|
|||
|
Perry and the GOP’s Feckless EstablishmentPosted on Sep 14, 2011The Republican Establishment is said to have grave qualms about Gov. Rick Perry. Here’s the problem: There is no Republican Establishment. It squandered its authority by building up the tea party’s brigades and then fearing them too much to do anything to check their power. Worse for those who think Perry would be a general-election disaster is the growing confidence among conservatives that President Obama will be easy to beat. This feeling will be bolstered by Tuesday’s special election that sent a Republican to Congress from New York’s 9th District for the first time since 1923. If Obama is going to lose anyway, many conservatives reason, why not go with their hearts? No, if Perry is to be defeated, he will have to do the job himself. And the week’s most important political news is that he might do just that. His vulnerabilities were certainly on display at this week’s CNN/tea party debate. Perry still hasn’t disentangled himself from his past suggestions that Social Security is unconstitutional. He will also be hurt by his humane position on immigration. He should be praised for it, but it will only bring him scorn among GOP primary voters. His biggest problem, however, is his executive order requiring preteen girls to be immunized against a disease that causes cervical cancer, a decision the religious right didn’t like and that Perry now says was a mistake. The dangerous charge here is influence peddling. Advertisement Perry’s response to the pay-for-play intimation from Rep. Michele Bachmann was one of the worst of its sort ever offered by a politician. “The company was Merck, and it was a $5,000 contribution that I had received from them,” Perry declared, misreporting the donor’s generosity. “I raise about $30 million. And if you’re saying that I can be bought for $5,000, I’m offended.” The single question this raised in a listener’s mind was: So how much can you be bought for? The question will linger. This helps Mitt Romney. It also cheers most Republicans who pass for Establishment these days and who worry that the tea party crowd will get Perry nominated. Yet these Republicans have only themselves to blame for abdicating to the far right. Business lobbies, once a moderating force, are largely out for themselves, concentrating their energies on how much they can secure in tax and regulatory benefits. Moderate politicians have been drummed out of the party or silenced as its leaders have played ball with the extremists throughout Obama’s term, rarely calling out their most outlandish and mendacious attacks. The theory was that anything that weakened Obama was good for the GOP. When tea party commentators proffered conspiracy theories straight out of the old John Birch Society playbook, Republican officials either stayed mum or nodded sagely as if their new allies were referencing Edmund Burke or Milton Friedman. The Republican triumph in a New York City district that uses a lovely stretch of water to connect white ethnic neighborhoods in Queens and Brooklyn will aggravate the party’s overconfidence and prevent a showdown with the tea party. Republican Bob Turner’s victory with 54 percent of the vote in what had been Anthony Weiner’s district is certainly alarming for Democrats. The White House will be tamping down panic by pointing to local factors, but its supporters in Congress are paying heed to the ill winds that blew in from Jamaica Bay. Still, this area was greatly affected by the politics of 9/11 and its Democratic presidential vote has dropped steadily since the 2000 election. Obama won just 55 percent in 2008, only 2 points more than his national share. The swing against the Democrats on Tuesday thus roughly matched Obama’s drop in the national polls. The result tells us what we already knew, not more. Yet if conservatives see New York 9 as further evidence that Obama is a pushover, Rick Perry—if he doesn’t self-destruct—will be able to tell them he is the guy who can destroy the Great Society, the New Deal and the Progressive Era with one decisive blow. And no Establishment will be there to stop him. E.J. Dionne’s email address is ejdionne(at)washpost.com. New and Improved CommentsWe are launching a major overhaul of our comments section. In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread. Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts. Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with. Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page. |
By aacme88, September 19, 2011 at 4:45 pm Link to this comment
Addendum to comment below:
Report thisIf we could get a mirror movement of progressives to do the same to the Democratic party, we may be able to rebuild democracy in this country.
By aacme88, September 19, 2011 at 4:41 pm Link to this comment
“The dangerous charge here [mandatory inoculation scandal] is influence peddling.”
You’re joking, right? These are Republicans! The party of Citizens United? How much can he be bought for? Apparently $30,000 will cover it.
Report thisInteresting to reflect that the first thing the Tea Party had to destroy on its way to destroying the country was the Republican Party. If they can be stopped now we will all be better off for their efforts.
By jim, September 19, 2011 at 8:25 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
perry will probably be your next prez. his ron reagan act will work. never under estimate the stupidity of the american voter!
Report thisBy surfnow, September 18, 2011 at 6:54 am Link to this comment
EJ Dionne is just one more Clintonite liberal- a paid shill for the biggest hypocrites in a cesspool of hypocrites ( the Democratic Party.) ” Feckless” as they appear to Dionne, the Rethugs will likely win in ‘12 ( and it could very well be Perry). They will win by default because Obama has been such a non-entity.
