![]() ![]() |
![]() |
| |
|
The Final Act of SubmissionPosted on Apr 13, 2007
By Scott Ritter In the months leading up to President Bush’s ill-fated invasion of Iraq, I traveled around the world speaking to various international groups, including many parliamentary assemblies. I spoke about democracy and the need of any nation or group of nations espousing democracy as a standard to embrace the ideals and values of justice and due process in accordance with the rule of law. I spoke of international law, especially as it was manifested in the charter of the United Nations (a document signed and adopted by all of the countries I visited). Invariably, my presentation focused on the nation in question, whether it was Italy, Denmark, the Netherlands, Japan or Great Britain, and the status of its relationship with the United States. As an American, I said, I appreciated each nation’s embrace of the United States as a friend and ally. However, as a strong believer in the rule of law, I deplored the trend among America’s so-called friends to facilitate a needless confrontation which would severely harm the U.S. in the long run. These nations were hesitant to stand up to the United States even though they knew the course of action planned for Iraq was wrong. Such permissive submission was deplorable, and invariably led to a comment from me about the status of genuine sovereignty in the face of American imperial power. If a nation was incapable of defending its sovereign values and interests, then it should simply acknowledge its status as a colony of the United States, pull down its disgraced national flag and raise the Stars and Stripes. Now the tables have turned. Americans, through the will of the people as expressed in the November 2006 election, voiced their dissatisfaction with the conduct of the American war in Iraq, and empowered a new Democratic-controlled Congress to reassert itself as a separate but equal branch of government—especially when it came to matters pertaining to war and the threat of war. This new Democratic leadership has failed egregiously. Not only has the speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, been unable to orchestrate any meaningful legislation to bring the war in Iraq to an end, but in mid-March she carelessly greased the tracks for a whole new conflict. By excising language from a defense appropriations bill which would have required President Bush to seek the approval of Congress prior to initiating any military attack on Iran, Pelosi terminated any hope of slowing down the Bush administration’s mad rush to war. Despite the fact that Congress was only stating through this language a simple reflection of constitutional mandate, Speaker Pelosi and others felt that the inclusion of such verbiage put the security of the state of Israel at risk by eliminating important “policy options” for the president of the United States. In short, Israeli national security interests trumped the Constitution of the United States. I consider myself to be a friend of Israel, a status which has been demonstrated repeatedly through words and deeds from January-February 1991, when I was involved in the effort to stop Iraq Scud missiles from striking Israel during the 1991 Gulf War, to the period between October 1994 and June 1998 when I served as the lead liaison between the United Nations weapons inspectors and Israeli intelligence, working to find a final accounting of Iraq’s proscribed weapons of mass destruction. I know only too well the precarious reality of Israel’s security situation, and am sympathetic to its need to proactively deal with threats before they manifest themselves in a manner which threatens Israel’s ability to survive as a nation-state. However, as an American who served on active duty in time of war as an officer of Marines, I also remember the oath I took to “uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” As such, I am troubled by the recent actions of Speaker Pelosi and other members of Congress who have not only abrogated their collective responsibility to uphold and defend the Constitution but have taken actions which, under normal circumstances and involving any other nation, would border on treasonous. Our collective duty as Americans must center on defending the very document, the Constitution, which defines who we are and what we are as a people and a nation. To have our elected representatives flagrantly push aside their constitutional responsibilities in the name of the security interests of another nation is unthinkable. And yet it has just happened, apparently without consequence. Sadly, the new Democratic Congress has cemented its status as yet another iteration of a system which long ago sold its soul to special interests. Democrats can cackle about Republican scandals, including the Jack Abramoff affair, which brought down Rep. Tom DeLay among others. But history will show that the Pelosi-led sellout to Israeli special interests endangered the viability and security of America as a sovereign state governed by the rule of law more than Jack Abramoff ever could. In this time of constitutional crisis, the American people need to wake up and demand that the basic tenets of the Constitution be adhered to. Congress is solely empowered by the Constitution to declare war. Demanding that the president of the United States adhere to this prerequisite is a