worker collective bargaining rights. Yet the state’s supposedly “broke” status did not stop him from approving tax cuts before he began his war on unions and proposed all manner of budget cuts, including deep reductions in aid to public schools.

In both cases, the fiscal issues are just an excuse for ideologically driven policies to levy lower taxes on well-off people and business while reducing government programs. Yet only occasionally do journalists step back to ask: Are these guys telling the truth?

The admirable website PolitiFact.com examined Walker’s claim in detail and concluded flatly it was “false.”

“Experts agree the state faces financial challenges in the form of deficits,” PolitiFact wrote. “But they also agree the state isn’t broke. Employees and bills are being paid. Services are continuing to be performed. Revenue continues to roll in. A variety of tools—taxes, layoffs, spending cuts, debt shifting—is available to make ends meet. Walker has promised not to increase taxes. That takes one tool off the table.”

And that’s the whole point.

Bloomberg News looked at Boehner’s statement and declared simply: “It’s wrong.” As the agency’s David J. Lynch wrote: “The U.S. today is able to borrow at historically low interest rates, paying 0.68 percent on a two-year note that it had to offer at 5.1 percent before the financial crisis began in 2007. Financial products that pay off if Uncle Sam defaults aren’t attracting unusual investor demand. And tax revenue as a percentage of the economy is at a 60-year low, meaning if the government needs to raise cash and can summon the political will, it could do so.”

Precisely. A phony metaphor is being used to hijack the nation’s political conversation and skew public policies to benefit better-off Americans and hurt most others.

We have an 8.9 percent unemployment rate, yet further measures to spur job creation are off the table. We’re broke, you see. We have a $15 trillion economy, yet we pretend to be an impoverished nation with no room for public investments in our future or efforts to ease the pain of a deep recession on those Americans who didn’t profit from it or cause it in the first place.

As Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., pointed out in a little-noticed but powerful speech on the economy in December, “during the past 20 years, 56 percent of all income growth went to the top 1 percent of households. Even more unbelievably, a third of all income growth went to just the top one-tenth of 1 percent.” Some people are definitely not broke, yet we can’t even think about raising their taxes.

By contrast, Franken noted that “when you adjust for inflation, the median household income actually declined over the last decade.” Many of those folks are going broke, yet because “we’re broke,” we’re told we can’t possibly help them.

Give Boehner, Walker and their allies full credit for diverting our attention with an arresting metaphor. The rest of us are dupes if we fall for it.
   
E.J. Dionne’s e-mail address is ejdionne(at)washpost.com.
   
© 2011, Washington Post Writers Group


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By mbt butik<, April 12, 2011 at 4:03 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Here´s a good way to keep your head above water:
listen to the Republicans, then do the exact
opposite. You´ll make tons of money and help
folks along the way. Doing well to do good.

Report this

By Frank, March 16, 2011 at 1:10 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I’m confused.  How can we be broke, we have been cutting taxes as fast as we can, so tax revenues have to be up through the roof.  How can lower taxes lead to a broke government?  Unpossible.

Report this
RayLan's avatar

By RayLan, March 15, 2011 at 6:02 pm Link to this comment

John M.
“We ARE broke folks, we really are.”
As I’ve commented previously - who is this tragic ‘we’ that are broke?

The statement is strategically and infuriatingly vague, insinuating everything in general and telling us nothing in particular, except to instill confusion and panic.

There will most always be a deficit.

There was a huge deficit during the Bush gulags of ridiculous war.

Capitalism runs on debt-financing - it is all a big Promise To Pay. The wheels of the capitalist industry turn on what is called ‘leverage’ which is the debt to equity ratio.


The reason it doesn’t keel over is that most leveraging has been regulated to require collateral -or capital to back it up.

The real estate bubble was built on ‘derivatives’ which are securities that didn’t need captilization because the servants of corporate America like Reagan and Greenspan worked at removing that regulatory requirement.


We have been pillaged by Wall Street and have insanely bailed out the Robber Barons who have blown the leverage beyond anything previously tried.
They are not broke - the government, that is the taxpayers have purchased their debt.

The other malaprop about ‘entitlements’ lumps a paid for benefit like Social Security with Medicare.

Medicare is only an ‘entitlement’ because the hot capitalist system of the US has coldly decided that health care should be a for-profit industry of the private sector - unlike any other developed civilized nation on the planet thus far.

