|
|
May 25, 2013
|
|
Scary Primary ResultsPosted on Sep 15, 2010By Ruth Marcus Partisan Democrats are delighted about Christine O’Donnell’s Republican primary victory over Rep. Mike Castle in the race for the open Delaware Senate seat. I’m despondent. From the Democratic point of view, the defeat of the moderate, well-known Castle turns what had looked to be a lost cause into a likely win. Keeping the seat in Democratic hands could be the margin of control in the Senate. So the folks who focus on electing Democrats and keeping a Democratic majority can’t be blamed for breaking out the champagne over O’Donnell’s win. Not me, for two reasons. First, I had thought the silver lining of this election year might be to produce a Senate with a more robust cadre of moderate Republicans. That caucus has pretty much dwindled to the two senators from Maine, with very occasional company from colleagues such as Massachusetts Sen. Scott Brown and departing Ohio Sen. George Voinovich. It’s awfully hard for a caucus of two to break with the party. Advertisement Now, it’s as plausible to envision a bolstered Jim DeMint caucus, following the disturbingly powerful junior senator from South Carolina: Sharron Angle (Nev.), Rand Paul (Ky.), Ken Buck (Colo.)—plus the two other incumbent-slayers of the primary season, Mike Lee in Utah and Joe Miller in Alaska. Scary. But not as scary as reason No. 2: the ripple effect of victories such as O’Donnell’s on other Republican lawmakers. Republican members of Congress look at races such as those in Utah, Alaska and now Delaware and think: There but for the grace of the tea party go I. They will be that much more watchful of protecting their right flank against a primary challenge. They will be that much less likely to take a political risk in the direction of bipartisanship. In this sense, it matters less whether O’Donnell will win the general election—that doesn’t seem likely—than that she won the primary. The Delaware result might be good news for both tea partyers and Democrats. It is not good news for the cause of good government. Ruth Marcus’ e-mail address is marcusr(at symbol)washpost.com. © 2010, Washington Post Writers Group Previous item: The Strange Death of Moderate Republicanism Next item: Will Big Tobacco’s Former Bagman Really Be the Next Speaker? New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By montymarket, September 19, 2010 at 10:13 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Why not have a witch in the Senate? Witches need representation, too. And a repub witch at that! Double double toil and trouble, fire burn and cauldron bubble. But seriously, since Catherine O’Donnell declared that she was previously involved in a coven of witches worshipping beezelbub and all that, we should give the tea party a chance and vote for the devil worshipper.
Report thisBy IchliebeSie, September 19, 2010 at 5:29 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Unfortunately, I think you underestimate the Tea Party and its potential in taking over the USA Ms. Marcus. I think you are also overly naive to believe that the USA society as a whole are not jumping on the Tea Party bandwagon. In my opinion, the wary ones of this so-called “Tea Party” still believe that they are not a threat to our society. They will be. Believe that Ms. Marcus. Just because the Tea Party are misinformed and misled does not mean they lack potential and ability to run the USA government as they see it - to its overall social detriment too.
Yes, there are parallels with the Tea Party and the very early stages of the Nazi Party. I bet all of you would like a few examples (since most believe here that there are not any parallels). Yes?
Here they are:
1) The origins of both of these parties were a social response to the economic downturn of the respective society. 2) Both held up nationalism and xenophobia as virtues. 3) Both cited and blamed certain religions, ethnic groups, even other countries, as a reason for their problems - in addition to a bad economy. All these factors instilled FEAR among the populace that a possible takeover of the nation by certain religious and ethnic groups would happen should these new parties not be elected. 4) Both used propaganda quite effectively on the populace; although, in my opinion the Nazis were much more skilled at using propaganda than Fox News is.
In principle, and perhaps my own bias, I have to give credit to the Nazi use of propaganda at least for the fact there was a tiny amount of truth in it. Conversely, Fox News is propaganda based on COMPLETE lie, COMPLETE bias, and COMPLETE distortion of the historical narrative. In fact, there is ZERO truth reported on Fox News. Unfortunately, too many USA citizens believe Fox News tells them the truth. Otherwise, the Tea Party would not be so powerful. Please correct me if I am wrong: did Fox News create the Tea Party?
On a more minor note, I do predict that, like the Nazis did, the Tea Party will create work for Americans. That would be an advantage for its people I am sure. Of course, by Americans I mean USA citizens ONLY. No one else may apply.
The Tea Party control of the USA concerns me much more than any possible USA version of Sharia Law made there.