logical and patriotic stance. Allowing any non-American interest, even one possessing such highly charged political and emotional sensitivities as Israel, to dictate otherwise represents nothing more than a capitulation of sovereignty. We the people need to rally around this defense of sovereignty. We must demand not only that Congress reassert its constitutional responsibilities and authority by demanding the president obey the letter of the law when it comes to war, whether against Iran or any other nation, but also to place in check the anti-American activities of one of the most powerful lobbies in Washington, D.C., the American-Israeli Public Affairs Committee. For decades AIPAC has operated in the shadows of American foreign policy decision-making, exerting its influence on elected officials away from the public scrutiny of the very constituents who elected those officials to begin with. It is impossible to hold someone accountable for actions that are kept secret, and as such AIPAC’s ability to secretly influence American foreign and national security policies represents a flagrant insult and threat to the very essence of American democracy. I am not advocating the dissolution of AIPAC. However, I am demanding that AIPAC be treated as any other representative of a foreign nation is treated. It should have to register as an agent of a foreign power so that the totality of its interactions with American officials can become a part of the public record. We require this of all other nations, including our good friends the British. To state that AIPAC, and by extension Israel, is above the law in this regard is to acknowledge the reality that American national sovereignty no longer matters when it comes to the state of Israel. So be it. But then we are, collectively, no better than those nations I mocked prior to the invasion of Iraq in 2003 as “colonies” of the United States. So if we are to continue to permit AIPAC to operate as an undeclared agent of a foreign nation, and to influence American foreign and national security policymaking at the expense of our Constitution, then we should acknowledge our true status as nothing more than a colony of Israel, pull down the Stars and Stripes and raise the Star of David over our nation’s capitol. While representing the final act of submission, it would also be the first truly honest act that occurred in Washington, D.C., in many years. Previous item: Welcome to the Boys' Club Next item: They're Democrats, Not Idiots Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.
Comment Pages:
1
»
By Peter RV, January 24 at 3:50 pm # Could this be the same Mikhail, the Jewish oligarch crook who robbed blind the Russians untill he got caught and ended up in a slammer?
By Mikhail Khodorkovsky, July 6, 2007 at 6:54 pm # You took the oath to “uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic.”
By Vcode Infosystem, April 27, 2007 at 6:13 am # Best Indian Films offers complete portal about Bollywood, regional film industry of India, top Indian Bollywood actors and actresses, awards, hits of 2006 and comprehensive coverage of Bollywood gossip. This site is a best online resource for everything you ever wanted to know about India’s Film Industries, especially Bollywood.
By Beau Alford, April 18, 2007 at 9:05 am # I would like to have some of what this guy is smoking. I have worked with Arabs and Jews, as in instructor. Don’t pass gas in the wind, dude.
By Dan Noel, April 17, 2007 at 10:21 am # What is most ironic in the Israeli lobby’s influence is that it represents much less the Israeli people than the Israeli government. The Knesset is awash with raging debates over Israeli policies, with harsh criticisms being thrown at the government and its agencies. But in Washington, just about all politicians toe the line of the Israeli prime minister, whatever that may be. Washington’s thinking pattern switches from Likud’s to Labor’s so effortlessly…
By Hugh E. Scott, April 16, 2007 at 7:08 pm # I had the good fortune of hearing Scott Ritter speak last February in my local community—Oak Park, CA. He’s a staunch defender of Israel but not the rightwing Likud Party. However, what stuck most in my mind after Scott’s speech was his debunking of Iran as a potential nuclear threat. Scott described Iran’s uranium enrichment program as a fiasco, caused by “mass distribution” problems during centrifuge spin-up, resulting in exploding aluminum tubes. According to a recent article in the Los Angeles Times, to produce weapons-grade uranium for one atomic bomb, 50,000 centrifuges would have to spin at max speed for an entire year without failure. Iran can’t even get half of its 3,000 centrifuges to work properly, much less 50,000. At the same time, Iran announced it would build two light-water reactors with help from Russia. Not, in my opinion, for obtaining plutonium for atomic bombs like the North Koreans did. I suspect Iran wants to whipsaw Western countries economically by selling its oil to friendlier governments such as China while subsisting totally on reactor-produced electricity. Saudi Arabia is threatening the same energy conversion. Atomic bombs aside, imagine a nuclear-powered Middle East that dispenses petroleum at its leisure to the highest bidder, which might not be the United States. What will Bush neocons do then? Start a regional war with help from Israel? Seems possible to me.
