|
|
May 21, 2013
|
|
Sorry Elizabeth, Wall Street Said NoPosted on Jul 19, 2011
So much for the meritocracy. Despite an elite education, effusive charm and brilliant wit, Barack Obama, like Bill Clinton before him, has ended up betraying his humble origins by abjectly serving the most rapacious variant of Wall Street greed. They both talk a good progressive game, but when push comes to shove—meaning when the banking lobby weighs in—big money talks and the best and the brightest fold. The defining moment of Clinton’s capitulation was his destruction of Brooksley Born, the one member of his administration with the courage and prescience to warn him about the unregulated derivatives trading that ultimately led to the housing collapse. For Obama, it is his decision not to nominate Elizabeth Warren to run the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which she fought so hard to create. Obama’s refusal to take the fight to Senate Republicans by nominating Warren should be taken as the vital measure of the man. This gutless decision comes after the president populated his administration with the very people who created the financial meltdown.
The Harvard credential worked for the likes of economist Lawrence Summers, who carried water for Wall Street under both Clinton and Obama, but not for that university’s distinguished law professor Warren, an outspoken defender of consumer rights who dared represent the interests of the victims of the banking scams. It is a painful reminder that for Democrats as well as Republicans, governance is still all about serving the rich. Advertisement As Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., put it in opposing Obama’s nomination of Gensler to be head of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the position once held by Born: “Mr. Gensler worked with Sen. Phil Gramm and Alan Greenspan to exempt credit default swaps from regulation, which led to the collapse of AIG and has resulted in the largest taxpayer bailout in U.S. history.” This bailout was engineered in cooperation with the Bush administration by Timothy Geithner, then head of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, who was rewarded for his catering to Wall Street avarice by being named Obama’s treasury secretary. With Geithner and Gensler now in charge of reregulating Wall Street as ordered by the Dodd-Frank law, it is no wonder that the lobbyists have been able to stall any significant progress in controlling the ever-threatening time bomb of the still unregulated $600 trillion over-the-counter derivatives market. It was after all Gensler who assured Congress back during the Clinton years that Brooksley Born was an alarmist and that the “OTC derivatives directly and indirectly support higher investment and growth in living standards in the United States and around the world.” No wonder Gensler had no difficulty being confirmed by Senate Republicans and Democrats, who are basically united in giving Wall Street lobbyists the governance they paid for. Of course, the main culpability is with congressional Republicans, who are dead set against any meaningful consumer protection. For that reason, they are likely to oppose the person Obama nominated instead of Warren, former Ohio Attorney General Richard Cordray, who has acted forcefully to defend consumer interests. As David Lazarus, the knowledgeable business columnist for the Los Angeles Times, wrote, “President Obama shouldn’t have backed down” in the face of GOP opposition to Warren, because Republicans will probably also find Cordray unacceptable. The reason being that they don’t want a strong director for the consumer protection agency, or even the agency itself. What remains to be seen is if Obama will play their game or finally take the gloves off. If we should have learned anything in the last decade of financial malfeasance by the banking industry, it is that consumers are in desperate need of protection. If Obama goes to battle for Cordray and he proves to be a strong director for the new agency, I will stand corrected, but the president’s abandonment of the brilliant and dedicated Warren is hardly an auspicious beginning.
Previous item: Rupert Murdoch Doesn’t Eat Humble Pie Next item: Murdoch: The Emperor Has No Clothes New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By Amex, July 20, 2011 at 7:31 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Obummer is a pussy and a traitor. Don’t count on him doing anything to further a progressive agenda. He has sold out his base and hopefully will get primaried by someone such as Elliot Spitzer.
Fuck you Obummer!!!
Report thisBy Jim, July 20, 2011 at 7:07 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
As Shenonymous reasons Warren may well be more effective as Sen. from MA. Will this then be viewed as a strategic stroke of genius by O, providing him yet more cover to sell us out to Lloyd, Jamie and the gang?
