|
|
May 21, 2013
|
|
James Cone’s Gospel of the Penniless, Jobless, Marginalized and DespisedPosted on Jan 9, 2012
By Chris Hedges “The Cross and the Lynching Tree are separated by nearly two thousand years,” James Cone writes in his new book, “The Cross and the Lynching Tree.” “One is the universal symbol of the Christian faith; the other is the quintessential symbol of black oppression in America. Though both are symbols of death, one represents a message of hope and salvation, while the other signifies the negation of that message by white supremacy. Despite the obvious similarities between Jesus’ death on the cross and the death of thousands of black men and women strung up to die on a lamppost or tree, relatively few people, apart from the black poets, novelists, and other reality-seeing artists, have explored the symbolic connections. Yet, I believe this is the challenge we must face. What is at stake is the credibility and the promise of the Christian gospel and the hope that we may heal the wounds of racial violence that continue to divide our churches and our society.” To read a review by Mel White of “The Cross and the Lynching Tree” in Truthdig, click here. So begins James Cone, perhaps the most important contemporary theologian in America, who has spent a lifetime pointing out the hypocrisy and mendacity of the white church and white-dominated society while lifting up and exalting the voices of the oppressed. He writes out of his experience as an African-American growing up in segregated Arkansas and his close association with the Black Power movement. But what is more important is that he writes out of a deep religious conviction, one I share, that the true power of the Christian gospel is its unambiguous call for liberation from forces of oppression and for a fierce and uncompromising condemnation of all who oppress. Cone, who teaches at Union Theological Seminary in New York City, writes on behalf of all those whom the Salvadoran theologian and martyr Ignacio Ellacuría called “the crucified peoples of history.” He writes for the forgotten and abused, the marginalized and the despised. He writes for those who are penniless, jobless, landless and without political or social power. He writes for gays, lesbians, bisexuals and those who are transgender. He writes for undocumented farmworkers toiling in misery in the nation’s agricultural fields. He writes for Muslims who live under the terror of war and empire in Iraq and Afghanistan. And he writes for us. He understands that until white Americans can see the cross and the lynching tree together, “until we can identify Christ with a ‘recrucified’ black-body hanging from a lynching tree, there can be no genuine understanding of Christian identity in America, and no deliverance from the brutal legacy of slavery and white supremacy.” “In the deepest sense, I’ve been writing this book all my life,” he said of “The Cross and the Lynching Tree” when we spoke recently. “I put my whole being into it. And did not hold anything back. I didn’t choose to write it. It chose me. Advertisement “Many Christians embrace the conviction that Jesus died on the cross to redeem humankind from sin,” he said. “Taking our place, they say, Jesus suffered on the cross and gave his life as a ransom for many. The cross is the great symbol of the Christian narrative of salvation. Unfortunately, during the course of 2,000 years of Christian history, the symbol of salvation has been detached from the ongoing suffering and oppression of human beings, the crucified people of history. The cross has been transformed into a harmless, non-offensive ornament that Christians wear around their necks. Rather than reminding us of the cost of discipleship, it has become a form of cheap grace, an easy way to salvation that doesn’t force us to confront the power of Christ’s message and mission.”
1
2
3
4
NEXT PAGE >>>
The World As It Is:Dispatches on the Myth of Human Progress
Previous item: Stuck in the Bloody Primaries Next item: Karzai’s Bagram Demands Add Stress to U.S. Policy New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By Wishingforsanity, January 9, 2012 at 10:58 am Link to this comment
There is but one true evil in this world. A human creation to enslave other humans and I’m
not referring to Global warming. I’m referring to religion. From the seemingly innocuous
Buddha to the “in your face Evangelical Right.”
Here’s me dream…I get to ask one question at the “morons on parade” at the 689th GOP
debate. Pretty sure that’s next week. It goes a little something like this…“Putting aside
your faith (pause for boos from rabid god fearing crowd) would ALL of you please point to
whomever who feel is the stupidest, most vapid, war mongering, fear mongering, money
starved, constitution eviscerating candidate here on stage tonight.”
(another pause as their feeble brains try and come up with an answer that doesn’t involve
some mythological deity)
“Wow, that was unexpected, you all pointed to yourselves in the first showing I can think
of where you’ve actually managed to, and I use this word carefully, thought for
yourselves. Amazing. Truly amazing.”
Call it a wet dream, unless your Santorum of course, but at let I’ve still got a dream.