By Concrete man, April 16, 2007 at 2:41 pm # From the point of view of global imperial interests, the war in Iraq was certainly not on the behest of the oil companies. I have looked at all the documents, I’ve done interviews with oil companies, I’ve looked at their publications for the five years in the run-up to the war and there is absolutely no evidence. On the contrary, if you pursue research on the various members of the Zionist power configuration in the United States, which I think is a conceptually more correct way of talking about this, rather than ‘the Lobby’, you will find that people of dubious loyalties, like Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith, Richard Perle and Elliott Abrams – the felon, that had an agenda of furthering Israel’s interests. - James Petras, author of The Power of Israel in the United States (2006)
By vincent405, April 16, 2007 at 9:33 am # Ritter is right on target. Read Jimmy Carter’s book where he spells out in detail what Israel is really doing. The land for peace and two nation solution makes a lot of sense....BUT Israel will not accept peace.
By Danny Quintana, April 16, 2007 at 12:31 am # The Iraq war is the symptom. The larger picture is the extraordinary influence of the defense industry and the energy companies. Israel obviously benefits from any foreign conflict as they will receive more aid given their powerful allies in Washington and on Wall Street. But this benefit to Israel from excessive defense spending is not the main story. What is needed is to look at the larger picture and a new direction for the American economy. If we slowly re-direct defense spending toward space and ocean exploration and at the same time convert our economy from oil to nuclear and natural gas, Israel and the entire Middle East will not take up so much time on the evening news. Middle East oil is only important because it is the current fuel for the world’s economic engines. Middle East conflicts occur in part because of the undue influence on policy of the military-industrial-labor unions-universities-congressional complex, (the defense spending coalition). By giving the aerospace contractors exploration of the inner solar system and the navy contractors exploration and preservation of the wild life in the oceans, we will slowly demilitarize the economy and above all give hope the nation’s greatest asset, our children. Israel is not the “cause” of the Iraq war or our energy dependence on Middle East oil. These are policy choices made by Congress and their corporate allies. Both political parties are beholden to the interests of the defense spending coalition and the energy lobby. Certainly Israel has a very strong presence in Washington. But their ability to influence policy would not be nearly so strong if America was not dependent on oil and defense spending. Of the 435 congressional districts, every one has either a military installation or a defense contractor. Until we give the defense contractors new missions, we will continue to have war as part of the necessary economic planning to prop up consumer spending and this false economy. If Israel did not exist, if September 11th had not happened we would have had to create a reason to increase defense spending. If not Iraq then why not Nigeria or Venezuela? Given the ability of mass media to provide propaganda to support these massive defense budgets in the name of “national security”, if the Middle East did not exist, we would have to find a Noriega or some other two bit dictator to punish with our aircraft carrier battle groups and rapid deployment forces.
By Esteban, April 15, 2007 at 5:11 pm # Christians, what Mr. Ritter and many commentators have written may have raised your ire but I want to encourage you to please consider the error of looking for solutions in politics. Your leader/president/prime minister is Jesus Christ and He’s the one who said that His kingdom is not of this world. Why do you keep participating in and supporting this madness of killing other members of His creation? Have you forgotten that our battle is not with people but with the evil spiritual forces that influence them? So what are we to do with Israelis, Iraqis, Iranians, et al? If you intend to be obedient to Christ’s teachings and not idle, easily-manipulated bystanders, you will sincerely love them and pray for them. There is no gray area in this regard.
By richard mann, April 15, 2007 at 3:19 pm # Funny that all roads about Zionism, PNAC, 911, Iraq, Iran all lead back to AIPAC. America has been bought, sold and delivered. Nancy Pelosi is attempting a rare hat trick. Forget about the gender thing, she is trying to satisfy the base of Democrats with the vote that put her in power in November 06. Yet she had long before been bought by AIPAC, so she is good with stripping timetables and placing impeachment off the table. You can see the physical conflict in Pelosi’s eyes as she attempts to dance to two masters at the same time. It’s not working very well for her. In truth, Israel loves George Bush and Dick Cheney, because they both seem willing to represent the nexus of Zionism and US Christian zealotry. That is the true power behind the neocons, this improbable wedding of two fascist religious ideologies, and their shared hatred of a brown and impoverished enemy. And so, Nancy Pelosi dances for two masters, the populist one that ostensibly brought her to power,which we liike to think of as corrective democracy, and the quiet one that paid the tab to get her into higher office. Pelosi is in the pocket of AIPAC. You didn’t really think it had something to do with democracy, did you?
