|
|
May 24, 2013
|
|
The ’80s Origins of Today’s Anti-Muslim BigotryPosted on Mar 11, 2011By David Sirota The least intriguing aspect of Republican Rep. Peter King’s congressional hearing this week on terrorism and the “radicalization in the American Muslim community” is the spectacle’s obvious hypocrisy. King was himself a cheerleader of a terrorist group (the Irish Republican Army), and his hearings ignore new government statistics showing that since 9/11, right-wing and white supremacist terrorist plots have outnumbered those of Muslims. Indeed, as the law enforcement data prove, if “radicalization” is a concern, it is at least as much of a problem in the ultraconservative community as it is in the American Muslim community. King has defended his hearing’s narrow focus by saying that “there are a small percentage [of Muslims] who have allied themselves with al-Qaida” and that “the leaders of that community do not face up to that reality [and are] not willing to speak out and condemn this type of radicalization.” In the wake of Joseph Stack’s kamikaze attack on the IRS, Scott Roeder’s killing of abortion provider George Tiller, and Byron Williams’ Glenn-Beck-inspired terrorist plot (among other atrocities), King should be saying exactly the same thing about his fellow conservatives—but he’s not. As I said, this hypocrisy isn’t interesting because it’s so utterly undeniable. However, what is interesting—and profoundly telling—is King’s explanation for his behavior. He says simply that “it makes no sense to talk about other [read: non-Muslim] types of extremism.” The remark, of course, typifies a broader sentiment in America and raises the most important “why” question: Why do so many like King see extremist acts by non-Muslims as mere isolated incidents that “make no sense to talk about,” yet see extremist acts by Muslims as a systemic problem worthy of military invasions and now congressional witch hunts? The short answer is 9/11—but that’s oversimplified. Anti-Muslim sentiment was embedded in American society well before that horrific attack stoked a bigoted backlash. The real answer is connected to overwrought Reagan/Bush-era pop culture that first equated “terrorist” with “Muslim.” Advertisement Notice that those two movies were aimed at ’80s kids who have now grown up. That was the norm with Islamophobic pop culture in the Reagan/Bush period—and not just in film. Early ’80s editions of the G.I. Joe comic book, for example, had the heroes alternately fighting Iranians and “infiltrating a Persian Gulf nation.” Likewise, in the lead-up to the first Gulf War, there were Muslim-demonizing board games for kids like “The Butcher of Baghdad” and “Arabian Nightmare.” And, of course, there was the World Wrestling Federation, whose pre-eminent bad guy was the keffiyeh-clad Iron Sheik—described by one wrestling publication at the time as an “evil hit man [who] shows no mercy in terrorist attacks on the USA’s best.” And so what started as a cheap pop culture trope in the 1980s has now become the unquestioned assumption—the assumption that King’s hearings clearly appeal to. His inquisition and the sentiment it represents asks us to continue indulging the stereotypes we were sold as kids, and to ignore what should be the most frightening fact of all: the fact that no matter what stories we were told in the ’80s, “radicalization” is a systemic problem, and not limited to any one religious minority. David Sirota is a best-selling author of the new book “Back to Our Future: How the 1980s Explain the World We Live In Now.” He hosts the morning show on AM760 in Colorado. E-mail him at ds@davidsirota.com, follow him on Twitter @davidsirota or visit his website at www.davidsirota.com. © 2011 Creators.com New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By oddsox, March 15, 2011 at 4:20 pm Link to this comment
felicity, I think you may have misread one of the graphs.
Here’s what’s what regarding the Top 10%
—Top 10% have incomes of $145,000 or more
—Top 10% pays 70% of all income taxes
—Top 10% controls 67% of US Wealth (down from 74% in 2007 due to decline in real estate)
—Top 10% earns 50% of all US income
—Top 10% accounts for 40% of all consumer spending.
Notes: This may be the only time you’ll see all these stats together in one place.
Most journalists & columnists cherry-pick from these and other wealth/income figures according to what point of view they’re promoting.
Also: it’s also important to note there is high correlation (overlap) between groups.
Report thisBut they’re not identical. The wealthiest 10% are not all the same people top 10% income-earners, for example.
By felicity, March 15, 2011 at 1:57 pm Link to this comment
Raylan - this one got me right in the gut. Of the total
Report thiscombined income of all of us, 400 of us have half of
it.
