LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
May 26, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     robert scheer     barack obama     gay marriage     chris hedges     ndaa
Most Read

Say 'Hi-Ho!' as They Strip-Search You

TED: 'A Money-Soaked Orgy of Self-Congratulatory Futurism'

A Rare Admission That Money Trumps Everything Else

I Can't Hear Myself Think

Children Slaughtered in Government Attack on Syrian Town

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Why Bain Questions Matter
OSHA Struggles When Tower Climbers Die

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Better Than We Found It
The Good-Natured Dictator

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar
The Last Days of Democracy

The Last Days of Democracy

By Elliot D. Cohen
$12.38

more items

 
Reports

The GOP’s Triple Play

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Oct 17, 2010

By E.J. Dionne, Jr.

PORTSMOUTH, N.H.—The Republican Party is running a three-level campaign this year that gives its candidates a wealth of advantages—in flexibility, deniability, and determination. 

At the first level are the party’s candidates, who can be as reasonable or as angry, as moderate or as conservative, as their circumstances require.

Next come the outside groups that refuse to disclose their donor lists. They are doing the dirty work of pounding their Democratic opponents in commercials for which no one is accountable. The Republican candidates can shrug an innocent, “Who, me?” Deniability is a wonderful thing.

And then on the far right, Glenn Beck and his allies cast President Obama as the central figure in a conspiracy against America itself, fueling participation by the most extreme 10 percent or 15 percent of the electorate.

Their crackpot ideas, as the historian Sean Wilentz documented in The New Yorker recently, originated in the 1950s and ’60s, in the paranoid theorizing of the John Birch Society. But whereas responsible conservatives such as William F. Buckley Jr. denounced the Birchers and the rest of the lunatic fringe back then, Republicans this time are riding the radical wave. In some cases (think Sharron Angle in Nevada), the extremists are their standard-bearers.

Advertisement

It’s quite brilliant in its way, and judging by the polls, it’s working out rather nicely for the Republicans. They are also profiting from the discontent bred by an economic downturn that began on their watch.

It’s strange to observe this process in New Hampshire, a state whose voters are famously engaged and generally moderate. They are also partially immunized against the power of television advertising, accustomed from their presidential primary to television screens filled with political messages of all kinds.

Kelly Ayotte is all charm and reasonableness as she works her way through the luncheon crowd at a meeting of New England’s largest Rotary Club at the Red Hook Brewery here last week.

In her brief address to the assembled business people and professionals, Ayotte, the former state attorney general and Republican nominee for the U.S. Senate, offers the usual Republican criticisms of a Washington that “has been spending too much money” and “not focusing on getting our economy back on track.” She commits to “lower taxes on small business and less regulation” but also pledges not to be a partisan figure. “Often, I’ll be bucking my own party,” she promises.

Frank Guinta, the Republican House nominee, was also the soul of equanimity when it was his turn to speak. He, too, stands four-square against mindless partisanship while sticking to his party’s message on taxes, spending and jobs.

Rep. Paul Hodes, Ayotte’s Democratic opponent, could not attend the event, but Rep. Carol Shea-Porter, the incumbent Democrat whom Guinta hopes to defeat, minces no words in bravely defending tax increases on upper-bracket earners before a crowd that, judging from its questions, includes a great many of them.

“We all have a responsibility to do what we can to get out of this debt,” she says. And she stoutly defends her vote for health care reform, asking the crowd if it really wants to repeal the new law’s consumer protections or its tax credit to help small businesses buy insurance.

You would never know that, away from the friendly Rotarian civic moment worthy of Tocqueville, Hodes was being pounded on the air by one of this year’s big outside conservative spenders, American Crossroads. “The guy just can’t tell the truth,” one ad declares, citing the state’s leading conservative newspaper. For her part, Shea-Porter has been hit by the pious-sounding Revere America group for her support of Obamacare. The ad warns ominously, and with no basis: “Your right to keep your own doctor may be taken away.”

