Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
June 18, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     nsa     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

The FBI May Have Finally Found Jimmy Hoffa

Say Hello to the 'Super Rich'

Bush Caved on NSA Surveillance After Top Officials Threatened to Resign

New Iranian President Wants to Heal 'Old Wound' With U.S.

Controversial Voting Law Struck Down, Snowden ‘Honored’ by Cheney, and More

Most Comments
Most Emailed

 * NEW! * The Terror Con
 * NEW! * This Will Not End Well
Great Gatsby Economics



The Unwinding


Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Reports

Spare Us the Propaganda on Afghanistan

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Jun 9, 2011
AP / Jason Reed

A U.S. military machine-gunner mans his weapon aboard an Osprey aircraft over southeastern Afghanistan on June 5.

By Bill Boyarsky

The White House account of President Barack Obama’s meeting with his Afghanistan team was insultingly vague for anyone wanting to know when—or if—the Afghanistan war will end.

After Monday’s session, which followed Secretary of Defense Robert Gates’ much-publicized trip to Afghanistan, this was all that was available on the White House web (propaganda) site:

“The President led his monthly meeting on Afghanistan and Pakistan with his national security team this morning. During this session, the President received briefings on progress in implementing our strategy for Pakistan and Afghanistan following the death of Osama bin Laden.”

The rest of the very short “readout” (70 more words, plus a list of attendees) was equally vague. Nowhere was there a hint of an answer to a question a soldier asked Gates during his Afghanistan tour, as reported by The Los Angeles Times. The question was, “Sir, since the death of Osama bin Laden, has the military strategy changed at all?” His answer, versions of which were given at other bases Gates visited, was, “We’ve made a lot of headway, but we have a ways to go.”

Just how far to go in this purposeless war is the subject of the current internal debate in Washington, one that is so heavy in muddy language that it is impossible for outsiders to follow. But the truth is, it’s probably already settled. We’re stuck in Afghanistan as long as Obama follows his present policy.

Advertisement

On one side of the charade of a debate, according to The New York Times, are Gates and others in the Pentagon who favor a small beginning to the troop withdrawal that Obama promised to begin next month. On the other side, the Times reported, is Vice President Joe Biden and others who want a faster withdrawal, presumably something substantial that Obama can take to the voters in the 2012 presidential election.

Nobody in this White House debate seems to be raising the central question: Why are we there? Judging from information leaked from the White House discussions, nobody is pointing out, as the soldier did, that bin Laden’s death may have changed things. This is especially true since al-Qaida is entrenched in places other than Afghanistan, including in the territories of our so-called allies Pakistan and Yemen, the latter now in turmoil with dictator-President Ali Abdullah Saleh recovering in Saudi Arabia from severe wounds sustained in a rebel attack on his compound.

The Obama administration is proceeding on the theory that the Taliban and al-Qaida are linked. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton reiterated the administration policy last February in a speech to the Asia Society. “The Taliban and al-Qaida are distinct groups with distinct aims, but they are both our adversaries and part of a syndicate of terror that must be broken,” she said. President Obama’s policy, she said, is “to disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qaida and prevent it from threatening America and our allies in the future. Al-Qaida cannot be allowed to maintain its safe haven, protected by the Taliban, and to continue plotting attacks while destabilizing nations that have known far too much war. ...”

The administration’s goal, she said, is to weaken the Taliban, split it from al-Qaida and reconcile with Taliban elements “who will renounce violence and accept the Afghan constitution.”

Bin Laden’s death did not change the policy. The day after he was killed by U.S. Navy SEALs, Clinton said the “battle to stop al-Qaida and its syndicate of terror will not end with the death of bin Laden. Indeed, we must take this opportunity to renew our resolve and redouble our efforts. In Afghanistan, we will continue taking the fight to al-Qaida and their Taliban allies. …”

So, the deadly slog through Afghanistan continues. What could have been a chance to change policy is becoming a footnote.

This should not come as a surprise. From the earliest days of the 2008 presidential campaign, it was clear that neither Obama nor Clinton would pull us out of Iraq or Afghanistan with any great speed. Obama, in fact, seized on the idea of expanding the war in Afghanistan as a way of defending himself from Republicans’ and candidate Clinton’s attacks for his criticism of the Iraq War. And no matter how much he criticized the Iraq misadventure, he always advocated the amorphous idea of keeping a small residual force there. When Obama chose Clinton as secretary of state, he picked someone who was like-minded.

