LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
May 27, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     robert scheer     barack obama     gay marriage     chris hedges     ndaa
Most Read

Say 'Hi-Ho!' as They Strip-Search You

TED: 'A Money-Soaked Orgy of Self-Congratulatory Futurism'

I Can't Hear Myself Think

A Rare Admission That Money Trumps Everything Else

Children Slaughtered in Government Attack on Syrian Town

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Why Bain Questions Matter
OSHA Struggles When Tower Climbers Die

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Better Than We Found It
The Good-Natured Dictator

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Reports

Sarah Palin, Neocon Messiah

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Mar 30, 2010
Sarah Palin
AP / Jae C. Hong

Sarah Palin speaks at the “Showdown in Searchlight” tea party rally in Searchlight, Nev., on Saturday.

By Robert Scheer

Judge them by their enemies. More evidence that Barack Obama might be shaping up as a good president is that Norman Podhoretz hates him so much. In a Wall Street Journal column Monday the guru of the neoconservatives declared: “I would rather be ruled by the Tea Party than by the Democratic Party, and I would rather have Sarah Palin sitting in the Oval Office than Barack Obama.”

I know that does not properly address all of the serious questions raised about the Obama presidency by progressives, myself included, and as of today we must now add offshore oil drilling to the list. But it is somewhat reassuring that the surviving father of the neocon movement should be left so totally unglued. He is joined in this embrace of the Palin rage by Bill Kristol, whose late father, Irving, was Podhoretz’s comrade in the long march from the far left to the far right. That shift brought the neoconservatives to the pinnacle of power in the Bush administration before they flamed out over the distortions of fact and logic they peddled as justification for the invasion of Iraq.

Among other things—and this was particularly important for Podhoretz, who for 35 years had edited Commentary, a leading journal in the Jewish community—the elimination of Saddam Hussein was supposed to leave Israel more secure. Instead, just the opposite has occurred as a consequence of the vastly increased power of Iran in the region thanks to the elimination of its most feared local adversary. Any effort to contain the power of Iran has been compromised by the leading role of the disciples of the Iranian ayatollahs in the politics of Iraq.

Obama had opposed that war, but he has certainly done his bit to carry on the Bush policy and has furthered it in Afghanistan as well. There is no sign of Obama abandoning those failed adventures, and his fitful efforts to contain Iran while negotiating a much needed settlement of the Israel-Palestine conflict are quite consistent with those of previous administrations. Indeed, the U.S. policy agenda for the region seems to be set by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who, as her warm reception at the recent AIPAC conference indicates, has long been regarded as a fervent friend of Israel.

Indeed, from health care, the banking bailout and on to Mideast peace, it is difficult to find a single policy proposal from Obama that Bill and Hillary Clinton had not both previously embraced. So why the particularly strident animus toward Obama? The answer lies in that fear so common to the tea party core—that Obama is a false prophet leading the good God-fearing folk astray. Since Podhoretz claims to be writing out of the Jewish tradition he does not embrace the possibility of Obama being the Antichrist, but his language is as descriptively bizarre.

Advertisement

In a WSJ article from last September headlined “Why Are Jews Liberals?” which is also the title of his latest book, Podhoretz complained bitterly, “One of the most extraordinary features of Barack Obama’s victory over John McCain was his capture of 78% of the Jewish vote.” What followed was a self-hating tirade against his own: “Jews are by far the most liberal of any group in America.” In support of that view he quotes the sociologist Nathan Glazer, who argued that Jews, as opposed to any other immigrant group in America, have ignored their improving economic status and instead consistently supported “increased government spending, expanded benefits to the poor and lower classes, greater regulations on business, and the power of organized labor.”

What a great testament to the enduring decency of Jewish values that they have proved so capable of embracing social goals that transcend narrow class interest. What a wonderful refutation of historical anti-Semitism that Jews so consistently ignore personal economic gain to serve the larger good. Not so in the eyes of Podhoretz, who was immensely disappointed that the commitment of Jews to those enlightened views did not dissipate with the nomination of Obama but rather increased somewhat.

