|
|
June 17, 2013
|
|
Realism and Compassion: Unacceptable in Today’s GOPPosted on Nov 24, 2011
By Joe Conason Tasteless and questionable as it was for CNN to “co-sponsor” a Republican presidential debate with a pair of right-wing Washington think-tanks, at least the branding was accurate. There among the honored interlocutors were the authors of dismal failure and national disgrace in the Bush era, such as Paul Wolfowitz and David Addington, whose presence helpfully reminds us that to elect a Republican risks a presidency that will make the same gross moral and strategic errors, or worse. Listening to them talk about Iran, a nation that unlike Iraq or the Taliban is a real military power, it was clear that we will certainly edge closer to another war with almost any Republican in power. What the debate also revealed again is that a Republican who dares to utter a few words of compassion or realism is likely to prove unacceptable to the base of that party. Coming off his proposal to repeal child labor laws, so that schools can force 9-year-olds to do the work of “unionized janitors,” it was surprising to hear Newt Gingrich appeal to human decency in resolving the immigration issue. But so he did, sensibly noting that deporting 11 million or more undocumented residents of the United States would be not only impractical but viciously cruel. It would mean ripping apart families that have lived here peacefully for generations. “I’m prepared to take the heat,” said the former speaker, rather courageously, for insisting that the law should be enforced “with humanity”—and his opponents, notably Mitt Romney, brought that heat to a boil, attacking Gingrich for supposedly supporting “amnesty,” perennial buzzword of the anti-immigrant movement. Actually, Gingrich doesn’t back amnesty per se—which usually indicates a “path to citizenship”—but his position is close enough to mean trouble from the GOP’s large nativist constituency. He prefers a selective service system for immigration, which would bring individual cases before boards of local citizens to decide whether any particular illegal immigrant should be deported or permitted to remain permanently, in a legal status that would be less than citizenship. As far as the immigrant-bashers are concerned, that’s amnesty, and the hell with it. Advertisement Yet for all his promises to “enforce the law,” Romney never bothered to explain how he will deport 11 million or more, as a practical and humane policy. Nobody who knows much about the issue believes that it can be done. But what we know about Romney—and the rest of the Republicans, who rarely pass up a chance to denounce organized labor—is that they prefer a low-wage workforce unable to assert any rights. If the undocumented were suddenly able to speak out and act without fear, they would also be able to join unions, demand higher wages and health benefits, and refuse to be used against native-born workers. If Gingrich takes the heat for his few words in defense of immigrant families, he was not the only Republican on stage to say something wise that will be used against him. Ron Paul sagely warned, as he has done many times before, that the “war on terror” and the “war on drugs” are flawed concepts that endanger constitutional liberty. Yet he also showed why libertarian ideologues like him are unfit to represent American ideals, when he claimed that all the money spent on foreign aid is wasted—in response to a question from Wolfowitz that specifically referred to the highly successful Bush administration program of HIV/AIDS assistance to poor nations. That discussion offered Rick Santorum a chance to shine, by denouncing the notion that Congress should “zero out” such foreign assistance programs, and to proclaim proudly that he had promoted the Bush AIDS programs in the Senate. No doubt he, too, will will have to take the heat—for acknowledging that American leadership cannot be based on military or economic power alone, and that as Jon Huntsman dared to say, America needs friends and allies in a changing world. In the era of tea party jingoism, there is precious little space for that traditional Republican outlook—and plenty of room for smooth panderers like Romney. Joe Conason is the editor in chief of NationalMemo.com. © 2011 Creators.com New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By Don Schneider, November 28, 2011 at 2:08 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
So long as there is money to be made exploiting workers, we will have an
Report this“immigration” problem. Once America has been reduced to the status of “newly
redeveloping” nation by the union busters and job exporting American investors,
we will then see lower wage jobs returning to American shores. First the complete
destruction of the American Middle Class must be accomplished by the Oligarchs,
and then the plutocrats will be in the position they have been seeking to legitimize
from the beginning of the Bush era. It won’t be long !
By aacme88, November 27, 2011 at 2:43 pm Link to this comment
“...it was clear that we will certainly edge closer to another war with almost any Republican in power.”
Well, yeah. But we knew that already. Along with the accompanying tax breaks for the rich to raise the revenue for it.
