|
|
May 21, 2013
|
|
Parents Behaving BadlyPosted on Mar 17, 2011By Ruth Marcus Tiger Mom, meet Lawsuit Mom. The Tiger Mother, aka Yale Law School professor Amy Chua, sought to assure her children’s success in a way that she described as quintessentially Asian: She pushed, bullied and at times insulted them into achieving. Lawsuit Mom Nicole Imprescia took another, quintessentially American approach. First, she paid someone else to handle the work for her. Then she sued to get the money back. Sigh. Did I mention that the dispute involved preschool? Advertisement Not just any preschool, of course, but a tony Manhattan preschool, annual tuition $19,000. Imprescia sent her daughter Lucia, then 3, to York Avenue Preschool in 2009. She pulled Lucia out one month into the child’s second year, after, according to a lawsuit filed in New York State Supreme Court, Lucia was “dumped” in with 2- and 3-year-olds. “Indeed, the school proved not to be a school at all, but just one big playroom,” the suit alleged. Little Lucia was still being taught shapes and colors at 4, for goodness’ sake! Didn’t they know she needed to be prepping for the ERB, the admissions test for private schools? All this matters, according to the lawsuit, because, as everyone knows in Manhattan’s “insanely competitive” nursery school scene, there is “tremendous pressure to choose the right preschool.” Why? Isn’t it obvious? Because “getting a child into the Ivy League starts in nursery school.” Hello, Nicole, you think being known as Lawsuit Mom is going to help your daughter get into the right school? Actually, Imprescia’s lawsuit is the second Parents Behaving Badly piece of litigation I’ve run across recently. In the other case, Houston surgeon Michael Bardwil sued his former prep school, Strake Jesuit College Preparatory School. Bardwil, class of 1973, was angling for his son, T.B., to follow in his footsteps. According to the complaint, a Strake parent raising money for the school’s expansion told Bardwil that the school had “gotten harder to get into” and “that it was very important that he make a contribution” to ensure his son’s acceptance. Bardwil duly pledged $50,000. He had paid $40,000 of that amount when Strake rejected T.B., who had performed poorly on his admissions test. Bardwil filed suit demanding his money back—and putting his son’s test scores in the court record for all to see. Of course, all these parents, in their out-of-control, complete-loss-of-perspective way, are behaving like this because they want what’s best for their children. Or at least what they think is best for their children. And if they are caught up in the frenzied, must-get-into-Harvard mentality of modern parenting, it is awfully easy to scoff but—for me, anyway—also easy to empathize. We are a year away from plunging into college admissions madness and I can already feel myself, against my will, getting sucked in. Worse, I can feel my daughter getting sucked in. She is wonderful, smart, well-adjusted. Whenever the subject of college comes up—and I don’t raise it—my message is always: Wherever you end up going to school, you will get a great education, have a wonderful time and succeed in life. I mean this, really I do ... but if you hooked me up to a polygraph, it would also show that I do want her to get into a good college. Is the Ivy League essential? No. Would it be nice to have that choice? Um ... Fifth Amendment. And while it’s easy to blame parents for succumbing to Ivy League-or-bust hysteria, schools themselves feed it. Look on the York Avenue Preschool website and you will find assurances that “our students have consistently tested well on the ERB” and “attend some of the finest private schools in the city.” In case you want more detail, York provides a handy listing of same. The hot movie for parents of high-schoolers these days is “Race to Nowhere,” a slightly overwrought documentary about students pushed to the brink by standardized tests, by an overload of Advanced Placement classes, by a surfeit of extracurricular activities. The showings, at least around here, have consistently sold out. For all the Chuas, Imprescias and Bardwils out there, most of us don’t want to see our children racing to nowhere. It’s just that the treadmill is so hard to resist, and even harder to step off. Ruth Marcus’ e-mail address is marcusr(at symbol)washpost.com. © 2011, Washington Post Writers Group New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By Anarcissie, March 18, 2011 at 8:39 pm Link to this comment
It would be interesting to see people take a radical approach to the question of learning things and becoming a success in the world—or some other kind of success, maybe a real one. Much of what is now being done at the higher bureaucratic levels with which the education industry is aligned is fictive, delusional, worthless, and worse. Anyone can see that. People who put their children in a nursery school thinking of Harvard are in some kind of hell. You don’t want to be there, and you don’t want your children to be there.