By oddsox, March 15, 2011 at 11:03 am Link to this comment
RayLan, thanks for sharing the wealth distribution blogspot link. Toward the bottom of the page, there is a graph that’s very telling.
It’s one showing Share of Federal Tax Revenue. As it shows, we’ve been steadily overtaxing labor (payroll taxes) since the ‘50’s. No wonder we have high unemployment.
Time now to eliminate payroll taxes altogether.
Report thisFund Social Security and Medicare with a non-regressive national sales tax.
By drbhelthi, March 15, 2011 at 6:51 am Link to this comment
Spooky-43, in your twin turbo, whisper-prop activities at three thousand feet. If you have had contact with Chip Tatum types, or are a colleague of his, my guess is, that you will appreciate his chronicles. It is wise to record these videos, as they are systematically “disappearing” from you tube, and the internet. BestRegards, doc b.
Report thishttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_6dOsAZfZI
By Gulam, March 14, 2011 at 5:11 pm Link to this comment
Thank you, drbhelth. And you know, we are the ones who will take grave
chances later when it comes time to hide these people and move them out of
harms way. Right now it takes courage to try and get people to look at a mess
that Americans and Israelis have been building for decades.
When I was a teenager in a general store out in the country I heard someone
saying ugly things about Jews, and it was a surprise, because that kind of a
thing was not something I had heard very often, especially in public. The old
man behind the counter said: “Son, there is no need to run your mouth off
about the Jews. Give the Jews enough rope and they will hang themselves.”
I remember thinking at the time. “If that is true, and it surely squares with what
Report thislittle I know of history, then the real challenge is going to be to find a way to
keep Jewish American out of harms way, even if they deserve it, because when
they go down everyone suffers. The problem is what on earth will rein them in.”
The following year Rachael Israel stood up in a Student Council meeting and
announced that if we ever tried to hold a Christmas Dance again her father’s
lawyers would put a stop to it. Within a few years I saw Palestinians in Israel
treated with contempt, racist hatred, and an arrogance of domination far more
intense than anything of that kind that I ever saw growing up in the South. I
was told with a sneer that the stupid American Christians would keep backing
Israel no matter what anyone said until Israel had the whole land and more.
By drbhelthi, March 14, 2011 at 4:00 pm Link to this comment
GULAM, whoever you are, thank you.
The motto of the MOSSAD, ” by way of deception, thou shalt do war,” is not limited to the israeli spy system. The israeli brain-washing propaganda has worked well, especially in the western world. As Gary Mont suggested, Americans missed and continue to miss the wake-up call. While too many naïve, non-israeli folk conscientiously spread Israeli propaganda, which is not Jewish.
Report thisBy Gulam, March 14, 2011 at 12:03 am Link to this comment
Unfortunately this is not a joke. It could very well get an awful lot of people killed.
Report thisIt did so once not long ago.
By Spooky-43, March 13, 2011 at 7:02 pm Link to this comment
Raylan says,
“America is owned and run by mostly white Christian-self-identified rich 10% corporate moguls who control 2/3 of the wealth”
And Gulam says,
“(the) Jews in Europe (Germany) during the 19th century, and they came in and took over the finance, the media, and academia in much the same way they have done again in the USA in the 20th”
———————————————————————————
So let me get this straight. The White Christian rich guys own 2/3rds of America, and the Jews own the other 2/3rds. And Oprah and Tiger Woods own a couple of thirds each.
The White Christians vote conservative, and the Jews vote liberal with Oprah and Tiger. The 4/3rds liberal vote swung the last presidential election for Obama, whom the Jews and the rich Christians both hate - the Jews because he is a Muslim sympathizer and the rich guys because he is not a member of skull and bones.
And bhelthi is touting a book that “clarifies the interaction among western world spy agencies and the MOSSAD, in certain historical events. The French secret service, and the U.S. N.S.A., for example, in the contrived auto accident of princess Diana”
These above facts prove absolutely that there is a God. For no small, perpetually hated population such as the Jews could possibly control virtually all the worlds money, universities, spy agencies, Nobel prizes in physics, rich Christian white guys, media and most Dunkin Donuts stores without a very powerful God looking out for them.
Report thisBy Gulam, March 13, 2011 at 5:34 pm Link to this comment
This is one of the saddest things that I have ever read. This short essay might
be used by historians in China for centuries to illustrate the crash of the West.