Report thisBy drbhelthi, November 27, 2011 at 2:07 pm Link to this comment
Some of Conason´s comments reflect ignorance, others of which reflect stupidity. His comment about Ron Paul, “Yet he also showed why libertarian ideologues like him are unfit to represent American ideals,-” is a combination of both, as if the criminals currently administering USGOV are doing a decent job.
Conason´s comment about “- highly successful Bush administration program of HIV/AIDS assistance to poor nations.” Successful for whom? AIDS was developed and spread by USGOV biowarfare scientists. Instead of curing, the pharma-drugs that are used only relieve the symptoms, the cost of which drugs is written off, when the drugs are “donated” out of country, or else paid for by U.S. Taxpayers.
It is obvious why genuine cures are utilized very quietly by a few physicians - and other persons. Another area of Conason´s grand ignorance.
Report thisBy Rodney, November 26, 2011 at 3:59 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
First of all the illegals are the one’s that feed us.
Report thisI don’t see any white folks picking crops for $.60 a
bushel or even black folks for that matter. I never
see white women mopping floors or making beds in
hotels and motels. So all the racism and bigotry that
is the party who loves to hate, spew out all the hate
they can muster and receive rauncous applause.
Whether it’s people dying because of lack of health
care,refusing to extend employment benefits for
people unable to find work,undocumented workers doing
America’s low paying dangerous work,or signing death
warrants and frying people like pieces of chicken,and
booing gay soldiers, the party of hate and bigotry
appauld their bigotry and hate.
By Archie Bunker, November 26, 2011 at 9:42 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/reagan-insider-gop-destroyed-us-economy-2010-08-10
There are 3,200,000 3.2 MILLION JOBS OPENINGS ?? http://www.cnbc.com/id/44838614
This is whats slowing employment, not the poor food picking migrants.
More Jobs Predicted for MACHINES. Not Humans, http://www.cnbc.com/id/45015714
SURPRISE GUESS WHO IS NOT PAYING TAXES!!!!!! http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/story/2011-10-06/income-tax-nonpayment/50676912/1?csp=obnetwork
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/how-the-gop-became-the-party-of-the-rich-20111109
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/reagan-insider-gop-destroyed-us-economy-2010-08-10
UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS ARE NOT CRIMINALS. Its a Civil Matter.
The whole thing is perplexing to people who don’t understand that being an illegal immigrant in and of itself is not a crime. The most pervasive comments made in news stories about Secure Communities go a little like this: “Illegal immigrants are what they’re called — they’re considered criminals by mere definition. Illegals who broke a bunch of laws to enter and live here should be subjected to immediate arrest and deportation — that’s fair for everyone.”
That’s not accurate, but a lot of people have that same misunderstanding — even law enforcement professionals.
During a teleconference last month on the troubles that Secure Communities is bringing to local law enforcement agencies, a few sheriffs on the call commiserated about their misunderstanding of immigration violations.
“I was always told it was a felony federal violation of law and was always under the impression that turning over any illegal immigrants (to ICE) was mandated by federal law — and so did my employees,” said Sheriff Ed Prieto of Yolo County, Calif. “But after we met with the Mexican consulate in Sacramento we learned it’s not. Then I started looking into how many of our people are being deported before trial and I became very uncomfortable contacting ICE for nonviolent offenders.”
Kane County, Ill., Sheriff Patrick Perez said that “90 percent of law enforcement officers believe (just being an illegal immigrant) is a crime, but I learned after talking to an immigration judge that it is just a civil offense.”
Sara Dill, a member of the American Bar Association’s Commission on Immigration and a member of the ABA’s Criminal Justice Council, explained it to me this way: “States are seeking to criminalize what is only a civil violation in federal law.” Dill said that failing to get a permit for home construction is one example of a civil, not criminal, violation. “Putting illegal immigrants in a criminal context confuses merely being present in the United States without authorization with crimes such as falsely claiming citizenship or identity theft, which are crimes under federal law.”
Everyone knows that of the universe of illegal immigrants, some have committed nonviolent and violent crimes — and everyone believes these should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
But believers of following “the letter of the law” cannot continue equating all illegal immigrants living in this country with criminals, who have plenty of civil rights of their own. That’s not the American way.
Report thisBy radicalfemme, November 26, 2011 at 5:37 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I heard someone on one of the shows I watch on MSNBC comment on the issue the other day that Newt is likely trying to distract the conservative base from the larger issue of his very tainted past. When it comes to morals the man flunks the bases test for purity with a big fat 0. Myself, that seems to me to be a more logical reason behind his current immigration policies. It isn’t compassion as much as it is trying to distract people from his vulnerable areas.
