|
|
May 19, 2013
|
|
Playing the Mommy CardPosted on Oct 27, 2010By Ruth Marcus Excuse me, Mary Fallin, did I just hear you say, “Woman up”? I believe I did. The next governor of Oklahoma will, for the first time, be a woman. Fallin, a Republican business executive, former lieutenant governor and currently member of Congress, is one possibility. The other is her Democratic opponent, Jari Askins, corporate lawyer, state agency head, judge, state legislator and now lieutenant governor. Feminist-wise, that’s the good news. The bad news came during a debate when Fallin was asked what defines her as a candidate and distinguishes her from her opponent. “I think my experience is one of the things that sets me apart as a candidate for governor,” she answered. Fair enough. Then she added, “First of all, being a mother, having children, raising a family.” Advertisement I wouldn’t put it first on the list of qualifications, but I can imagine times when the experience of motherhood, of juggling family and career, of real-life encounters with overcrowded classrooms or the impact of modern technology on children, could come in handy to a politician. Certainly, practice settling disputes among quarreling children could be usefully transplanted to a governor handling an unruly state legislature. When Washington Sen. Patty Murray first billed herself as a “mom in tennis shoes”—and this was, remember, back in 1992, the post-Anita Hill “Year of the Woman”—the slogan captured her effort to relate to the concerns of everyday voters. But especially when two women are on the ballot, a few things ought to be off-limits. One is hairstyle—and, yes, I’m talking to you, Carly Fiorina. Another, and this is more serious, is marital and family status. The unstated premise of Fallin’s comment is: “I’m a mom and she’s not.” And the unstated but barely disguised conclusion is: “And that makes me better and leaves her lacking in a material way.” This put-down packs a far more powerful punch in a woman-on-woman race. If Fallin were running against an unmarried man, the I’m-a-parent-and-you’re-not card wouldn’t be quite so loaded: A “childless” female candidate tends to be perceived as lacking in an essential way that a man without children is not. And if Askins’ opponent were a married father, he would probably be smarter than to bring up her marital and maternal status for fear of the ensuing backlash. House Speaker-for-the-time-being Nancy Pelosi likes to talk about quieting a room with her mother-of-five voice. I’m going to use my mother-of-two tone: Mary Fallin, you put down that “mommy card” right now. Ruth Marcus’ e-mail address is marcusr(at symbol)washpost.com. © 2010, Washington Post Writers Group New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By SarcastiCanuck, October 28, 2010 at 1:54 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Ms.ThatDeborahGirl,please chill out and look at the heart of the story which I believe you have actually elaborated on in your angry rant.Ms. Marcus has hit on one of the most subtle forms of manipulation by candidates that have children.By stating it,they place themselves up on that invisible pedestal that states “I have children,therefore I must be a good person thus a trustworthy candidate”.If thier opponent doesn’t it makes them look either selfish,self centred or somehow inferior.Whether its the Mommy card or the Daddy card it is another example of suggestive slander.Even if the the non-parent candidate has better skills,intelligence,work ethic or principles,they are ever so cleverly demeaned by being dealt the Parent card.Sarah Palin and her Mama Grizzly populism is a blatantly glowing example of this….Doesn’t Osama bin Laden have children?Ms.Marcus,your pointing out this oh so subtle voter manipulation is quite astute and the fact that you have children of your own gives it even more credibility.
Report thisBy ThatDeborahGirl, October 27, 2010 at 11:55 pm Link to this comment
Mommy card? As an African American mother, I’m inclined to be just as pissed about this as the fictional race card. But I’ll stick with the Mommy card since that’s the idiotic topic at hand.
Men invoke the “father” card at the drop of a hat. Mitt Romney made it a major sticking point that his boys didn’t need to participate in the war he was hawking as long as they were helping good old Dad on the campaign trail. Much has been made of John McCain’s kids, Dick Cheney’s daughters gay and straight, The Bush Twins, one of whom called a proud papa on his celly from the Ellen show. Obama - two lovely daughters, Sasha and Malia - one of whome Glenn Beck infamously mocked. Bill Clinton ain’t been president forever and we all still blinked back tears of nostalgic pride earlier this year over little Chelsea’s wedding and it wasn’t just because of Mama Clinton either.
So to denigrate a mother’s pride in her accomplishment of being a parent and how it relates to her overall sense of purpose, skills and partly defines her as a woman and human being…yeah, that smacks of bullshit.
And it doesn’t take anything away from her childless political opponents who I’m sure has their own sense of purpose, skills and myriad other things that define them as a woman and human being - without being a parent.
Pitting women against each other is sooooo 2005 and went out of fashion with the played out “Mommy Wars” - working moms against stay at home moms - with women who choose to remain single or childess pitted against them all as if it’s some winner take all WWE match refereed by yet another mom and candidate, Linda McMahon.
Your “article” annoys me. Non-issue drivel like this annoys me. Can you please pick something more substantial to write about next time?
Now I remember why I stopped reading and commenting here for so long - but this was just to ridiculous to ignore.
Report thisBy Nobody's Fool, October 27, 2010 at 7:48 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
There’s nothing more queer, or pathetic, or evilly dishonest, than dykes who are unable or unwilling to master, or who are desperately trying to mask, the mannerisms. Some of these broads are effectively closeted by their long suffering, dysfunctioal families.
Life in the good ol’ U.S.A. is a glittering bitch. Cinderella and Sleeping Beauty, please come back, we need you.
Report this