For a Jewish journalist to talk at length about the origins of America’s fear of
Islam and contempt for everything Muslim on a blog run by Jews in a country
where a clear majority and more of the major news organizations are in Jewish
hands, and not mention at all their role in this is, well, terrifying. The little-
educatged gentile herd has been brow beaten into submission; they long ago
learned in school never to even utter the word “Jew” at all, but no sane Jew
should allow this kind of dangerous pretence any longer. How could one
possibly write about this new tide of rising anti-Semitism without talking about
whether or not America’s other Semites are the driving force behind the tide,
since that is certainly what many people are thinking, if they are thinking?
On excavation sites in Israel in the late 60s and early 70s religious Jews would
talk late into the night about the coming American holocaust that many of them
saw as inevitable. They were saying: “We control the media and universities, and
we will never be able to resist driving America to war against the Arabs. There
is too much money to be made, so we will surely do this, and it will bring on
the next deluge.” That the Jews in America own the media is no wild anti-
Semitic accusation; it is a fact that anyone can confirm in just a few hours of
research. Many pro-Jewish web sites brag about this. Together with the similar
stranglehold over American academia and Congress, the big newspapers, TV
networks, and internet magnates have methodically and visibly taken the USA
down this path to destruction. No objective analysis could possibly deny heavy
Jewish involvement again and again in setting this course.
This is a tragedy of monumental proportions in the making and anyone who
truly loves and admires the Jewish community must of necessity be horrified.
Those who deeply care do not roll over and pretend that this is not happening.
Anybody with one shred of journalistic integrity could not pretend to write
about this rising tide of hatred against Islam and at least make some reference
to the fact that, in the eyes of many, Israel and the American Jewish community
are largely responsible, even if it is a few Southern conservatives who step up
and make asses of themselves once the situation is ripe. Whether Israelis and
Jewish Americans are largely responsible for this or not may be a complex and
difficult question, but what matters almost as much is that this is the
perception of the silent majority, that great gentile herd, and not without
reason. When a third Jew was installed on the Supreme Court, replacing the last
Protestant, little was said, true, in the Jewish owned press.
Let’s not pretend that this is not a remarkably similar situation to that in
Germany a century ago, for Germany had been the most liberal and open place
for Jews in Europe during the 19th century, and they came in and took over the
finance, the media, and academia in much the same way they have done again
in the USA in the 20th. This is THE most important factor playing out in
American history right now, yet any suggestion that the Jews might have done
anything to have justified German anger has been so strictly banned that it has
been possible for that community to come to America and do the very same
thing all over again.
If there is hope at all must it not start with honest appraisal of the situation? Is
Report thisit not far far better to talk about it now here rather than wait for a Hitler to start
doing it in public? Hitler was not some super evil genius who created a bad
situation by himself; he was just a crackpot who gave voice to what millions of
people were already angry about but to liberal to speak of themselves.
By GoyToy, March 13, 2011 at 5:19 pm Link to this comment
Peter King—INRI
Perhaps, has last name is Kahane
Report thisBy felicity, March 13, 2011 at 1:54 pm Link to this comment
I remember something a Senator said after Reagan was
elected but before he was sworn into office. “If the
Soviet Union is ever going to attack us, it’ll do it
now before Reagan takes office, and if it doesn’t it
never will.”
The Soviets didn’t of course but it continued to be
Report thisthe rationale for, the justification for, even
upping, arms production - remember Reagan’s extremely
expensive SDI pipe dream? Face it, pretty hard to
justify spending the greater part of the
discretionary budget on the Pentagon without a
menacing enemy.
By RayLan, March 13, 2011 at 10:10 am Link to this comment
This is fiddling with the symptom and not the disease.
Report thisAmerica is owned and run by mostly white Christian-self-identified rich 10% corporate moguls who control 2/3 of the wealth.
http://itoosing.blogspot.com/2011/02/wealth-distribution-in-america-2011.html
Every other group is villified in subtle and not so subtle ways. Any opportunity to set off a wildfire of racism and xenophobia is seized like a stock op.
The disease is so deep rooted in needs a fundamental re-vamping of the entire culture.
By drbhelthi, March 12, 2011 at 6:36 pm Link to this comment
The motto of the israeli MOSSAD, ” By way of deception, thou shalt do war,” has been evidenced in the military and political actions of the USGov for at least forty years. The political stance of Rep. Peter King amplifies this deception.