Report thisBy Morri Creech, July 20, 2011 at 7:04 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I’m put in mind of Lloyd Blankfein’s claim that he was “doing God’s work.” So was Jesus, but he turned out to be worth only thirty denarii in market value. Those glorified employees—they’re not tycoons, they’re not “capitalists” who take risks with their own money to create anything (American jobs least of all)—work in a service industry. Perhaps they should look to serving others instead of simply serving themselves. Warren understands that, and it is a deeply cynical move on the administration’s part to honor greed at the grave expense of the commonweal by not choosing her. Our leaders should heed William Blake’s warning in “Auguries of Innocence”: “A dog starv’d at his master’s gate / predicts the ruin of the state.” How ominous, then, that millions of men, women, and children find themselves in such dire straits while Wall Street sits idly at the banquet table, gorging on the spoils.
Report thisBy BR549, July 20, 2011 at 6:55 am Link to this comment
The reason we are nearing a default status has nothing to do with either party by itself; it is solely about corruption and a near total lack of managerial capabilities.
Who would we default on? We could refuse to default on Social Security and those currently in the military and intentionally default on the Defense Industry, which I would venture to say would undergo some belt tightening before having to reinvent themselves in the transportation and energy conservation industries. Ultimately, and for some stupid reason, we automatically assume that the banks must always be paid off first. Screw the banks, we don’t owe them a dime. They have manipulated people to think that they can’t survive without currency and yet it just so happens that currency is exactly the vehicle that the banks use to parasitize the rest of the world’s working population.
We need to send home the tens of thousands of troops we are supposedly “training” from other countries.
But no, Obama, as well as all those politicians who have been on the Defense contractor dole will still be pontificating why we need to be at war with the rest of the world and trying to convince us that it’s Social Security that is the problem, or whatever. As far as Social Security, we have been paying into that Intra-governmental slush fund for years, thinking that the account has been balanced and well managed all along.
Politicians have secretly authorizing the construction of bunkers for themselves, paid for with our tax dollars, for some day when they deem it’s OK for the working chattel to be gassed, bombed, fried, or whatever because THEY are so needed to effectively manage the proper functioning of this country. Ever wonder where the hell all those piles of rock debris on the side of the highway going to Denver Intl Airport came from. Putting a new runway out on the plains should have been a normal cut-and-fill operation with even the cuttings for the basement being used. So what are all those piles. They represent a only small part of the billions (trillions) of tax dollars wasted on
secret projects like Agenda 21 behind our backs.
Do the American people owe anything? No. The politicians, who exceeded their oaths of service and the banks they catered to; they can sit on the sideline and fight amongst themselves over who owes whom what. In the meantime, the rest of us have a country to repair.
Report thisBy Shenonymous, July 20, 2011 at 6:24 am Link to this comment
It is conspicuously absurd to say “liberals” are the hidden hand [in]
Report thisthe conservative glove. Some Democrats, and I would agree that too
many apparent Democrats are slavish to the Republican will and
intentions. But liberals do not see them as Democrats. You need
to be more discerning if you are to have any credibility.
By Inherit The Wind, July 20, 2011 at 6:22 am Link to this comment
Why are we surprised that he caved on Elizabeth Warren when it’s clear he’s caving in on the far bigger issue of Republicans threatening to force the US government into default if there aren’t more tax cuts for the rich and benefits cuts for everyone else?
Remember: just last week or the week before Orren Hatch said “The poor must sacrifice” and Obama’s caving in to let Hatch’s commandment become law.
Report thisBy DaveZx3, July 20, 2011 at 5:55 am Link to this comment
Ardee,
I think that ‘dropping out’ is, in its own way, a vote, and is a way of upholding one’s responsibility to his community.
I come to political forums, as well as scientific forums, to learn and to participate.
Airing my views is another way that I believe I am serving my community.
Report thisBy BR549, July 20, 2011 at 5:49 am Link to this comment
PatrickHenry, July 20 at 4:18 am
“Elizabeth Warren is head and shoulders above any other candidate and IMHO a better and more honest broker than most of her seniors. ...... We are less served without her.”