Report thisBy berniem, March 18, 2011 at 7:41 pm Link to this comment
I’ll bet mom is a conservative!
Report thisBy Skat, March 18, 2011 at 7:40 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
There are many excellent schools that are not Ivy League. I’ve found more anxiety over Ivy League in the eastern U.S. than in the midwest or northwest. It’s a matter of perspectives. The parents have their own reasons for being caught up in the frenzy over preschools but teenagers have a lot of pressure put on them in school and don’t have the experience to sort it all out - yet. I’m encouraging my child to ask herself what she loves doing and studying and then researching the many schools out there that can provide an interesting environment for learning. She’s not impressed by claims to fame and glory. I was taught by a graduate school professor in the midwest who was courted by Harvard and Yale for years. He preferred to teach in a small school in the middle of the country, giving his time to students who were there for the love of learning. For those who are not seeking careers that are more dependent on the name of the school than on the quality of education, there are many options. (Qualifier: a decent education is still available at the Ivy League schools, I’m sure. It’s just not the only place.)
Report thisBy Jolimont, March 18, 2011 at 2:22 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
The problem these NY children have is they have idiots
Report thisfor parents.
By Inherit The Wind, March 18, 2011 at 11:04 am Link to this comment
As a parent of a 10th grader we are “arming” for the assault on college admissions. Daily invites from every school in the land (and even Canada) are placed by my son’s place. He’s a little daunted by it as they all say “Call us!” but none give a good reason why. (A good reason for HIM to call, not a good reason for them to have him call).
Yet we picked a pre-school based on fun and socialization, and little “education” and somehow he’s still a top student, being recruited all over.
If this mother in NY REALLY wanted a “top” preschool for learning then she should have sent the tot to a Montessori school.
Plus, the MOST important thing you want your child to learn young is good study habits, starting with: Studying is your first priority, before play and games and sports. If you have to tell your junior high or HS kid to study, it’s too late.
So, when they start getting homework, usually in 1st grade, you have to check if they’ve gotten it, brought it home and then done it first thing. Make it a habit, a compulsion, an addiction. Nothing immediately pressing? Then work on that term paper due next month!
Report thisBy winsome1, March 18, 2011 at 9:45 am Link to this comment
Dear Truthdig,
Report thisIf you feel you must do some popular culture, you can do so much better than
Ruth Marcus. Call me.
By Big B, March 18, 2011 at 7:36 am Link to this comment
The only difference between Ivy schools and the rest is simple, but sizable. First, the schools name on your diploma is invaluable. But second, and most important, is the potential valuable contacts one can make with members of america’s power families.
America’s “house of lords” is still being educated in the Ivy League.
Report thisBy kerryrose, March 18, 2011 at 5:53 am Link to this comment
I normally don’t read Marcus’ blogs, but as a parent with a son in 11th grade, I couldn’t help myself.
About Ivy Leagues-
I thought it was essential that I do my doctoral work at an Ivy school. I went to Teachers College, Columbia. I was shocked (as an adjunct professor I had a clue how a class should be run) by the level of teaching and professors. The Philosophy of Art Education professor was from Malta, had never taught Art to K-12 children, and seemed stuck in a Modernist 1950 was of thinking about art.
Another professor was a recent graduate of TC from India. She had never taught in the US, and her classes consisted of long Powerpoint presentations. Apparently it is cheaper to hire TA’s and recent graduates as adjuncts.
And the attitude. It is just a pervading sense of entitlement with no grounds in real life quality. I have stopped pushing my son toward the Ivies. Now I try to find out who the Professors are that teach in the foundation deparments.
It is very competitive finding a faculty position and very good recent PhD’s take jobs at non-Ivy’s. I know now that this is what matters.
Report this