|
|
May 23, 2013
|
|
Politicians Are Different From You and MePosted on Jun 8, 2011
The current issue of The Week magazine certainly has the right headline: "Hey, Look at Me!"
But the picture was not of Congressman Anthony Weiner and his little package. The picture below the headline showed Sarah Palin and her great big Harley-Davidson. She is fully clothed, wrapped in leather actually.
"Hey, Look at Me" could be the motto of modern politics, particularly male politicians. The name of the game has always been seduction of individuals, of crowds. That is what politicians do. I’ve traveled with a lot of them long enough to know that unlike the characters in "Toy Story," they come alive only as the crowd gathers. That is the nature of their business, then they withdraw, often in silence, to prepare for the next encounter.
Under our system, politicians are not chosen by "the people" or the "bosses" or the media. They are self-selected. John F. Kennedy was really the first of the self-selected. Son of a movie mogul, he understood the power of flesh and he used it every chance he got. If you remember, one of his standard campaign photos was a picture of himself, bare-chested at the wheel of his patrol boat, PT-109. His opponent in 1960, Richard Nixon, didn’t get it; another naval lieutenant, Nixon’s war picture was him standing at attention in his dress blues.
But Kennedy did not stop there. One picture that sticks with me is him in a steaming bath—trying to soften his constant back pain. Sitting around him, on the floor, on the toilet, leaning against the moist wall were the chosen few, wearing suits and ties. These were business meetings, and whatever one thinks of Freud, Kennedy the naked chief was exercising total power over his sweaty minions.
Advertisement
Well, they had bodies, the young brothers. Lyndon Johnson, no great body his, took the Kennedy trick a step further, holding meetings while he was doing other business on the toilet. The euphemism for that is "earthy." And then, of course, there was the famous photo of LBJ pulling up his shirt to show reporters the scars after a gall bladder operation.
Next, Richard Nixon was a more modest man, but would sometimes change clothes for evening functions as he gave orders to trusted aides. Then there was Jimmy Carter, running in a race in what could pass as underwear and collapsing in front of the whole world.
When speculation about his age and fitness bothered Ronald Reagan, he climbed a tree on his ranch, bare-chested with a chainsaw in hand for photographs published in Parade magazine. As for Bill Clinton, we know he had selected showings of his body, or parts of it.
"Hey, Look at Me!" Now, two young congressmen have tried "limited hangout." It hasn’t worked so well for them. Chris Lee had to quit a couple of weeks ago. Weiner may have to as well. The lesson here seems to be that only the emperor can go around with no clothes.
While it’s creepy to imagine our highest officials photographing themselves for Twitter and all to see, this is not going to end. It is a just an electronic upgrade of politicians—a senator from the West and a mayor from the East come to mind—sending aides out into the crowd to ask a comely young thing if she had any plans after the show.
Our politicians are different from you and me. Self-selected men and women. Risk-takers who need adulation and conquest to keep them going. Life is a race against boredom, and they are more than willing to take the risks of being caught for the thrill of catching.
© 2011 UNIVERSAL UCLICK Previous item: Weiner’s No Longfellow Next item: Reflections on Israel: From Idealism to Ethnic Cleansing New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By Lafayette, June 12, 2011 at 10:12 pm Link to this comment
RITES OF PASSAGE
{PJT: Each had a competing military photo from his youth.}
A rite of passage almost uniquely amongst males. Women prefer the Trophy Wife with the 2.3 children, blond hair and blue eyes.
Democracy has its faults. Choosing our leaders in LaLaLand on the Potomac by means of their physical attributes is one of them.
Why does no one publish a copy of their SAT-scores?
Report thisBy Paul J. Theis, June 12, 2011 at 6:16 am Link to this comment
An interesting take. I wonder how it applies to Bush vs. Kerry. Kerry played hockey and went windsurfing. Bush played Top Gun and cut brush. Each had a competing military photo from his youth.
As to the question of why politicians are different ... I recall reading that Winston Churchill was said to acutely feel a lack of maternal affection. It was said of Richard Nixon that he was a very serious child who was, if not unhuggable, not hugged very often. (Kissinger famously commented something like: “Imagine what Nixon might have become if only his mother had loved him.”) And, finally, I believe Rose Kennedy is said to have never hugged JFK.
Report thisBy Lafayette, June 11, 2011 at 11:58 pm Link to this comment
CAVORTING
If our leaders could put on such behavioural nonsense it must be that they were told “the people suck it up”. We, the sheeple, we luv it.
Go figure ... it’s neanderthalish and one cannot imagine a woman PotUS who would lower her personal dignity by cavorting with such undignified behaviour as “the leader of the free world”.
So, if anything, this is male behaviour at its worst. Meaning they’ve confused freedom-of-speech for freedom-of-cavorting-like-a-first-class-assh*le.
Report thisBy mindful, June 9, 2011 at 4:46 pm Link to this comment
In short, humanity has less sense and intelligence, than God gace geese.
Report thisBy Maani, June 9, 2011 at 2:07 pm Link to this comment
Gerard:
You make a good point: our entire society is based around a “look at me” attitude, from Facebook to American Idol, from online photos to almost any “reality” show. [Are you aware that they are planning an “American Idol”-type show to choose a “candidate” for president in 2012, the winner of which will be given a certain amount of money to start their campaign? I kid you not!]
Actually, though, I think it is the AVERAGE person who has the “self-select, look-at-me” attitude. Politicians (particularly in the U.S.) are chosen by the corporatocracy (and/or through the Bilderberg Group).
Peace.
Report thisBy omop, June 9, 2011 at 6:26 am Link to this comment
Maybe R. Reeves is on to what the future will be. A throng of male “packages” and
Sarah’s next bus tour “boobs a la Revere” to seduce the un-employed and bored
American.
Uncle Zeb [whose close to 69 years old] and lives up in the Ozarks has always had
a yen to gaze at Ms. Sarah’s bodice “au naturel” as a deciding factor whether to
vote for or agin.
He’s hoping that her next bus tour will stop by his fishing hole.
Report thisBy Chris Herz, June 8, 2011 at 7:35 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Perhaps we should draft people for public office—like we once drafted soldiers. Or maybe Lotto winners, they having no motives for bribe-taking and demonstrating graphically that they are fortunes favorites.
Report thisBy gerard, June 8, 2011 at 3:57 pm Link to this comment
At least we might agree on the fact that “Hey, Look at me!” is the most common personal request ofpeople living through what passes for “modern times.” WWe are all in a hurry to be “self-selected”, to “matter”, to show off, to be noticed.
The extreme TV shows are nothing but. Mass sporting events, pretty much the same. The entire fashion business and its millions of followers, ditto. The TV business is fueled by ads encouraging people to “look their best” so “people will look at them.” It’s one of the first things children say repeatedly:
Report this“Mom, Dad .. Look at me!”
By Justin Weleski, June 8, 2011 at 2:46 pm Link to this comment
JFK was a self-selected man? That would have been news to his father, Joe
Kennedy. Joe was the driving force behind the Kennedy clan, and anyone who
took even the slightest amount of time researching JFK’s rise to the Presidency
would realize that. Joe Kennedy was the self-selected man and patriarch; John,
while remarkable in his own way, was by no means “self-selected.”
It appears that the author stared at a few pics of JFK, mixed his latent homosexual
attraction with a heavy dose of conventional (mythologized) wisdom, and blurted
out (or should I say ejaculated?) the first thing that came to mind.
Two thumbs way down.
Report thisBy sharonsj, June 8, 2011 at 1:34 pm Link to this comment
Is this the same thing as the religious right claiming that God wants them to be elected?
Report this