LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
May 27, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     robert scheer     barack obama     gay marriage     ndaa     chris hedges
Most Read

Say 'Hi-Ho!' as They Strip-Search You

TED: 'A Money-Soaked Orgy of Self-Congratulatory Futurism'

I Can't Hear Myself Think

A Rare Admission That Money Trumps Everything Else

Children Slaughtered in Government Attack on Syrian Town

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Why Bain Questions Matter
OSHA Struggles When Tower Climbers Die

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Better Than We Found It
The Good-Natured Dictator

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar
The Bases of Empire

The Bases of Empire

By Catherine Lutz
$17.28

more items

 
Reports

Romney and the Art of Unpredictable Predictability

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Dec 29, 2011
Gage Skidmore (CC-BY-SA)

By E.J. Dionne, Jr.

MANCHESTER, N.H.—No matter what happens in Iowa, Mitt Romney has a safety net in New Hampshire.

And that could rank as the year’s most perilous sentence. Why shouldn’t Romney be surprised in the state that temporarily derailed Barack Obama’s supposedly rapid march toward nomination four years ago? Hillary Clinton humbled many a pundit here in 2008, reason enough to challenge the rapidly jelling conventional wisdom about the Republican presidential campaign.

In just a few weeks, Romney has been transformed from an embattled and weak front-runner into the real thing. He has a chance of winning the Iowa caucuses on Jan. 3 as his dazed opponents scratch at each other trying to emerge as the leading non-Romney. Libertarian Ron Paul, who will never be nominated, now looks to be Romney’s main competition in Iowa. Paul is doing a fine job as Romney’s blocking back, preventing anyone else from emerging early enough to give Romney a stiff race.

The key to wrapping up a nomination quickly has always been an Iowa-New Hampshire one-two punch, and the Granite State, which votes on Jan. 10, seems to be a Romney fortress. Romney’s headquarters here on Elm Street was bustling with activity on Tuesday night, as if Iowa didn’t matter. Leaving nothing to chance, Romney made campaign stops that day in Londonderry and Portsmouth before he left for his final Iowa push. If Iowa is Romney’s venture capital, New Hampshire is his nest egg.

“I don’t see anyone challenging Romney for the win,” said Fergus Cullen, the former New Hampshire state Republican chairman, referring to his state. “Second place,” he adds, “is still wide open,” a consolation only if Romney heads toward the GOP’s Southern contests weaker than he looks now.

Advertisement

Steve Duprey, the Republican national committeeman who, like Cullen, is neutral (though Susan Duprey, his politically influential wife, is a close adviser to Romney’s wife Ann), sees Romney and Paul as having the strongest New Hampshire organizations—precisely what Iowa Republicans say about ground strength in their state. By contrast, he says, Newt Gingrich has little going on organizationally—his headquarters down the street from Romney’s was a quiet enclave on Tuesday—and is depending almost entirely on enthusiastic support from the Manchester Union Leader, the state’s legendary conservative daily. One of the mysteries of the contest is how the Union Leader might pivot if Gingrich stumbles in Iowa.

Former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman has “a great professional organization,” Steve Duprey said, but also a core problem: “He started running as a moderate and now he’s saying he’s a conservative. That’s confusing.” Indeed, Huntsman, who is skipping Iowa, now wants to become the conservative alternative to Romney and Gingrich. Hoping that repetition is persuasive, Huntsman’s television and print ads here tout him as “a conservative hero in this race,” “more conservative than Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney combined,” and the author of “the most conservative” program. Pulling together moderate independents and dissatisfied conservatives is the magic Huntsman is betting on.

