|
|
May 23, 2013
|
|
The Bizarro FDRPosted on Aug 4, 2011
By David Sirota Barack Obama is a lot of things—eloquent, dissembling, conniving, intelligent and above all, calm. But one thing he is not is weak. This basic truth is belied by the meager Obama criticism you occasionally hear from liberal pundits and activists. They usually stipulate that the president genuinely wants to enact the progressive agenda he campaigned on, but they gently reprimand him for failing to muster the necessary personal mettle to achieve that goal. In this mythology, he is “President Pushover,” as New York Times columnist Paul Krugman recently labeled him. This storyline is a logical fallacy. Most agree that today’s imperial presidency almost singularly determines the course of national politics. Additionally, most agree that Obama is a brilliant, Harvard-trained lawyer who understands how to wield political power. Considering this, and further considering Obama’s early congressional majorities, it is silly to insist that the national political events during Obama’s term represent a lack of presidential strength or will. And it’s more than just silly—it’s a narcissistic form of wishful thinking coming primarily from liberals who desperately want to believe “their” president is with them. Such apologism, of course, allows liberals to avoid the more painful truth that Obama is one of America’s strongest presidents ever and is achieving exactly what he wants. Advertisement On health care, for instance, Obama passed a Heritage Foundation-inspired bailout of the private health insurance industry, all while undermining other more progressive proposals. On foreign policy, he escalated old wars and initiated new ones. On civil liberties, he not only continued the Patriot Act and indefinite detention of terrorism suspects but also claimed the right to assassinate American citizens without charge. On financial issues, he fought off every serious proposal to re-regulate banks following the economic meltdown; he preserved ongoing bank bailouts; and he resisted pressure to prosecute Wall Street thieves. On fiscal matters, after extending the Bush tax cuts at a time of massive deficits, he has used the debt ceiling negotiations to set the stage for potentially massive cuts to Social Security and Medicare—cuts that would be far bigger than any of his proposed revenue increases. As hideous and destructive as it is, this record is anything but weak. It is, on the contrary, demonstrable proof of Obama’s impressive political muscle, especially because polls show he has achieved these goals despite the large majority of Americans who oppose them. Importantly, though, Obama himself has not suffered from equally negative polling numbers. While his approval rating is not terrific, he is in decent shape for re-election—and, more significantly, he has suffered only a minimal erosion of Democratic support. He is relatively popular, in other words, despite advocating wildly unpopular policies. Thanks to that reality, every one of his stunning legislative triumphs now has the previously unprecedented imprimatur of rank-and-file Democratic support. In forging such bipartisan complicity with what were once exclusively right-wing Republican objectives, Obama has achieved even more than what he fantasized about when he famously celebrated a previous Bizarro FDR. In a 2008 interview with a Nevada newspaper, Obama lauded Ronald Reagan for “chang[ing] the trajectory of America” and “put[ting] us on a fundamentally different path.” Reagan was a truly strong executive—but the Gipper was nothing compared to our current president. David Sirota is the best-selling author of the new book “Back to Our Future: How the 1980s Explain the World We Live In Now.” He hosts the morning show on AM760 in Colorado. E-mail him at ds@davidsirota.com, follow him on Twitter @davidsirota or visit his website at www.davidsirota.com. © 2011 Creators.com New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By oregonbird, August 4, 2011 at 11:40 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Absolutely, unblinkingly correct. The only thing you missed was that a good 30% of the left wing WANT ANOTHER OPTION! We acknowledge that Obama fooled us. That the effort and heady excitement of 2007-8 was ultimately an example of handing over our cow for magic beans. But now what?
We’re not going to take to the streets. So let’s just take that off the table like it’s a workable health care plan. But we WILL support and vote for a better candidate - so who is going to stand up? Franken would be my choice, I’m not over the whole ‘intelligence is politically sexy’ thing. We’ve proven that we can respond to a really good Will.i.am mash-up - so who are *you*, with your access and charm, going to talk into throwing their hat into the ring?
And don’t suggest Clinton. She’s a corrupt insider making deals to destroy the arctic with the oil companies and arranging vast real estate sell-offs to the Chinese.
Report thisBy Beca, August 4, 2011 at 11:36 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I wrote a long comment, but this stupid “are you human” crap made it dissapear! Bottom line is that Obama is a Corporatist Republican dressed like a Democratic president. He is fooling the Democratic party into silence and compacency as he advances the Republican agenda at breakneck speed. People need to wake the heck up!
Report thisHe is infinitely more dangerous than G.W. Bush ever was, since he has silenced the opposition to the Republican agenda he is pushing! I know there is massive cognitive dissonance going on between the conflict of what he says and what he does—but people need to come to terms that we are dealing with the great pretender!
Page 2 of 2 pages < 1 2