The blah about ‘entitlements’ is an apparently successful ploy to draw attention away from the cause to the symptom.

The cause is de-regulated run-away capitalism.

Until that is addressed and fixed, cutting spending will only bandage an economy that is chronically diseased only to erupt again.

Cutting Medicare is like giving aspirin to a leper.
It is a dangerous indulgence in denial and wishful thinking.

Report this
John M's avatar

By John M, March 15, 2011 at 2:44 pm Link to this comment

A deficit without defense

How much is entitlement spending the real source of
our budgetary woes? Here’s a stat for you: In
President Obama’s proposed 2012 budget, the White
House Office of Management and Budget estimates (in
Table S-4) that mandatory spending this year (2011)
will be $2.194 trillion, while total federal receipts
will be $2.174 trillion.

That’s right: Even if we were to spend every dime of
federal revenue on mandatory programs (Medicare,
Medicaid, Social Security, and the like), we would
still have a $20 billion deficit. When you add in
interest payments on the debt ($207 billion), we
would have a $227 billion deficit. That’s even if we
didn’t spend anything at all on discretionary
programs, the category of spending that includes
homeland security, interstate highways, national
parks, and, of course, national defense.


We ARE broke folks, we really are.

http://washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-
confidential/2011/03/deficit-without-defense

Report this

By Michael Shaw, March 15, 2011 at 11:06 am Link to this comment

Bravo Gary Rose!

Report this
zonth_zonth's avatar

By zonth_zonth, March 15, 2011 at 9:54 am Link to this comment

bill said
“So what’s more important—meaningless currency
comparisons or the ultimate purchasing power of your
currency”

Well I suppose if you can continue to buy a bunch of false needs for the cheap at Walmart (much cheaper indeed than you can in Australia) than the US is in fine shape relatively speaking. However, the accumulation of false needs for cheap does not reflect a higher standard of living.

Report this

By tedmurphy41, March 15, 2011 at 6:45 am Link to this comment

If America was really broke, it wouldn’t be involved in so many areas of the World, and it most certainly would not be able to finance the military escapades that are currently taking place, especially in the Middle East and Afghanistan.
What it really means is that your limited resources are being badly directed and the American people are being misinformed, as usual.
Wealth, unfortunately, is finite, but wars are a real drain and always very expensive.
You have the power to make a real difference, so choose what you want!

Report this

By DBM, March 15, 2011 at 3:04 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Unregistered: 
“both political parties have been co-opted by our
would-be oligarchists”[sic]

Really?  “would-be”??  What more does it take to be an
oligarch than to own and manipulate the government?

Report this

By Bill Jencks, March 14, 2011 at 8:22 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I am amused when I see comments about the Aussie
dollar or Canadian Loonie surpassing the dollar in
value.

When all’s considered, nobody really understands
currency in relation to purchasing power these days.
Value always seem to be in the digits. People seem to
be impressed by the increase or decrease in a currency’s
digits when measured against another currency’s
digits.

What nobody seems to understand is that ALL the
worlds fiat currencies have been falling in
purchasing power over decades. Why? Because all fiat
currencies hold dollar assets and Treasuries.

ALL fiat currencies are steadily devaluing in other
words—some, like the dollar, faster than others.

Don’t believe me? Then what did a liter of petrol or
a loaf of bread or an ounce of gold cost in March
2010 and what does it cost now? You will perhaps
notice that it doesn’t matter whether you measure or
price this in dollars, loonies, Aussie dollar or Thai
Baht—all currencies are steadily devaluing vs
commodities ie things you buy.

So what’s more important—meaningless currency
comparisons or the ultimate purchasing power of your
currency?

Report this

By Michael Shaw, March 14, 2011 at 7:17 pm Link to this comment

The only thing going broke in America, beyond what’s left of the middle class and our ever growing numbers in poor, is the moral character of our leadership. It’s a lot cheaper for billionaires to buy politicians than it is to pay taxes.

Report this

By AJZ, March 14, 2011 at 5:16 pm Link to this comment

Technically I don’t think you can say that this country is broke (maybe broken, though).  The real question is though: from where do we get the funds to get us out of the red?  Until everybody, and I mean everybody, including the rich, the middle class, the elderly, the military, etc. gives up something, preferably according to their ability to pay, we will never solve this problem.  Balancing the budget on the backs of those least able to pay is monstruous and immoral and, I believe, in the long run it will be bad politics.  Be careful what you wish for, Republicans.