Amen, brother. Some people are criticizing Sheer, here, but he has nailed this issue on the head.
Report thisBy RaySunshine, July 20, 2011 at 5:43 am Link to this comment
The problem with Obama is two-fold: (1) he lacks the background in economics to evaluate for himself the advice he is receiving and the abilities of those he appoints, thereby choosing to rely on “Resumes” (including Mary Shapiro at the SEC), and (2) he views compromise as salutary while the Republicans are intent on a long-view of intransigence to derail the Presidency, be it his or any other not under their control.
Report thisThey did it with Clinton over a mere sexual indiscretion, and they are now doing it using the National Debt as the wedge to “divide & conquor”.
Obama refuses to engage on that same basis! Moreover, he refuses to fight fire with fire, and is leaving the “Power of Definition” to the Republicans. Thus, use of the term “entitlement” when referring to social security and medicare is a misnomer; in truth the term “entitlement” applies to Wall Street and the rich who view themselves “entitled” to keep their monies while using others’ monies to enrich themselves, even to the point of not sharing in the pain of the very policies & practices they espoused during the Bush administration! In addition, their assertion that jobs are created only by the Rich, referring to the rich as “Job Creators” is ludicrous. Even were it true, they never ever use their own funds! They pride themselves on using investor monies, those which come from the middle class, invested in pension plans, insurance companies and investment companies. And, no job is created unless it results in padding their own accounts using the efforts of another! And, they insist on a 40% Internal Rate of Return! That’s why Venture Capitalists and Accredited Investors finance a mere 1% of the deals seeking financing. Thus, it make no sense to not tax the rich; they will still have access to middle class funds to fund their activities!
And, President Obama totally ignores the fact that the mechanisms for the creation of equity capital are broken! We no longer have small brokers regulated by the SEC raising capital for small businesses!!! They are now extinct as regulated by the Big Brokers who control FINRA! Without equity, small businesses are unable to access debt capital. Obama doesn’t understand that basic principle of Finance.
By David J. Cyr, July 20, 2011 at 5:38 am Link to this comment
QUOTE, Robert Scheer:
“What remains to be seen is if Obama will play their game or finally take the gloves off.”
__________________
Scheer’s columns evidence how liberals are either irredeemably evil (Obama), or hopelessly uneducable (Scheer).
Liberals are the hidden hand within the conservative glove.
Republicans and Democrats are codependent… always playing their game together as one, on the same corporate person party team.
Without the support of the progressive liberal Democrats, the regressive conservative Republicans wouldn’t have a fighting fist.
The “Principles” of Liberal Voters:
http://chenangogreens.org/home/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=491&Itemid=1
Report thisBy Anarcissie, July 20, 2011 at 5:16 am Link to this comment
We don’t really know that. In any case, politics—the question of whose will shall prevail in a community—is forced on all members of the community, whether they agree with its structure and its leadership or not. So even the most thorough-going anarchist is involved and might have something to contribute to the collective view of the situation.
In this case, as in so many others, I’m struck by progressives’ continued belief in the possibilities of the existing system which, once again, has been refuted by events. You all faithfully helped elect Democrats to the presidency and Congress, and you have gotten nothing in return. What are you going to do about it, inside the system or out? Wail for another year, and then vote for Obama and his party because the other guys are worse? Or what?
Report thisBy Any Body But Obama in 2012!, July 20, 2011 at 4:59 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Obama loves to hire unqualified and/or corrupt folks.
Check out this high level appointment in the Treasury Department - Lorraine Cole.
This woman knows zip about her job. She never worked in finance and has no academic credentials in the field.
Lorraine Cole
Director, Office of Minority & Women Inclusion U.S. Department of the Treasury
202.927.8181 Office
.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
Contact this waste of taxpayers’ money and see just how unqualified she is.
Any Body But Obama in 2012!
Report thisBy Unconventionalideas, July 20, 2011 at 4:48 am Link to this comment
Exactly.
Until Scheer decides to stop playing the naivete game, I’m not sure thinking readers should give any time to his columns.