That is why the current Afghanistan review taking place in the White House doesn’t mean much. Judging from Clinton’s words, the United States will continue to battle the Taliban until it agrees to what amounts to unconditional surrender to this nation and Hamid Karzai’s government. This indicates that next month’s troop reductions will be small. 

In the short run, the administration may get away with this fake debate because the war continues to be a low-visibility event in the news media. And because no strong anti-war movement has developed. But this could change. An ABC News/Washington Post poll taken at the beginning of June showed that just 43 percent of those surveyed felt the war was worth fighting, and 73 percent said a substantial number of troops should be withdrawn this summer. Another sign of expanding opposition was the narrow defeat of a House resolution calling for accelerated withdrawal, introduced by Republican Walter B. Jones of North Carolina and Democrat Jim McGovern of Massachusetts.

An increasing number of people want to know how long we’ll be in Afghanistan, not to mention why we are there. Hopefully, their ranks will grow, and Obama, worried about re-election, will listen.


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By faith, June 13, 2011 at 8:11 pm Link to this comment

Thank you gerard.  I will do the same.  I am more than happy to support a cause
that can effect change and help our nation return to values that reflect a sense of
humanity and care.  Your comments are always great, whether here, or on HP.

Report this

By faith, June 13, 2011 at 8:07 pm Link to this comment

Felicity, we stay in Afghanistan and other wars not because of threats, veiled or
otherwise.  Instead I assert that we continue our warmongering because there is
so much money to be made for defense contractors, corporations.  They make
billions for providing our troops with nonpotable water, poor antiquated
equipment, etc.  Maybe not all of them do so, but I suspect it is the majority.  Just
consider the billions that have gone missing in Afghanistan.  How do you lose 6
1/2 billion dollars?  There is no accountability.

Report this

By faith, June 13, 2011 at 8:02 pm Link to this comment

Traditional Democrat - I agree with you entirely.

Report this

By ocjim, June 12, 2011 at 5:03 pm Link to this comment

Even if we left Afghanistan, which we should immediately, miscreant backward-looking Republicans would always halt investments in our future, whether it is in health care, education, infrastructure, or whatever.

Their goals are meant for plutocrats and for re-election, even if our country tanks.

Report this

By Traditional American Democrat, June 12, 2011 at 10:47 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

When the post-2012 election results are in and the pundits have the first crack
at writing history, here is what I would like for them to consider: Obama lost
because, upon election, he immediately turned his back on those who elected
him.

As evidence, I would include the following:

1. TARP & Financial Bailout: Over 70% of us opposed the bailout. Obama
accelerated it with Geithner and Bernanke - both Bush carryovers Obama
embraced.

2 . Health Care: 72% of us supported “a government-administered insurance ?
plan—something like Medicare for those under 65—that would compete for ?
customers with private insurers.” Obama blocked hearings on single payer and
chocked off true health care reform.

3. The Debt and Fair Taxes: Washington Post-ABC poll Washington Post-ABC
poll, Spring 2011: 72 percent support raising taxes on the rich - including 68
percent of Independents and 54 percent of Republicans. Obama twice
‘bargained’ to extend the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy.

4. Afghanistan: 64% of us opposed expanding the war in Afghanistan and ?
wanted to disentangle from Bush-era ‘War on Terror’ and ‘preventive war’
policies. Today, over 70% of Americans oppose the war. Obama continues it.

So, when folks on cable begin to grapple with Obama’s 2012 lose, let them
remember that Obama had a great deal of support and the issues on which the
support rested were very very significant and the majority of Americans were
very clear about what they wanted and expected from the national leader.

Obama ignored the voters - his own supporters.

Obama’s only hope is for the Republicans to continue being stupid. But, the
Republicans are not going to be stupid for that much longer, and Obama will
lose in 2012, because he dissed the people who voted for him.

Report this

By felicity, June 12, 2011 at 10:01 am Link to this comment

It’s been revealed that Karzai has threatened the US by
telling it that should it leave Afghanistan,
Afghanistan will ally itself with China.