He bemoans the fact that the vast majority of Jews did not share his fear that Obama was too liberal or anti-Israel, but instead of chalking that up to an honest disagreement he invokes the language of the devil’s deception: “I am hoping against hope that the exposure of Mr. Obama as a false messiah will at last open the eyes of my fellow Jews to the correlative falsity of the political creed he so perfectly personifies and to which they have for so long been so misguidedly loyal.”

So what does that make Sarah Palin—the true messiah?

Click here to check out Robert Scheer’s new book,
“The Great American Stickup: How Reagan Republicans and Clinton Democrats Enriched Wall Street While Mugging Main Street.”


Keep up with Robert Scheer’s latest columns, interviews, tour dates and more at www.truthdig.com/robert_scheer.



Get truth delivered to
your inbox every week.

Previous item: Here We WMD Again: Iraq and the Mythical Pakistani Package

Next item: Voyeurism and Sexual Intimidation Have No Place in Business



New and Improved Comments

We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.

In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.

Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.

Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.

Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.

By robert puglia, March 31, 2010 at 9:03 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

i’d rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal
lobotomy. neoconman pariah.

Report this

By AlwaysAskWHY, March 31, 2010 at 8:56 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Sarah Palin is just BUSH IN DRAG:

* Uninformed
* Incurious
* Inarticulate
* Greedy
* Corrupt
* Opportunistic and Exploitative
* Indifferent to human suffering and human life
* Uneducated (can happen, even WITH a degree)
* Publicity Whore (will say or do anything for it),
* SHAMELESS
* PATHOLOGICAL LIAR

Report this

By christian96, March 31, 2010 at 8:54 am Link to this comment

Gordy—-I am on disability and presently writing a
book for teenagers which relates how the Bible relates to their lives.  I am a member of The Rotary
Club to provide community service and considering
re-joining Big Brothers to assist boys without
fathers.  I may not join at this time because I don’t
want to stretch my time to the point it influences
my health.  How do you serve your community?

Report this

By Mcoyote, March 31, 2010 at 8:50 am Link to this comment

The Tea Party is a distraction.

The Tea Party/Teabaggers is not really a movement, but rather a relatively small number of right-wing extremists who have been used by the Democrats as a scapegoat for their own hypocrisies.

It’s an Astroturf movement by such figures like Dick Armey and other Republican and conservative lobbyists who are manufacturing right-wing dissent to distract from the real left-wing dissent that is ignored by the media.

Think about it; what better way of getting the right-wing fascist message out there than giving it media exposure? And indeed, that is what we have.

If you follow the media narrative in America, there is no left-wing dissent. There is only right-wing dissent. This simultaneously legitimatizes the right-wing narrative and gives justification for the Obama administration to crack down on ANY dissent-because a handful of right-wing fanatics are given media exposure.

The point is to get liberals to react, and it keeps working again and again.

No tea bagger or Limbaugh or Fox news nonsense can stand up to a strong left wing narrative for even a minute. How any of us could ever lose a debate with those talking points, or be frustrated or worry about it is a mystery to me.

The worry is the potential for violence from the right wing media, it is not the “ideas” they present that are the worry. Those ideas only have traction because so many are chicken shit scared to be real leftists, for fear of being too radical or something, because they are too weak and confused and cowardly.

Teabaggers et al, are moving into the vacuum created by this timidity and confusion and playing on liberal/progressive identification with the Democrats.

The reason people like Fox news, Glen Beck etc. is because it is entertaining and because they can pick up talking points that will drive liberals crazy. For the ruling class agenda to be advanced, it requires BOTH the right wing media AND the predictable liberal reaction.

That said, it is dangerous. We contribute to the danger by taking it so seriously (the “opinions,” not the pandering to bigotry and hatred - that needs to be taken very seriously) and reacting so predictably.

What better way to “legitimize” the center-right policies of the Obama administration than to contrast them to the full-blown, ultra-right insanity of Sarah Palin-like Teabaggery.

Democrats are using the tea baggers’ antics as a tool to stifle dissent from the Left. How dare we criticize Obama when doing so is to be on the same side as the tea baggers? Obama apologists won’t even listen to any argument from the Left against Obama’s policies, they automatically categorize it in the same category as the crap being spewed by tea baggers.