Report thisBy samosamo, September 17, 2010 at 6:07 pm Link to this comment
****************
Even as all these tea partyers seem to be knocking out the
incumbent republicans and some democrats, it is interesting to
consider that this is what those ‘leaders’ of the of the facade of 2
parties want because it is reported that the senator from alaska
who lost the primary to a tea partier has decided to run on a
‘write in’ which the repubs still insist on support the tea partyier.
Says way more than I would like to hear or know as it is
tantamount to them wanting those tea partyers to win and gain
office because they know once those lobbyyists start pushing
through the doors of those newly elected tea people with all
them bribery dollars, any sense of ‘taking their government back’
will quickly become just part of who was before in that office,
gone.
Those tea partyers made be adamant about their current cause
Report thisbut money will soon quell that.
By tedmurphy41, September 17, 2010 at 7:52 am Link to this comment
For these Democrats to glory in the Republican’s discomfort shows a complete lack of progressive policies in their own ranks and an absolute failure to offer the American public, experienced, competent candidates who are able to understand and deal with the ongoing problems that are currently confounding the recovery within the USA.
Report thisBy Jimnp72, September 16, 2010 at 7:42 pm Link to this comment
oh well these are the same morons who eat dead animals and think nothing of it
Report thisso what do you expect
By Tesla, September 16, 2010 at 6:40 pm Link to this comment
I for one will not assume that the anti-incumbent and
Report thisanti-government mood will not turn out dim-o-crats that
failed their mandate and not reward s**tbag teaparty
candidates. Our current government model is beyond
broken and is not salvageable because the corporations
are the republicrats.
By Anarcissie, September 16, 2010 at 9:38 am Link to this comment
ITW—At this point I don’t see a Hitler type on the stage or in the wings.
Report thisBy The Joke's On Us, September 16, 2010 at 8:17 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I can easily see this cracking open of the champagne turning into a horrific backfire. Just look at what’s happened over the last year and then tell me this country isn’t capable of voting these scary people in. Massachusetts voted in a Republican senator. Rick Scott is leading in the polls in Florida - the proud recipient of the largest Medicare fraud fine in history. Carly Fiorina leading in California…a person who’s biggest claim to fame is outsourcing tens of thousands of jobs overseas.
Two out of three of these states are historically blue; and even Florida went for Obama in 2008. So no, I wouldn’t be surprised a bit if Delaware voted in Christine O’Donnell.
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, September 16, 2010 at 3:59 am Link to this comment
If the Teaparty victories cost the GOP their chance at taking over the House and even the Senate, and, better still allow the Dems to maintain similar majorities going into the future, then the GOP will be forced to do another 1964 evaluation. If, however, they win smashing victories in the fall, History will record this as America’s 1933: when Democracy voted itself out of existence in favor of fanatical reactionaryism, that led to the most infamous dictatorship in memory.
Report thisBy PatrickHenry, September 16, 2010 at 3:25 am Link to this comment
We need to vote out all encumbents, Democrat and Republican.
Many of these fossils are overdue for retirement anyway.
Report thisBy FiftyGigs, September 15, 2010 at 5:57 pm Link to this comment
“It is not good news for the cause of good government.”
Assuming Republicans are in the government. There is no law requiring them to be, and we control whether they are or not.
PUNISH REPUBLICANS.
Vote Democrat.
Report thisBy taikan, September 15, 2010 at 5:32 pm Link to this comment
There is another reason for Marcus to be despondent about O’Donnell’s primary victory. The electorate’s anger at “establishment” politicians is so great at the moment that it is entirely plausible that O’Donnell, along with Angle, Paul, Buck et al., may be elected. If so, then we will have a Congress with a sizable contingent of Senators, along with some Representatives, who don’t believe in government.
Report thisBy gstoddard, September 15, 2010 at 3:17 pm Link to this comment
“It is not good news for the cause of good government.”
Hasn’t this cause been lost long ago? We have a political class whose primary
motivation is being elected and then staying in office as long as possible, the
needs of the nation be damned. We have an electorate that is becoming less
well informed each day as the world becomes more complex and our role in it
more difficult. We are losing the ability to rationally protect our own national
interest.
As a consequence our political system (a misnomer) has not been as
dysfunctional as it is now in my seven decades of life. Too many of our political
leaders are unable to talk with their counterparts in the other party about the
issues while being mutually respectful, and there are those in the electorate
who want only their way without any compromise. Politics is the art of
compromise and compromise is seen s weakness.
The politics of anger, blame, and narcissism is grinding our nation into the
ground at a time when other nations are emerging and growing their
economies. Arianna Huffington makes a compelling case for changes that are
within our power to make in her new book “Third World America.”
At my age, I am in the protected class with a comfortable income and access to
Report thishealth care so I am reasonably secure for the rest of my lifetime, but I worry
about the world that my grandchildren are growing up into.