Hodes estimates that he has been battered by $4 million in outside ads and, in an interview, condemns “the idea that corporations and third-party interests can flood our airwaves with millions of dollars without our knowing who they are.” But he gamely predicts that sophisticated New Hampshire voters are “less susceptible to the garbage being thrown at them.”

What’s striking is that both Hodes and Shea-Porter are unafraid to embrace their votes for Obama’s program, which makes you wonder if their party and the administration would be in better shape now if both had long ago embarked on a systematic defense of their actual record.

As it is, these Democrats and scores like them elsewhere face Republican opponents who can be calmly affable, knowing they have behind them oodles of secret cash and a far right that sees Nov. 2 as Armageddon.   
   
E.J. Dionne’s e-mail address is ejdionne(at)washpost.com.
   
© 2010, Washington Post Writers Group


New and Improved Comments

We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.

In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.

Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.

Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.

Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.

By Mardy, October 19, 2010 at 6:45 am Link to this comment

Putting faith in the imminent collapse of the currency market is a kind of messianic fervor, isn’t it?  I’m reminded of all those prophets of doom and gloom over the centuries?

Fly Fly Fly,
The leaves are leaving the trees,
Hot is the wind,
Armageddon is coming.

But Armagedden never comes.  Still, things could get worse, much worse if you guys have your way.

Report this

By Mardy, October 19, 2010 at 5:45 am Link to this comment

If any of you were in Maine’s 2nd district, where I
am, you’d vote in the Tea Party nut, Jason Levesque,
and vote out the Blue Dog Democrat, Mike Michaud. 
Mike may be a Blue Dog in favor of a balanced budget
amendment, which I am not, but I infinitely prefer
him over the bitter liar, Levesque.  Michaud ended up
voting for the final Health plan that went through,
IMPERFECT AS IT WAS, but it IS BETTER THAN THE
ALTERNATIVE which is nothing.  It is a small step
forward but now is in danger of being torpedoed by
the very forces you will end up strengthening in this
election.  Did any of you know that the perfect is
the enemy of the good, or even of the fair?  But
what you all seem to believe is that impossible is to
be preferred over anything at all.

Report this
PatrickHenry's avatar

By PatrickHenry, October 19, 2010 at 2:38 am Link to this comment

Mardy,

“Oh, and PatrickHenry, the way to get new ideas and new leadership is not vote the old out and replace them by the even more old and the really crazy (i.e.TPs), is it?

New ideas out of old leadership, I don’t think so.

Encumbent Democrats and Republicans have been paid off part and parcel, a good reason for term limits.

The ‘Tea Party’ is the hijacked remnants of the Ron Paul revolution consisting of disenfranchised Republicans, Independents and Democrats who tire of the business as usual attitude of the current U.S. government.

I don’t really worry about it as it will all come to an end when our currency tanks on the world market.

Report this

By MC Hammerabi, October 18, 2010 at 10:38 pm Link to this comment

EJ Dionne is dusty old bones…full of green dust.  Red rover, red rover, let the extremists take over!  EJ, you may wish for neutered cons like Buckley, but Buckley ain’t here no more (back off grammar police!)

End the Fed. End the Wars. End the Empire.

Report this

By the worm, October 18, 2010 at 6:44 pm Link to this comment

It disturbing that commentators continue to blame this disaster on cleaver
wealthy Republicans who will jump up after Halloween and presto Armageddon!

But the real blame goes to the Democrats who became wannabe Republicans.

Here’s a large example (one so large that had the Dems done what the people
wanted, they probably would be sitting pretty right now - even with this
economy).

Example: Just sixteen short months ago, in June 2009, a New York Times/CBS
poll found -

”  72% of Americans ‘supported a government-administered insurance plan—
something like Medicare for those under 65—that would compete for
customers with private insurers.’  “

The Democrats chose to give us the short end of the stick ... It is important -
very important—to note that “us” is 72% of the voters. Not just those fringy
Liberals , but 72% of those polled.

The Demos thought we (“us”) ... Well , what did they think? We wouldn’t notice?
We’re too simple to know ?  We’d take anything? Or Did the Democrats just not
care? Obama did not lift a finger to lead; he simply sat there, lame and
disengaged, while Max Baucus crafted a bill to the insurance industry’s liking.