The tea bagger thing serves the purpose of making sure the intellectual liberals get all worked up about Palin et al and are therefore estranged from and irrelevant to the general public. It works like a charm, every time, to decapitate the working class.

Modern liberalism is occupying the space where the Left should be, confusing and misleading people, steering people away from accurate perceptions and clouding their minds, preventing them from asking the right questions because they think they already have the answers. That is dead wood that needs clearing. If we are willing to kick over the beehive of modern liberalism you will see the true face and the true nature of the ruling class war against the people with crystal clarity. As it is, we can’t even see the enemy now. We are looking out the tent flap watching for the approach of those dreaded right wingers, and the enemy is behind us right in our own tent.

Report this

By Shift, March 31, 2010 at 8:43 am Link to this comment

Clearly Obama has joined the elite political class.  The economic elites are being well served by him.  If we view elitism as a class that cannot be prosecuted for their crimes; and, cannot lose money on their investments, then it becomes clear that both Democrats and Republicans are complicit.  Put simply the people are being ignored.  The People are gently lied to then viciously undercut with legislation masked to appear favorable but by design harms the People.  The consistent passage of anti-people legislation has led to political reaction such as the Tea Party.  Today both parties serve corporate America, not the people.  The metaphor that I use to describe this reality is:  The Eagle cannot fly with two right wings!

Report this

By maheanuu, March 31, 2010 at 8:42 am Link to this comment

““The devil will not get me with sex, food, power or money.  What’s he got left?  Nothing! “”

What devil are you talking about?  The only devil is see is in the details.  I am seeing nothing but ignorance and superstition in your comments.  Can you prove any of the so called miracles or even the Christ in your bible?  What about the Christ that led very much an identical life in Egypt 2000 years before your christ appeared.  The legend continues, even in modern times, there is still stone age thought and reasoning.  I would hope that humans might grow out of the superstitious past and advance themselves out of ignorance, but as long as there are so very many people out there who only wish to rest at a point just above knuckle draggers this will not be possible.  Religion has been the bane of development in the world, and in fact has killed more people than any other ideas…  Prove to me that there is a “God” and I will believe, until then it is Science and Proof that rule my life.

Just this old Chief’s 2¢

Report this

By omop, March 31, 2010 at 8:27 am Link to this comment

Mr. Scheer’s Sarah Palin, Neocon Messiah combines certain Jewish beliefs with an
individual that best represents a “cut and paste” oddity of a politician.

  In the very essence of their soul Jews believe that: 1) We are always innocent –
and lets be honest now, 2) Jewish lives are more valuable than those of others. Is
that not basically the West’s way of dealing with Africans, Asians and the non
Judeo-Christian world?

  And the proof of the pudding lies in the coming of the Messiah who its
guaranteed will be a male and of the faith. The Podhoretz’s, Kristols and like
minded people must be quite desperate to align themselves with SP. The
suggestion that they are is most welcome to all decent thinking Americans.

Report this

By mlb, March 31, 2010 at 7:51 am Link to this comment

Again and again the Democratic Party moves to the right, and every time, instead of responding in a bipartisan spirit the Republicans move even further to the right and attack the Democrats all the more ferociously.  Obama and the Democratic Party leadership have perhaps misunderstood.  The GOP isn’t all that interested in policy, and governance just isn’t what they’re al about. They want power.  If the Democrats were to produce nothing but legislation straight from Republican heaven (they’re already pretty close as it is) the Republicans would revile them for it.

So I think the hatred towards Obama from the GOP would be there no matter what Obama did.  If it’s even more intense than it might otherwise be it isn’t because Obama’s too progressive but just the opposite.  It’s because he’s too right wing and encroaching on GOP territory. 

The Antichrist Obama crowd are the reliable Republican base, the multitude of ninnies who can be manipulated into believing anything.  The recent poll showing that 2/3rds of Republicans think Obama is a socialist when the truth is he’s using the economic downturn as an excuse to make an unprecedented Democratic attack on social programs is ample demonstration of that.  The rank and file Obama haters hate because they’re encouraged to and in many cases because they’re racists. 