Report thisBy bpawk, January 9, 2012 at 10:08 am Link to this comment
While reading this article, especially “...He writes for the forgotten and abused, the marginalized and the despised… those who are penniless, jobless, landless and without political or social power…” I could see that between the lines what you are saying is that religion acknowledges injustice in the world by overlays a kind of superjustice that is acknowledged to be not on earth (the meek will inherit the earth, they’ll get theirs (the evil) on judgment day, etc.). If you are acknowledging there’s no justice by creating a superjustice when you die, why don’t you try to fix the injustice now? This is why a lot of people don’t like religion - they don’t address the here and now issues of injustice but instead explain away their apathy to say there’s something better after they die. This lets the bad folks away with exploiting others and lets the apathetic voters off the hook. While I like the empathy, nothing really gets done to make the world a better place because people accept their lot in life (rich think they are ordained to be rich, poor think this is God’s plan for them).
Report thisBy balkas, January 9, 2012 at 10:00 am Link to this comment
blacks loving white people or whites loving blacks? please don’t!! blacks [or whites] first of all and
before you do anything else, respect ALL PEOPLE AND PEOPLES!!
i strongly aver that one cannot love another person if that person is of another ‘faith’, culture, or
ideology.
respect=right of a person to live in peace, to work, to KNOW, to obtain healthcare.
and i give no hoot what you think of me or whether you love me or not.
the poor white trash don’t need love of even one black person- they need blacks’ support in
Report thisobtaining basic human rights.
and since 99.999 of blacks would vote for a denial of these rights, they can shove their love for the
white people—and especially for the onepercenters. thanks
By balkas, January 9, 2012 at 9:36 am Link to this comment
seems CE identifies [or conflates] ‘faith’ [danger word] with instinct to survive,
Report thishope for better life.
survival instinct and hope [btw, both terms i treat as undefinable] runs eternal, i
aver, and almost under any condition; whether imposed by other people or nature.
yes, if pain is too great or if a person is caught in a fire in a building, a person
would jump to death rather than be roasted alive.
and [cagily, is it?] suggest that survival instinct and eternally hoping is solely a
function of ‘religion’, jesus, bible, clerical ‘teachings’ or their science?
is this guy aware of the fact that such thinking [science] is so vitiating and vicious?
probably not, i suggest.
i don’t think anybody is evil. that includes CE. thanks
By balkas, January 9, 2012 at 9:10 am Link to this comment
i suggest that blacks of afrika were more civil to one another before
Report thisarrival there of arab and christian voodoo-logists, than after their arrival.
but even, germanic and slavic peoples ca even 2k years ago—who at that
time still inhabited an area around the black, caspian, and azov seas—
were by far more civilized and peaceful before they came in touch with
evil roman empire and evil christianity, than after.
in n. america, it had been christianity which utterly destroyed indigenous
millennial adaptation for survival. thanks, bozhidar balkas
canada/croatia
By balkas, January 9, 2012 at 8:56 am Link to this comment
theology=godology=voodoo-ology=devilology.
Report this[indigenous[ primitive culture=high civilization and civility.
By Inherit The Wind, January 9, 2012 at 8:37 am Link to this comment
I read these comments, as an agnostic, and I think: “How would I have stood up to the constant and very real threat of ‘Judge Lynch’ if I were growing up Black in the Deep South?” I don’t know the answer to that.
I am well old enough to remember the dogs and fire hoses of Bull Connor and of Wallace trying to block admission to the Univ. of Alabama. Growing up White, progressive and Northern made what went on down there horrifying but easy to ignore what was going on in my own back yard.
Cone’s frustration with White Christians is understandable. They STILL think much the same way—they call it the “TeaParty” and “Values Voters” but they are basically the old southern white racists. Cone (or Hedges) doesn’t even address what was the BASIC justification for their evil: Whites actually questioned and debated whether Black people had souls or not (and, of course, concluded they did not—else how justify racism and slavery?).
There have always been fine Christians and evil ones, both devout and pious, whether Dr. Cone…or Tomas de Torquemada. Piety can take you to being Mother Teresa, or to being a Taliban torturer (or any other religious fanatic trying to force, by force, his religion on others).
Where is the line? I think it’s obvious. You can say “You have to choose” but once you say “If you don’t choose as I tell you, you will go to hell and be an Enemy of God”, you have crossed the line into the Inquisition, the Taliban, the murderers claiming God’s mandate.