Report thisBy Marian Griffith, September 18, 2011 at 3:43 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
@berniem—-as if re-electing Obama will make any difference as to the direction plotted—-
Yes, it does make a difference. At least with the speed the ship is sailing if not the course.
You have seen what the crazies would vote into office if given half a chance. Are you really telling me that you believe having one of them at the controls (and unlike Bush who was carefully handled by Cheney and the neocon idealogues this new crop of fringe will not allow themselves to be handled and will do whatever they feel like) will be no worse than the careful ‘doing nothing and only give in to the republicans when pressured’?
What is needed most of all is -time-, time to rebuild the democrat party from the ground up so that it both has the ideas and the will to stand up to the slash and burn tactics of the republican party. The ultimate goal must be to reform the political system so a situation of unbridled corruption and commercial control can never happen again, but the reality of the current system is that an independent party will never make that happen.
It is different if a less corporate controlled candidate for the democrat nomination would and could stand up, but we all know that is unlikely to happen. So, we will have to grit out teeth and vote for whatever candidate the democrat party nominates while working to reform the party from the ground up, starting with the local branches, so that more progressive and more humane voices can be heard over the republican shrieking of ‘greed is good’ and ‘truth is a lie’ that permeates the media to the point that it seems to be the only reality.
And if you honestly believe that the disasters that will happen with Obama as president are the same as with Perry (who is unashamedly corrupt and make the little shrub look smart by comparison), Romney (who is so priveledged that he lacks all compassion with people who have to struggle to get by day by day) or Bachman (who does not even seem to have a functioning brain) then I fear we do live in an entirely different reality and have nothing left to discuss.
Report thisBy berniem, September 17, 2011 at 2:41 pm Link to this comment
In a corrupt duopoly does it actually matter who is elected? We fell for the rhetorical “Lucy & the Football” in ‘08. Now we’re supposed to be spooked by the crazy talk from the T-Bagger Party as if re-electing Obama will make any difference as to the direction plotted for this neo-fascist ship-of-state? Cmon, wake up! We are merely the audience in this political theatre sitting thru the official but absurd USA “reality” show in between commercials for the corporate sponsors of the fake reality shows that they proffer to keep us amused and diverted while we get conned that our continued fleecing will actually give us our country back! While our Arab cousins fight for their rights, we are content to lazily rely on the hatemongers and propagandists to steer us back to the garden!
Report thisBy prisnersdilema, September 17, 2011 at 4:27 am Link to this comment
The Republicans are good at rebranding themselves.. Conservatives, who have seen
Report thistheir brand tainted, by the gutting they have done to this country have now become Tea
Partiers. But they are still Republicans, crooks. The Democrats like to call themselves
progressives, but not liberals too much any more. They have tainted their own brand, by
following Republican policies, and not supporting the Democratic base. The voter may
be wondering just who is who. And that is just the way the corporations want it.
By Ray Duray, September 15, 2011 at 6:08 pm Link to this comment
The success of Rick Perry at attracting the attention of the corporate media seems to indicate that the Murdochs, the Redstones and the other rich CEOs of the media love the pliability of a small man like Perry.
For those who are on the young side, here’s something by Thom Hartmann about what a tremendously different and more compassionate world we lived in when PresidentFranklin Roosevelt was going up against the “malefactors of great wealth”.
http://therealnews.com/t2/component/seyret/?task=videodirectlink&id=10895
Report thisBy Jimnp72, September 15, 2011 at 11:47 am Link to this comment
Some also say that Bush also stole the 2004 election. He certainly did steal a lot of things from us.
I remember the unity many of us felt after 9/11 and how Bush promptly destroyed it by pointing blame at the dems for everything and politicizing a great tragedy. It’s been all downhill from there.
Where is the unity and the jobs, oh righteous repugs?
Russ Feingold for president, we dont have one now.
Report thisBy felicity, September 15, 2011 at 9:10 am Link to this comment
Unfortunately Mr. Dionne, by now the American
electorate has become so conditioned by the
politically ambitious (aided and abetted by the
Media) to regard anything said by same, to regard the
content of the platform of either party as just as
likely to be true as to be false. What’s really
alarming is the how we’ve become conditioned to
disregard the past performance of a candidate as any
indication of what to expect in the future should he
be elected.
We’ve grown (or at least been conditioned) to believe
that when it comes right down to it, we end up on
election day having to vote for one or the other pig-
in-a-poke.
Certainly, the re-election (some would argue, the
Report thiselection) of Mr. Bush in ‘04 would support this
argument.