This is an ancient tried, and true way for petty
tyrants to manipulate powerful nations to do their
bidding - threaten to side with the adversary. This may
be a reason, the real reason, we are continuing to stay
in Afghanistan.

Report this
mindful's avatar

By mindful, June 12, 2011 at 7:48 am Link to this comment

The mission is to split A Q with the Taliban. Make the taliban abide in peace and accept the Afgani Constitution?

You might just as well say, we’re here waiting for Jesus to return and free his people to paradise.

Report this
RedwoodGuy's avatar

By RedwoodGuy, June 12, 2011 at 5:48 am Link to this comment

@sludge
I am completely with you when it comes to not voting. There is no reason to lend your credibility to a corrupt system. Let it alone.

Report this

By Claus-Erik Hamle, June 12, 2011 at 4:57 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The real problem is that the Pentagon aims to achieve a disarming first strike capability. Trident missile engineer Bob Aldridge-www.plrc.org-resigned because it´s suicidal and wrote 3 books on First Strike Capability. With the missiles in Bulgaria, Romania and Poland by 2015 to shoot down missiles surviving First Strike with Minuteman-3 and Trident-2,maybe only for Blackmail, the Russians will go for Launch On Warning by 2014. Bloody fools in the Pentagon !

Report this

By sludgegulper, June 11, 2011 at 1:18 pm Link to this comment

Redwoodguy, I’m afraid that if you hope to change the mentality of a sixteen year old boy you’ll find it an up-hill struggle. It really is too late by then. As the Jesuits used to say…“Give me a child until he is seven and I will give you the man” So, if you hope to stop future futile wars then you’re going to have to get ‘em while their young and teach em not to pick up that gun.
For future elections there is really only one course of action and it’s very simple. The good people of America (I should say U.S.A.) could really upset the apple cart by just not voting. It’s as simple as that. Can you imagine the constitutional crisis that would ensue if NOBODY voted (of course it will never happen) but imagine, just for a moment. The incumbent politicos would have no mandate to continue and there would be no new “Potus”. As Mr O’Rourke said “don’t vote, it just encourages the bastards”

Report this

By norry, June 11, 2011 at 12:48 pm Link to this comment

Two weeks before Australia lost it’s very popular elected Prime Minister Kevin Rudd,Twiggy Forest, an insignificant human being,powerful because he manages a mining company, said on mainstream tv,“Rudd is finished”. And we did nothing!
Obama, Bush,Rudd,Palin,different names only,the same corprotocracy runs the western capatilist show.These people are very small potatoes,aloud only to make small potato decisions.

Report this
John R.'s avatar

By John R., June 11, 2011 at 11:58 am Link to this comment

Again and again we are at war. If only there would be a place to confront these so
called (humans) that purport peace yet make weapons and send out troops.

If only we could take these decision makers at the top - to a place of isolation and
confront them, alone, in their own minds, the minds that have have been schooled in our classrooms, and by our peers, and by time watching the television screen, the movie theatre…

If only, how we could replay the pain that the innocents of war have endured, the
mothers pain at the loss of they’re children. A man’s simple feeling of
hopelessness - due to the destruction of his village, and city.

Only in (hopefully) an afterlife - we will have a one on one conversation with these minds, that seem, so out of touch and feeling with the notion of empathy.

Report this
PatrickHenry's avatar

By PatrickHenry, June 11, 2011 at 9:54 am Link to this comment

I am beside myself as I watch this once great nation squander our wealth pursuing this military action.

It is hardly a war, never declared, just a bully in someone elses home.

Report this
RedwoodGuy's avatar

By RedwoodGuy, June 11, 2011 at 7:17 am Link to this comment

So, if anyone still wanted to crusade against the war, what would be an effective way to protest? There’s only one: Go out and teach young people about American State Terror and empire. Go find all those 16 year old boys who can’t wait to pick up a gun and fight for freedom. You’ve got about 2 years to teach them the ropes. Teach them about the American System of Military Backed State Capitalism.

Get out your Noam Chomsky reader and sit them down for a class on how it all works. How we use, abuse, and toss young bodies away like so many Johnny mops so that rich old pricks can get richer. Get them to read Howard Zinn’s “People’s History of America.” See if you can pound any sense into their testosterone soaked brains. Because this much is for sure, if the young ignorant ones won’t pick up the gun, you can bet your arse the old chicken-hawks like Dick Cheney ain’t going to do their won dirty work.