Report thisBy balkas, January 9, 2012 at 8:35 am Link to this comment
language is self-reflexing. you make a statement and you can make another statement about the first
statement. once you make another statement, you can make statement’s about the statement just made, and
then go on making statements about statements ad infinitum.
a faith, any, is really making statements about statements. this process is unending.
ie, one can say s’mthing about s’mthing else in perpetuity. it makes no difference if you talk about the
meaning of cross, jesus, bible, quran, mohammed, yahweh, torah, talmud, mein kampf, das kapital, life on
earth, the statements made about the above listed THOUGHTS [which cause etern disputes, rancor, anger,
hatred, etc] are self reflexing.
thus, ALL ‘FAITHS’ [means: watch it, danger word; may make you blood boil] are self-reflexing. and, because
of that self-splitting—by this time, have split in thousands of ‘faiths’ or cults, as i call them.
factual statements, such as: sun is shining, it’s raining, tree is blooming, i have a carrot seed in my hand- in
Report thisshort, about what can be seen, are not self-reflexing—just one look at the sunshine, rain, the seed, is worth
more than all talking one could think of.
so, don’t get caught in this vicious maize. or you’d lose your peace every time you listen to any cleric. tnx
By SharonMI, January 9, 2012 at 8:28 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I was stunned to read that in this age of Obama, lynching is back…and self-lynching to boot:
http://susie-c.tumblr.com/post/15105973656/an-extrajudicial-execution
This time it’s self-lynching, so not white-on-black, hmmm, could “self-lynching” become the new self-immolation of political protest?
Report thisBy prisnersdilema, January 9, 2012 at 8:23 am Link to this comment
The Christian right bears responsibility for the Repuglican rights rise to power, and the
Report thisaftermath of that rise. America’s endless wars and the looting of the treasury were all
made possible by them, and their foolish clinging on to ideology that has been used
against them to justify evi in all it’s forms….
By John Sullivan, January 9, 2012 at 8:19 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Legitimate spirituality is the domain of the individual. Religion is simply power.
Report thisBy mrwebster, January 9, 2012 at 8:08 am Link to this comment
Hedges is self deluded about his Christian religion. He writers as if the racism and white supremecy of Christianity is really actually apart from the religion. As with his arguments with the atheists, he wants to convienently tell us that religion is not part and parcel of the wicked soul. He wants to ignore the history and theological foundations which Paul, not Jesus, created.
His pushes an apologia for Christianity as religion polluted by outside forces when in fact as in the case of the is article, Christianity, his Christian religion, was the religion of the oppressers whether it involved American slavery, oppresed French peasants, or Russian serfs.
Hedges wants his Christianity to be revolutionary when in fact its practice since Constantine has been anything but revolutionary. In a sense, the oppression that Christianity has endorsed and supported would not be overcome until Western secular anti-religion movements were born out of the Enlightenment.
It is no wonder that a figure such as Lenin pronounced religion the opiate of the people. This wasn’t some uniquely Marxist revelation, but the truth about Chirstianity which Hedges cannot handle and wants to soften by claiming something uniquely postive about it expressed by those opppressed by it.
Report thisBy pragmatic_realist, January 9, 2012 at 8:06 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
It needs to be said that President Obama is a great admirer of Neibuhr and his “Christian Realism”.
Report thisBy balkas, January 9, 2012 at 7:51 am Link to this comment
correction: ...and galileo’s science does not divide us as does christian
Report this[and this time i add also as judaic and islamic] faith does.
in fact, the science of what can be seen, reunifies or helps us think the
same way about most aspects of daily living.
religions are sciences about unseen and unseeable phenomena.
in, short, these sciences are voodoo and witch crafts. tnx
By balkas, January 9, 2012 at 7:42 am Link to this comment
bears repeating: blacks were better off as slaves than as ‘free’. tnx
Report thisBy Ambill94, January 9, 2012 at 7:40 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Excellent!!!! Many of us have struggled with the failure of Christianity to be a truly revolutionary faith. How, in light of the gospel that we all claim brings the good news, can we listen to the ignorance and heresy that is preched in our churches and practiced in our institutions.
I can remember when Catholic priests in Central and South America were condemened for preaching “revolution theology”, that according to some was the main cause for political upheaval in many countries, and was therefore by definintion un-American and somehow evil.
Report thisBy gringo45, January 9, 2012 at 7:36 am Link to this comment
Thank you for clarifying an issue that you mentioned on BookTV.
Report thisBy sallysense, January 9, 2012 at 7:33 am Link to this comment
(should it seem like something’s missing as if no one is around…
Report thisor the counter’s unattended at a nearby lost and found…
don’t fret about time hiding souls or silencing their sound…
you’ll find them still within you on that common-bonded ground!)...
By balkas, January 9, 2012 at 7:32 am Link to this comment
christian faith of which hedges speaks is best understood as a science,
Report thisbut with a peculiar and particular mode of research and evaluation of
that probe, search.
for one thing christian science or ideology splits people into soul and
body and galileo’s science does not.
and galileo science does not divides as does the church science. divided
we suffer tragedies of all kinds. if united, we would have behaved much
better towards one another. tnx
By doublestandards/glasshouses, January 9, 2012 at 7:26 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
James Baldwin, 1963
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOL5ciA6AU&feature=related
Quite an education. Now try to imagine seeing something like this today on public televison(which was called educational tv back then)and imagine the current crop of republican presidential candidates responding to it. And this film was made for school children!