Report thisBy examinator, November 25, 2011 at 9:23 pm Link to this comment
charrob,
Your espoused views are not that of a ‘a hardcore liberal’ (in the American), rather the arguments put appear are that of Republican/conservative Lite at best. At worst they reflect similar views to the ignorance of the rump Tea Party movement(sic). i.e. big on latent chauvinistic arrogance and intellectual myopia.
Big on opinion and rhetoric and light on true liberalism (left) underpinning assumptions.
To wit: all humankind are equal.
I find the notion that any country “is an island complete of it’s self” both naive and necessitating the ‘conservative’ notional ideological fictions.
ergo I think it either disingenuous or self deluding to claim being a liberal let alone a ‘hardcore’ one.
Report thisBy jrundin, November 25, 2011 at 4:17 pm Link to this comment
Actually, a word of good cheer to all those worried
about illegal immigration:
Illegal immigration has plummeted since the economic downturn; there may even be net emigration from the U.S. right now.
So stop worrying.
—John
Report thisBy charrob, November 25, 2011 at 2:09 pm Link to this comment
As a hardcore liberal, i believe the left is on the wrong side of immigration. Those hurt the worst in this country by illegal immigration are those in our poorest class (those who can least afford the competition); african americans have been speaking out for years that having to compete with illegal immigrants has suppressed their wages as they engage in a race to the bottom.
Illegal immigration hurts us all because we are the ones who have to foot the bill for many families having on average 8 or 9 children. In the 1950’s, 1960’s, we had around 150 million people in this country: at over 300 millions, we need more energy, more oil-drilling which kills marine species and wildlife, we need more factory farming so that animals are literally tortured and caged up when, with a smaller population, they may have more opportunity to roam on undeveloped lands.
We need to get rid of the reasons illegals are pouring over our borders: the stupid ‘war on drugs’, “free” trade pacts and American militarism in their home lands. If we get rid of any reasons they come here because of actions we’ve done, then they should have every opportunity to build up their own country. Our country is filled up—to the brim. And the jobs are needed by Americans born here.
Report thisBy FLGibsonJr, November 25, 2011 at 2:23 am Link to this comment
There is a reason that illegal immigrants have been allowed to illegally enter this country by the millions and millions and millions over the last couple of decades, through both Republican and Democratic administrations. It is because large powerful corporate interests that represent big business want massive unregulated immigration and it’s depressive effect on wages. They pay (contribute to) both Democrats and Republicans to allow illegal immigration to continue and they get their lower wages for working people across this country. Newt was just letting these corporate interests know that he would do their bidding and continue to allow the flow of illegal immigrants so businesses can continue to pay low wages. If you want the continuance of massive illegal immigration, like this author appears to want, don’t worry, corporate power controls this country and therefore the illegal immigration will continue.
Regards,
Report thisBy Marian Griffith, November 25, 2011 at 1:09 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
@bonito
—-I would like Joe Conason or any other person in this Nation, to tell me how, with conviction just how Increasing immigration at a time when 20 to 25 Million U.S. Citizens are seeking employment could possibly benefit the Workers in this country.—-
And I would like to point to the (in)famous speech that mr. Colbert gave to a congress committee, and later the ‘I told you so’ follow up on his show.
Report thisBy examinator, November 24, 2011 at 7:59 pm Link to this comment
EmileZ,
Report thisTwo basic points,
- what is the title of the article?
Answer: “Realism and Compassion: Unacceptable in Today’s GOP”
What is doesn’t say is *A comparison of (et al)*
The author is sticking to the context. Pity you’re not.
e.g. Your response is in essence arguing in answer to “Jack the ripper” was a monster. It to comparing him to “the Boston strangler” ask your self how does that change the asserted facts for for the rippers guilt?
Answer: zip, zero nought,nil, narder, nothing, Boopkiss, bugger and f*** all!
You are entitled to criticise the narrowness topic. But all that is beyond that i.e. out of context comparisons, Ad homs don’t bode well for your perceived ability to reason or your argument.
By bonito, November 24, 2011 at 7:50 pm Link to this comment
I would like Joe Conason or any other person in this
Nation, to tell me how, with conviction just how
increasing immigration at a time when 20 to 25
Million U.S. Citizens are seeking employment could
possibly benefit the Workers in this country.
