|
|
May 23, 2013
|
|
Romney Meets ‘Peasants With Pitchforks’Posted on Mar 14, 2012Political revolutions leave chaos in their wake. Republicans cannot shut down their presidential nominating contest because the party is in the midst of an upheaval wrought by the growing dominance of its right wing, its unresolved attitudes toward George W. Bush’s presidency, and the terror the GOP rank and file has stirred among the more moderately conservative politicians who once ran things. When Pat Buchanan ran for president in the 1990s, the conservative commentator lovingly referred to his partisans as “peasants with pitchforks.” The pitchfork brigade now enjoys more power in Republican politics than even Buchanan thought possible. Mitt Romney is still the Republican front-runner by virtue of the delegates he relentlessly piles up. But Romney keeps failing to bring this slugfest to a close. No matter how much he panders and grovels to the party’s right, its supporters will never see him as one of their own. One senses that the conservative ultras are resigned to having to vote for Romney in November against President Obama. They are determined not to vote for him twice, using the primaries to give voice to their hearts and their guts. They will keep signaling their refusal to surrender to the Romney machine with its torrent of nasty advertisements and its continuing education courses in delegate math designed to prove that resistance is futile. The more they are told this, the more they want to resist. Advertisement Santorum’s purity as a social and religious conservative is unrivaled, and his traditional family life—he’s always surrounded on primary nights by a passel of kids—contrasts nicely with Newt Gingrich’s rather messy personal history. It is no accident that while Gingrich narrowly carried the ballots of men in Tuesday’s Alabama and Mississippi primaries, he was routed among Republican women who were decisive in Santorum’s twin triumphs. It was the conservative version of the personal being the political. And while Republicans shout to the heavens against class warfare, they are as affected as anyone by the old Jacksonian mistrust of the privileged whose football knowledge comes not from experience or ESPN but from their friendship with the owners of NFL franchises. In Mississippi and Alabama, Romney again prevailed among those with postgraduate educations and incomes of over $100,000 a year. He was defeated by those with less money and fewer years in school. The revolt of the right-wing masses means that Romney stands alone as the less than ideal representative of a relatively restrained brand of conservatism. The growing might of the conservative hard core, reflected in its primary victories in 2010, led other potential establishmentarians to sit out the race in the hope that the storm will eventually pass. But having decided to run, Romney must wage a campaign of denial. He buries his old Massachusetts self and misleads about what he once believed. He even tries to run to Santorum’s right. Recently, he denounced Santorum for voting in favor of federal support for Planned Parenthood, a group to which Romney’s family once made a donation. It is an unseemly spectacle. Bush’s efforts to craft a “compassionate conservatism” friendlier toward those in the political middle collapsed into ruins years ago. This year’s Republican candidates almost never speak Bush’s name. It is to Santorum’s discredit that he did not dare defend his perfectly defensible vote in favor of Bush’s No Child Left Behind education program. Santorum, too, fears the pitchforks wielded by those who see any exertion of federal authority as leading down a road to serfdom. And so it is on to Illinois, the next place Romney has to win to keep the resistance at bay. The Land of Lincoln would be a fine setting for a stand in favor of a more measured form of conservatism. But it won’t happen. Romney is anxious about the power of the Republican right in downstate Illinois—the very region that opposed Honest Abe in his celebrated Senate race 154 years ago. Once again, Romney will take the moderates for granted, ignoring the last remnants of the old Lincoln party as he chases after an elusive right. And once again, Santorum’s battle cry will challenge conservatives to have the courage to complete the revolution they started the day Barack Obama took office. E.J. Dionne’s e-mail address is ejdionne(at)washpost.com. Previous item: Youth in Revolt: The Plague of State-Sponsored Violence Next item: What Are We Doing in Afghanistan? New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By Korky Day, March 15, 2012 at 10:59 am Link to this comment
Shameful of the article to ignore candidate Ron Paul.
Report thisHe’s the only prominent presidential peace candidate in either Duopolistic party.
He has the most, by far, of peasants with pitchforks (and serving soldiers).
(By the way, you might want to vote in my fun poll for his vice-presidential pick:
http://www.demochoice.org/dcballot.php?poll=PaulVP2012 ).
I’m a Green but I hope Ron Paul wins the Republican nomination to start to break down the Duopoly’s dictatorial rule.
By sciencehighway, March 15, 2012 at 9:00 am Link to this comment
@Unconventionalideas: It matters for one reason only: The next president will most likely be required to either affirm or alter the balance of power on the Supreme Court - the bench upon which (as the last dozen years have dismally demonstrated) true political power resides. Please keep such lofty decisions as Bush v. Gore and Citizens United in mind when voting this fall.
Report thisBy balkas, March 15, 2012 at 8:21 am Link to this comment
stir the pot, but same stew comes out. dionne thinks. seems, one can
Report thiselucidate what is happening and been in US for the last 4 centuries by
‘explaining’, romney, buchanan. santorum, et al.
can one imagine, send s’mone [say me] on a mission to explain obama
knowing he was not only in politics but also in law—and to make
matters more clazy, in US politics/law!!!
that much punishement i’d never take on no matter what u’d pay me for
the effort! thanks
By bigchin, March 15, 2012 at 7:25 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
blah blah blah, the GOP… blah blah blah
yeah, well… Obama is the president, has been for 3+ years and all the shit that has gone down on his watch went down on his watch, with much complicity, indeed, eager, strutting complicity (how do you spell c-o-m-p-r-o-m-i-s-e, E.J.?)
Obama, our murderer-in-chief, is a fraud. http://www.truth-out.org/why-president-obama-keeping-journalist-prison-yemen/1331746908
The Democratic Party is a fraud.
Vote progressive third party candidates.
Dionne is a propagandist for the corrupt and craven Democrats
Report thisBy Unconventionalideas, March 15, 2012 at 4:22 am Link to this comment
Remind me again why it makes a difference which candidate from the corporate elite party consisting of the Republican and Democrat wings, gets elected as president of the United States?
Report this