A more complete understanding of the MOSSAD is provided by the years of research presented in Gordon Thomas´s volume, “Gideon´s Spies The Secret History of the MOSSAD”. This volume also clarifies the interaction among western world spy agencies and the MOSSAD, in certain historical events. The French secret service, and the U.S. N.S.A., for example, in the contrived auto accident of princess Diana.
Report thisBy call me roy, March 12, 2011 at 4:14 pm Link to this comment
When the Mafia was investigated, the Italians complained that the investigator’s should not be able to use the word “Mafia”? I smell political correctness and it smells really bad
Report thisBy Azcat85, March 12, 2011 at 2:57 pm Link to this comment
It seems that comparing Muslim terrorists with the IRA is ridiculous. Islamist jihad
Report thispurports to kill every infidel in the world. Unfocused and unprincipled except in
their cultish religion. The IRA was fighting against an occupied British army on
their soil. Hence when the British troops left, the IRA stopped bombing. They are
not the same and does not place Rep King in a conundrum.
By Azcat85, March 12, 2011 at 2:56 pm Link to this comment
It seems that comparing Muslim terrorists with the IRA is ridiculous. Islamist jihad
Report thispurports to kill every infidel in the world. Unfocused and unprincipled except in
their cultish religion. The IRA was fighting against an occupied British army on
their soil. Hence when the British troops left, the IRA stopped bombing. They are
not the same and does place Rep King in a conundrum.
By AnAlienEarthling, March 12, 2011 at 3:58 am Link to this comment
King’s congressional “klavern” articulates one that
we of a ‘non-white’/‘brownish’/‘mixed’ persuasion
have known viscerally well since our childhoods: if
the person on the street cannot accord you
“recognition” as a ‘White American’, then you are at
best ‘suspiciously’ American. The nature of this
‘recognition’ is a ‘mindless’ minding, as it were, an
‘unquestioned-because-unquestionable’ acceptance as
American by virtue of skin complexion. The racial
slurs that have targeted me throughout my childhood
are too numerous to recall.
Americans have to realize that their “racism” is not
some set of mental states, some matter of attitude
towards some certain ‘others,’ an aberration that
only requires a ‘change of mind’ or a dosage of
‘education’ for correction. (Indeed, when one
researches the HISTORY of the concept of ‘race,’
through its twists and contortions through biology,
anthropology, all the way back to its Grecian and
Roman expression in ‘humoral theory’, one discovers
its purely ‘artefactual’ nature, that it is a purely
human construct lacking reference to any natural
phenomenon whatsoever).
Rather, America’s racism is a disease infecting the
“Existenz” of those who identify themselves as “White
Americans,” , a slash in “Being-with” (“Mit-sein”)
that has been ‘scabbed’ over, a deformation of the
“With-world” (“Mit-welt”) that constitutes American
society.
Our society’s rectification, to immunize the “With-
world,” we must begin with our infants: in rearing
our children we accord no recognition value to the
superficial differences between us. (America’s
prejudice impacts the affective centers of our
children’s brains!) The comportment which expresses
our embrace of others is not allowed to warp or
distort. The Sartrean ‘look’ we cast and that is cast
upon us will not suffer a ‘glaucoma’ when that
‘other’ is ‘non-white’/‘brownish’/‘mixed’.
However, among whom could such an upbringing become
garden, a matter of course?
Without such a change in our society, prejudice and
Report thisdiscrimination will continue ‘continuing’ - the
PERVERSION that King displays will arise again,
again!
By pivory@ozemail.com.au, March 12, 2011 at 12:09 am Link to this comment
But don’t forget a lot of this comes back to 1 point: ‘Our oil is under their sand.’
Report thisBy bogi666, March 11, 2011 at 7:58 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Peter King of the Jews. He’s auditioning for the Messiah and being bribed by the Zionists to do so. On a per capita basis Timothy McVeigh body count of 169 closely approximates the individual body count of the 19 9/11 hijackers
Report thisBy drbhelthi, March 11, 2011 at 4:11 pm Link to this comment
If Mr. Peter King genuinely represents the folk in the district of NY, who allegedly elected him, I better understand why Mrs. Clinton was elected by NY voters.
One tends to conclude that the MOSSAD component of the Hitler Society must be rewarding its pimps well, behind the scenes. With CIA black-budget dollars.
Report thisBy velville, March 11, 2011 at 3:47 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Some historian you are, Sirota.
