|
|
May 20, 2013
|
|
Republican Reality Show Gets Weirder and WeirderPosted on Dec 8, 2011I guess I was wrong. I thought Republicans surely would have come to their senses by now. Instead, they seem to be rushing deeper into madness. With less than a month to go before the Iowa caucuses, Mitt Romney, the candidate shown by polls to have the best chance of defeating President Obama, evidently remains unacceptable to most of his party. He has spent the summer and fall playing second fiddle to a series of unconvincing “front-runners” who fade into the shadows once their shortcomings become obvious. The latest is Newt Gingrich, a man with more baggage than Louis Vuitton—and the taste for fine jewelry of Louis XIV, judging by his Tiffany’s bill. Be honest: Is there anybody out there who believes Gingrich would make it through a general election campaign against Obama without self-destructing? I didn’t think so. Far from settling down, the Republican contest keeps getting wackier. I can think of no better illustration than the fact that a Dec. 27 candidates’ debate—the last before voting actually begins with the Iowa caucuses—will be moderated by Donald Trump. Romney, Ron Paul, Rick Perry and Jon Huntsman have had the dignity and good judgment to decline participation in what is likely to be an embarrassment for all involved, except Trump, who lives in a world beyond shame. Paul’s campaign noted that the planned event would create an “unwanted, circus-like atmosphere” that is “beneath the office of the presidency.” Advertisement “I’m surprised that Mitt Romney said no,” Trump told MSNBC. “Frankly, I’m surprised, because he really wants my endorsement. I mean, he wants it very badly.” Really? Before associating themselves too closely with Trump, I’d suggest all the candidates look at a Fox News poll from September. While 10 percent of Republicans surveyed said they would be more likely to vote for a candidate if he or she were endorsed by Trump, nearly twice as many—18 percent—said Trump’s backing would make them less likely to vote for the candidate. And that’s nothing compared to the potential impact in the general election against Obama. Among all voters, the Fox poll found, only 6 percent said a Trump endorsement would make them more likely to vote for the endorsee, while a stunning 31 percent said they would be less likely to do so. That’s quite an achievement for the helmet-haired host of “The Apprentice.” It’s hard to think of anyone else this side of Guantanamo whose backing could turn off nearly one-third of the U.S. voting population. Doesn’t bother Gingrich, though. He seems to see participation as a matter of courage. “I think if you’re afraid to debate with Donald Trump,” he said, “people are going to say, ‘So you want me to believe you can debate Barack Obama but you’re afraid to show up with Donald Trump?’” Gingrich thus casts his lot with the likes of Sarah Palin, who claims that if she were running for president, she’d definitely take part in the Trump debate. She says the encounter will be “a positive thing” because Trump “will be able to attract a diverse demographic that maybe has not been as interested in this horse race thus far.” But since we know from the Fox poll that much of the audience is likely to find the spectacle repellent, I suspect Palin is just showing solidarity with Trump. Reality-show stars gotta stick together. Do you suppose Trump will ask Gingrich about the ethics violations he committed while he was speaker of the House, or the $300,000 penalty fine he had to pay? Do you think he’ll press Gingrich on the lucrative lobbying-by-another-name he’s been doing on behalf of clients such as the government-supported mortgage giant Freddie Mac? Do you imagine he’ll read Gingrich his Dickensian quotes about child labor laws and ask him to explain which jobs are suitable for urchins and which are not? No, no and no. This show can have only one star, and we already know who it is. No matter which candidates show up, Donald Trump’s debate will be about Donald Trump. I’m betting that at some point during the event, Trump will actually utter the phrase “You’re fired.” And from the direction of the White House, you’ll hear the sound of high-fives.
New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By Krahn, December 12, 2011 at 6:43 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
The primaries are not about votes, they are about
money, especially this early. That’s why New
Hampshire and Iowa are so important. Not because
they give you lots of votes, but because they show
you are viable and can get you lots of money. You’ve
got a couple months to get votes, and a full year for
the general election.
Any first year political science student should know
it’s far easier to get money from small special
interest groups than by appealing to the majority.
the bigger the group the less they will invest. The
why, if not obvious is too long to explain in a
comment, but it is almost always true.
The fringe is exactly who needs to be appealed to at
this point in the game. The gamble is how extreme
you can go but still be forgettable in the end. Sure
in a poll people will say their less likely to vote.
Come general election time though Trump’s endorsement
won’t even rate on the top 20 issues for 99% of the
people.
Gingrich and Santorum are making a calculated risk,
that will probably pay off in spades.
The real shame is a political writer for the Washing
Report thisPost would have to know all this, It’s fundamental.
The only reason not to even hint at it in the article
is because you don’t care about informing people of
the truth, only swaying opinion.
By Rixar13, December 12, 2011 at 5:32 am Link to this comment
“Gingrich, apparently lacking dignity and good judgment, will eagerly participate.”
Report thisFamily values….?
By guysorow, December 10, 2011 at 2:33 pm Link to this comment
Ole Robie you always knock it out the park. Repubs and Trump. Freak show
Report thisis too kind.
By Maani, December 9, 2011 at 9:03 pm Link to this comment
“President Obama has been a pretty good repub president so far, but, not to fear, his lefty marxist self will reemerge after his next coronation, er, swearing in as POTUS.”
Methinks your history is a bit skewed. It was George W. Bush who was “coronated” by SCOTUS. (And remember that Scalia refused to recuse himself despite the fact that his son was one of Bush’s attorneys…)
Obama won the election pretty much fair and square. That is hardly a “coronation.”
Report thisBy oddsox, December 9, 2011 at 5:30 pm Link to this comment
berniem:
Report thisSWIFT COURT MARTIAL & JUSTICE to BRADLEY MANNING, PAROLE for TIM DECHRISTOPHER if PROMISES to be a GO0D BOY…(WHICH HE WON’T.)