Report thisBy ardee, July 20, 2011 at 4:41 am Link to this comment
DaveZx3, July 20 at 4:23 am Link to this comment
Ardee,
At times, I allow my fingers to type without my brain getting in the way. This is for the purpose of reading and learning what my fingers have to say. My brain being weighed down and perverted in its thinking at times by the ignorance of human politics, to the point where it is nice to get an alternative viewpoint.
Well, it worked for Thom Wolfe…..
I liked what my fingers had to say. It was not at all a dismal prophecy or did not contain a germ of hope, as you said.
You are far from the only one disenchanted, depressed even, by our current political situation. But, while you are free to feel any way you choose I again have to wonder why come to a political forum? Societies cannot function without government. Road building, all infrastructure in fact, public education et al may be possible without government if one lives in a small community isolated from all others. It wont work here and now.
If we must have some form of government then we all must be engaged in the struggle to create the best form thereof. You can enjoy the birds and bees, deer too ( yummy), to your hearts content in fact. But know that other will do your duty for you. You apparently fail to understand that you have an obligation to a society that allows you the privilege of living as you do.
Report thisBy Batmagoo, July 20, 2011 at 4:38 am Link to this comment
I want to command DaveZx3 for his post.
Report thisAnd to Ardee: sometimes there is no hope, and rising to optimistic platitudes or endlessly looking for finality, silver linings, or positive closure is a simple game of denial - I think I’ll join Dave and the deer on the porch and have that beer!
By DaveZx3, July 20, 2011 at 4:23 am Link to this comment
Ardee,
At times, I allow my fingers to type without my brain getting in the way. This is for the purpose of reading and learning what my fingers have to say. My brain being weighed down and perverted in its thinking at times by the ignorance of human politics, to the point where it is nice to get an alternative viewpoint.
I liked what my fingers had to say. It was not at all a dismal prophecy or did not contain a germ of hope, as you said.
In fact, I learned that the perpetually needy, must embrace politics, including democracy, but this is actually a character flaw in man, this thinking that he is free to get his way by influencing others, through politics, to become as discontent and needy as he is, and through the democratic process, deny up to 49% of the population their idea of what “the way” should be.
It suddenly struck me that modern politicians have actually fine-tuned the system to where they can expect to deny up to 84% of the population their legitimate idea of what the way should be, as in 84% now believe wars in the middle east are of no use whatsoever, yet, apparently 16% get to overrule them. In this light, I declare that democracy is an delusion.
Further, I saw that the deer in my backyard spend the afternoon lounging in the sun, while I toil away struggling to achieve my goals, and I suddenly saw the whole struggling, achieving, getting, needing thing as totally counterproductive and against nature.
So it was nice therapy, free and peace inducing. I have decided to take the day off and go sit in the backyard with the deer and drink beer, and quit worrying about the pathetic struggles between democrats and republicans, communists and capitalists, liberals and conservatives, etc.
While you saw it as depressing, I saw it as liberating, and that is the difference of perspectives.
And now I feel very comfortable equating voting to an offensive act of depriving another of something he should possibly never be deprived of. It is war without guns, where there has to be a winner and a loser, and the loser may not lose his life, but then again, maybe he will.
I saw that the gain that is expected from voting must be terribly, terribly important the way people whine forever when they lose. Of all the votes which have ever been voted, the poor continue to be with us, so it obviously is not helping them.
One of the joys of freedom is that of thinking outside of the mainstream. Sorry if this is offensive to you.
Report thisBy madisolation, July 20, 2011 at 4:22 am Link to this comment
“What remains to be seen is if Obama will play their game or finally take the gloves off.”
Robert Scheer, the fact you can even write that sentence at this stage of the game shows that you’re oblivious and stupid or you think your readers are.
Report thisBy PatrickHenry, July 20, 2011 at 4:18 am Link to this comment
This is so shameful it makes me shake my head in disgust.
Elizabeth Warren is head and shoulders above any other candidate and IMHO a better and more honest broker than most of her seniors.
