![]() |
![]() |
||
|
Tenet’s Share of the ShamePosted on May 3, 2007By Joe Conason While the natural human fascination with gossip and backbiting among our rulers guarantees media coverage and best-seller status for George Tenet’s new memoir, the former CIA director cannot achieve absolution in print or on television. His clumsy attempts to shift the blame to Vice President Dick Cheney and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and their rebuttals are titillating but ultimately pointless. He is right about them, of course, but they are right about him, too. History will absolve none of them. With thousands of Americans and Iraqis dead and national honor permanently tarnished, there is more than enough blame to go around. As a group of former intelligence officers observed in a letter they sent to Tenet upon the publication of “At the Center of the Storm: My Years at the CIA,” his outrage over the misleading propaganda that led to the war is belated and utterly self-serving. During the critical months between September 2002 and March 2003, in the midst of that White House campaign, he was nothing but the useful tool of those he now criticizes. From the beginning, Tenet knew that his colleagues in the White House and the National Security Council were concocting a case for war that went far beyond any reliable intelligence about Saddam Hussein’s arsenal and intentions. He knew that his best field officers and most competent analysts didn’t believe the warnings about an Iraqi “mushroom cloud.” He also knew that they had no convincing evidence of ties between Saddam and al-Qaida. Yet while Cheney and Rice lied dramatically on national television, persuading the majority of Americans that Iraq was indeed behind the 9/11 attacks, Tenet maintained a discreet silence—except when he was enabling them. Advertisement The former CIA chief replied indignantly. No, he said, “we didn’t believe al-Qaida was going to do Saddam Hussein’s dirty work.” Why, then, did he emphasize the alleged connections between al-Qaida and Iraq when he testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee in February 2003? The answer is that he knew what the White House wanted, and he delivered the message that helped to sell the war. Tenet played the stooge over and over again during those months. In October 2002, he signed the National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq, a fatally skewed assessment of the dangers posed by that ruined country. In January 2003, he let the White House pretend that Iraq was seeking to obtain uranium from Africa. And in February 2003, as Secretary of State Colin Powell presented a series of bogus assertions to the United Nations and forever disgraced himself and his country, Tenet sat behind him in silent, nodding confirmation of those falsehoods. Perhaps the most pitiful argument mustered by Tenet to defend himself today is his attempt to rebut the “slam-dunk” anecdote. President Bush and other members of the administration have said that the CIA director assured them the intelligence proving the existence of Saddam’s terrible arsenal was unassailable. He whines that his basketball cliche has been misinterpreted, because he was only promising the president that a strong argument could be made, not that the information itself was perfect. More plausibly, he also notes that the decision to invade had been reached long before that little warmongering pep rally in the Oval Office. But so what? Tenet sat and listened as the president told us, untruthfully, that no such decision had been made—and that war would only be waged as a “last resort.” He doesn’t deny encouraging Bush’s war salesmanship, even though he doubted the wisdom of that policy and the process that had led to it. His fitful protests against the worst lies uttered by Cheney and Rice had no effect because he refused to risk his own position on behalf of truth. Bleating about his damaged reputation, Tenet sounds much like Powell, whose loyalty to the president overruled duty to the country. Tenet got a medal and a multimillion-dollar book contract, but he forfeited his honor, and that cannot be retrieved. Joe Conason writes for the New York Observer. © 2007 Creators Syndicate inc. Previous item: AIDS Czar Caught With His Pants Down Next item: Time to Crack Down on the Student Loan Cesspool CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment |
We just got faster!
Our site is growing, and we’ve upgraded our servers to bring you a better, faster Truthdig experience.
We’re thrilled with our improvement — but it’s added a lot to our costs. Please help us to keep things snappy and make sure you have instant access to thousands of in-depth Truthdig articles, interviews, videos and cartoons.
Please chip in today with a gift to keep us moving forward. Then check out the site for yourself!
By Fadel Abdallah, May 9, 2007 at 10:52 pm #
Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld, Powell, Tenet, Wofowitz, Gonzalez and others, all represent the tail of the snake, to use an Arabic linguistic metaphor. The head of the snake is George Bush, the so-called Commander-in Chief. Unless Americans collectively go after this snake head we will be all beating around the bush, and we will all continue to have blood on our hands.
To add insult to injury, Tenet was rewarded by 4-million dollars book contract to tell us his shameful part in this national and international bloody scandal. Wolfowitz was rewarded with the presidency of the World Bank, where he continues to make shameful scandals. But the Liar-in-Chief continues to sit in the blackened White House, defying and disgracing America and democracy.
Report thisBy cann4ing, May 9, 2007 at 10:18 pm #
Re comment #68918 by Elizabeth Lockyear. Since you bring it up, here is how dubya got rich.
1984 Arbusto was a bust. No problem when your Dad’s the VP of the U.S. Dad’s wealthy friends hand W 1.1 million shares in Spectrum 7 stock + a $75,000 annual salary.
1986 Spectrum 7 is $3 million in debt. Daddy’s BCCI/intelligence community friends purchase Spectrum 7, handing the “fortunate son” $600,000 in Harken Energy stock, a seat on the Harken board, a consulting contract worth $80,000 to $120,000/yr.
June 22, 1990, one week prior to Harken posting a $23.2 million end of quarter loss and resultant drop in Harken stock to $2.37/share, W, who sat on the Board’s audit committee, unloads 60% of his Harken stock at $4.12/share ($848,560).