If everything seems to be going Romney’s way, here is a word of caution from an unexpected source. Former Gov. John Sununu is one of Romney’s staunchest supporters in the state, but also a tested veteran of many a New Hampshire primary. “People have to understand that primary races are extremely volatile because all the candidates are expressing more or less the same philosophy,” this professor of realpolitik explained to me. “So primary races are often won or lost by nuances or small mistakes.” One of Sununu’s greatest political triumphs came in 1988, when he helped engineer a turn in the primary’s last days away from Bob Dole and toward his candidate, George H.W. Bush, with an eleventh-hour ad attacking Dole for “straddling” on taxes.

So what could possibly upend Romney? There are two debates scheduled for the weekend before the voting here. They present Romney with an opportunity to wrap things up—and a minefield of potential troubles. Or Iowa could anoint a new conservative alternative to Romney: A Rick Santorum surge or a Rick Perry comeback could create a new one-on-one dynamic here. Or Romney could simply fall far short of what are now soaring expectations in Iowa.

Still, what’s most astounding is that a Republican contest characterized all year by melodrama and comedy now seems headed toward the most conventional and predictable conclusion possible. It’s hard to believe things will really end this way. The biggest upset would be no upset at all.


E.J. Dionne’s e-mail address is ejdionne(at)washpost.com.
   
© 2011, Washington Post Writers Group


New and Improved Comments

We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.

In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.

Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.

Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.

Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.

By cmstombach, January 3 at 7:52 pm Link to this comment

Mitt Romney self professed that he is a Mormon which raises several issues. Brigham Young settled UTAH to start HIS OWN EMPIRE “Deseret” but was unsuccessful. Ever since then to the present, Mormons to include Mitt Romney have had an antithesis toward the US Government which is based on the Constitution. Additionally, as a Mormon who gives his “Testimony” at which time all state “I know this is the TRUE church, I know Joseph Smith is the TRUE prophet”. No doubt Mitt Romney makes these statements today. Additionally, the LDS church’s premise is that Joseph Smith was told by an angel that all churches were wrong. Moreover Joseph Smith who wrote the Book of Mormon was a bigot. Look at the scriptures (http://christiandefense.org/mor_black.htm) (“But let them apostatize, and they will become gray-haired, wrinkled, and black, just like the Devil” (Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses, vol. 5, p. 332) that Mitt Romney as a Mormon believes THIS IS A BIBLE!
In my opinion Mitt Romney is a bigot through his LDS (Mormon) religion and comments he made about Obama:
Having an antithisis to the US government makes Mitt ANTI-AMERICAN.
And he may become President? Charles Manson would be a better choice!!

Report this
drbhelthi's avatar

By drbhelthi, December 29, 2011 at 12:54 pm Link to this comment

@DBM
” - - and so the “Leader of the Free World” will remain a creature of the banks and
multinationals that fund them all.”

As if Romney were not one of their pimps - - !
Yes.  Although over fifty-five years late, it isn’t too late to take seriously the information
reported by congressman Norman Dodd of the Reese Committee, 1954.  The tax-exempt
foundations, such as the Ford Foundation and the Carnegie Endowment, have operated
since 1945, to assist the NewWorldOrder to overtake the USA and western world. 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iAmZFBkWNpo&feature=related

Also in 1945, the NAZIs in the US began to move their HQ from Berlin to D.C.  and other
southern states, and pulled off the first iteration of Operation Paper Clip.  Which two
hundred, initial NAZI scientists were developed into what is now NASA.  GHWBushSr, of
the NAZI Bush family, was one of the first to talk about a “New World Order” in a public
speech.  We see in NDAA 2011 an advancement of Naziism that was initiated by the
GHWBushSr entourage.
http://video.google.de/videoplay?docid=8252175042329977626#

Report this

By DBM, December 29, 2011 at 7:03 am Link to this comment

Yawn!  Being the least idiotic of a pack of idiots is faint praise indeed.  This will be true of whoever comes out of the Republican Primary.

This person, despite being well-funded and carrying the unshakeable Republicans, will then get mowed down by the certainly not idiotic Obama ... and so the “Leader of the Free World” will remain a creature of the banks and multinationals that fund them all.

Report this
Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.