Usually it is the immigrants from Mexico and South
America that come to this Country to work in the
fields. Certainly not those from Asia, the Middle
East, Europe, and other nations do not come here to
pick Lettuce, or work in the fields as laborers,
instead have their sights set on good paying jobs
usually held by U.S. Citizens, and will do anything
necessary to undercut these same persons and/or
replace them.
Corporate Billionaires and Millionaires like Bill
Gates claimed that he needed the Brightest and the
Best in order to compete with the rest of the World,
so he was allowed to import many from other
countries, but I suppose he found out that they were
not as fine as he initially believed, because he
ended up paying them about 50% of the salary of the
Engineers already employed at Microsoft.
About 12 years ago Pat Buchanan wrote a book
advocating zero immigration into the United States,
one of the reasons given that population growth at
present rate would be more then enough to supply the
needs of employers as far as employees were
concerned. I do not often agree with Conservatives
but on this I do agree. When Corps. cease to
manufacture goods in these United States and seek to
ship jobs overseas to countries with much lower
wages, can only result in lowering the standard of
living for all workers, Union or otherwise.
Beware all whom are not aware that the Republicans
Report thisare out to reduce wages in this country by at least
50%, but are also coming after our Social Security,
Medicare, Medicaid, and any other program that does
not directly benefit the Rich and Greedy.
By jrundin, November 24, 2011 at 4:01 pm Link to this comment
As almost always, I enjoyed this post by Joe Conason and I agreed with it.
But there was one thing that didn’t please me.
It’s the myth that Bush policy was good on AIDS in Africa. I don’t know why but even liberals seem to think that Bush was good on AIDS in Africa. He was not.
The policies he pursued were wrong-headed. Sure, they facilitated treatment, which is good. But on prevention issues, they were bad: things like abstinence programs and the like—the sort of dumb things that religious conservatives think will work against AIDS and have been proven by objective research NOT to work—and worse yet, actually to exacerbate the epidemic.
Please do a bit of research on this topic before you repeat this canard.
See:
http://prospect.org/article/how-bushs-aids-program-failing-africans
and
Report thishttp://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/02/25/opinion/main3873641.shtml
By sand11, November 24, 2011 at 3:22 pm Link to this comment
I was rather shocked by Gingrich’s comments on immigration…..he usually plays more to his audience. But the scattered comments that occasionally sounded sane still came from disparate individuals who lack so much sense and compassion on other issues that the overall possiblity of a viable, reasonable GOP candidate continues to look very dim.
Report thisBy Haudenosaun, November 24, 2011 at 1:09 pm Link to this comment
” Friends” and “allies”, what a joke. Empires don’t have friends, they have “assets”
Report thisWhen those “assets” no longer do the bidding of the empire, they are discarded
and replaced. And god help any government or people who refuse to play by the
rules of the Empire, because the Empire and its “assets” are very good at
manufacturing evidence and selling it to its citizens.
By Chris Herz, November 24, 2011 at 12:58 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
This author is unjust to confine his criticism to the Republicans. Mr Obama’s Democrats have exceeded the late unlamented Bush regime in the number of deportations and jailings. Both regimes did not and do not hesitate to separate children from parents; even in some cases deporting kids who came here so young that they have no cultural connections with their birth countries—cannot speak Somalian, etc.
How cruel and immoral.
Report thisBy Marian Griffith, November 24, 2011 at 12:15 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
@blueokie (and others)
You are assuming that the president is in charge of the country and its politics.
He is not, and has not been for decades now.
And this will not change while both sides of the aisle are bought by the same commercial and ideological lobbyists and while the president needs to appoint (economical and ideological) ‘experts’ in his cabinet of ministers and secretaries of state. The ‘experts’ that are on the payroll of the same economical and ideological special interest groups before and after their stint in politics and who will be handsomely rewarded if they steer the direction of the country and its laws in the direction most beneficial to their true masters.
Obama appointed a lot of ‘experts’ from the Clinton and Bush days so as to appear bipartisan. In this he was advised by the leaders of the democrat party. Unsurprisingly they favoured the continuation of the policies that characterised those decades. It is unlikely that Obama has a free hand to replace these ‘experts’ by anybody as he sees fit, and it is painfully obvious that his own party will only follow him insofar as it will not risk the anger of the tea party (and decrease their chances at re-election). The democrats have not exactly supported the progressive agende (what little there was of it) of Obama, not even when they were one vote short of absolute majority in both Houses.