By richard mann, April 15, 2007 at 3:14 pm # Funny that all roads about Zionism, PNAC, 911, Iraq, Iran all lead back to AIPAC. America has been bought, sold and delivered. Nancy Pelosi is attempting a rare hat trick. Forget about the gender thing, she is trying to satisfy the base of Democrats with the vote that put her in power in November 06. Yet she had lonjg before been bought by AIPAC, so she is good with stipping timetables and placing impeachment off the table. You can see the physical conflict in Pelosi’s eyes as she attempts to dance to two masters at the same time. It’s not working very well for her. In truth, Israel loves George Bush and Dick Cheney, because they both seem willing to represent the nexus of Zionism and US Christian zealotry. That is the true power behind the neocons, this improbable wedding of two fascist religious ideologies, and their shared brown and impoverished enemy. And so, Nancy Pelosi dances to two masters. The one populist one that ostensibly brought her to power,which we liike to think of as corrective democracy, and the quiet one that paid the bills to get her into higher office. Pelosi is in the pocket of AIPAC. You didn’t really think it had something to do with democracy, did you?
By avatar singh, April 15, 2007 at 2:33 pm # jewish lobbu=y is effective only as long as it coincides with the efforts of british lobby. very true -in fact so called jewsih lobby” power is a propaganda done by the english race to hide thier nefarious iterference in the american ploicy to uinflunce american domestic and foreing policy for the benefit of england. 1999. how england has used jews for the benfit of english race only and for deliberatily creating disruption in Europe. England had threatened israel in 1948 during israeli war of indepdence that england would use atom bomb agaisnt israel unless israel stop ddrowning royal air foarce palnes and pilots who were helping Jordan against israel. igners.
By Bobby, April 15, 2007 at 1:22 pm # As always Scott Ritter is correct.
By louis morelli, April 15, 2007 at 1:10 pm # Not all Jews are to be blamed for the debacle over there. Some are just as innocent as I am and I am neither for or against Israel. I am however not a fan of Zionists. They like the Mafia (I am Italian of Italian decent) are the problem, we cannot be blamed for the lousy condition precvailing with the likes of those people and who is to blame-well they have called me “grease ball” “Dago” and on and on. So let us brand all people, black, green and orange at foult. No, to strong against any one group is not fair. But zionist’s are no good. For me that is the way it is.
By Arun, April 15, 2007 at 12:38 pm # Counterskeptic (#64098)is right, 5th message down from here. Our senators act as how our society is and the people are. Every American is responsible for what is happening in the world due to US. It is citizen’s responsibility to change things, if needed even the political system.
By Michael McCarthy, April 15, 2007 at 12:38 pm # Mr Ritter whines on about the power of AIPAC but it only serves as a distraction from the bigger issue of jews and their crafty control of government, education, media and big money, here and elsewhere. AIPAC is big but it gets bigger and Mr Ritter is afraid to speak on the real problem that is destroying this country and europe. Some Marine. Try http://www.antiwar.com http://www.jewwatch.com http://www.ihr.org http://www.judicial-inc.biz worth spending a week on these sites.
By Terry, April 15, 2007 at 11:09 am # Yes. Thank you, Scott. Well said.
By lani, April 15, 2007 at 10:30 am # Scott Ritter,
By johndonald, April 15, 2007 at 9:30 am # A close read of the rise and fall of the Third Reich teaches that for 10 years prior to the Second World War a small minority of Jewish people in Germany had gained control of the media, the banking industry, much of the commercial business and, yes, some political power with elected persons. When this distortion was realized by the masses, they elected a radical “people-person” that resulted in a tragic war and the much described “hollowcost”. When such a small minority of persons in any society gain such disproportionate economic and political power it is not hard to see how the average voter can be led astray. Well here we are again in the 21st century when American Jews control most of the US media, many of the economic “engines of business”, much of the banking business and, yes, have elected several persons whose goal is to distort the objectives of Israel for their advantage. (Lieberman is the best example, but the unelected Perle, Feith, etc. have played a big roll). When the average American wakes up and realizes that such a small minority have hijacked their “Christian Country” they could also elect someone who promises to restore power (economic and political) to the people-base. And if that newly elected person proposes some severe methods of control, another tragic event could take place. Can American avoid another holocaust?
