LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 19, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Rise Up or Die

The Lotto Symbolizes the False Promises of Barracuda Capitalism

Truthdigger of the Week: Sen. Angus King

Obama Unscathed by Scandals, Mayor Denies Smoking Crack, and More

'SNL': Stefon's Farewell Features Anderson Cooper

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * Rise Up or Die

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Act of Congress
Daily Rituals
The Girls of Atomic City

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar
Los Angeles: City of Dreams

Los Angeles: City of Dreams

By Bill Boyarsky
$12.15

more items

 
Reports

Romney and the South Carolina Conundrum

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Nov 2, 2011

By E.J. Dionne, Jr.

COLUMBIA, S.C.—Can Mitt Romney be dislodged as the fragile but disciplined front-runner for the Republican presidential nomination? If he can, South Carolina is the best bet for the role of spoiler.

Republican primary voters here have historically ratified establishment choices, but the old establishment has been displaced by new forms of conservative political activism, the tea party being only the latest band of rebels.

South Carolina conservatives also seem representative of their peers around the country in being uncertain and more than a trifle confused about the choices they have been handed. They are skeptical of Romney, disappointed by Rick Perry’s early performance, were enchanted by Herman Cain—a spell that may soon be broken—and are not sure what to make of the rest of the field.

All this, paradoxically, gives hope to the non-Romneys in the contest, including Perry but also former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman, who was campaigning in the state this week. Huntsman, given his low standing in the national polls, has a surprising number of high-powered supporters here. His strategy is to startle with a strong showing in the New Hampshire primary Jan. 10 and then pivot to South Carolina, which votes Jan. 21. This seems unlikely, but not crazy.

“I have never seen a Republican primary as wide open at this stage as this primary is,” said Bob McAlister, a Huntsman supporter who served as chief of staff to former Gov. Carroll Campbell. “That gives plenty of room to an unknown candidate, so that gives hope to Huntsman and, to be honest, to some of the other lesser-knowns.” 

Advertisement

The candidate who absolutely needs to win here is Perry. It’s no accident that he announced his candidacy in Charleston. Brad Warthen, a popular South Carolina blogger (and a friend from his days as editorial page editor of The State newspaper) thought at the time that Perry’s August announcement speech was pitch-perfect for the state’s conservatives in its passionately anti-government and anti-Washington tone, delivered in the city where the Civil War began. The primary and, indeed, the nomination seemed within Perry’s grasp.

And then he did a remarkable job of kicking it away. Rep. Mick Mulvaney, a rising conservative star in Congress and a staunch Perry supporter who helped craft his flat tax proposal, was frank in describing Perry’s early debate performances as “extraordinarily poor.” But given Perry’s underlying conservative strength, Mulvaney sees him as having ample time to rebuild and win back supporters who parked themselves with Cain.

It is a sign of how much Cain has been hurt by his handling of sexual harassment allegations that supporters of rival candidates were carefully silent about the news of the last few days. Cain is undermining himself and needs no help from anyone else.

Mulvaney thinks Cain’s “9-9-9 tax plan” was key to his emergence because voters liked “the fact that he’s at least made an attempt of offering specifics.” But Warthen notes that there is no “emotional attachment” to Cain, which makes him especially vulnerable to a quick bursting of his bubble.

In the meantime, Romney looms over the race, still unable to manage a surge despite the missteps of his opponents. “He seems capped out at 20-something,” said former Gov. Mark Sanford, referring to Romney’s standing in the polls. “There’s been a philosophical angst within the Republican Party electorate about Romney, for whatever reason.” Romney’s health care plan in Massachusetts remains a major obstacle, and charges of flip-flopping have taken hold.

The front-runner path is less promising than it used to be for another reason. Will Folks, the sometimes controversial former Sanford aide who writes the state’s most popular political blog, argues that “the old structure of South Carolina Republican politics has been overturned,” putting new forces into play. Religious conservatives, who are central to Perry’s strategy, are still important, but Folks sees another group as potentially pivotal: voters who are relative social moderates but hold conservative views on taxing and spending issues. They will be Huntsman’s targets, and Perry and Romney need them, too.

And just to complicate things further, Sanford detects “a little bit of a ... bump” here for former House Speaker Newt Gingrich.

Warthen still believes South Carolina could revert to form and support Romney as the most plausible nominee. But in perhaps no other state do the many conflicting and frequently obstreperous strains of conservatism come together—and collide. For Romney, the skilled management consultant, this will be his toughest assignment.

E.J. Dionne’s e-mail address is ejdionne(at)washpost.com.
   
© 2011, Washington Post Writers Group


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By Dieter Heymann, November 6, 2011 at 5:43 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Since when has Mr. Dionne been an adviser to Herman Cain?

Report this
Blueokie's avatar

By Blueokie, November 3, 2011 at 5:27 pm Link to this comment

The Republicans are split into three camps that matter; the Rovian Oligarchs
(Romney), the Koch Brothers Tea Baggers (Cain), and the Know Nothing Tea
Baggers (Perry, for now).  The protean Paul does not fit those categories and is
therefore ignored by the MSM (corporate media), in spite of any success or grass
roots support.  To the Republican party he is a Model-T compared to a Chrysler
3000, a quaint reminder of their origins, but left behind by the modern inheritors
of the philosophy of the deeply mentally ill Ayn Rand.  Romney, a Mormon,  has no
chance with those remnants of the Confederacy, otherwise known as the South
Carolina rank and file Republican voter.  Unless, of course, he has a spontaneous
conversion while visiting Bob Jones University.  And with Romney, you just never
know where he will stand tomorrow.

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, November 3, 2011 at 1:13 pm Link to this comment

Perry will win in that racist red-neck bastion of Republicanism. All it took for George W. Bush to win after losing to McCain in New Hampshire was push-pollers calling voters and say “Would you vote for McCain knowing he has an illegitimate ‘colored’ daughter?”  Worked like a charm…and it’s true, sort of.  Cindy and John McCain’s adopted daughter, Bridget, was born in Bengla Desh, has very, VERY dark skin, and was born out of wedlock.  Of course, Bush’s team wanted the red-neck’s to think that McCain had knocked up a Black woman and this was the result (Ironically, Strom Thurmond did exactly that—paying for and taking care of, but never acknowledged HIS Black daughter.)

So Perry is a shoe-in for SC. He’s just the kind of loose racist/non-racist they go for.  Dumb enough, too.

Report this
morongobill's avatar

By morongobill, November 3, 2011 at 12:09 pm Link to this comment

Yes very peculiar indeed, the bias against Ron Paul, which would persist right up to the bitter end, regardless of how well he might do.

Report this

By Bill, November 3, 2011 at 7:51 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

This is an interesting article. Interesting for one reason: NOT ONE TIME did the author even MENTION the candidate who is currently in third place in SC, and who is quickly rising with a good chance to finish first: Ron Paul. Hmmmm, why would the author so blatantly ignore a top-tier candidate? Like I said: Interesting, since a CNN/Time poll released last week shows Ron Paul polling third in the key early voting states of Iowa, New Hampshire AND SOUTH CAROLINA: http://ti.me/s4BzpL

Report this
Billy Pilgrim's avatar

By Billy Pilgrim, November 3, 2011 at 5:47 am Link to this comment

One more year of this political nonsense. Let the
circus continue. As P.T. Barnum once said…

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.