Report this
RedwoodGuy's avatar

By RedwoodGuy, June 11, 2011 at 7:09 am Link to this comment

The number of Americans negatively affected by this war is miniscule. The amount of wealth being moved and created and controlled by this war is enormous. Hence, this war will continue until that ratio is reversed.

The losers are the usual young folk too ignorant to have learned anything yet about American state terror, and business empire building. They go off in snappy uniforms with testosterone bubbling over the lid to kill in the name of freedom and other idiotic ideas planted in their brains since kindergarten. They simply don’t know any better, and there is never a shortage of old, fat, gray haired greedy pricks willing to take maximum advantage of their ignorance. <yawn>

The American deaths from these modern wars don’t even surpass the Friday night shooting deaths in the average big city. There’s no draft, so the impact of these wars is so close to negligible that you might as well call it zero. Oh hell yes, there will be a generation of young people all mentally munged-up over this - just like Vietnam, but that axe won’t fall for years yet.

Money? Well, American people have never had any real say in how the money gets wasted, so it’s a neutral point really. Yeah, it’s billions! or it is trillions! or it is jickity-jillions! Makes no difference at all. No one actually knows what a billion dollars is or means anyway. Besides, when it comes to government expenses money literally does come from trees. Our promise to pay the value of a dollar? Yeah, it’s a promise to pay with another dollar! So, really who cares?

You and I are on the bottom of the pile. The guys with the guns, bombs and drones don’t take your calls, and they aren’t listening to your pain here. Get over it.

There is - and always has been exactly one and only one way to stop wars: Don’t pick up the gun Johnny.

Report this

By bogi666, June 11, 2011 at 6:21 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

On book t.v. this morning a book was reviewed, published by City Lights publishing. Turn out the CIA has been heavily involved in creating the destruction of Afghanistan since 1973, it marked as a country for a proxy war between the Soviet and American empires, by the USG. That’s about 40 years and counting, another 40 years is not out of the question. Additionally, the native American and African societies, destroyed by white,actually had more advanced societies compared to the Rambofication of the Western societies which is why they have to be exterminated. The name of the book “crossing Zero:The AfPak war at the turning point”.The book TV review can be seen at the book tv web site. It’s a must, captivating.

Report this

By madisolation, June 11, 2011 at 4:58 am Link to this comment

“We’re stuck in Afghanistan as long as Obama follows his present policy.”
should read:
“We’re stuck in Afghanistan as long as Obama is President.”

People who support Obama are immoral individuals, for they support a man who murders for no reason at all.

Report this
EmileZ's avatar

By EmileZ, June 11, 2011 at 1:39 am Link to this comment

I predict that we will build at least one huge permanent (though it may not be labled as such) military base much like the US embassy in Iraq. We will then say “mission accomplished” and draw down the enlisted troops. Many contractors and troops will remain however. It will be like Iraq, but with ongoing drone strikes etc. That is what I believe they are aiming for but it won’t work (not that Iraq has been any great success).

It was never about Bin Laden or Al Qaida. It is about empire for empire’s sake. These (american) people are criminally insane.

Report this

By Aarky, June 10, 2011 at 7:43 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Bring our troops home now. It’s a lot cheaper to feed them here than there

Report this

By gerard, June 10, 2011 at 7:37 pm Link to this comment

Faith:  I don’t know of any signature/ad campaign going on at the moment. The most recent one I know about came out of Psychologists for Social Responsibility PsySR (it’s on the web by name.) Such campaigns are frequent, and have some effect though not enough to force the government to acknowledge their point of view—yet. But at least they’re out there.  My contention is that every bit of doing anything helps, and a sizeable movement will grow gradually, especially if unemployment continues to rise ahd people lose homes and jobs and health care.
It’s going to take a lot, however, because many, many people are too scared to open their mouths—thanks to the pervasive propaganda and surveillance.
  Many people right now are working on the torture problem, one way or another. Over 100 churches have united in a Campaign against Torture, urging the Senate Intelligence Committee to make its now-finished 3-year investigation Report of U.S. torture public instead of keep it under wraps. This is of course important because if we don’t get a handle on this outrage, torture will pass as okay.  This interfaith organization is nationwide and can be found (with materials for download, for people to use to spread information about the project).  Look up:  National Religious Campaign Against Torture. NRCAT.