By Rabbit, April 15, 2007 at 8:23 am # I think the main point here is that politicians are being pre-screened by corporate and foreign interests. What voters want rarely comes into the equation.
By Morin P, April 15, 2007 at 7:52 am # I appreciated a lot the article of Mr Ritter and it is good to hear from sensible Americans once in a while. Yet if the security of Israel is of concern, what about the security of the Palestinian people? What about their rights which have been negated for the last half century for the sake of a created thief nation which is Isreal and that with the total support of the US. Patric
By Kol Klink, April 15, 2007 at 7:42 am # To Mr. Hoffman:
By Matt, April 15, 2007 at 7:32 am # Mark Hoffman writes: “Here we are again.... we have seen this all before. Things go sour - can it be us? Can it be who we elected? ... No that can’t be it, its got to be the Jews because we all know they run everything.” Mark: (1) Israel is not “the Jews”. This is how Israel gets what it wants. It insists that it is “the Jews”. Then, by definition, anyone who speaks against Israel is anti-Semitic. (2) We as a body politic must face and deal with what is true. Whether that truth makes you uncomfortable is irrelevant.
By Animadverto, April 15, 2007 at 6:39 am # Divide and Conquer This has nothing to do with “Jews”, “Christians” and “Muslims”. It is more closely associated with “Secret Societies” draped in religious conviction to the public masses. Is President Bush truly a “Born Again Christian”…Let’s get real! Religion, ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender and virtually all other societal divisions are used to subdue the masses by separating them into categories and groups, then to “pit” each against the other(s). There are extremists in every camp; unfortunately, it is the extremists in such divisions that are the most active in the geopolitical arena that insight the conflicts and arouse the emotions of the ignorant masses. This has been going on since the beginning of time. Today is no different, with the exception that, no longer does mankind use swords and arrows, but “nukes” and “biologicals”. This is by design the desire of the “New World Order” and they are of every ethnicity, religion and “interest(s)” that involve the desire for power, control, i.e., subversion the masses. AIPAC is dangerous to the United States, but then so is every other special interest effecting our political process. It is amazing how easily people will play into this and not see it for what it is.
By Concrete man, April 15, 2007 at 4:18 am # No Roxanne, European imperialism which led to American imperalism is not all the fault of Jewish peoples. In fact, Fredrick Tobin who is one of the top Holocaust revisionist scholars says, “don’t blame the Jews, blame the gentiles”.
By Ralph McGaughey, April 15, 2007 at 2:27 am # This is not the worst. America has ceded jurisdiction over itself to Israel. Nearly ten years ago an American who never had been outside America killed an American in Maryland. The killer was Solomon Sheinbein. The victim was Tello. The murderer fled to Israel which claimed jurisdiction because the criminal was a jew. Israel held a trial and gave him a softball sentence. The US government has acceded to this outrage. Both the Clinton and the Bush administrations have done nothe=ing. A Republican and a Democratic Congress have done nothing. A government that allows its jurisdiction over its citizens and territory to be usurped is a colonial possession. The total slavishness of the Washington establishment is a stain upon the Constitution which is defiled by these bootlickers.
By aeskylos, April 14, 2007 at 11:18 pm # Scott lays it bare
By Concrete man, April 14, 2007 at 7:12 pm # Not only is Scott Ritter right on the money with his analysis, but so is James Petras in his authoritative study of USrael: The Power of Israel in the United States; as well as Jeffrey Blankfort’s article, War for Israel; as well as Stephen Sniegoski’s work on Israel, and how the war was not for oil but for Israel; as well as Mearsheimer and Walt; and Jimmy Carter; and have you read Israel Shamir’s amazing books? Oh, and another must read, Grant Smith’s Deadly Dogma, a study of the Zionist Neocons that goes back into Wolfowitz’s days of extending the Cold War for Israel’s benefit… enjoy
By Stephan, April 14, 2007 at 5:59 pm # Obviously, the US has been in a retarded state of mind for some time now. It’s not scarry anymore, now it’s just funny.
By Davy de Verteuil, April 14, 2007 at 5:32 pm # Davy de Verteuil of Trinidad & Tobago W I.