Sarah Palin reveals the mind of the typical Republican voter every time she opens her idiot “Isn’t it great to be free” mouth and spouts dishonest and embarrassingly childish rhetoric to cheering crowds.  She and her fellow tawdry panderers shore up their base but in so doing also prove that most Republican voters are incapable of responsibly taking part in a democracy.

And to propose an answer Podhoretz’ question about why Jews are “liberal” (though I think he probably understands the answer but just can’t handle it),  couldn’t it be that having been so badly mistreated themselves historically, Jews in general, as opposed to the rabid Zionists, tend to be sympathetic to the downtrodden and hence lean toward the left?

Report this

By Beltwaylaid, March 31, 2010 at 7:49 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Mrssiah

Your political strategy will play out perfectly if you
can get the remaining 2/3 of the populace to agree to
radical lobotomies so they will all be on your level of
thinking.

Report this

By gerard, March 31, 2010 at 7:27 am Link to this comment

Don’t worry, Robert.  Almost nobody could understand sentences like that last one anyway.  The correlative falsity of their political creed which they so perfectly personify and to which they have for so long been so misguidedly loyal denies them the ability to separate a complex-compound subject worse confounded from an over-modified verb with a convoluted adverbial insertion.  Wheweee!  Ain’t English wonderful?

Report this

By Gordy, March 31, 2010 at 7:21 am Link to this comment

Christian96, which association are you with and in what
setting do you deliver your services?

Report this

By christian96, March 31, 2010 at 6:50 am Link to this comment

Gordy—-If you believe the devil is a metaphor, he
already has a good hold on your mind.  It’s pretty
obvious by the rest of your comments.  I didn’t run
from her literally.  However, if you were familiar
with the Bible you would know the story of Joseph.
Joseph was the youngest of 12 sons who was betrayed
by his brothers but eventually made it to Egypt and
through much trial, tribulation and SELF-CONTROL was
elevated to a high position in Egypt.  His superior’s
wife tried to seduce him.  Joseph literally ran from
her after she ask him for sex.  She held onto his
coat as he fled.  Then, as the devil has done through
people for years, she lied.  She told her husband
Joseph tried to seduce her.  Then, she presented
Joseph’s coat as proof.  Her husband had Joseph put
in prison for an extended period of time.  In conclusion, your feeble attempt at psychoanalysis
leaves much to be desired.  Beside being a Christian
I am also a Counseling Psychologist.  I suggest you
study the Bible to learn more about spiritual matters.  Without that knowledge you are manipulated
by evil spirits like a puppet.

Report this

By balkas, March 31, 2010 at 6:43 am Link to this comment

Wife and i own our house 100%; thus, rule it 100%. The 2% of americans who own 98% of it, rule it 100%. The reason the twopercenters rule america 100% instead of 98% [give or take a few pennies]is because they are fiercely interdependent.

The 98%ers, are extreme independent-dependencies; i.e., very disorganized; so, their 2% of the rule disappears completely.
So, all that is left of their rule is like the grin of the cat with its waggingly-taunting tail that strutted by u.

Report this

By Kropotkin, March 31, 2010 at 6:32 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Gubernatorial candidate Palin was in Wasilla in 2006 to get the blessings of a lunatic preacher from Kenya, she smiling as he warned of the need to take power from “the Israelites.”  I wonder what Podhoretz would think about that?  It’s still on YouTube, I believe.

She is Ms. Whitebread, personified. Her husband is part Yup’ik Eskimo, about 1/8th or 1/16th, and she used that drop of Native blood in a laughable attempt to establish her post-racial creds. In fact as Governor she has referred to Inupiat Eskimos as “Arctic Arabs,” called Obama “Sambo,” and, while in her early 20s, let a light-skinned African American who was passing that she didn’t “do black guys.”