Iraq Veterans Against War (Google by the name) does a lot to try to end the wars and Chris Hedges has lent his influence with them.  It is one place I feel moved to help with contributions.

Report this
JimBob's avatar

By JimBob, June 10, 2011 at 3:37 pm Link to this comment

Mr. Boyarsky, allow me to enlighten you.  The reason
we are in Afghanistan is that military adventurism is
the only fiscal stimulus the Republicans will vote
for.  Ask ‘em for money for roads, for dams, for pure
research, for schools, for anything and they’ll say
“No.”  But ask them for money for blowing things and
people to smithereens and they’ve got their checkbook
out in the blink of an eye.  It suits their
fundamentally paranoid view of the world to be at
perpetual war; the side-effect of creating jobs for
Americans is just that, a side-effect.  Obama has the
very same tiger by the tail: ramping down the war
means bringing home soldiers and contractors, idling
the Raytheon, General Dynamics, et al. production
lines that make the weapons of war.  In an economy
where a few thousand jobs move markets and make/break
political campaigns, a few hundred thousand newly unemployed
citizens simply cannot happen. 
If we had a Congress that would redirect government
money away from war and weapons to useful investments
in our infrastructure and the education of our young
people, it would be no problem.  But we don’t.  And
there’s no sign that we will any time soon.  So
expect perpetual war, in one form or another, for the
foreseeable future.

Report this

By bonobo65, June 10, 2011 at 1:16 pm Link to this comment

To my mind:  The Obama Admin will only pretend and play
around this issue.  There is no veracity!  To them,
this is a non-issue.  Their ears are shut!  Get over it
folks.  Their ears are shut.  They don’t give a squat
about what we think.

Report this

By squeaky jones, June 10, 2011 at 11:45 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The Spice Must Flow! (Dune by Frank Herbert).

Report this

By faith, June 10, 2011 at 10:33 am Link to this comment

Tell me where to send my $10 gerard.  In fact, I will send $10 for each member of
my family.  The greed and avarice that continues to reward those in power that are
at the root of all the deaths and mayhem affecting not only our troops, but the
civilians dwelling in their own homelands is appalling.  Absolutely appalling.
So, do I send my $10 to IAVA or where?  I am more than ready to oust every
elected politician that supports these continued and expanding wars.

Report this

By gerard, June 10, 2011 at 10:23 am Link to this comment

Typo.  Sorry.  Suggestions.  (My connections work either too slow or too fast.Why?)

Report this

By gerard, June 10, 2011 at 10:20 am Link to this comment

How come people commenting seldom make any succestions for organizing and working on some project together for change—non-violent because violence won’t work as well because it is too threatening for an overblown government, fragile and teetering in spite of all its military hardware and propaganda?

Report this

By Moonlighter, June 10, 2011 at 7:37 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Obama 2012:  Mourning in Amerika.

I believe I’ll give what campaign donations I would have given to Big O instead to Iraq Veterans Against the War and/or to a “primary challenger” willing to take on the Dems.

Report this

By sand, June 10, 2011 at 7:11 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

There are plans underway to keep anything to do with our wars and murders by drone SECRET, via incorporating the plans and attacks into CIA missions.  “OK folks, pay up, go broke, go homeless, starve for all we care…YOU will pay for the murderous secret wars!”

Report this
RayLan's avatar

By RayLan, June 10, 2011 at 6:35 am Link to this comment

Anybody who buys into the Oblahma rhetoric about pulling out being complicated has also bought into the belief that Oblahma is his own person - bull! - he is bought and sold by the military-industrial corporatocracy - Everything else is noise and empty babble. War is an essential kingpin of any Empire (see English, Roman, Ottoman etc..)

Report this

By Marc Schlee, June 10, 2011 at 5:53 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Without the murder industry the US economy would go belly up and stay belly up for a long, long time.

FREE AMERICA

REVOLUTIONARY (DIRECT) DEMOCRACY

Report this
morongobill's avatar

By morongobill, June 9, 2011 at 8:29 pm Link to this comment

Stick a fork in it, this Amerikan Empire is doomed.

But a lot more brown and dark skinned people worldwide will have to be blown to kingdom come before it happens.