Report this

By Richard Friedman, March 14, 2011 at 4:29 pm Link to this comment

The column is right.  But why won’t Obama and other
Democrats stand up and tell the Republicans and Tea
Party people that they are spewing nonsense?  Their
mystifying enabling of those folks is frustrating and
makes me think my vote for the Democrats was a waste. 
I didn’t think I was getting a me-too party, but it
looks like that’s exactly what I got.

Report this
Lori F's avatar

By Lori F, March 14, 2011 at 3:53 pm Link to this comment

Most of us commenters seem to agree that the people and the SYSTEM are broke, if not our governments’ budgets.  But I disagree with peterjkraus (and with Mr. D Jr’s implication), it’s not just the Republicans—BOTH parties are to blame because they’re both funded by Wall Street and Big Business. 

The only way that fact will change is if We the People do something about it, not expect those bought-and-paid-for politicians to destroy their feed trough.  We can work to change how politicians get elected. Because corporations are considered “people,” and money is considered free speech, it’s “One dollar (or $1 million), one vote”, not “One person, one vote.” We first need a constitutional amendment that states only people are people and money is not speech. Then, have all elections run with a set, finite amount of money given to all candidates who collect enough signatures on a petition.  The money would come out of our taxes.  IMO, that would be one of the best uses of taxes!  Also have strict term limits and don’t allow pols or their staff to work for lobbying firms after they leave office. 

I believe left, right, and center can agree on this, if we keep our sights and our rhetoric on the “bottom line,” rather than bickering across the political spectrum. There are several websites that are dedicated to this goal. For example, try http://movetoamend.org/news/

Another option is to change the Supreme Court.  We can work to impeach Justice Roberts and those who are twisting the intent of our Constitution from its protection of People to its new goal to protect corporations.

Report this
RayLan's avatar

By RayLan, March 14, 2011 at 3:32 pm Link to this comment

The incendiary fallacy about ‘broke-ness’ leaves out an essential component of ‘we’.

‘We’ must include the middle to working class poor - Yes they are being empoverished and dis-enfranchised by the very rhetoric that wants to cut back the social services that have prevented them from sinking even lower into ‘broke-ness’.
So that level of ‘broke-ness’, therefore, does not justify the draconian reductions of public expense.

‘We’ does NOT include the upper 2 -5 % of the orporate-enriched private sector class who purchased the loyalty of the public sector and under whom the fiscal ‘austerity’ that the lower classes but be subjected to, is promoted.

We must also clarify just exactly ‘what’ is broke. The economy is doing much better - if you are a corporation - if you are a worker looking for that corporation - the economy is still bleak.

So deficit-ranting is nowhere justified on the basis of the above ‘we’ who are broke.

Lies, lies and corruption served over and over again like yesterday’s pork.

Report this

By garyrose66, March 14, 2011 at 2:51 pm Link to this comment

It is with great amusement that I see the macro-economics analyses of those who know nothing about macro economics all to prove a point that they should have lower wages, pensions and less social benefit from living in the country that possesses the greatest economic wealthmaking engine in the world. These are the dangerous ones, they can throw around meaningless drivel posing as macroeconomic “analyses” on taxes and debt, and GDP and all that crap to fool those who have even less of a clue.  They parrot terms and words and don’t think for themselves, then try to rant about their perfect knowledge in places like this comment page.  The amusement ends when I consider how the wealthy few have turned the corner on creating enough of these dupes geographically dispersed throughout the population sufficent to hijack the alleged democracy we are supposed to be living in, which will destroy what is left for those who are not duped.

Report this
de profundis clamavi's avatar

By de profundis clamavi, March 14, 2011 at 2:07 pm Link to this comment

I see some of you expressing the misplaced anger of the tea party - an argument that runs something like this - “rich liberals like Mr Dionne aren’t broke, but working folks like me are, thanks to high spending liberals in government.

Guess again, tea partiers. The reason you’re broke isn’t high taxes. It’s because your darling right wing politicians have busted your unions and cut the funding from the public services and facilities you used to depend on.

Now those same right wing politicians are getting you to blame the liberals for making you poor and powerless, when it is the Republicans who did that.