And in the mean time the republicans have degenerated into an ‘sectarian’ organisation, that defines the political discourse in an ‘us and them’ and that sees any compromise with ‘them’ as the blackest of treason. This has been developing in several guises since the Reagan days (‘moral majority’ to name but one incarnation of populist rhetoric) and the democrats never developed an answer to this scorched earth tactics, which left them waffling and floundering without direction. The only candidates they managed to get elected were moderate republicans.
It may be that OWS may bring about a renewal of social conscience in the USA. I am not holding out much hope, it always has been an atrophied belief system, easily overshadowed by greed and egocentrism. But that is the best message to overcome the myopic message of the republicans. That we are one people with many different ideas and beliefs that can not be divided in an ‘us and them’, and that we should care for one another because if not us then nobody will and the universe will carelessly crush us all.
But the concepts of altruism (freely doing things for others because we are all one) and insurance (everybody sharing a small part of the greater burden placed on a few) have always been at odds with how the american people have chosen to self-identify.
Report thisBy Blueokie, November 24, 2011 at 10:02 am Link to this comment
Yes the Republicans are evil, but it gets tiresome reading about how the Dim- ocrats will save us. Just a quick run down of the current policies of Pres. Wall Street Puppet exposes the myth of two separate parties. His expansion of the Empire’s wars by proxy into Africa, along with a U.S. military and mercenary
build up, his star chamber that decides with no transparency or oversight on where and and why the drones will strike next. His saber rattling with China and wanting to expand a bloated and colonial presence in Asia. His “Free Trade Agreements” with the worlds second largest money launderer, a country with
natural resources coveted by the corporate state, and an Asian country that had laws the elite found mettlesome. He supports Israel’s illegal occupation and genocide against the Palestinians.
At home, he expands the surveillance state, and arms paramilitary police forces meant for population control under the guise of protection against terrorism. His Justice Department coordinates crackdowns on peaceful protests and goes to court to say there is no right to privacy and the government has the right to track any citizen by GPS for any reason. He stands idly by while workers rights are usurped. He protects the previous administrations obvious domestic and war crimes sprees, not to mentions his benefactors on Wall Street from their obvious massive fraud, while breaking up families and setting records for
deportations for the most petty reasons imaginable. He promotes the cult of consumerism, while simultaneously participating in the manufactured scarcity crisis. He pays lip service to the climate crisis while making no attempts to curtail it. And that is just scratching the surface.
“Our current political situation is a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror” - Lewis Black
Report thisBy Maani, November 24, 2011 at 9:24 am Link to this comment
This is actually wonderful news. The more hardcore the GOP base gets, the less likely they are to have a significant effect on the elections. Further, this will swing independents away from the right. And if we have learned anything in the past two or three elections, it is that it is independents who determine the outcome.
Report thisBy omop, November 24, 2011 at 9:13 am Link to this comment
As an old codger in the Ozarks said about Newt….“the man talks like the
Report thiscomic book CAPTAIN AMERICA”.
By sharksbreath, November 24, 2011 at 5:55 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
EmileZ: Some how you missed the point. The point is
the base of the GOP. The base of the Democratic party
is against Obama on this. We don’t celebrate the fact
he’s cracked down on deporting people.
Yet the GOP acts like Obama has done nothing and has
actually encouraged illegals to come to the country
when nothing could be further from the truth.
Now back to the article. What Joe is saying is that
if you speak with compassion in the Republican
primary you will soon find yourself ostracized.
You may want to point to Obama which is fine but this
article is about the base. The dem base wishes Obama
had more compassion on this issue. To me it’s just
more pandering by Obama to the GOP.
When the election comes around he can tell those who
are against illegal immigration that he was tougher
on them than Bush. The GOP will try but they can’t
use this issue against him.
That won’t win him any votes on this side but has
Report thisObama ever been worried about the voters on his own
side.
By Caro, November 24, 2011 at 2:37 am Link to this comment
I suggest that Gingrich’s position on illegals isn’t
based on compassion, but on his corporate masters’
insatiable appetite for low-wage workers.
Carolyn Kay
Report thisMakeThemAccountable.com
By EmileZ, November 24, 2011 at 1:49 am Link to this comment
The Obama administration has cracked down on and deported more “illegals” than Bush.
It is easy to criticize the Republican assholes if you don’t scrutinize the Obama administration.
Actally it is easy to criticize both, but that point may be lost on Mr. Conason who clearly doesn’t really give a fuck about the issues he is selectively editorializing on.
Report this