Report this
Sabagio's avatar

By Sabagio, March 31, 2010 at 6:07 am Link to this comment

Sara Palin as the leader of the American People? Neocon? This is a woman who reminds me of the old WWI song “Howya Gonna Keep um down on the farm, after they’ve seen Pareee.” As VP candidate for the GOP she came across as one whose insights were as a Parochial a native New Yorker and reveled in her ignorance of issues. But she was wined and dined and dressed by the GOP leadership and what happened? She believes that she is a political phenom, a major player on the national political stage, an independent thinker who can convince the rest of us the righteousness of her cause by just trusting her, no questions asked. Maybe, someday? Nah. For me this is a woman who got a brief taste of political power at the Republican trough and wants more, more, just more. And the GOP leadership wants
to give it to her, despite the fact she took the money from Fox News bailing after two years in office on the Alaskans who elected her governor.
Now a desperate old man, John McCain, wants a Last Hurrah on the national stage, and fearing he won’t get it, brings her back to prop him up, literally and figuratively, in hopes he can be re-elected to the Senate and die in office. I find that…selfish in every sense of the word. Cynical .  Ingenuous.  New Mexico voter deserve better. And the American don’t deserve Sara Palin, no way. Surely the GOP can do better in selecting their leadership for the next decade.

Sabagio Mauraeno, drinking coffee on a bright sunny cloudless day in Decatur, Georgia

Report this

By The Old Hooligan, March 31, 2010 at 6:01 am Link to this comment

I’m still waiting for Palin to show up in that ‘Ex-Governors Gone Wild’ video. Or, maybe one of these days she’ll show up in an ‘Ex-Presidents Gone Wild’ video.

“How’s that Hopey-Changey thing workin’ out for ya?” Palin asked recently. One helluva lot better than your hilariously failed gig as the Governor of Alaska, Sarah. Thanks for asking.

Report this

By suds mcduff, March 31, 2010 at 5:40 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

“A few months ago
a female neighbor informed me she liked to give and
receive oral sex.  I turned and ran as fast as I
could.”

——You wouldn’t happen to have her number, would you?

Report this

By Marc Schlee, March 31, 2010 at 5:26 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

This whole “Sarah Palin” article was a trojan horse for more Jewish pissing and moaning.

FREE AMERICA

REVOLUTIONARY (DIRECT) DEMOCRACY

Report this

By moses, March 31, 2010 at 5:20 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

In one graph from the street (or water), Surfnow says basically the same thing Chris Hedges says in his long brilliant cautionary tale.

Report this

By balkas, March 31, 2010 at 4:55 am Link to this comment

Presidents come and go but presidency-congress-judiciary stays ab the same.
The system of rule may yaw from time to time slightly left or right but lust to obtain more land and denial of some basic rights to own people stays the same.

And all presidents in a classroom are either good while presiding or become good eventually!
Every president must a fortiori be good if the system is good; of which presidency, judiciary, media,congress ar ejust parts.

So if any part of it is bad, it makes also the constitution bad; since it sets up laws under which the branches of governance function.

And which allows or even demands a prez do ‘bad’ things; i.e., in the eyes of some people but never in the eyes of the constitution or laws.

Exception to this rule was nixon who had been deposed by the system but for trivial reasons and not for killing s,e. asians.
Both truman for killing japanese and nixon for killing other asians were actually good boys.tnx

Report this

By Gordy, March 31, 2010 at 4:46 am Link to this comment

christian96, the Devil is a metaphor - there’s not
really an evil demon who tried to tempt you with sexy
ladies.  Maybe you turned down a good time for no
reason. 

You - perhaps - showed tolerance towards her by
agreeing to accompany her to dinner; she certainly
showed tolerance towards you after you ran from her
like a lunatic. 

What’s the point of running from the woman?  The
desire for the woman is ‘the problem’ and that is
inside you, either latent, waiting for a woman to
appear, or active during fantasy.  If you are into
mastering yourself and actually succeeding at it then
you should be able to be around objects of
‘temptation’ without being perturbed.  Did Jesus run
like a maniac from any sexy woman?  I doubt it. 

You know, maybe that woman just sensed exactly what
you need the most.