Report thisBy GradyLeeHoward, January 9, 2012 at 7:11 am Link to this comment
False Christianity is the delusional embrace of
death and suffering for pleasurable purposes. And
that is why it would be impossible to turn
Thanatoptic Christainity around. Psychologically,
most Christianity is selfish and utilitarian. It
can embrace any needed contradiction for purposes
of gaining power or wealth. The co-optation of
Reinhold Niebuhr is an excellent subject for
discussion of how American Christians are born
sell-outs. They seek Elite approval. These people are so delusional they can
sit through a sermon by James Come or even Jeremiah
Wright and feel superior like Dana Carvey’s Church
Lady.
Chris talks about the suffering body on the tree
but the mind is also routinely crucified by
powerful misbelief groups. When the desperate
dissenter enters a Mission or a Salvation Army it
is a re-education camp where he is cleansed of all
outrage and comes away with “Pie in the sky after
you die.” If not, he doesn’t eat. I have a friend who thinks Ten Thousand
Villages can never be exploitative of the powerless
because it is done in Christ’s name. That’s stupid.
Hedges quotes Cone: “I like to write about the good
faith. I like to write about faith that resists. I
like to write about faith that empowers. I like to
write about faith that enables people to look
another in the eye and tell ’em what you think.” I
have done these things empowered by a faith in
human rights not handed down by some sky Potentate.
As far as a religion Christianity is just one slice
of bread out of a long bag; one serving of juice
from a gigantic grape press that is the human
spirit. If we can cry over and speak for crushed
bodies then why can’t we “manifest and represent”
over all the belief and faith that has been crushed
by selfish power; all the breakthrough ideas of
cooperation and organizing that have been aborted
by big business and the state? Many times solutions
were in our face, in our grasp; and hierarchical,
deferential, polite to power Christianity, or some
other Voodoo, was thrown over our heads like a bag
and our hands clasped in praise of cruelty with an
electrical tie.
Chris has a right to be Christian. He seems
Report thisauthentic and tries to walk the walk. But he has to
remember there are others like me in the movement
who have a broader view of Creation, don’t need the
accoutrements of Immortal Royalty for attraction,
and are ready to lay our bodily burden down when
the circumstances demand it. People of any color
can be lynched, and the innocent are being murdered
over resources and access all around the world even
as I write. In fact, the Planet is being crucified
over energy. This is Monday: Sunday school was
yesterday: Most church goers are back to their
bloodthirsty ways again. What good is a one day a
week ally ready to backstab as soon as the fried chicken and cake are consumed? As Tommy Smothers observed in 1970:“He
sees his shadow- he goes back in- and we have six
more weeks (years? lifetimes? millenia?) of Winter
(injustice? concentrated power? death embrace?)Herman Cain and Clarence Thomas probably think they are pleasing God. What kind of God finds their walk pleasing?
By Gordon Matthews, January 9, 2012 at 6:50 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Many, many thanks for this essay, Chris. In Whirlpool controlled Berrien County, Michigan an African-American man’s body has just turned up floating in the river in St. Joseph. More on this unspeakable event:
http://bhbanco.blogspot.com/2011/12/rip-timothy-bulldog-allen.html
As many know, Whirlpool stole land deeded in perpetuity to Benton Harbor for a golf course. We hope thousands can Occupy the PGA in May. More on this:
http://occupythepga.wordpress.com/
Also, there’s a lot of info regarding the stolen land
Report thisat bhbanco.org.
By 3am mystic, January 9, 2012 at 6:14 am Link to this comment
While growing up in the southern white church during the 50’s and 60’s I often heard family, friends and church leaders say in regard to the Civil Rights Movement, and I quote, “Good colored Christians don’t go for that mess”; and I believed them. Since then I have asked God many times to forgive me. I was forgiven the first time; each time since is to help me never forget.
Over the years I came to see that the white dominated conservative church demands obedience from their African American members, in essence they tell them “be good”; and part of that obedience is to “never bring up the past”, which actually makes the present as oppressive.
I am thankful that I finally came to see that the Gospel does not make Children of God; it recognizes children of God, and that includes all who have taken a breath in this world. And whether they were hanged upon a cross, from a hanging tree, or feeling the fear of being severed from Social Security, Medicare or Medicaid, I must see them each morning in my mind’s eye as I eat and enjoy my breakfast and safely go to my job; or my Christianity is nothing.
Report thisPage 2 of 2 pages < 1 2