![]() ![]() |
![]() |
| |
|
Putting Our Worst Foot ForwardPosted on Apr 26, 2007By Joe Conason While international organizations such as the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank and the United Nations may still seem remote to most Americans, those institutions symbolize the increasing integration of a planet that deeply needs capable, trusted and farsighted guidance. Not so long ago, the United States was known as the “indispensable nation,” the one that could be relied upon to lead in times of crisis. That forfeited reputation is not only the world’s loss, but ours as well. Cronyism, neglect, corruption, rigidity and plain stupidity—perpetrated by figures who had billed themselves (and were billed by the mainstream media) as the geniuses of our time—have exacted an awesome toll on the inheritance we received from previous generations. Our heritage of world leadership in the last century was built not upon military power alone, but arose from economic, diplomatic and moral foundations that somehow survived despite many earlier mistakes and even crimes. With the advent of the Bush administration, however, our luck has obviously run out. Neither allies nor adversaries pretend to believe that the ludicrous characters sent forth by the president to represent us are statesmen. Not only does nobody much care what we think, but most people are now inclined to distrust and oppose us on principle. The latest example of American decline is, of course, the embarrassing little scandal that has besmirched World Bank President Paul Wolfowitz. Always an overrated bureaucrat, he seems to have spent an inordinate amount of time and effort in recent years fashioning literal sweetheart deals for his paramour—a Tunisian-born Saudi named Shaha Riza—at the bank, the State Department and the Pentagon. Even while Wolfowitz was serving as deputy defense secretary, he allegedly pressured a major defense contractor to hire Riza. For a month, she worked in Iraq on “democracy promotion”—a traditional American objective thoroughly discredited because of Wolfowitz and his fellow neoconservatives. Considering Wolfowitz’s monumental failure at the Pentagon, where he overruled wiser and more experienced staff in preparing for the invasion of Iraq, his own promotion to the World Bank presidency was mystifying. His vaunted brilliance notwithstanding, he may well be the single most incompetent public servant of the past quarter-century, with the only significant competition coming from his former boss, Donald Rumsfeld. Together, they ensured that the occupation of Iraq had too few troops and too little planning, while allowing Republican cronies and crooks to siphon away billions of taxpayer dollars. It was all going to pay for itself with Iraqi oil revenues, or so Wolfowitz had testified in Congress with his usual confidence. By the time that particular bill came due, he had moved on. When Wolfowitz showed up at the World Bank, he touted another worthy agenda. Like John Bolton, his fellow ideologue appointed to serve as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, he said that he intended to promote reform and fight corruption. But in both cases, those high-minded purposes were thwarted by personal inadequacies—while zealous certainty in their own moral purposes blinded them to those shortcomings. In Wolfowitz’s case, that characteristic arrogance enabled him to inveigh against corruption and scourge bank employees while he simultaneously arranged an extraordinary sinecure for Riza. She was seconded to the State Department, with an enormous tax-free salary exceeding the compensation of the secretary of state, where she worked under the supervision of Elizabeth Cheney (whose rank as principal deputy assistant secretary of state for Near Eastern affairs was owed wholly to her father, the vice president). Under the deal set up by her boyfriend, Riza would automatically receive “outstanding” ratings, with a top position waiting for her on her return to the World Bank as soon as Wolfowitz’s term expires. Neoconservatives apparently believe fervently in merit and competition and hate affirmative action, unless their own careers (or the careers of their lovers) are at stake. All this familial boodling proceeded happily while Vice President Dick Cheney whispered lies about the supposed “nepotism” behind former Ambassador Joe Wilson’s unpaid mission to Niger. The White House didn’t appreciate Wilson’s exposure of the truth behind the administration’s “mushroom cloud” fear-mongering about the perils of Saddam Hussein, so they exposed his wife’s CIA identity to smear him. Hypocrite is far too inadequate an insult to describe these people. With its endless procession of tawdry scandals and buffoonish antics, the Bush administration often looks and sounds like a sitcom. In retrospect, as America and the world confront terror, disease, poverty and environmental peril, it will be recognized as a tragedy. Joe Conason writes for the New York Observer. © 2007 Creators Syndicate Inc. Previous item: Supremes Know Best Next item: Mr. Bush, Tear Down These Walls! Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.