Report this

By christian96, March 31, 2010 at 4:01 am Link to this comment

Could Sarah Palin be THE ANTICHRIST?  Somebody is sure setting her up with a lot of attention for some
reason.  Seems like she always has an American flag
behind her picture.  That’s a little scary considering the covert activities of our government
for years.  Don’t forget.  The devil started out by
deceiving a woman and down through the ages pulled
down many powerful men through women. King David was
the apple of the eye of God.  Don’t you think the
devil would go after the apple of God’s eye.  He did.
Got him with a woman.  Don’t you think Bathsheba
knew David would be watching when she got naked?
John the Baptist lost his head over the hate and
deception of King Herod’s wife.  A few months ago
a female neighbor informed me she liked to give and
receive oral sex.  I turned and ran as fast as I
could.  Last week she and another female neighbor
ask me to go to dinner.  While we were waiting on our
food they calmly ask, “What astrological sign are you?”  I calmly replied, “I was born under the Christian sign.”  I’m not a woman-hater.  In fact,
I love women.  I’m just very very familiar with the
tactics of the devil.  Jesus told us our enemy is
not flesh and blood but spiritual.  The devil will
not get me with sex, food, power or money.  What’s
he got left?  Nothing!

Report this
Mike789's avatar

By Mike789, March 31, 2010 at 4:00 am Link to this comment

Seems to me the Jews have a history of sticking together for a common cause. They’re not disuaded from gaining advantage through a collective effort. Why do so many Americans buy into the “socialist” rhetoric when it could be more accurately described as an “American common cause” for better prices? We never even got close to that paradigm with healthcare. (Corporatisms tactics of divide, dumb-down and conquer has succeeded very well.)

Report this

By surfnow, March 31, 2010 at 3:11 am Link to this comment

I have for some time been predicting that Sarah Palin will be the next president. Despite Obama’s so-called ” success” with healthcare reform, it won’t take long for most Americans to see what a joke it really is- especially Progressives who will see absolutely nothing to cheer about in it. As the economy crumbles even more the reactionary movement on the right will solidify further, and Democrats and BIg Government will take the blame. Christie’s win in NJ and Scott’s in Mass. was only the beginning, the midterms will be a decided Republican slam across the board and Obama will be a virtual lame duck by early 2011.

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, March 31, 2010 at 3:03 am Link to this comment

Don’t forget, Mundt, according to your own scripture your Messiah was a Jew from the House of David, a rabbi, following Jewish Law, and offering a more merciful interpretation of that Law.

Scheer writes one of his better columns here. What’s interesting about Podhoretz and Kristol is that DESPITE the clear evidence that the fall of Saddam Hussein was bad for Israeli security, they cling to the fiction that it was a good thing.

He does, however, to make his point, a couple of key factors:
1) Obama inherited situations in both Iraq and Afghanistan that had no good solutions. Bush & Co had managed to f*** things up in all kinds of creative ways (and these are supposed to be the guys who faked the WTC attacks?) They were clearly The Gang That Couldn’t Shoot Straight (especially Cheney). I’m not sure I agree with Obama’s policies but at least he’s using his brain and trying to find the safest path through the Dead Marshes.
2) Scheer more blatantly ignores the fact that both Sec. Clinton and VP Biden were seriously embarrassed by the Rightest Israeli government and are FURIOUS about that. They and Obama are looking for ways to get Netanyahu to back down.  In this I must agree with those I usually disagree with here: Obama needs to use heavy economic pressure on Israel, even cancel joint military actions and training (if any are planned), and use the might of the USA.

But overall, Scheer is right. I thought Bush the least educated and least intellectually curious President since Harding. He’s not actually dumb, but lazy and unable to deal with opposing views.  But Palin is SO ignorant, irrational and demagogic—and clearly incompetent she reminds me of the warning:
If you think something’s fool-proof, you just haven’t found a big enough fool!

Report this

By Mundt, March 31, 2010 at 2:10 am Link to this comment

No, the true Messiah was crucified for being outspoken, contrary the lamestream dogma of His day, and a perceived threat to elite establishment types…Oh, wait…

Report this

By dsmith, March 31, 2010 at 1:43 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Sarah Palin would be Silly Putty in the neocons hands. They know that if Palin is elected president, perish the thought, that President Palin was advised to bomb Iran, her only question would be, “Secretary of State Kristol call Tel Aviv and ask…should I use nuclear or conventional warheads?”

Report this

Page 2 of 2 pages  <  1 2

Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.