Here’s a question for the Dems from those of us who they ignored: Why would
we donate, campaign for, support people who did not support us?

Democratic answer: Oh those other guys will be worse.

Our answer. We’ll vote Democratic, but that’s about it. It’s hard to motivate
ourselves to go out, to donate, to get involved and to campaign (ie take positive
action) for a Party that does not represent you, but is merely better than other
guys.

PS The premise that you are “better than the other guys” is becoming harder
and harder to defend, given the paucity of meaningful legislation over the last
seventeen months.

Report this

By the worm, October 18, 2010 at 6:21 pm Link to this comment

The Republican Party has the Palin-Beck Republicans, the nominal Republicans
and the invisible heavy donor Republicans.

As EJ says, this “gives the Republicans a wealth of advantages.

But here’s a Republican advantage EJ didnt mention: The Republicans have the
Presidency.

Here’s what Obama has done in seventeen months:

1. Gutted real financial reform (no Glass-Steagle, no ‘too big too fail)
2. Rejected the only health care option that would simultaneously extend
coverage and cut costs (single payer)
3. Supported a stingy stimulus (one-third tax breaks)
4. Doubled-down & accelerated the Bush bailouts
5. Escalated a fruitless war in Afghanistan
6. Not helped people in bankruptcy & needing mortgage remediation
7. Not passed a jobs bill & had trouble extending unemployment compensation
8. Ignored previous Republican profligacy, crimes, misdemeanors
9. Used “Heck of a Job, Timmy” to promote low taxes for the wealthy on capital
gains, dividends and ‘carried interest’
10. Sand bagged the “Budget Commission” with Max Baucus clones

These are all Republican policies.

With the defeat of the nominal Democrats and the election of the three-
personed Republicans, having a Republican President should put an end to the
middle class within a decade.

Report this

By Mardy, October 18, 2010 at 5:19 pm Link to this comment

Ooooh, BarbieQue, you’re checking up on me.  Pretty
good. grin I suppose I could check your profile too.  DLC? DCCC?  Ha ha.  Yes, I’ve contributed money ($25
levels) several times in the past.  So?  Am I
advancing an agenda?  I’m simply responding to views
I think are wrong, or crazy.  Well, maybe that is advancing an agenda.  You apparently have an agenda
too.  Hey, here’s my agenda: Vote the Dems out of
office at your peril.  You see, I do believe there’s
a difference between Dems and Republicans, a party
that has really gone off the deep end.  My agenda is:
I’d rather be in the frying pan, where there may
still be hope, than in the fire where I’ll be surely
destroyed!

Oh, and PatrickHenry, the way to get new ideas and
new leadership is not vote the old out and replace
them by the even more old and the really crazy (i.e.
TPs), is it?

Report this
PatrickHenry's avatar

By PatrickHenry, October 18, 2010 at 4:26 pm Link to this comment

Mardy,

I plan to vote out Steny Hoyer, Barbara Mikulski and any other AIPAC mongers.

There is no difference between (R) and (D) any more, only old and new and we need new ideas and new leadership.

Report this
BarbieQue's avatar

By BarbieQue, October 18, 2010 at 4:15 pm Link to this comment

Mardy:

A glance at your profile indicates you’ve made 11 posts in about 3 weeks, interestingly after signing up 10 months ago.

DLC? DCCC?

Telling people what to do is not the best way to advance your obvious agenda.

And continuing to vote for the same old will continue to get you more of it. You may not think the wars are a big deal now that a (D) is ordering drone strikes, or building another base in Afghanistan, or mandating (unconstitutionally) that Citizens must fatten the wallets of major for profit insurance companies. But you are not the only one here.

Some of us are trying to think outside the box. I haven’t seen anyone tell you how to vote.