By rumblingspire, December 9, 2011 at 5:19 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Alice Cooper - LEVITY Ball
Report thishttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGJC0lQTxjk
By berniem, December 9, 2011 at 3:53 pm Link to this comment
Really, if SB 1867 should pass shouldn’t the republican party and its members as well as a sizeable number of democrats be detained and subjected to rigorous enhanced interrogation as members/supporters of terrorist organizations. The damage caused by these polititians and their supportive dupes have caused far more damage to the overall health and stability of this country than those deranged extremists did on 9/11/01! FREE BRADLEY MANNING AND TIM DECHRISTOPHER!!!!!
Report thisBy norman harman, December 9, 2011 at 3:40 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Before all of us liberals, leftys, progressives, Democrats, etc., get too cocky let’s
remember this president has already “compromised” away all of the political
capital he amassed during the course of his election.
No matter how stupid, moronic, idiotic, absurd and just plain crazy the Republican
candidate is likely to be, Obama’s track record thus far is downright lousy.
Obama losing to some Texas empty suit, or that ridiculous Georgia blowhard, or
Report thisthe robot from New England is not that hard to visualize.
By blogdog, December 9, 2011 at 3:04 pm Link to this comment
RE: ...lefty marxist self… ?!?! Bloody Hell!!!
Obomber is Wall Street’s hand-picked puppet - installed to run left cover for the
Report thisglobalist agenda - just like Dubya was installed to run right cover - the L-vs-R
duping of the under classes by the plutocrats (in service to the oligarchs) is a
distraction that everyone needs to learn to avoid
By bluejeanne, December 9, 2011 at 12:58 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Weirder and weirder . . . the comedic duo of The Donald & The Newt. It’s also known as ‘theater of the absurd.’
They do seem to have some common characteristics. Both are enormously egotistical. Niether seems to have a problem breaking marriage vows. They’re both out of touch with the real world.
Gingrich is especially baffling for having converted to Catholicism. One wonders if he concluded from having studied history that this religion would afford him the entre into the world of culture and intellectualism or would it simply expedite his career? Such a conversion, after all, could conveniently absolve him of his previous marriages by declaring them anulled. Never underestimate the cleverness of the Political Animal.
Report thisBy objective observer, December 9, 2011 at 9:38 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
fear factor has nothing on the crybaby liberals whining about the republican nominee du jour. what a bunch of whiners. President Obama has been a pretty good repub president so far, but, not to fear, his lefty marxist self will reemerge after his next coronation, er, swearing in as POTUS.
Report thisBy Big B, December 9, 2011 at 6:18 am Link to this comment
rumblingspire
You are correct, they do long for a return to the 50’s. Unfortunately, its the 1850’s.
Report thisBy Outraged, December 9, 2011 at 1:32 am Link to this comment
The unbelievable irony is that it could actually be
news to Trump that people loathe him.
You have to remember, when that show aired
Americans, were losing benefit after benefit,
wage increase after wage increase and opportunity disappeared.
Everyone hated that disgusting asshole’s show.
Except of course for those Grinch loving types,
but it’s hard to count someone as
a human being who doesn’t act like one.
I thought Trump paid for everything to do with that
Report thisinsult to our intelligence, and that that was the
only reason it was on air…...
By EmileZ, December 8, 2011 at 11:50 pm Link to this comment
Good title for the article.
This is indeed, as I suspect you are well aware, Mr. Robinson, nothing more then a reality show.
Gingrich never intended to get the nomination, and has never seriously persued it. He signed up for the free publicity. Book sales, job with Fox, etc..
You have got one hell of a cushy gig going here, Mr. Robinson, but I must ask….
Don’t you ever get bored???
Don’t you want more???
Report thisBy blogdog, December 8, 2011 at 11:42 pm Link to this comment
You’re fired!
...could be worse: I, for one, will never forget listening to a live broadcast from the floor of the Senate,
when in the 2003 debate over launching undeclared war on Iraq, Robert C. Byrd directed his speech to
the far end of Pennsylvania Avenue and advised the resident therein to be mindful of the fate of the
English King who dragged his subjects through a decade of waring bloody hell and paid a dear price for
it: Charles The First.
as for Newt, he knows show biz: “write anything you want about me, just spell my name right” - and
along those lines, if we might proceed… citing those two in the same posting is like putting Maria Callas
on stage with Lady Gaga
as for The Donald, I’ve pointed out before that from the table of any real oligarch, he’d be dismissed for
Report thisfarting without permission (e.g. those self-proscribed from publication in Stevie Forbes little newsletter)
- but, now it seems that just plain old Republicans care not to share the air he breathes - next stop: The
Sands on The Strip
By purplewolf, December 8, 2011 at 11:21 pm Link to this comment
How can they come to their senses ? You have to have some to begin with in the first place and they have none.
Or in the words of Forest Gump’s mother in the movie, ” stupid is as stupid does.” Seems to sum it up alright.
Report thisBy mrfreeze, December 8, 2011 at 11:05 pm Link to this comment
Regarding the Republican candidates, this essay reminds me of the old saying:
“You can’t fix stupid…..”
to which I’d like to add a corollary
“But millions of Americans will vote for stupid…..”
Report thisBy rumblingspire, December 8, 2011 at 9:50 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Faine Jade - 06 - Ballad Of The Bad Guys (1956 A.D.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gP7ZUAFKT14
“1956 is dead
Report thisbut still exists
within your head”
By Philip Greene, December 8, 2011 at 9:04 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Sarah who?
OH—wasn’t she somebody once?
Report this