Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
June 19, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     nsa     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Reporter Who Brought Down the 'Runaway General' Dead at 33

The Terror Con

Nate Silver vs. Politico: It's on Again

The Making of a Global Security State

IRS Conspiracy Theory Debunked, Rand Paul Answers Cheney Criticism, and More

Most Comments
Most Emailed

 * NEW! * Greenland’s Great Melt Is Pinned On Climate Change
The Making of a Global Security State



The Unwinding


Truthdig Bazaar
In Katrina’s Wake: Portraits of Loss From an Unnatural Disaster

In Katrina’s Wake: Portraits of Loss From an Unnatural Disaster

By Susan Zakin (Author), Bill McKibben (Author), Chris Jordan (Photographer)

more items

 
Reports

Santorum Needs Gingrich in the Race

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Mar 15, 2012

By Eugene Robinson

If Rick Santorum wants to keep Mitt Romney from wrapping up the Republican nomination before the convention, he should encourage Newt Gingrich to stay in the race, not drop out.

Not everyone buys this theory, I admit. The doubters include Santorum—who keeps shoving Newt toward the exit—as well as quite a few leading conservatives, including Family Research Council head Tony Perkins and influential blogger Erick Erickson. They want to see a two-man contest between a “Massachusetts moderate” and a dyed-in-the-wool conservative.

I think they should be careful what they wish for. The “throw Newt from the train” people think the math is on their side, but it isn’t.

It’s true that from the primaries and caucuses held so far, we know that the Romney vote is much smaller than the anti-Romney vote. In Ohio, for example, Romney managed a slim victory with 38 percent versus Santorum’s 37 percent. But Gingrich, meanwhile, drew nearly 15 percent. Add those voters to Santorum’s, and Romney would have suffered a shattering defeat.

Santorum and Gingrich are both campaigning on the premise that Romney is not a genuine conservative. Both candidates draw support from self-described “very conservative” Republicans. Since Gingrich—who supposedly had a “Southern strategy” for winning the nomination—couldn’t even beat Santorum in Alabama and Mississippi, it’s clear who would have the better chance against Romney, mano a mano. Ergo, Newt, hasta la vista.

Advertisement

But this logic ignores the subtleties of the delegate math. Sorry to inflict a flurry of numbers, but here goes: To win the nomination, a candidate needs the support of 1,144 convention delegates. According to projections from The Associated Press, at this point Romney has 481 delegates, Santorum has 252, Gingrich has 128, and Ron Paul has 48.

By the AP’s count, 1,356 delegates remain up for grabs in the remaining primaries and caucuses. That’s right, we haven’t even reached the halfway point of this seemingly endless slog to the convention in Tampa.

Both Santorum and Gingrich say their goal is to keep Romney from reaching the magic number of 1,144 before the convention. After the first ballot, they would count on being able to persuade Romney’s delegates to abandon him in favor of a more authentic conservative.

This is a smart strategy, because—as the Romney campaign loves to point out—it is almost inconceivable that Santorum or Gingrich could win the nomination any other way. Santorum would have to win roughly two-thirds of all the delegates at stake in the remaining contests to secure the nomination before the convention. Gingrich would have to win even more. Not gonna happen.

Romney needs to win just half the remaining delegates. But that’s still no cakewalk, even with Romney’s vastly superior resources and organization.

The headline from Tuesday’s contests was that Santorum won in Alabama and Mississippi. But since delegates there and in most other GOP contests are awarded proportionally—and since there were also contests in Hawaii and American Samoa, where Santorum and Gingrich didn’t really compete—Romney ended the night having won 43 delegates, more than any other candidate.

But Santorum won 36 delegates and Gingrich won 24—meaning that while Romney increased his lead over the others, he fell short of winning half the delegates that were available. If he continues “winning” the delegate race at Tuesday’s pace, he will fail to wrap up the nomination before the convention.

What if Gingrich dropped out? It’s reasonable to assume that much of his support would go to Santorum, but not all of it.

My interpretation of what we’ve learned from exit polling so far is that Santorum’s voters tend to doubt Romney’s steadfastness on social issues, while Gingrich’s supporters tend to doubt that Romney is a true small-government conservative. That’s an oversimplification, but I think it’s basically correct.

Gingrich voters who put less emphasis on social issues—or who doubt Santorum’s commitment to small-government principles—might well turn to Romney instead. Given the Romney campaign’s deep pockets, Santorum would face a blistering barrage of negative ads in every state. Legitimate questions about Santorum’s electability would be raised nonstop.

The Romney campaign is built for this kind of multi-theater battle. Santorum’s comparatively underfunded campaign is not. The most favorable field of battle for the anti-Romney insurgency would be a contested convention—and the most plausible way of getting there is for Gingrich to stay in the race and help keep Romney’s delegate count short of 1,144.