By Janus, May 2, 2007 at 7:16 am # Well, the most glaring incompetent and the very worst ever to hold the office is the Puppet in the White House, dancing on the strings of Chief Chicken Hawk-Puppeteer Cheney whose popularity is around 9% (yes, nine percent). Hence, there can no surprises at the number of their inept doofuses holding appointive offices and doing their share of wrecking the image and effectiveness of the Country at home and abroad. One thing is clear, years need not pass until historians can rate this Crowd. We are right now living witnesses to this disaster of an administration that is surely to remain an indelible blot on the history of the Country.
By M Currey, April 28, 2007 at 7:28 pm # When the hard workers finally got a union, a union they needed because the Henry Ford’s of America had the use of the police to beat back the workers, now the unions are not very usefull and what do the likes of Bush think of, not the workers, they let the corporations rule so the corporations pay less taxes, take the work overseas, and when there is talk of the economy getting better the people getting the better part of the economy is the stock market, the people who have excess money so they make their money make money, the middle class who do not have the luxury to gamble get squeezed more and more, soon people will just be working for food, the new slaves, while the old English system survives, kind of like the Cratchetts the father working until Christmans Eve and just having a Sunday off. Of course in China, workers only get a Sunday (or their day off) once a month, they also live in a dorm room and cannot even afford the product they make, this is what the CORPORATE AMERICA would like to see happen, the Rich get Richer and the Poor get Poorer. But is it not good to keep winning wars that we are suppose to be winning, after all we do not want to encourage the enemy to wait us out. But they will out man us, remember that in the Middle East women have up to twenty children, they well certainly out birth us. So in the long win they will win.
By Trigger finger, April 28, 2007 at 7:20 am # How can we blame Bush for this disaster? He is just an incompetent unskilled man who thought it would be cool to be the President, and now finds himself in way over his head. Just like every other thing he has ever attempted, he has always been a failure. It is the ignorant people who managed to get him into this position and those who voted for him and the Supreme Court who decided that he won the fixed election, who should be held accountable. And we the people of this country, will pay dearly for those blunders for many generations to come. The day is rapidly approaching where the American worker will be willing to take any employment for $.50 an hour. Your “elected” corporate government is working very hard to that end every day!
By DennisD, April 26, 2007 at 6:45 pm # Bu$h, for all his arrogance, certainly doesn’t believe in the buck stops here philosophy. His administration has been just one big, happy, don’t give a shit frat house for his buddies. Just another group of self important, rich boys that won’t have to clean up the mess they’ve made or pay the bill when their eight year party is over. “And justice for all” - who the f**k is kidding who. Another sad American myth.
By THOMAS BILLIS, April 26, 2007 at 1:55 pm # Here is what Joe misses.The ultimate responsibility for the undoing of the greatness of America are the American people who elected a semi literate man President.When you elect an idiot who do you expect him to nominate to key postions other idiots.This was all predictable and the American people disregarded all to vote for a man they wanted to have a beer with.Look around the next time you are in a bar and decide which one of your fellow travelers you would want to be President of the United States.Wake up make a better decision next time.
By Valley, April 26, 2007 at 11:25 am # Despicable. I really can’t believe we voted the people who appointed him into office. He’s supposed to alleviate poverty and suffering. Instead he just uses the money for high class prostitution.
By dale Headley, April 26, 2007 at 11:17 am # Alberto Gonzales was a stark example of why the Bush White House is self-destructing when he demonstrated so spectacularly that he is incompetent. Is it any wonder that agencies in this government, from FEMA to the “Coalition Provisional Authority” in Baghdad, have performed like Keystone Kops, when the only qualification for their jobs was their opposition to abortion?
By Eirk McBain, April 26, 2007 at 8:03 am # “His vaunted brilliance notwithstanding” ? How many more times are we going to be subjected to some fool in the media referring a sycophant Washington politician or bureaucrat as a genius. Before declaring someone a genius, take a look at their accomplishments: have they written a great novel, made an important scientific discovery, composed a symphony, or have they been like the Paul Wolfowitz’s of this world: professional kiss ups. Has anyone really taken a good look at what this genius has written?
By James Yell, April 26, 2007 at 6:17 am # About the only way to make any sense of this Administrations wastrel ways and law breaking is that the super rich had decided to destroy our National Government in the interests of “high handed” and out-rageous wealth. The beginnings of this movement were the move of corporate offices beyond our laws and borders and the lack of accounting for this treasonous move. They want our market, but want to be free of paying the bills for its use. It is time to bring back Teddy Roosevelt’s trust busting, or busting whatever device they use to hide behind and control market. Add Your Comment |
COMMENT TOOLS:
Hide comments
Show comments
Comment on this article