While W never desplayed any particular acumen at creating and managing a business, as the son of a sitting U.S. President, he did display a knack for assembling wealthy investors, including billionaire Richard Rainwater, to acquire the Texas Rangers. For an initial investment of $606,000, including a $500,000 bank loan paid for by the sale of Harken stock, W received a 1.8% share of the team and the position of managing general partner at $200,000/year. His share would swell to 11.8% as a “sweat equity” for his stellar efforts in assembling the investors.
W then persuaded Arlington Mayor Richard Green to submit a referendum for a 1/2 cent sales tax that would provide a $165 million subsidy for construction of a new stadium, threatening to take the Rangers to Dallas if the good folks in Arlington didn’t fork over the dough. He then used political connections in the Texas legislature to create a development agency with the power of eminent domain, which then condemned the property needed for the stadium, and when he became governor, he signed into law a sports facility financing bill which permitted Texas cities to levy taxes for stadium construction.
In 1998, media mogul Tom Hicks purchased the franchise for $250 million—the team, the stadium and the adjacent 300 acres which included the Six Flags amusement park. Gov. Geo. Bush walked off with $14.8 million, $2.7 million on his initial 1.8% ownership and $12.2 million for his “sweat equity.”
Report thisBy Elizabeth Lockyear, May 9, 2007 at 8:13 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Tenet and Powell are traitors just like Bush, Cheney and the rest of the neocons. But it was the press that gave them rock star status and kept the truth from the American people. A few stories about how Bush and his cronies cheated and stole from the people of Arlington, TX, when he was one of the owners of the Rangers might have given the voters enough information to reject Bush. The burden of guilt must weigh heavily on the MSM.
Report thisBy Hammo, May 5, 2007 at 2:15 pm #
Tenet’s role in and knowledge of events and activities leading up to the invasion and occupation of Iraq certainly should be explored.
Like Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith, Richard Perle and many others, Tenet seems to have been close to an “inner circle.”
His new book may further open the can of worms about what has been going on in the last few years. More on this in:
“Mistakes or plans in 9/11, Iraq invasion and occupation, War on Terror?” (American Chronicle)
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=11401
- - -
“‘Intelligence failures’ prior to 9/11, Iraq war: Planned strategies?” (American Chronicle)
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=3367
Report thisBy Novista, May 4, 2007 at 12:23 pm #
Let’s see ... my Australian Oxford dictionary says a ‘tenet’ is a principle of a person or school.
Guess they’ll have to add a “2. unprincipled scoundrel” or some such.
OTOH, all this news has saved me money. Now I won’t need to buy his tome. I only wish I had not wasted Au$50 on Woodward’s 3rd apologia. Lo, how the might have fallen.
Report thisBy THOMAS BILLIS, May 3, 2007 at 3:55 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Here is something frightening to reflect on in the light of subsequent relevations.George Tenet may have been the most capable member of this administration.Could you picture Alberto Gonzales or Brownie there.We might have been at war with Brazil.At least Tenet directed the President toward Moslem countries.As President Bush has often said lets go after those happy moslems you know the sunny{sunni] ones.
Report thisBy Leefeller, May 3, 2007 at 3:32 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Tenet, comes clean!
Report thisTenet is like the guy behind the wheel of the getaway car during a bank robbery.
Even though, equally guilty of committing a crime, Tenet feels he was justified, because he was not the one holding the gun, all he was suppoed to do is take his split of the pot and keep his mouth shut.
Maybe the crooks in the White House pissed him off or they did not provide the cut of the take he felt he deserved, so for a few bucks Tenet, in his twisted logic, is now justified, by fingering the crooks? Crooks have no shame.
By Frostedflakes, May 3, 2007 at 2:19 pm #
George Tenet is a criminalistic opportunist. He was aware of his deceitfulness during his tenure within the Bush regime, and he remains deceitful in his “book of lies”. Just like the rest of the Bushies, anything for a buck. When Americans finally wake up and prosecute these war criminals, George Tenet should be right in line with Bush, Cheney, Rice, Wolfowitz, Gonzales, Powell, and Cristall of The National Review.
Report thisBy Michael Boldin, May 3, 2007 at 12:53 pm #
The reality here is that all those in power who promoted or simply allowed all this to happen share in the responsibility. Some are have a greater weight, but all must be held accountable. Tenet is no angel as head of the CIA.
The CIA - along with the pentagon - create a culture of aggression in American foreign policy. We spend countless billions and billions every single year to maintain the greatest national OF-fense in the history of the world.
It’s time that we change that - we need a national DE-fense instead of a national OF-fense. When that happens, criminals like tenet, cheney, bush and the rest won’t have the tools to wage war and commit many of their crimes…
Some reading on this:
“National Defense vs. National Offense”
Report thishttp://www.populistamerica.com/national_defense_vs__national_offense
By QuyTran, May 3, 2007 at 11:00 am #
He’s shameless so never mention “shame” to him. This guy only knows spitting out then sucking back immediately when seeing interests !
Report thisBy cann4ing, May 3, 2007 at 10:40 am #
George Tenet is a co-conspirator in the Bush administration’s concoction of a war of aggression—a crime under the principles of the Nuremberg tribunal. His semi-mea culpas do not absolve his culpability.
Report this