December 5, 2016 Disclaimer: Please read.
Statements and opinions expressed in articles are those of the authors, not Truthdig. Truthdig takes no responsibility for such statements or opinions.
Top 5 Ironies of U.S. Reaction to Egypt/UAE Bombing of Libya
Posted on Aug 26, 2014
By Juan Cole
This post originally ran on Juan Cole’s Web page.
The diplomatic angst issuing from Washington around the United Arab Emirates and Egypt bombing of weapons depots belonging to the Qatar-backed fundamentalist militia of Misrata holds many delicious ironies:
1. According to the BBC, “the U.S., France, Germany, Italy and the UK issued a joint statement denouncing “outside interference” in Libya.” Seriously, guys? Except for Germany, these are the NATO countries that intervened in Libya in the first place, in large part at the insistence of an Arab League led by Egypt and the UAE! It is true that the UAE and Egypt don’t have a U.N. Security Council Resolution, which authorized NATO involvement (I supported the then no fly zone on those grounds). But the newly elected Libyan House of Representatives has openly called for international intervention against Libya’s out-of-control militias and it is entirely possible that the Libyan government asked, behind the scenes for these air strikes. In any case, “outside interference” isn’t the issue!
2. The U.S. is said to have been “caught off guard” by the air strikes. But the U.S. bombed Tripoli in 1986 without coordinating with most of its Middle East allies. Or then there was that sudden invasion of Iraq for no good reason in 2003. The U.S. is always catching the Middle East off guard.
Square, Site wide
3. The U.S. is said to be concerned that the UAE used U.S. military equipment in ways not authorized by Congress. But Israel does this all the time and there is no such expression of concern then.
4. The U.S. is planning unilateral air strikes on Syria, the sort of operation that the UAE and Egypt are imitating.
5. The U.S. Congress has been obsessing for years about the September 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi by extremist militias of the sort the UAE and Egypt are now weakening in Libya. Are the Republicans in the House just interested in making political hay with the deaths of the U.S. ambassador and 3 other Americans, or do they really want to roll back extremist forces and lawless militias in Libya? If the latter, they have given no sign of it except carping.
New and Improved Comments