We are less served without her.
Report thisBy Shenonymous, July 20, 2011 at 4:17 am Link to this comment
She will run for Senator in Massachusetts and she will win with
our help. She will be much more effective as a senator than the
director of a much needed program, as she will get to vote in
Congress, and you know she will always vote on behalf of the
people, not just the people of Massachusetts but for all Americans.
She is inspiring and incomparable. With no crystal ball seeing the
future, the signs have already started that this will turn out to have
been the best thing not only for Elizabeth Warren but for this country.
While we who hold Elizabeth Warren in the highest esteem are
Report thisdisappointed, the gross reality is that she would have been put through
the Republican grinder and might not have survived the Congressional
advise and consent process. Throwing her into their grotesque grilling
would not have done her any good. We just have to have the resolve to
get her elected.
By Billy Pilgrim, July 20, 2011 at 4:13 am Link to this comment
We can only hope that Ms. Warren becomes the next
Report thisSenator from Massachusetts and then runs for President
and wins in 2016. We should also hope that she is the
real deal and not a fraud as our current President
appears to be; otherwise, we are “Waiting for Godot”.
By C.Curtis.Dillon, July 20, 2011 at 3:37 am Link to this comment
But ardee, he is running away. From his promises, from his supporters ... he constantly runs away. Physically he’s still there but that means little. He’s a coward ... afraid to propose something that might not work. He gave up single payer without even a fight and signaled early his willingness to throw away the public option. He runs away at the slightest push back. There is no fight it him. I can’t imagine him going to the capital and doing a “Johnson”, leaning over another senator while barking out what he wants. He’s never done that and never will. He’s afraid of confrontation ... thus he’s a coward.
Report thisBy indc, July 20, 2011 at 3:17 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Obama is the weakest, most spineless individual to be president in at least a century. He has made his way by pandering to big monied interests and lying that he is more than a lackey.
Re-electing Obama is the worse of all possible outcomes, it will further destroy any credible Democratic party, and almost certainly lead to a republican elected in 2016 who is even further to the right than Obama. This would insure accelerated dismantling of US democracy and anything resembling economic fairness, and with this more oppressive tactics against opposition to this trend. Here is one argument of why, given who Obama really is is vs who he said he was, McCain may have been better in the long run.
http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/guy-t-saperstein/37402/would-america-have-been-better-off-with-president-mccain
Report thisBy Lewis, July 20, 2011 at 3:17 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
..anyone who claims Obama is really in charge and is lacking in some respect is either kidding themselves or others.
Remember what happens to any actual progressive voice with any power (reminder - 2 Kennedys, M.L. King, et al)?
If he is a coward he has every logical reason to be afraid.
Report thisBy Dr Bones, July 20, 2011 at 3:16 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Slogan of 2012 election…Forever the corporate tool.
Report thisBy ardee, July 20, 2011 at 3:13 am Link to this comment
C.Curtis.Dillon, July 20 at 12:06 am
To be a coward one has to run away. Obama is not cowardly, he is demonstrating his allegiance to those who own him and his party lock,stock and barrel.
DaveZx3, July 20 at 2:38 am
Gee, Dave, having a bad day? To say that Democracy is an illusion, and then descend into such a downward spiral causes me to ask ,why then do you come to a political forum?
In a counter to your dismal prophesy, one that contains absolutely not a single germ of hope or direction I offer that Democracy is a participatory political choice. We the people, having been seduced by cheap plastic toys purchased at exorbitant interest rates, having allowed the death of the free press along with investigative journalism, and being almost completely unaware that our governance has been usurped by the power of corporate money are still not without choice or hope.
I believe in the democratic process, and so should you, especially in the void of no other alternative in your bleak and dire post. I further believe that, as conditions worsen, as the people begin to understand that the over one million homes now awaiting foreclosure proceedings to join the already foreclosed million homes, as the job market continues to constrict more and more will understand the poor choices available from the two major parties extant.