If you have anything to blame the liberals for, it is this: for the past 30 years, instead of directly confronting the right wing, calling them out for being the elitist swine that they are, and aggressively promoting the rights of working people, the liberals have tried to persuade the right wing to soften their policies, and gradually compromised away everything working people gained from 1930 to 1960. Above all, liberals have been afraid of openly saying that rich people have to pay higher taxes if we are going to have a society that functions for the benefit of all.

Liberals have been weak, pathetic representatives and advocates for the working people of this country.

But that doesn’t mean the Republicans are on your side if you’re an ordinary working American.

Report this

By sharonsj, March 14, 2011 at 10:09 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

You may not be broke, but most of the people I know are.  We can barely pay our bills, we close down most of our homes in the winter (can’t afford the heat), we buy all our clothes and shoes at thrift shops, and we buy cheap food at Dollar General (in processed packages detrimental to our health).

The average folks I know are so enraged by their own elected officials, I expect that as things worsen—and they will—you’ll be seeing more Egypts here in America.

Report this
zonth_zonth's avatar

By zonth_zonth, March 14, 2011 at 9:29 am Link to this comment

no worries.  US secretary of Treasury genius economist will institue the “Print more money!” clause.  To be damned with inflation!  Australia dollar has just recenly surpassed US dollar.  Who is next Canada (if it hasnt already)?  Just a matter of time.

Report this

By Bill Jencks, March 14, 2011 at 8:34 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

“And we will come up with wiser and more sustainable solutions if we approach fiscal problems calmly, realizing that we’re still a very rich country, and that the wealthiest among us are doing exceptionally well.”

LOL…Well, OK, the wealthiest are doing well—I’ll except that. But what about the rest of the 297 million Joe’s on Mainstreet America?

Are they doing so well Mr Dionne Jr ?

Bye they way, have you ever heard of the US Fiscal Gap—which, curently, is an ongoing promisory US
government debt of $202 trillion(Kotlikoff)? This
debt kinda makes US GDP pale into insignificance,
don’t it Mr D ?

So the US Govt is not broke then?

And meanwhile, dollar value continues to spiral
downwards in value because of QE. And besides greatly benefiting US exports as well as deliberately damaging the world’s developing mercantilist economies and markets, this also devalues the ordinary US citizen’s dollar savings and earnings does it not?

Of course, the very wealthy people have already spent the last year or so fully consolidating their own positions before “The Big Fall”. Great Job Obama !! Most of the sensible ones have already exited dollars now, owning gold and tangible foreign assets instead.

Yes, quite. The wealthy ones are doing so very well aren’t they?

Report this

By Proud to be Unregistered, March 14, 2011 at 8:32 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Mr Dionne Jr. is right, of course; “bankruptcy” is impossible for us, at least so long as the dollar is the world currency.

We’re not broke, we’re BROKEN—but it comes to the same thing, Mr D jr, since a nation which is broken cannot get its house in order. How broken are we? The public is divided to a degree not seen since the Civil War, and both political parties have been co-opted by our would-be oligarchists. Meanwhile, the body politic has developed rheumatoid arthritis—our gov’t, like a diseased immune system, attacks the citizenry its supposed to protect: millions persecuted by DEA for their drug preference, thousands hounded by FBI for their political beliefs, all Americans snooped on by DHS and the junior G-men of its “Infragard” program. All this regardless of who’s in office: the closet neocon Clinton, the outed neocon Bush, or the current neocon, the kinder, gentler Bush Lite.

Meanwhile Uncle Sam and the Fed add 5 to 10 thousand dollars in new debt per capita per year—every fiscal year the deficit adds another $50/month to your share of the federal installment
plan. Naturally, this reduces your funds available to finance other purchases, like food.

Let’s not sugar-coat things, Mr Dionne Jr. It’s the collapse of the Fourth Reich out there. Merely pointing out that politicians lie like dogs hardly matters at all when the Red Army is already across the Oder River.

Report this
peterjkraus's avatar

By peterjkraus, March 13, 2011 at 11:03 pm Link to this comment

Here´s a good way to keep your head above water:
listen to the Republicans, then do the exact
opposite. You´ll make tons of money and help
folks along the way. Doing well to do good.

Remember: Republicans lie. That´s what they do.
They lie.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.