By Hakkaka, April 14, 2007 at 2:41 pm # Not only is congress and the administration completely in the Zionist corner “all the time” making no difference -in relation to israel and the middle east- which party wins the elections, but also the media in almost most of it forms. The newspapaers have been gatekepers, allowing only news sympathetic to israel or Zioism in general( witness its deplorable reaction to president’s Carter valiant attempt to expose the truth on Israel’s subversions of peace attempts and apartheid policies as one only recent example). Most commentators and news reporters on major media ( TV, cable, NPR) on the Middle East are either Jews/Zionists or profoundly pro-Israelis. Guests on these programs are also the same. Radio talk-show-hosts - disproportionally are Zionists ( and neocons) or very pro-zionists. University departments ( at the major universities) dealing with Middle East, Journalism, political departments are also packed with Zionists. Professors with non-zionist sympathies are either scared away (ganged up on) , or never considered for hiring. The examples are numerous. Yes, the more Americans realize that the Israelization of America is bad for the US both domestically and in foreign affairs,the better. ( This is the biggest fear the pro-zionists have and vehemently combat at all costs: the truth Only then the tide will be reversed. The issue has finally been exposed and has started to become a legitimate story. It is up to us -all of us- to make the difference.
By guntotin ganglion, April 14, 2007 at 1:56 pm # I wonder how many people know that Israel perpetrated an act of war against the United States on June 8, 1967? One day before the Israeli’s attacked Syria, during the Six Day War, Israel without warning attacked the U.S.S. Liberty, in international waters off the coast of Gaza, and killed 37 crewmen and wounded 173 out of a crew of 297. The attack was sustained far longer than it would have taken to positively identify the Liberty as a US intelligence gathering ship. It is not credible that Israel didn’t know. One curious fact that underlines the incredible nature of the denials is that no less than 8 reconnaissance flights by Israeli aircraft preceded the attack. Clearly, they knew what and whom, they were attacking. And they would have known that this was an act of war. The only question that remains to this day is, why did they do it? It would appear that the Liberty was in position to gather some intel, perhaps regarding the upcoming attack on Syria, that the Israeli’s didn’t want exposed to the US intelligence community. It can be assumed that it was something of such sensitivity that number one, they were willing to destroy a US intelligence ship and kill everyone on-board, which they clearly tried to do, to keep that secret, or if they failed in the attempt to destroy the ship and crew, be exposed for having perpetrated an act of war on the US. Clearly the 2nd possibility was what happened, and then Israel went into ass-covering mode, and called in all their markers with the US to whitewash the incident. Whatever the reason, it has been covered up to this very day. To elaborate briefly on the intensity of the attack, crewmen afterward were given the task of counting all the holes in the ship that were larger than a man’s fist, and they counted 861 such holes. As to .50 caliber holes, those were assessed to be in the thousands. When crewman attempted to abandon ship, Israeli torpedo boats fired on them, forcing them back onto the ship, which was on fire. When firefighting crews tried to fight the fires, the torpedo boats fired upon them, forcing them below decks, to escape the murderous assault. The torpedo boats during the attack were reported to have approached to within 50 feet of the ship, so the claims that they didn’t know it was a US ship are lies. At about the same time as the torpedo boat attacks stopped, as a result of an open transmission from the US Sixth Fleet for it’s fighters to engage and destroy the attackers, Israeli attack helicopters arrived over the ship. Survivors reported that the helicopters were packed with men in combat battle dress. Clearly, they were on station to finish the job, kill everyone on-board and sink the ship. The ship was defenseless, the crew unable to put up any defense whatsoever, and Israeli combat troops were moving to board them...do the math. The only thing that stopped them was that the US Sixth Fleet sent rules of engagement in the clear, and they knew they would be destroyed...and thus the attacks finally stopped, and the Israeli’s started with their campaign to cover their crimes. For further details on this cowardly, vicious attack on a US ship in international waters see http://www.ussliberty.org/report/report.htm The simple fact is, they committed an act of war against the United States, and got away with it. They murdered 37 US sailors. They’ve never been made to explain why they attacked, other than the spurious claims that it was mistaken identity. That is simply not credible. This is just one more facet of the madness that is the insidious and incestuous nature of the relationship between the US and Israel. The surviving members of the crew are continuing to try to get the Congress to investigate this heinous act of war that cost so many lives, but so far, the Congress is showing no interest. Could AIPAC be the reason? Seems likely. Add Your Comment |
COMMENT TOOLS:
Hide comments
Show comments
Comment on this article