Sorry to be so gloomy.

Report this

By Robin Gorsky, June 9, 2011 at 7:38 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

We are there for profit and promotions. Remember the classic line from The I-Feel-Like-I’m-Fixing-To-Die Rag of the Vietnam era:

“There’s plenty of good money to be made, selling the Army the tools of the trade.”

Plus there is no place for the voter to turn. Obama as a campaigner seemed to offer a change, but has turned out to be a third term of the Bush administration.  And it is now clear that Obama will never leave.  In the 2012 election Obama will face no primary challenge.  So that means the voters have to hope a Republican ticket will emerge that is seriously opposed to our continuous warfare in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, and Libya (did I leave any out? That seems unlikely.  So we are stuck, watching our country self-destruct.

Report this

By litlpeep, June 9, 2011 at 6:28 pm Link to this comment

“Nobody in this White House debate seems to be raising the central question: Why we are there?”

Maybe there is a compelling reason why no one in our Administration is talking about why we have a monstrous military machinery roaming over Afghanistan & Pakistan:  Wall Street’s bankers and investors told them to say nothing because the truth might sneak out.

We are there to protect the Wall Street investment fantasies about a “liberated” AfPak “economic exploitation zone.”

Report this

By FRTothus, June 9, 2011 at 6:22 pm Link to this comment

What Rot these ‘leaders’ spew, and how shameful we
have such an incredulous press that always trusts
them, believes what they say, takes them at their
word, gives them another chance. 

The Rot goes so much deeper. There is a callousness
that pervades, that capitalism - a disaster for the
majority, as Adam Smith pointed out over 200 years
ago - has wrought.  The work to convince us that it
is normal and natural that we can be temporarily
rented for money has succeeded spectacularly. Putting
price tags on everything, people have become
accustomed to selling anything, even themselves.   
George Carlin was quite right when he pointed out
that the schools seek to produce obedient workers for
what are essentially the current-day mills. It is a
system of exploitation of the many by the well-placed
few whose enterprises, being exploitive and therefore
illegitimate, requires force to maintain the state of
affairs, courts that will not dispense justice, laws
that “protect the minority of the opulent from the
majority”.  What capitalism has NOT wrought is an
enrichment of the whole of the people.  In fact,
everywhere the capitalist agenda is carried out, the
greater the disaster for the majority.  Compare the
conditions just before the fall of the Kremlin in the
Soviet satellite states versus the domains under
which the US had complete supremacy, namely Central
and South America.  The former Soviet Bloc nations
had universal housing, employment and social
services, a modicum of security in old age and for
the orphaned.  What they didn’t have were Death
Squads a la Central and South America, nor did they
have the extreme destitution rampant in America’s
“little region over here which never bothered
anybody”. It was the Second World, yes, meagre, by
the standards of Western glitz, and living under a
dictatorship, elected or military or as a result of a
coup (as in the US), the Eastern Bloc nations did not
have it easy, but the comparison to what the US did
and continues to do to ensure the Third World of the
people of its hemisphere is despicable by any
standard. As an American, I have no standing to judge
what the Soviet Union did to its vassal states, but I
do have standing when it comes to what the US does,
and I say such reprehensible behavior by a nation
that is obsessed with its alleged greatness is
despicable and shameful to any real patriot.

Contrary to its dogma, work is not honored or
rewarded in the United States.  It is an owners’
paradise, where the well-placed, wealthy few are
protected from the vicious vagaries of the jungle
called the free market by steady taxpayer subsidies,
huge cost-plus taxpayer contracts, highly
protectionist trade policies, bail-outs, and laws
which are cobwebs for them, and chains of steel for
everyone else.  Corporations are coddled, while the
majority of hard working people, the working poor the
hardest workers of all, are left out to dry.  And if
ever there were people that the military empire ought
to be taking care of, if no one else, should
certainly not be the millionaires in politics, or the
corporations which ought to be able to take care of
themselves, but the ordinary soldier, put in harm’s
way for the sake of profits, who then returns to a
government that treats even them like dirt.  But then
capitalism prides itself for its ruthlessness, has
paid many writers to try to create moral
justifications for selfishness and the callous
disregard of others.