How about the antisemitism and antimuslim history of the Catholic church in Spain? Or antibuddhist history of the Islamics in Pakistan? Or antihindu history of the Brits in India? Or antijewish history of France and Germany and other countries pre-Hitler? Or anticatholicism in the Know-Nothing United States? Or antiacadianism in Louisiana and Mississippi when children from French-speaking families were snatched away and put into schools where they were whipped if they did not speak only English?
In your zeal to come up with a smirky answer you show that you are happy to take things out of context and pretend that you are worth considering.
Now that we admit that there is bigotry and hatred in every society, how about a few solutions? Like calling out the haters and publicly humiliating them? Like Jeremiah Wright, “Hymietown” Jesse Jackson, Al “Brilliantine” Sharpton, Bailey “God Does not Hear” Smith of the SBC, the Iranian short bastard, Tutu the hater, and others?
But that would take intellectual power you either do not have or do not care to use.
Report thisBy question, March 11, 2011 at 2:26 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Great article, but I would add one point. In the ‘70’s during the Iran hostage crisis, the daily news showed horrific pictures of extremists screaming, burning flags & parading along streets whipping themselves…there was even self-immolation in the name of Allah. Watching this, I was terrified & convinced that the Muslim religion was based on violence & rage. And when I realized I was beginning to hate a group of people - prejudice - I did what my parents taught me. Got a copy of the Koran & several books on Islam from my library & read for 2 weeks. After which I realized for myself, in my own heart, that Islamic extremists are no different & just as crazy & destructive as Judeo-Christian extremists. And none of the religions is responsible for those fringes. King is abusing his position. And maybe we need a lot more TV & movie coverage of the compassion & sacrifices of Muslims all over the world & over time since many Americans at least seem reluctant to research when they can watch TV.
Report thisBy TDoff, March 11, 2011 at 1:56 pm Link to this comment
While Peter King was a major organizer of U.S. Irish-Catholics in support of the IRA, another major IRA supporter was Moammar Khadafy, Libyas’s dictator, who provided terrorist training camps in Libya. Many IRA members were sent to those Libyan camps, funded by Peter King’s efforts, to learn how to terrorize and destroy their fellow Irish folks. Since King and Khadafy have so much in common, and such a history, perhaps Obama should send Peter to Libya as a special envoy to solve the ‘Arab Troubles’. At least that would have the benefit of removing him from the U.S.
Report thisBy MeHere, March 11, 2011 at 12:34 pm Link to this comment
Many beneficial and productive sources of work have been lost but we can always
Report thiscount on the manufacture of fear and enemies….. up to a point though. Bear in
mind that many defense projects are contracted out under dubious deals with
businesses in obscure locations.
By DavidByron, March 11, 2011 at 12:26 pm Link to this comment
donna made a good point: you can’t talk about anti-Arab bigotry without mentioning Israel.
Well—he just did, but you shouldn’t.
Report thisBy DavidByron, March 11, 2011 at 12:21 pm Link to this comment
Aren’t all US politicians in favour of terrorism that they like?
Reagan said the Taliban were like the founding fathers. Clinton met with the leader of the IRA’s political wing. US policy is to support terrorists all over the world. The KLA for example in Kosovo, was endorsed by the Democrats and now I guess the Libyan “resistance” (aka terrorists too) are feted by the so-called left. The right loves them some terrorist brutality if its aimed against leftist regimes such as the Contras in Nicaragua or a range of anti-Cuban terrorists living in Miami.
Supporting terrorism is practically a condition of being in US politics.
Report thisBy SarcastiCanuck, March 11, 2011 at 10:15 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
As Chris Hedges says,people now cannot seperate reality from fantasy in our pop culture world.Ignorance and stupidity will reign supreme,and maybe might already.
Report thisBy donna, March 11, 2011 at 9:46 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Popular culture is feeding anti-Muslim sentiments. The horrible TV program, NCIS, consistently portrays Muslims as terrorists and glorifies the Mossad. This show is an example of zionist influence in the media.
Report thisBy ardee, March 11, 2011 at 8:34 am Link to this comment
The real “enemies” of this nation are King and his ilk.
Report thisBy gerard, March 11, 2011 at 3:00 am Link to this comment
Well, David, part of the problem is that the “surveillance department” needs victims in order to stay in business, and if you can keep the focus on justifying victimization of a reliigious or ethnic minority at home, people will forget to notice that your “defense department” needs victims in the Middle East or Africa in order to stay in business. There’s a not-so-subtle reciprocation in the arrangement which American people generally are too stupid, or too scared to recognize.
Report this