As the process you disparage is vibrant and alive it will provide the platform for the electorate to cast votes for the burgeoning third party movement, and especially for the Green Party, as it declares its refusal to accept corporate funds and thus corporate strings. Obama and his cohorts have so aptly shown that acceptance of such leads to Democratic Party puppetry and outright and outrageous obeisance to their masters, much as the GOP has succumbed to the radical tail wagging that dog.
One further comment. If you do not agree that is fine. But if you refuse to offer choice or hope then what is the point? You are the same as those who urge a continuation of the status quo and refuse to consider alternatives in the face of obvious proof of their party’s corruption.
Report thisBy monkeymind, July 20, 2011 at 3:04 am Link to this comment
different story, same thesis.
C-A-P-I-T-A-L-I-S-M
screwed.
ever get the feeling you’re being cheated?
Report thisBy DaveZx3, July 20, 2011 at 2:38 am Link to this comment
By Sanjiv Bhattacharya, July 20 at 12:51 am
This is the problem with democracy. It falters when
most voters are too stupid to vote in their own
interests”.
————————————————————
Or perhaps the stupid ones are actually those who believe that by voting, they can make a difference.
Democracy is an illusion. It does not exist except in the minds of those who overestimate the value of their pathetically short and individually meaningless lives. Who believe that there is some irreversible, progressive evolution taking place, where if you can just struggle enough, as a people, to reach some humanistic goal, that this represents some type of eternal victory.
There are no eternal victories. Everything deemed worthwhile, in the fatally flawed minds of men, is a constant, day to day struggle to maintain the illusion of achievement. And this struggle extracts a huge toll on humanity. It is a struggle not worth undertaking.
Where did man get this desire to achieve or progress?
Certainly the beasts do not achieve or progress. The apes, swing in the trees and pick nits off of each other as they have for thousands of years, without change.
Was man injected at some point with some poisonous substance that made him perpetually discontent and susceptible to the idea that it is worthwhile to struggle without end?
For crying out loud, my dog lives in the same house I live in, and eats the food off of my table. He does not struggle, have any goals, or noticably worry about anything. He is always happy, wagging his tail and appreciative of the attention I give him. And he has never voted a day in his life.
So, who is the stupid one? The one who constantly struggles to gain something, some material thing, or some fleeting goal? Or is it the one who is content to live his life oblivious to the idea that there may be some other beings sharing the earth with him who are perpetually so needy, that they actually consider traveling long distances to kill other beings for the purposes of achieving their pathetic, selfish goals?
The ones who vote for the purpose of electing others who will act as their hero or savior in their eternal struggle are the stupid ones.
It is this getting, achieving, struggling mentality of man which is the problem. It is not observable in nature, and a mystery as to why he has been plagued by it.
Report thisBy drbhelthi, July 20, 2011 at 2:13 am Link to this comment
“If Obama goes to battle for Cordray and he proves to be a strong
director for the new agency, I will stand corrected, but the president’s
abandonment of the brilliant and dedicated Warren is hardly an auspicious
beginning.”
It distresses me greatly to read the articles of intelligent journalists,
who continue to hold to the naivete´, that supported their vote for the
Kenyan, Barack H. Obama, puppet of the Rockefeller-Rothschild tax-exempt
foundations, who govern the democrat party.
Applying the wisdom of the original inhabitants of what is now the
American continents, immediately dispells such naivete´: “What you do
speaks so loud, I cannot hear what you say.”
That some people continue to believe that the Kenyan, Obama, was
Report thisinstalled to be constructive instead of destructive, is incredible.
By Bill, July 20, 2011 at 1:35 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Obama will go down as the president who started the destruction of SS and MEDICARE. i expected this from a rep. but not a dem. GUTLESS I will not vote in 2012
Report thisBy Mark Lindley, July 20, 2011 at 1:33 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Such a clear account - thank you!