Report this
Muzzle Flash's avatar

By Muzzle Flash, June 9, 2011 at 5:48 pm Link to this comment

Given the headlines lately I feel that the most terrifying thing I’ve seen is all the
people who cursed Bush with such contempt for his actions, such distain for all he
and his followers represented, slapping Obama 2012 sunrise stickers on their
bumpers…

The pentacle of satire unfolds, a horrific sad statement of racism, war, hero
worship, confusion, control, hypocrisy. The final nail. A symbol of all this country
has failed to be.

Report this
PatrickHenry's avatar

By PatrickHenry, June 9, 2011 at 5:47 pm Link to this comment

Karzi threatened the U.S. yet once again today that any additional killing of women and children by drones would not be tolerated.

Who does he think he is?

Report this
mindful's avatar

By mindful, June 9, 2011 at 4:40 pm Link to this comment

Oh, boy, we have money for 10,000 wells in Afganistan with 9500 dollars for each well being kept by Haliburton. Same old dirty. Things never change really.
In the mean time Republicans are pulling social security elders under the train. Cutting benefits by freezing much needed increases, allowing part B mandatory Medicare to eat any and all increases.
Defunding people programs for heat and energy.

Wow, what a country. Next time I want to be born in Denmark.

Report this

By balkas, June 9, 2011 at 3:54 pm Link to this comment

murder and theft is legal in u.s; as long as it is done by a group of people. of
course, stealing, murdering, and sending young people to death had been legal
and a moral imperative in all lands and empires in which supremacists have
ruled.

in such behavior with specific rationalization employed [generally posited as
truth and utter justification for such behavior] u.s is not an exception or
uniqueness.

rationalization usually consists of demonization of targeted group of people,
defense of own ‘interests’, evocation of great perils or harm coming to a given
empire or country, unless war is not waged and ‘enemy’ crushed and thus
country or empire once again saved.

‘saving’ the country never seems to end; there is always at least one more ‘save’
to be made [or engineered].

so, voting in diff individuals, amounting to 000000001% of a group or mafia in
u.k, russia, france, u.s, canada changes nothing! tnx

Report this

By Michael8000, June 9, 2011 at 3:27 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

That’s all the Obama administration really has at this point: propaganda. No victory, no popular support, no good reason to stay, no money to pay for it. Lots of propaganda.

Report this

By California Ray, June 9, 2011 at 3:20 pm Link to this comment

Why let the bear out of the trap, especially if the bear is happy to stay in?

Report this

By gerard, June 9, 2011 at 2:40 pm Link to this comment

I wonder how many validated signatures could be obtained, (accompanied by a $10 or more donation sent to Iraq Veterans against War) to place an effectively designed ad in the New York Times (or to promote an online drive) demanding “Get Out of Afghanistan by the Date You Promised or we will NOT vote for you in 2012” ? ? ?

That ought not strain anybody’s budget or willingness.  Preference would of course be a huge and representative crowd of people in the street in D.C.  But something, anything is better than nothing right now.

Report this

By diamond, June 9, 2011 at 2:24 pm Link to this comment

And there was Ryan Crocker on my TV saying “Iraq was hard but Afghanistan is harder”, as if it’s all about AMERICA. Not about the millions they’ve killed. The same way Vietnam was about America and not the five million Vietnamese the US military machine killed there. Even a movie like ‘The Hurt Locker’ swept the Iraqis into a corner as if they were rubbish. The only Iraqi to put in a real appearance had a bomb strapped to his body. A nation that thinks this way is a danger to itself and everyone else. Apparently when America invades a country for its resources, it is doing the newest version of the ‘White man’s burden’, that colonial excuse for theft and genocide used by the British Empire, which is what Ryan Crocker was really talking about.

Report this

By BProgress, June 9, 2011 at 2:18 pm Link to this comment

More hope for Nobama’s change… It ain’t. gonna. happen…

Report this

By talkmaster, June 9, 2011 at 1:30 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

please ask china, russia and iran why we stay in afghanistan. We already build
bases all over the place and more are in planning.

Report this

By String, June 9, 2011 at 11:42 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

What about the CIA involvement in creating/supporting both the Taliban and Al-Queda and fomenting trouble within Pakistan.
The entire W.O.T at this point is a farce. It is a fight against an enemy of our own making. And, your column does nothing except legitimize these efforts by not addressing these facts properly.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.