Eugene Robinson’s email address is eugenerobinson(at)washpost.com.
   
© 2012, Washington Post Writers Group


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

oddsox's avatar

By oddsox, March 19, 2012 at 8:22 pm Link to this comment

Marian, Griffith, you write:
“the candidate with the biggest PAC budget is going to win the elections.”

That would mean Romney gets the Repub nomination and Obama wins in November. 
That’s where the smart money is right now, but the smart money also knows November is a long way off.

Santorum, Gingrich and Paul supporters have argued they are still in the race in spite of the money because of their message(s).
This is standard fare for underfunded candidates, we may even hear it from “poor ol’ Romney” this fall, though it wouldn’t resonate well coming from him.

“The more targets Romney’s tarring machine has the less effective it will be at destroying an opponent.”

I’ve often wondered about this as a Republican strategy to dilute MSM criticism during the past few years. 
Remember just 6 months ago how many TruthDiggers still feared a run by Sarah Palin?  Then Trump, Bachmann, Perry, etc. etc. etc.

But all that’s history and so is Romney’s “tarring” of fellow Repubs.
The drama may be kept alive a while longer for the benefit of the MSM and to keep focus away from the Economy, but the issue has been settled:  Romney will be the Repub nominee.
Romney has already begun putting less focus on other Repubs more on Obama.
He’ll try for Rubio for VP, but won’t get him. 
Doubt he’ll wind up with Newt or Santorum either. Romney won’t want them, what states can they deliver to him that he wouldn’t get anyway? 
My wild-hair guesses would be Susana Martinez or Brian Sandoval, governors of N.Mexico and Nevada, respectively. 
These are just guesses, who do you think?

“Robinson’s preferences for an Obama re-election ...may sway him to prefer Santorum over Romney, but it does not alter the essential analysis.”

What Robinson’s preference of for an Obama re-election alters is whether he writes this column (or his next) in the first place.

Report this

By Marian Griffith, March 19, 2012 at 4:24 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

@Oddsox

Whether or not it is good for Romney/Santorum/Obama if Gingrich drops out of the race really depends, as mr.Robinson writes, what percentage of the Gingrich voters prefer Santorum over Romney.
The second question, which sadly is not much of a question anymore, is how much impact the relentless barrage of toxic adds is having on the voters. This impact has been shown, repeatedly, to be huge. Meaning that the candidate with the biggest PAC budget is going to win the elections, simply because too many voters publicly decry them but privately are swayed to doubt by them.
The more targets Romney’s tarring machine has the less effective it will be at destroying an opponent. If Gingrich leaves all that money can be thrown at painting Santorum blacker (in the black=evil sense) than Obama and Romney can present himself to the doubting republican voters as the reasonable alternative. If those doubters can switch between Santorum and Gingrich that tactic is not going to be as effective.

So the question of how this hypothetical Gingrich dropping out of the race or not will play out really depends on how many of his supporters will choose Santorum over Romney and how easily the ‘Not Mitt Romney’ crowd will switch between Santorum and Gingrich (if he does remain in the race) in the face of increasingly filthy campaigning and campaign adds.

Robinson’s preferences for an Obama re-election is immaterial in this. It may sway him to prefer Santorum over Romney, but it does not alter the essential analysis.

Report this
oddsox's avatar

By oddsox, March 16, 2012 at 11:42 am Link to this comment

From now until the election, begin with this premise:
Robinson wants Obama re-elected.
All his columns are written with that end in mind.

If you want Obama to win in November as Robinson does, there are 2 subtexts at work here:

1) The preference for Santorum as Obama’s opponent. 
Santorum offers rich soil for personal attacks, as we’ve seen from various TruthDig posters:  homophobe, religious zealot, warmonger and chauvanist are just a samples.
But personal attacks are a given no matter who the Repubs pick,—with Santorum there are added bonuses: 
—the question of his recent experience vs. Obama’s(he’s 3 years older than Obama but doesn’t seem so—and though Santorum served 2 terms in the House before his 2 full terms as US Senator, it seems like ancient history.  All this before 2007)
—his recent electoral track record.  Blown out by 18 points last time he ran for office (2006)
—Rick’s underfunded compared to other Repubs, who in turn, will have less $$ than Obama when the focus turns to the general election.

2) More than other Repubs, Santorum gets sucked into the vortex of social issues. 
Any of the 4 remaining Repub candidates have a chance vs. Obama one-on-one if they focus on Jobs and the Economy, but Santorum has shown himself to be the most easily distracted. 

Here’s what’s interesting about this column:
EJ Dionne starts from the same premise, but comes to to the opposite conclusion.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/post/the-dixie-primaries-and-the-2-percent-solution/2012/03/13/gIQAvzFb9R_blog.html

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.