Report thisBy Sanjiv Bhattacharya, July 20, 2011 at 12:54 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
If we haven’t learned our lessons about Obama by now, surely his performance with this debt ceiling should have helped. He essentially volunteered to do what Bush could only fantasize about — to shred the safety net, sell out the elderly and the handicapped and turn America into Africa where flies crawl into the mouths of dying orphan babies and nobody cares.
Obama’s negotiating style is to brag that he’s
“getting things done” as he drops his pants and bends over for his “colleagues in the House”. This time he told us, things would be different. This time he would ask for lube. Meanwhile Eric Cantor’s telling the world: “Lube is off the table. Astroglide is a job-killer which America can’t afford at this time.”
But of course he is the president that we deserve.
America is burning and yet the people eagerly fan the flames. To hear Speaker Boner talk about how “the American people spoke clearly in the midterms…” So what? Why are we listening to the American People? They’re idiots.
This is the problem with democracy. It falters when most voters are too stupid to vote in their own interests. For decades now ordinary Americans have been voting to impoverish themselves for the benefit of millionaires. Salt-of-the-earth poor folk all over this fair land look in the mirror and see a rich person, the way anorexics look in the mirror and see a fat person. Except anorexics know they’re dying (they hate themselves) whereas these idiots, the Republican base, are oblivious (they love themselves). All they know for sure is that they are the bestest people in America and America is the bestest country in the whole world. That and the fact that President Obama is a Muslim from Africa.
America is a dinosaur groaning and lurching in its
final throes, an ungainly small-brained reptile at
the end of its era. Too ignorant to understand its
plight, and too supine to object in any case.
The brilliant Mr Scheer and Mr Krugman and Mr Rich
and so many others reach only their audiences, those who read and weep at their helplessness. What we need is an age of protest. Rhetoric with fire and anger. No conciliation, no gentlemanly conduct. Only rage and burning. Ignite these fools before they tie the rope around their own stupid necks.
sanjivb dot com
Report thisBy Sanjiv Bhattacharya, July 20, 2011 at 12:51 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
If we haven’t learned our lessons about Obama by now,
surely his performance with this debt ceiling should
have helped. He essentially volunteered to do what
Bush could only fantasize about — to shred the safety
net, sell out the elderly and the handicapped and
turn America into Africa where flies crawl into the
mouths of dying orphan babies and nobody cares.
Obama’s negotiating style is to brag that he’s
“getting things done” as he drops his pants and bends
over for his “colleagues in the House”. This time he
told us, things would be different. This time he
would ask for lube. Meanwhile Eric Cantor’s telling
the world: “Lube is off the table. Astroglide is a
job-killer which America can’t afford at this time.”
But of course he is the president that we deserve.
America is burning and yet the people eagerly fan the
flames. To hear Speaker Boner talk about how “the
American people spoke clearly in the midterms…” So
what? Why are we listening to the American People?
They’re idiots.
This is the problem with democracy. It falters when
most voters are too stupid to vote in their own
interests. For decades now ordinary Americans have
been voting to impoverish themselves for the benefit
of millionaires. Salt-of-the-earth poor folk all over
this fair land look in the mirror and see a rich
person, the way anorexics look in the mirror and see
a fat person. Except anorexics know they’re dying
(they hate themselves) whereas these idiots, the
Republican base, are oblivious (they love
themselves). All they know for sure is that they are
the bestest people in America and America is the
bestest country in the whole world. That and the fact
that President Obama is a Muslim from Africa.
America is a dinosaur groaning and lurching in its
final throes, an ungainly small-brained reptile at
the end of its era. Too ignorant to understand its
plight, and too supine to object in any case.
The brilliant Mr Scheer and Mr Krugman and Mr Rich
and so many others reach only their audiences, those
who read and weep at their private helplessness. What
we need is an age of protest. Rhetoric with fire and
anger. No conciliation, no gentlemanly conduct. But
rage and burning. Ignite these fools before they tie
the rope around their own stupid necks.
http://sanjivb.com/
Report thisBy C.Curtis.Dillon, July 20, 2011 at 12:06 am Link to this comment
Obama is a coward!
Report thisPage 3 of 3 pages < 1 2 3