Report this

By Mardy, October 18, 2010 at 3:43 pm Link to this comment

Big mistake, PatrickHenry, you’ve been believing too
much of the current propaganda, not just on Fox but on
the mainstream media as well.  By voting Dems out of
office, or even Blue Dog Dems, you’ll be replacing them
with Tea Party crazies and they will only make matters
worse, much worse!  Think twice.

Report this
PatrickHenry's avatar

By PatrickHenry, October 18, 2010 at 2:01 pm Link to this comment

I plan on voting all encumbents out next election.

We the people need to send a message.

Report this

By Mardy, October 18, 2010 at 12:18 pm Link to this comment

Hammond Eggs, aren’t you on the wrong website?  Sounds
like Red State or equivalent would be more appropriate
for your comments.

Report this

By Hammond Eggs, October 18, 2010 at 9:53 am Link to this comment

Monsieur Dionne forgot to add that if Obama had not turned out to be the Liar and Betrayer that he is, the Dims wouldn’t be in the trouble they’re in now.  As for political ads, you have to be dumb enough to believe any of them, or even pay attention to them.

Report this

By Mardy, October 18, 2010 at 6:29 am Link to this comment

eggroll, where do you pick up these beliefs?  Pretty
presumptive stuff, I would say.
morristhewise, I think you’re pretty wise on that one.
BarbieQue, you are a riot! What a bunch of wild-a**
statements.  They may be your reality but it’s
certainly not that of every other American. 

Meanwhile, the Republicans take over and the country
goes from the frying pan into the fire.

Report this
BarbieQue's avatar

By BarbieQue, October 18, 2010 at 5:44 am Link to this comment

My reality is that EJ is a party hack. My reality is that unless this nation gets over this divisive insane (D) vs (R) BS it’s going the way of Rome.

Change My Ass. We’re in Afghanistan, probably about to invade Pakistan, we’re drone bombing civilians (by mistake of course) creating many more real enemies daily, the new president makes jokes about said drone bombs (which would have outraged some people if the last dingbat said it).

We’ve gone from manufacturing giant to being dependent on China to make our damn soldiers boots while smirking sellout bullsh*t artists like Bubba signed “agreements” like NAFTA.

O-Change-O has given this entire nations health care future to scummy thieving insurance companies and lemmings like DiDroneOn have cheered it on.

O-Change-0 has given billions and billions to banks and companies like AIG while stacking the cat food commission with punks like Simpson who said social security is like ““A Milk Cow With 310 Million Tits” [...]

If Dumbya had done these things some fake (D)emoRats would have been OUTRAGED.

That’s MY reality and every other Americans.

And to watch a lemming like DiDroneOn yammer away at divisive bullsh*t is disgusting. There. Happy? :D

Report this

By morristhewise, October 18, 2010 at 5:42 am Link to this comment

Despite constant bad mouthing from angry Americans, Obama has a lock on his
job as president. People need a scapegoat for all the nations ills, and Obama has
become the bad boy and perfect target. He is battered and abused but like an old
shoe cannot be replaced.

Report this

By eggroll, October 18, 2010 at 5:24 am Link to this comment

I’m coming to a different conclusion, in part because I believe Obama is practicing a longer strategy and David Plouffe just isn’t that stupid. What seems to be going on is the Long Con, or more precisely the Long Rope-a-Dope, whereby the House is handed back to the Republicans, who can have investigations and hearings to their hearts delight over the next two years. But they come in on a promise to cut spending and Obama holds them to it. What seems to have had little play was the Cameron’s government has demanded, and will get, a 7-8% cut in defense spending as other spending categories have been “protected.” Here in the US, I would expect that Christmas 2011 and 2012 will be pretty lean for poorly connected defense contractors. 2 years of gridlock, 2 years of currency devaluation, 2 years of “making our country weaker” and Obama will be reelected by a landslide.

Report this

By Mardy, October 18, 2010 at 3:22 am Link to this comment

So, BarbieQue, you know better?  How about that E.J.
describes reality?  What’s your reality?

Report this
BarbieQue's avatar

By BarbieQue, October 18, 2010 at 12:43 am Link to this comment

E.J. Di-Drone-On

Report this
Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.